Examining the Role of Novel CKD Therapies for the ADPKD Patient : Kidney360

Journal Logo


Examining the Role of Novel CKD Therapies for the ADPKD Patient

Patel, Dipal M.; Dahl, Neera K.

Author Information
Kidney360 2(6):p 1036-1041, June 2021. | DOI: 10.34067/KID.0007422020
  • Open

Two new classes of drugs, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHis), are likely to have a significant effect on the management of CKD.

SGLT2is were approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of diabetes in 2013, and have now been shown to slow the progressive loss of kidney function in both diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease (12–3). SGLT2is demonstrate mortality benefit for patients with CKD, distinguishing them from renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis), which have otherwise been the mainstay of treatment for patients with diabetic or proteinuric CKD and which provide mortality benefit for a subset of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (4). Studies of SGLT2is in nondiabetic CKD have been extremely encouraging and we expect that these medications will soon become standard of care for diabetic or nondiabetic, and proteinuric or nonproteinuric, CKD. The potential benefits of SGLT2is have not been specifically explored in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), because both major trials of SGLT2is in nondiabetic CKD (the ongoing EMPA-KIDNEY study [5] and the recently published DAPA-CKD study [1]) excluded patients with ADPKD.

Separately, HIF-PHis are anticipated to have a major effect in the management of anemia of CKD. The current use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) involves a complex balance between treating anemia and limiting potential adverse effects of cardiovascular events, hypertension, and loss of vascular access (6). HIF-PHis have beneficial effects on iron metabolism, hypertension, and inflammation (7). However, there are concerns that HIF activation could promote cyst growth (8) when used for treatment of patients with ADPKD.

Here, we examine reasons why patients with ADPKD, who comprise approximately 5% of the ESKD population in the United States, warrant unique consideration regarding treatment with SGLT2is or HIF-PHis. We will review the potential risks and benefits of these medications in ADPKD.


SGLT2is target sodium-glucose cotransporters in the proximal tubule to induce glycosuria and increase sodium delivery to the macula densa, thereby inducing afferent arteriolar constriction. The subsequent reduction in intraglomerular pressure has been proposed to moderate the work of tubular transport and lower cortical oxygen demand (9). SGLT2is have demonstrated efficacy in slowing decline in kidney function and reducing progression to ESKD (12–3). Dapagliflozin demonstrated a number needed to treat of 19 to prevent a primary composite outcome of a sustained decline in eGFR of at least 50%, occurrence of ESKD, or death from a kidney or cardiovascular event (1). Mechanisms of action, although not fully understood, seem nonspecific and could be beneficial to patients with CKD from any intrarenal process. Supporting this notion, benefits of dapagliflozin were similar for patients with or without type 2 diabetes (1).

By causing glycosuria, natriuresis, and glucose-driven osmotic diuresis, SGLT2is stimulate vasopressin and water reabsorption (10). Vasopressin is known to stimulate cyst growth (11). The selective vasopressin (V2 receptor) antagonist tolvaptan is indicated for patients with ADPKD at risk of rapid disease progression. Using SGLT2is in conjunction with tolvaptan may block the vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption needed to avoid volume depletion with SGLT2is, raising concern for risk of hypovolemia, hypernatremia, and AKI. We have seen AKI develop in a single patient prescribed both tolvaptan and an SGLT2i, which resolved after discontinuation of the SGLT2i. The effects of treatment with both an SGLT2i and tolvaptan on urine output should be further studied in a clinical trial, given the distinct benefits of both classes of medications.

Many patients with ADPKD either cannot tolerate tolvaptan or choose not to use it due to aquaretic side effects and risk of liver injury. Tolvaptan is not indicated for patients with ADPKD who are at lower risk of progression, and may not be beneficial to those over the age of 55, leaving many patients with ADPKD off disease-modifying therapy. They might potentially benefit from the use of an SGLT2i; however, given the concern for stimulation of vasopressin, the effects of SGLT2is in ADPKD in patients off tolvaptan would need to be evaluated.

SGLT2is have been studied in animal models of ADPKD with conflicting results. Cyst epithelial cells are dependent on aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation (Warburg effect), and hyperglycemia promotes cystogenesis and cyst growth (11). One could hypothesize that, by reducing hyperglycemia, SGLT2is could reduce cystogenesis. However, data on the effects of SGLT2is in various ADPKD rodent models have been inconsistent (11). Han:SPRD rats demonstrated a reduction in proliferation of cyst epithelium when treated with the SGLTi phlorizin (12), but not with dapagliflozin (13). PCK rats demonstrated an increase in cyst volume and albuminuria after treatment with dapagliflozin (14). Because neither of these models are based on PKD1 or PKD2 mutations, these discrepancies highlight the challenges in the existing murine models of polycystic kidney disease (15). Further data on SGLT2is and alterations of the metabolic profile in ADPKD are needed.

