Extracorporeal Blood Purification Is Appropriate in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 and Multiorgan Failure: COMMENTARY : Kidney360

Journal Logo

Moderator Commentary

Extracorporeal Blood Purification Is Appropriate in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 and Multiorgan Failure: COMMENTARY

Ostermann, Marlies1; Koyner, Jay L.2

Author Information
Kidney360 3(3):p 423-425, March 31, 2022. | DOI: 10.34067/KID.0005242021
  • Open

Substantial progress has been made in our understanding and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Steroids and inhibitors of IL-6 have emerged as promising therapies, when coupled with respiratory support/supplemental oxygenation to prevent progression and improve outcome (1,2). However, mortality remains high, in particular in patients who become critically ill and need organ support. It is therefore natural to call for more rescue strategies. Chung and Olson make a clear case for the role of extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) as a possible adjuvant therapy for patients who are critically ill with COVID-19, on the basis that removal of circulating inflammatory mediators and pathogenic molecules might prevent organ damage or mitigate organ failure (3). Kashani and Forni, in contrast, urge caution and highlight the complexity of cytokine physiology and the potential risks of unselected cytokine removal (4).

Various EBP techniques are available that can remove some of the circulating molecules implicated in in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 (Table 1). In 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to grant temporary emergency use authorizations for four devices (oXiris Set, CytoSorb, Optia Apheresis System with the Depuro D2000 Adsorption Cartridge, and Seraph-100). Of note, the FDA made this decision at a time when there were no pharmacological therapies for COVID-19 and the role of steroids and IL-6 inhibitors was less well established. Chung and Olson fully support the FDA's decision and add that a multimodal EBP approach centered on pathogen reduction may have the most benefit, given the dynamic pattern of mediator release in COVID-19 and the spectrum of different techniques available to clear molecules (3). They acknowledge the need for rapid decisions in a pandemic and the obligation to continue collecting data related to EBP in COVID-19. This is particularly relevant because EBP has been studied in sepsis for more than a decade, but its role remains controversial despite several observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Kashani and Forni urge the application of a similar level of caution in COVID-19 (4). Highlighting the complex regulation of cytokine release and interactions and the lack of tools to guide and monitor EBP therapies, they raise concerns about the risks of removing cytokines in a nonspecific manner and the additional harm from potentially removing drugs and nutrients. In their opinion, more research with patient-centered outcomes is needed before EBP can be recommended for patients with COVID-19.

Table 1. - Extracorporeal techniques in coronavirus disease 2019
Technique Main Clearance Principle Main Components Removed Additional Comments
Hemofiltration Extracorporeal passage of blood through a hemofilter and utilizing convective clearance (solvent drag) to remove small and medium-sized molecules (<60 kDa) Pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators both removed at equal rates Loss of nutrients, trace elements, drugs and helpful anti-inflammatory mediators
Hemoperfusion Extracorporeal passage of blood through hemofilter or sorbent containing cartridge where molecules/mediators are adsorbed (allowing removal of larger mol wt molecules compared with convection alone) Cytosorb: most cytokines, myoglobin, PAMPs and DAMPs but not endotoxin, and IL-10
Oxiris: cytokines, endotoxin
D2000 Plasma Adsorption Column: TNF-α, IL-1B, IL-3, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, IL-10, and IFN-γ
Seraph-100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter: viral particles, inflammatory mediators
Polymyxin B immobilized fiber columns: endotoxin
LPS adsorber: LPS and endotoxin
Adsorption of drugs, nutrients and helpful anti-inflammatory mediators
Plasmapheresis Extracorporeal separation of blood into its components with the removal of plasma (molecules and proteins) and replacement with albumin or fresh frozen plasma Cytokines, endotoxin, and inflammatory mediators Loss of albumin, antibodies and Igs
PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs, danger-associated molecular patterns; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.

It has become clear that COVID-19 is not caused by a single, genetically identical RNA virus but instead from an evolving pathogen with multiple mutations, lineages, and variants that have different effects on transmission and virulence. In fact, >60 subtypes of COVID-19 have been proposed in the last year (5). Some forms are associated with a particularly high risk of spread and mortality (6). In addition, not all hosts are the same. Host variability, genetic predisposition, and variable comorbidities contribute to differences in the risk of infection, host immune response, disease progression, and mortality (7). As outlined in detail by Kashani and Forni, the magnitude of the innate immune response is highly variable (4). On the basis of lymphocyte activation and cytokine profile, several different immunophenotypes have been described. These, together with additional pathobiological mechanisms including intravascular thrombosis and endothelial activation, contribute to different subphenotypes of COVID-19. We believe it is this variability in phenotype and host immune response that should serve as a focus of future investigations in the setting of COVID-19 and other forms of sepsis.

