Plasma can be manufactured by multiple methods. Few studies have compared quality parameters between plasma products that may affect efficacy and safety.
Four different plasma products were analyzed to include fresh frozen plasma (FFP), liquid plasma (LP), solvent detergent plasma (SDP), and a spray-dried, solvent detergent–treated plasma (SD-SDP) at multiple time points of storage. Parameters measured included red blood cell, platelet, and white blood cell counts; microparticle phenotypes; thrombin generation; and thrombelastography. These parameters were compared in 10 samples of each product.
SDP and SD-SDP contained the smallest number of residual cells compared with FFP and LP. Platelets were the most common residual cell in all products and were highest in LP. FFP contained the greatest number of residual red blood cells. Total microparticle counts were elevated in LP and FFP compared with SDP and SD-SDP. Cell-derived microparticles in both LP and FFP were mostly platelet in origin. Microparticle counts in SDP and SD-SDP were negligible. Thrombelastography results demonstrated similar thrombin, fibrinogen, and platelet function on Day 28 LP compared with Day 5 thawed FFP. Thrombin generation assays revealed that the total, lag time to, and peak thrombin formation were higher in SDP and SD-SDP compared with FFP and LP. All parameters in FFP and LP products were characterized by a large degree of variability.
The differences in cellular, microparticle, and functional hemostatic parameters measured between plasma products have the potential to affect efficacy and safety. Further study is needed to elucidate the potential immune effects of the cellular and microparticle differences noted as well as the clinical implications of altered thrombin generation kinetics in SD products.
From the Division of Critical Care (P.C.S., E.F.), and Laboratory Medicine (P.C.S., D.J.D.), Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis; St. Louis, Missouri; US Army Institute of Surgical Research (H.F.P., J.K.A., A.P.C.), Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas; Blood Systems Research Institute (S.P., P.J.N.), San Francisco; and University of California (S.P., P.J.N.), San Francisco, California; and Entegrion (O.G.), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Submitted: November 5, 2014, Revised: January 16, 2015, Accepted: February 2, 2015.
Presented at the 4th Annual Remote Damage Control Resuscitation Symposium of the Trauma Hemostasis and Oxygenation Research Network, June 9–11, 2014, in Bergen, Norway.
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.jtrauma.com).
Address for reprints: Philip C. Spinella, MD, Campus Box 8116, NWT 10th Floor, 1 Children’s Place, St. Louis, MO 63110; email: email@example.com.