It is also important to consider the potential benefits of SGLT2is outside of delaying the loss of kidney function (Figure 1). When studied in a patient population mostly already on RAASis, SGLT2is have shown a greater reduction in the rate of eGFR decline in CKD compared with tolvaptan in ADPKD (Table 1). Direct comparison is limited given that patients with ADPKD have a unique pattern of changes in renal function (16,17). All three agents have been shown to delay progression to ESKD. Only SGLT2is have been shown to provide a mortality benefit for patients with CKD (1234–5,1819202122–23), although both RAASis and SGLT2is provide mortality benefit for patients with heart failure (24). Because cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in ADPKD, this additional mortality benefit of SGLT2is may be an important consideration for patients with ADPKD.

Figure 1.:
Proposed benefits and risks of therapeutic agents in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Benefits supported by data are shown with solid green lines. Theoretic benefits (not studied in clinical trials) are shown with dashed green lines. Possible adverse effects are shown with dashed red lines. CV, cardiovascular; ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; HIF-PHi, hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor; RAASi, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
Table 1. - Major trials evaluating efficacy of RAAS inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and tolvaptan in kidney disease
Drug Class RAAS Inhibitors (CKD) SGLT2 Inhibitors (CKD) Tolvaptan (ADPKD)
Trial RENAAL (19) IDNT (20) AASK (23) HALT-PKD (28) CREDENCE (2) EMPA-REG OUTCOME (3) DAPA-CKD (1) TEMPO 3:4 (21) REPRISE (22)
Study population T2DM with nephropathy T2DM with nephropathy Black patients with HTN ADPKD with HTN T2DM on RAASi T2DM (>80% on RAASi) With or without T2DM (>95% on RAASi) ADPKD with TKV ≥750 ml (>70% on RAASi) ADPKD (>80% on RAASi)
Cr 1.3–3.0 mg/dl Cr 1.0–3.0 mg/dl for women or 1.2–3.0 mg/dl for men eGFR 20–65 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR 30–90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR 25–75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR 25–65 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for ages 18–55
UACR ≥300 mg/g Urine protein ≥900 mg per 24 hr UACR 300–5000 mg/g UACR 200–5000 mg/g eGFR 25–44 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for ages 56–65
Intervention 50–100 mg losartan or placebo 300 mg irbesartan, 10 mg amlodipine, or placebo 2.5–10 mg ramipril, 5–10 mg amlodipine, or 50–200 mg metoprolol Lisinopril with placebo, or lisinopril with telmisartan 100 mg canagliflozin or placebo 10 mg or 25 mg empagliflozin or placebo 10 mg dapagliflozin or placebo Tolvaptan (average 95 mg/d) or placebo Tolvaptan (90/30 mg or 60/30 mg) or placebo
Target BP: standard (120/70–130/80 mm Hg) or low (95/60–110/75 mm Hg)
No. of patients 1513 1715 1094 558 4401 7020 4304 1445 1370
Follow-up 3.4 yr 2.6 yr 3–6.4 yr 5–8 yr 2.6 yr 3.1 yr 2.4 yr 3 yr 1 yr
Main outcomes (intervention compared with placebo) Composite of ESKD, doubling of Cr, or death; RR, 16% (95% CI, 2 to 28) Composite of ESKD, doubling of Cr, or death; RR, 20% (95% CI, 3 to 34) with irbesartan compared with placebo; RR, 23% (95% CI, 7 to 37) with irbesartan compared with amlodipine Composite of ESKD, reduction in eGFR by ≥50%, or death; RR, 22% (95% CI, 1 to 38) with ramipril compared with metoprolol; RR, 38% (95% CI, 6 to 59) with ramipril compared with amlodipine Increase in TKV per yr; 6% in low BP group, 7% in standard BP group Composite of ESKD, doubling of Cr, or kidney-/CV-related death; HR, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82) Composite of ESKD, doubling of Cr, or kidney related death; HR, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.75) Composite of ESKD, sustained decline in eGFR of at least 50%, or kidney-/CV-related death; HR, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68) Composite of time to worsening Cr, pain, HTN, or albuminuria; 44 events per 100 patient-years with tolvaptan, and 50 events per 100 patient-years with placebo Change in eGFR per yr; −2.34 with tolvaptan and −3.61 with placebo (difference, 1.27)
Change in eGFR per year, −4.4 with losartan and −5.2 with placebo (difference, 0.8) Change in CrCl per year, -5.5 with irbesartan, −6.8 with amlodipine, and −6.5 with placebo (differences, 1.3 and 1.0, respectively) Change in eGFR per year, −1.81 with ramipril and −2.42 with metoprolol (difference, 0.61) Change in eGFR per year, −2.9 in low BP group, −3.0 in standard BP group Change in eGFR per year, −3.19 with canagliflozin and −4.71 with placebo (difference, 1.52) Change in eGFR per year, −0.19 with empagliflozin and −1.67 with placebo (difference, 1.48) Change in eGFR per year, −1.67 with dapagliflozin and −3.59 with placebo (difference, 1.92) Increase in TKV per yr, 3% with tolvaptan and 6% with placebo
Similar findings in lisinopril/ placebo group compared with lisinopril/ telmisartan group Change in eGFR per year, −2.72 with tolvaptan and −3.70 with placebo (difference, 0.98)
Common side effects Hyperkalemia, cough (ACE-I) Genital mycotic infections, hypovolemia Aquaresis, LFT abnormalities
Cost $ $$ $$$$
Common side effects and cost are listed for each class and are not specific to individual trials. Patients with ADPKD were not specifically studied in trials of RAASi and SGLT2i, with the exception of HALT-PKD (16,17). RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SGLT2, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2; ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; RAASi, RAAS inhibitors; TKV, total kidney volume; Cr, creatinine; UACR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio; RR, relative risk; CV, cardiovascular; CrCl, creatinine clearance; ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; LFT, liver function test; SGLT2i, SGLT2 inhibitors. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Recently, the mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) finerenone also showed a benefit in cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes (25). MRAs have been shown to decrease BP in early ADPKD (26), and show beneficial effects in a rodent model (27). However, MRAs were not permitted in the HALT-PKD study (28) and have not been otherwise extensively studied in ADPKD.

SGLT2is have been reported to promote erythrocytosis by indirectly increasing expression of HIF-2α (29). As explained below, this effect may speak in favor of the unique benefits of this class of agents and may offer a novel pathway for treatment of anemia for patients with ADPKD.


A key regulatory function of the kidneys is oxygen-regulated expression of erythropoietin. This process occurs through HIF-α, which is marked for degradation by prolyl hydroxylases in states of normoxia, but binds to HIF-β to activate nuclear transcription of hypoxia response elements, including EPO, in states of hypoxia (67–8). HIF-2α is found in glomerular and peritubular cells and is the primary HIF-α isoform responsible for erythropoietin production, whereas HIF-1α is found in tubular epithelial cells.

In polycystic kidneys, cysts can compress nephrons and vasculature, resulting in local hypoxia and induction of HIF-α (8). An increase in HIF-2α likely explains the commonly observed phenomenon of patients with ADPKD having lesser degrees of anemia, with less need for ESAs. However, induction of HIF-1α increases chloride-dependent fluid secretion and promotes a switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, thereby promoting cyst expansion. HIF-1α levels are high in human and rat ADPKD kidneys, and HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression levels correlate with cyst burden. Other mechanisms by which HIF-1α could regulate cyst growth are unclear, because HIF-1α has been shown in different systems to be both pro- and antiapoptotic, and pro- and antiproliferative (8).

These data raise concern for increasing cyst growth when treating patients with pre-ESKD ADPKD with HIF-PHis (Figure 1). However, given the significant burden that anemia can pose to the quality of life of patients, a risk-benefit analysis in the context of other available treatment options must be considered. Patients with anemia of CKD have relative deficiencies in erythropoietin production and are often unable to properly use iron stores. They are treated with ESAs and iron, which can worsen functional iron deficiency and inflammation (6). HIF-PHis have been shown to increase hemoglobin values in dialysis- and non–dialysis-dependent CKD, while also decreasing hepcidin levels and reducing intravenous iron requirements (7). A post hoc analysis of patients with pre-ESKD ADPKD who were enrolled in clinical trials of HIF-PHi efficacy may help address the concern for potential acceleration of cyst growth and loss of kidney function; however, the small numbers of patients with cystic kidney disease (136 of 2761 patients in the Olympus trial of the HIF-PHi roxadustat [30]) in these trials may limit analysis.

Current HIF-PHis stabilize both HIF-1α and -2α isoforms, although there are no data regarding changes in HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression levels. If there is an agent that predominantly stabilizes HIF-2α, it may be possible for HIF-PHis to provide a greater benefit than risk for patients with ADPKD. SGLT2is are proposed to suppress HIF-1α while activating HIF-2α (29), potentially providing a unique mechanism to safely activate HIF-driven erythropoiesis for patients with cystic kidney disease.

