Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Victims of Domestic Violence on the Trauma Service: Unrecognized and Underreported

Davis, James W. MD, FACS; Parks, Steven N. MD, FACS; Kaups, Krista L. MD, FACS; Bennink, Lynn D. BSN; Bilello, John F. MD

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care: February 2003 - Volume 54 - Issue 2 - p 352-355
doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000042021.47579.B6
Original Articles

Background  Domestic violence (DV) has received increased recognition as a significant mechanism of injury. To improve awareness about DV at our institution, an educational program was presented to the departments of surgery and emergency medicine. Pre and posttests were given and improvement in knowledge was demonstrated. In addition, a screening question for DV was added to the trauma history and physical (H & P) form. This study was done to determine the long-term efficacy of these efforts in increasing recognition of DV and referral to social services in patients admitted to the trauma service. Recognition of DV and appropriate referral should be increased after education and change in H & P form.

Methods  All patients admitted to the trauma service at a Level I trauma center over a 10 month period with the mechanism of injury “assault” were reviewed. DV was determined to be present, likely, unknown, or absent based on information from the prehospital report and medical records. The DV screen question was reviewed for use and accuracy.

Results  During the study period, 1,550 patients were admitted to the trauma service, with assault listed as the mechanism of injury for 217 (14%). DV was confirmed or likely in 27 patients (12.4% of the assaults). Of patients with confirmed or likely DV, only 7 received appropriate referrals, with 2 generated by the nursing staff. Of the confirmed and likely DV patients, 17 (63%) were sent home without investigation of safety and only 21% of all assault victims had any social services evaluation (usually to investigate funding or placement). The DV screen was used in only 12 patients. Reasons given for failure to complete the DV screen on the H & P included examiner discomfort in asking the question, and an environment judged to be inappropriate (resuscitation area in the emergency department).

Conclusion  DV is unrecognized and underreported. Efforts to improve recognition and reporting of DV events need to be ongoing. Screening for DV is not effectively done as part of the initial evaluation. Assessment for DV may be more appropriate as part of the tertiary survey.

From the Trauma Service, University Medical Center, Fresno, California.

Submitted for publication May 29, 2002.

Accepted for publication September 16, 2002.

Presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Western Trauma Association, February 24–March 1, 2002, Whistler-Blackcombe, British Columbia, Canada.

Address for reprints: James W. Davis, MD, FACS, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, 445 South Cedar Avenue, Fresno, CA 93702.

© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.