The expert group of the 25th Acute Disease Quality Initiative agreed it was plausible that EBP therapies could have a role in the management of individual patients with COVID-19 (8). If used, the specific technique should be selected on the basis of randomized controlled data and the pathophysiology they are designed to target. They also recommended that future research should identify individuals who were likely to benefit from EBP and patients who may be harmed. Parameters for monitoring and discontinuing EBP and information about the effect on removal of drugs and nutrients and other complications during EBP are urgently needed. Although the literature contains many case reports and case series describing good outcomes with EBP in COVID-19, the need for caution was highlighted by a recent single-center, open-label RCT in 34 adults with COVID-19 pneumonia (9). Patients requiring support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were randomized to ECMO in combination with cytokine adsorption, versus ECMO alone. The study showed patients treated with cytokine adsorption filters had insignificantly higher serum IL-6 levels after 72 hours, and significantly higher 30-day mortality (82% versus 24%, P=0.002).

We see potential parallels between the application of EBP in the setting of COVID-19 and the use of high cutoff dialyzers in multiple myeloma. Several RCTs have failed to consistently demonstrate improved patient outcomes through the removal of injurious light chains in patients with myeloma kidney (10,11). In these multicenter RCTs, there were subsets who were more (or less) likely to recover renal function in the setting of severe AKI. Current work is focused on determining which patients with AKI and high light-chain levels are most likely to benefit from high-cutoff dialysis. Importantly, the protocols in these prior trials involved more than just the high-cutoff dialysis (or standard dialysis) to treat the underlying disease, in particular the use of chemotherapy (e.g., bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and corticosteroids) to help reduce the ongoing production of light chains (10). In the future, trials exploring the use of EBP in COVID-19 should build on these concepts, trying to identify those patients most likely to benefit, and combine EBP with the currently validated treatments, some of which target reducing the host response.

In our opinion, there are biologic and pathophysiologic reasons that make EBP a plausible therapy in COVID-19 (and other forms of sepsis) but only in carefully selected and monitored individual patients. The characteristics of this cohort need to be identified first in carefully conducted research studies. We acknowledge this path to precision medicine in COVID-19, balancing potential benefit and harm, requires an incredibly rapid pace but caution is necessary nevertheless to avoid iatrogenic harm.

Disclosures

J.L. Koyner reports receiving consulting fees from Baxter and NxStage Medical; reports receiving research funding Fresenius Medical; and reports receiving speakers fees from NxStage Medical. M. Ostermann reports speaker honoraria from Baxter, Biomerieux, and Fresenius Medical; reports receiving research funding from Baxter, Biomerieux, Fresenius Medical, and LaJolla Pharma; and reports receiving consulting fees from Baxter and NxStage.

Funding

None.

See related debates, “Extracorporeal blood purification is appropriate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and multi-organ failure: PRO,” and “Extracorporeal blood purification is appropriate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and multi-organ failure: CON,” on pages and , respectively.

Acknowledgments

The content of this article reflects the personal experience and views of the author(s) and should not be considered medical advice or recommendation. The content does not reflect the views or opinions of the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) or Kidney360. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s).

Author Contributions

M. Ostermann conceptualized the study; and all authors wrote the original draft and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

References

1. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, Staplin N, Brightling C, Ustianowski A, Elmahi E, Prudon B, Green C, Felton T, Chadwick D, Rege K, Fegan C, Chappell LC, Faust SN, Jaki T, Jeffery K, Montgomery A, Rowan K, Juszczak E, Baillie JK, Haynes R, Landray MJ; RECOVERY Collaborative Group: Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with covid-19. N Engl J Med 384: 693–704, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
2. Shankar-Hari M, Vale CL, Godolphin PJ, Fisher D, Higgins JPT, Spiga F, Savovic J, Tierney J, Baron G, Benbenishty JS, Berry LR, Broman N, Cavalcanti AB, Colman R, De Buyser SL, Derde LPG, Domingo P, Omar SF, Fernandez-Cruz A, Feuth T, Garcia F, Garcia-Vicuna R, Gonzalez-Alvaro I, Gordon AC, Haynes R, Hermine O, Horby PW, Horick NK, Kumar K, Lambrecht BN, Landray MJ, Leal L, Lederer DJ, Lorenzi E, Mariette X, Merchante N, Misnan NA, Mohan SV, Nivens MC, Oksi J, Perez-Molina JA, Pizov R, Porcher R, Postma S, Rajasuriar R, Ramanan AV, Ravaud P, Reid PD, Rutgers A, Sancho-Lopez A, Seto TB, Sivapalasingam S, Soin AS, Staplin N, Stone JH, Strohbehn GW, Sunden-Cullberg J, Torre-Cisneros J, Tsai LW, van Hoogstraten H, van Meerten T, Veiga VC, Westerweel PE, Murthy S, Diaz JV, Marshall JC, Sterne JAC; WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group: Association between administration of IL-6 antagonists and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A meta-analysis. JAMA 326: 499–518, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11330
3. Chung K, Olson S: Extracorporeal blood purification is appropriate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and multi-organ failure: PRO. Kidney360 3: 416–418, 2022 https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0006632020
4. Kashani K, Forni L: Extracorporeal blood purification is appropriate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and multi-organ failure: PRO. Kidney360 3: 419–422, 2022 https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0007382020
5. DeMerle K, Angus DC, Seymour CW: Precision medicine for COVID-19: Phenotype anarchy or promise realized? JAMA 325: 2041–2042, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.5248
6. Challen R, Brooks-Pollock E, Read JM, Dyson L, Tsaneva-Atanasova K, Danon L: Risk of mortality in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1: Matched cohort study. BMJ 372: n579, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n579
7. Pairo-Castineira E, Clohisey S, Klaric L, Bretherick AD, Rawlik K, Pasko D, Walker S, Parkinson N, Fourman MH, Russell CD, Furniss J, Richmond A, Gountouna E, Wrobel N, Harrison D, Wang B, Wu Y, Meynert A, Griffiths F, Oosthuyzen W, Kousathanas A, Moutsianas L, Yang Z, Zhai R, Zheng C, Grimes G, Beale R, Millar J, Shih B, Keating S, Zechner M, Haley C, Porteous DJ, Hayward C, Yang J, Knight J, Summers C, Shankar-Hari M, Klenerman P, Turtle L, Ho A, Moore SC, Hinds C, Horby P, Nichol A, Maslove D, Ling L, McAuley D, Montgomery H, Walsh T, Pereira AC, Renieri A, Shen X, Ponting CP, Fawkes A, Tenesa A, Caulfield M, Scott R, Rowan K, Murphy L, Openshaw PJM, Semple MG, Law A, Vitart V, Wilson JF, Baillie JK; GenOMICC Investigators; ISARIC4C Investigators; COVID-19 Human Genetics Initiative; 23andMe Investigators; BRACOVID Investigators; Gen-COVID Investigators: Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19. Nature 591: 92–98, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03065-y
8. Nadim MK, Forni LG, Mehta RL, Connor MJ Jr, Liu KD, Ostermann M, Rimmelé T, Zarbock A, Bell S, Bihorac A, Cantaluppi V, Hoste E, Husain-Syed F, Germain MJ, Goldstein SL, Gupta S, Joannidis M, Kashani K, Koyner JL, Legrand M, Lumlertgul N, Mohan S, Pannu N, Peng Z, Perez-Fernandez XL, Pickkers P, Prowle J, Reis T, Srisawat N, Tolwani A, Vijayan A, Villa G, Yang L, Ronco C, Kellum JA: COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury: Consensus report of the 25th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Workgroup. Nat Rev Nephrol 16: 747–764, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00356-5
9. Supady A, Weber E, Rieder M, Lother A, Niklaus T, Zahn T, Frech F, Müller S, Kuhl M, Benk C, Maier S, Trummer G, Flügler A, Krüger K, Sekandarzad A, Stachon P, Zotzmann V, Bode C, Biever PM, Staudacher D, Wengenmayer T, Graf E, Duerschmied D: Cytokine adsorption in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (CYCOV): A single Centre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 9: 755–762, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00177-6
10. Hutchison CA, Cockwell P, Moroz V, Bradwell AR, Fifer L, Gillmore JD, Jesky MD, Storr M, Wessels J, Winearls CG, Weisel K, Heyne N, Cook M: High cutoff versus high-flux haemodialysis for myeloma cast nephropathy in patients receiving bortezomib-based chemotherapy (EuLITE): A phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 6: e217–e228, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30014-6
11. Bridoux F, Carron PL, Pegourie B, Alamartine E, Augeul-Meunier K, Karras A, Joly B, Peraldi MN, Arnulf B, Vigneau C, Lamy T, Wynckel A, Kolb B, Royer B, Rabot N, Benboubker L, Combe C, Jaccard A, Moulin B, Knebelmann B, Chevret S, Fermand JP; MYRE Study Group: Effect of high-cutoff hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on hemodialysis independence among patients with myeloma cast nephropathy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318: 2099–2110, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17924
Keywords:

acute kidney injury and ICU nephrology; blood purification; COVID-19; debates

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology