Assessment of the spectrum of hepatic encephalopathy: A multicenter study : Liver Transplantation

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Assessment of the spectrum of hepatic encephalopathy: A multicenter study

Reuter, Bradley; Walter, Kara; Bissonnette, Julien; Leise, Michael D.; Lai, Jennifer; Tandon, Puneeta; Kamath, Patrick S.; Biggins, Scott W.; Rose, Christopher F.; Wade, James B.; Bajaj, Jasmohan S.*

Author Information
Liver Transplantation 24(5):p 587-594, May 2018. | DOI: 10.1002/lt.25032


Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major cause of morbidity in cirrhosis. However, its severity assessment is often subjective, which needs to be studied systematically. The aim was to determine how accurately trainee and nontrainee practitioners grade and manage HE patients throughout its severity. We performed a survey study using standardized simulated patient videos at 4 US and 3 Canadian centers. Participants were trainees (gastroenterology/hepatology fellows) and nontrainees (faculty, nurse practitioners, physician assistants). We determined the accuracy of HE severity identification and management options between grades <2 or ≥2 HE and trainees/nontrainees. In total, 108 respondents (62 trainees, 46 nontrainees) were included. For patients with grades <2 versus ≥2 HE, a higher percentage of respondents were better at correctly diagnosing grades ≥2 compared with grades <2 (91% versus 64%; P < 0.001). Specialized cognitive testing was checked significantly more often in grades <2, whereas more aggressive investigation for precipitating factors was ordered in HE grades >2. Serum ammonia levels were ordered in almost a third of grade ≥2 patients. For trainees and nontrainees, HE grades were identified similarly between groups. Trainees were less likely to order serum ammonia and low‐protein diets, more likely to order rifaximin, and more likely to perform a more thorough workup for precipitating factors compared with nontrainee respondents. There was excellent concordance in the classification of grade ≥2 HE between nontrainees versus trainees, but lower grades showed discordance. Important differences were seen regarding blood ammonia, specialized testing, and nutritional management between trainees and nontrainees. These results have important implications at the patient level, interpreting multicenter clinical trials, and in the education of practitioners. Liver Transplantation 24 587–594 2018 AASLD.

© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid