Single institution studies have shown that clinical examination of the cervical spine (c-spine) is sensitive for clearance of the c-spine in blunt trauma
patients with distracting injuries. Despite an unclear definition, most trauma centers still adhere to the notion that distracting injuries adversely affect the sensitivity of c-spine clinical examination. A prospective AAST multi-institutional trial was performed to assess the sensitivity of clinical examination screening of the c-spine in awake and alert blunt trauma
patients with distracting injuries.
During the 42-month study period, blunt trauma
patients 18 years and older were prospectively evaluated with a standard c-spine examination protocol at 8 Level 1 trauma centers. Clinical examination was performed regardless of the presence of distracting injuries. Patients without complaints of neck pain, tenderness or pain on range of motion were considered to have a negative c-spine clinical examination. All patients with positive or negative c-spine clinical examination underwent computed tomography (CT) scan of the entire c-spine. Clinical examination findings were documented prior to the CT scan.
During the study period, 2929 patients were entered. At least one distracting injury
was diagnosed in 70% of the patients. A c-spine injury was found on CT scan in 7.6% of the patients. There was no difference in the rate of missed injury when comparing patients with a distracting injury
to those without a distracting injury
(10.4% vs. 12.6%, p
= 0.601). Only one injury missed by clinical examination underwent surgical intervention and none had a neurological complication.
Negative clinical examination may be sufficient to clear the cervical spine in awake and alert blunt trauma
patients, even in the presence of a distracting injury
. These findings suggest a potential source for improvement in resource utilization.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic/care management, level IV.