Until further data are available to understand the potential effect of HIF-PHis on cyst development and growth, we suggest limiting their use in patients with pre-ESKD ADPKD.


Patients with ADPKD represent a significant portion of the CKD and ESKD population. Whether they are at low or high risk of disease progression, the nephrology community should be able to offer disease-modifying agents that are effective and safe. Tolvaptan reduces progression of kidney disease and delays onset of kidney failure (18,21,22); however, it carries a significant burden of side effects and monitoring to minimize risk of toxicity. We would favor a randomized controlled trial of SGLT2is for patients with ADPKD who are not candidates for tolvaptan. We discourage use of HIF-PHis in patients with non–dialysis-dependent ADPKD, unless they have failed treatment with traditional therapies. All treatment should be aimed at keeping target hemoglobin within the national guidelines. In this era of an expanding armamentarium in treating CKD, we eagerly await definitive clinical trials studying the use of these novel therapies in patients with ADPKD.


N.K. Dahl reports being the principal investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Allena, Bayer, Kadmon, Regulus, Reata, and Sanofi; serving on the medical advisory board for National Kidney Foundation New England Chapter and ESKD Network, Region 1; receiving honoraria from the National Kidney Foundation and Otsuka Pharmaceutical; having consultancy agreements with Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; serving as a scientific advisor for, or member of, the PKD Foundation and Natera. The remaining author has nothing to disclose.




The authors acknowledge valuable input from Dr. Whitney Besse and Dr. Stefan Somlo in reviewing this manuscript.

The content of this article reflects the personal experience and views of the author(s) and should not be considered medical advice or recommendations. The content does not reflect the views or opinions of the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) or Kidney360. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s).

Author Contributions

N.K. Dahl provided supervision; and N.K. Dahl and D.M. Patel conceptualized the study, wrote the original draft, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.


1. Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Toto RD, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC; DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators: Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 383: 1436–1446, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024816
2. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, Edwards R, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bull S, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Chu PL, de Zeeuw D, Greene T, Levin A, Pollock C, Wheeler DC, Yavin Y, Zhang H, Zinman B, Meininger G, Brenner BM, Mahaffey KW; CREDENCE Trial Investigators: Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 380: 2295–2306, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811744
3. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Zinman B: Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 375: 1801–1802, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1515920
4. Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Navarese E, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Salanti G, Wiebe N, Ruospo M, Wheeler DC, Strippoli GF: Comparative efficacy and safety of blood pressure-lowering agents in adults with diabetes and kidney disease: A network meta-analysis. Lancet 385: 2047–2056, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62459-4
5. Herrington WG, Preiss D, Haynes R, von Eynatten M, Staplin N, Hauske SJ, George JT, Green JB, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Wanner C: The potential for improving cardio-renal outcomes by sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibition in people with chronic kidney disease: A rationale for the EMPA-KIDNEY study. Clin Kidney J 11: 749–761, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy090
6. Fishbane S, Spinowitz B: Update on anemia in ESRD and earlier stages of CKD: Core curriculum 2018. Am J Kidney Dis 71: 423–435, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.026
7. Sanghani NS, Haase VH: Hypoxia-inducible factor Activators in renal anemia: Current clinical experience. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 26: 253–266, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2019.04.004
8. Buchholz B, Eckardt KU: Role of oxygen and the HIF-pathway in polycystic kidney disease. Cell Signal 69: 109524, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109524
9. Nespoux J, Vallon V: SGLT2 inhibition and kidney protection. Clin Sci (Lond) 132: 1329–1339, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20171298
10. Masuda T, Muto S, Fukuda K, Watanabe M, Ohara K, Koepsell H, Vallon V, Nagata D: Osmotic diuresis by SGLT2 inhibition stimulates vasopressin-induced water reabsorption to maintain body fluid volume. Physiol Rep 8: e14360, 2020 https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14360
11. Nowak KL, Hopp K: Metabolic reprogramming in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Evidence and therapeutic potential. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 577–584, 2020 https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.13291019
12. Wang X, Zhang S, Liu Y, Spichtig D, Kapoor S, Koepsell H, Mohebbi N, Segerer S, Serra AL, Rodriguez D, Devuyst O, Mei C, Wüthrich RP: Targeting of sodium-glucose cotransporters with phlorizin inhibits polycystic kidney disease progression in Han:SPRD rats. Kidney Int 84: 962–968, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.199
13. Rodriguez D, Kapoor S, Edenhofer I, Segerer S, Riwanto M, Kipar A, Yang M, Mei C, Wüthrich RP: Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 with dapagliflozin in han: SPRD rats with polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res 40: 638–647, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1159/000368540
14. Kapoor S, Rodriguez D, Riwanto M, Edenhofer I, Segerer S, Mitchell K, Wüthrich RP: Effect of sodium-glucose cotransport inhibition on polycystic kidney disease progression in PCK rats. PLoS One 10: e0125603, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125603
15. Menezes LF, Germino GG: Murine models of polycystic kidney disease. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech 10: e153–e158, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmec.2013.10.002
16. Brosnahan GM, Abebe KZ, Moore CG, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Bae KT, Grantham JJ, Schrier RW, Braun WE, Chapman AB, Flessner MF, Harris PC, Hogan MC, Perrone RD, Miskulin DC, Steinman TI, Torres VE; HALT-PKD Trial Investigators: Patterns of kidney function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A post hoc analysis from the HALT-PKD trials. Am J Kidney Dis 71: 666–676, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.023
17. Yu ASL, Shen C, Landsittel DP, Grantham JJ, Cook LT, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Bae KT, Mrug M, Harris PC, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Shi T, Bennett WM; Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP): Long-term trajectory of kidney function in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int 95: 1253–1261, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.023
18. Bennett H, McEwan P, Hamilton K, O’Reilly K: Modelling the long-term benefits of tolvaptan therapy on renal function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: An exploratory analysis using the ADPKD outcomes model. BMC Nephrol 20: 136, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1290-5
19. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S; RENAAL Study Investigators: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 345: 861–869, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011161
20. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz I; Collaborative Study Group: Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345: 851–860, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011303
21. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Grantham JJ, Higashihara E, Perrone RD, Krasa HB, Ouyang J, Czerwiec FS; TEMPO 3:4 Trial Investigators: Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 367: 2407–2418, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205511
22. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Perrone RD, Koch G, Ouyang J, McQuade RD, Blais JD, Czerwiec FS, Sergeyeva O; REPRISE Trial Investigators: Tolvaptan in later-stage autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 377: 1930–1942, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1710030
23. Wright JT Jr, Bakris G, Greene T, Agodoa LY, Appel LJ, Charleston J, Cheek D, Douglas-Baltimore JG, Gassman J, Glassock R, Hebert L, Jamerson K, Lewis J, Phillips RA, Toto RD, Middleton JP, Rostand SG; African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Study Group: Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: Results from the AASK trial [published correction appears in JAMA 295: 2726, 2006]. JAMA 288: 2421–2431, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.19.2421
24. Lam CSP, Chandramouli C, Ahooja V, Verma S: SGLT-2 inhibitors in heart failure: Current management, unmet needs, and therapeutic prospects. J Am Heart Assoc 8: e013389, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013389
25. Filippatos G, Anker SD, Agarwal R, Pitt B, Ruilope LM, Rossing P, Kolkhof P, Schloemer P, Tornus I, Joseph A, Bakris GL; FIDELIO-DKD Investigators: Finerenone and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Circulation 143: 540–552, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051898
26. Nowak KL, Gitomer B, Farmer-Bailey H, Wang W, Malaczewski M, Klawitter J, You Z, George D, Patel N, Jovanovich A, Chonchol M: Mineralocorticoid antagonism and vascular function in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 74: 213–223, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.037
27. Jeewandara TM, Ameer OZ, Boyd R, Wyse BF, Underwood CF, Phillips JK: Protective cardiorenal effects of spironolactone in a rodent model of polycystic kidney disease. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 42: 353–360, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12372
28. Schrier RW, Abebe KZ, Perrone RD, Torres VE, Braun WE, Steinman TI, Winklhofer FT, Brosnahan G, Czarnecki PG, Hogan MC, Miskulin DC, Rahbari-Oskoui FF, Grantham JJ, Harris PC, Flessner MF, Bae KT, Moore CG, Chapman AB; HALT-PKD Trial Investigators: Blood pressure in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 371: 2255–2266, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402685
29. Packer M: Mechanisms leading to differential hypoxia-inducible factor signaling in the diabetic kidney: Modulation by SGLT2 inhibitors and hypoxia mimetics. Am J Kidney Dis 77: 280–286, 2021
30. Fishbane S, El-Shahawy MA, Pecoits-Filho R, Van BP, Houser MT, Frison L, Little DJ, Guzman NJ, Pergola PE: Roxadustat for treating anemia in patients with CKD not on dialysis: Results from a randomized phase 3 study. J Am Soc Nephrol 32: 737–755, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020081150

cystic kidney disease; ADPKD; HIF-PHi; SGLT2i

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology