Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Airbag Protection Versus Compartment Intrusion Effect Determines the Pattern of Injuries in Multiple Trauma Motor Vehicle Crashes

Loo, George T. MPA; Siegel, John H. MD; Dischinger, Patricia C. PhD; Rixen, Dieter MD; Burgess, Andrew R. MD; Addis, Michael D. BA; O'Quinn, Timothy BS; McCammon, Laurie BA; Schmidhauser, Carl B. MHS; Marsh, Philip MS; Hodge, Philippa A. MS; Bents, Frances MS

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care: December 1996 - Volume 41 - Issue 6 - p 935-951
Article
Buy

Objective A prospective study of the interaction between airbag (AB) and seat-belt (Bt) protection versus vehicular compartment (VC) intrusion effects on injury patterns in motor vehicle crash (MVC) trauma patients.

Methods Two hundred MVC patients, nonejected drivers or front seat passengers wth multiple trauma or severe lower extremity (LE) trauma admitted to two Level I trauma centers.

Results In frontal crashes, airbags (AB) more than Bt reduced Glasgow Coma Scale severity in brain injury, face fracture, shock, and the need for MVC extrication (all p < 0.05). Frontal AB also had a protective effect on LE fractures (41% vs. 66%, p < 0.01), but had no significant protective effect on pelvic fractures. When AB protection was present, it prevented brain and face fracture injuries caused by impact contacts and reduced the incidence of these injuries resulting from VC intrusions (p < 0.05). Thoracoabdominal injuries resulting from steering wheel intrusion showed AB protection against intrusions of twice the magnitude of those seen in non-AB vehicles (p < 0.05). In frontal MVCs, AB reduced LE fracture contact injuries but did not prevent LE fractures resulting from intrusions of instrument panel, toepan, or floor pedal structures. In lateral MVCs, Bt did not protect against brain, face, thorax, or pelvic injuries.

Conclusion Safety measures beyond frontal airbags must address frontal crash LE injuries induced by steering wheel, instrument panel, and toepan passenger compartment structure intrusions. Lateral crash injuries may profit from side AB supplemental restraint protection.

From the Departments of Surgery and of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Injury Sciences, New Jersey Medical School-UMDNJ, Newark, New Jersey (G.T.L., J.H.S., D.R., M.D.A., L.M., P.M., P.A.H.), Charles McC. Mathias National Study Center for Trauma and EMS and Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland (P.C.D., A.R.B., T.O., C.B.S.), and Dynamic Science, Inc. Annapolis, Maryland (F.B.).

Supported by contract DTHN22-92-Y-07340 from the Crash Worthiness Research Division of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, January 10-13, 1996, Orlando, Florida.

Address for reprints: John H. Siegel, MD, FACS, FCCM, Wesley J. Howe Professor of Trauma Surgery, Chairman: Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Injury Sciences, New Jersey Medical School-UMDNJ, Medical Sciences Building G-609, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103.

© Williams & Wilkins 1996. All Rights Reserved.