Odontogenic Keratocyst of Maxilla Managed with Enucleation and Peripheral Ostectomy: A Case Report : Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Case Report

Odontogenic Keratocyst of Maxilla Managed with Enucleation and Peripheral Ostectomy: A Case Report

Gupta, Manish; Gupta, Monica1,; Gupta, Akanksha2

Author Information
Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice 4(1):p 39-41, Jan–Apr 2023. | DOI: 10.4103/jssrp.jssrp_16_22
  • Open

Abstract

Odontogenic keratocyst has many etiological classifications, variable nomenclature, and treatment dilemmas associated with it. We present the case of a young female with a large single painless and progressive lesion involving the right maxilla successfully treated with enucleation and peripheral ostectomy. The case is presented to highlight that these cysts are usually asymptomatic initially and may be confused with maxillary sinusitis. They need careful radiological and histopathological evaluation and should be resected using aggressive approaches to prevent future recurrences.

INTRODUCTION

Philipsen first described odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) in 1956.[1] In 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) termed it as keratocystic odontogenic tumor, a benign unilocular or multilocular intraosseous tumor with odontogenic origin, histologically multilayered parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium lining and possessing the potential for aggressive and infiltrative behavior.[2] In 2017, the WHO reclassified it from a tumor to a cyst.[3] It is a cyst of epithelial development, arising from the remnants of the dental lamina, retained in the alveolar bone during tooth formation or subsequent proliferation of posttraumatic implantation of the basal oral epithelial layer. It is named as keratocyst, since the cyst lining produces keratin material.

It is mostly seen in 10–40 years of age, predominately among males and mainly involving the mandible. Presenting features include pain, facial asymmetry or swelling, bone expansion, discharging sinus, or numbness/tingling of the lip and teeth.[4] Surgical resection is the only treatment available. The conservative surgical approach involves marsupialization and enucleation with or without curettage.[5] An aggressive approach would involve peripheral ostectomy, curettage supplemented with Carnoy’s solution, and en bloc resection.[5] Our case is unique as it was a large maxillary parakeratinized OKC in a female and was managed with marsupialization and enucleation with peripheral ostectomy without resorting to complete maxillary resection and with no recurrence in the last 3 years.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-female presented to our outpatient clinic with swelling of the right part of the face for 1 year. The swelling did not cause any pain but was progressively increasing in size. She had suffered blunt trauma on the right side of the face 5 years back, with no history of fracture or any treatment sought at that time. There was no history of nose block, discharge, or bleeding from the nasal or oral cavity, neither any loosening nor loss of teeth. She had no history of difficulty in chewing food or articulation. On examination, there was a 5 cm × 4 cm bony hard swelling in the right maxillary region, obliterating the nasolabial fold [Figure 1]. The examination of the oral cavity did not show any abnormal displacement of the tooth or bulge on the alveolus or hard palate.

F1
Figure 1:
Preoperative clinical picture showing diffuse swelling (white arrow) on the right side anterior wall of the maxilla

A noncontrast computed tomogram of the maxilla-facial area revealed a 4.3 cm (superior-inferior) × 3.6 cm (medial-lateral) × 2.9 cm (anterior-posterior), well-defined lytic expansile lesion, arising from the maxillary alveolus of the right side and bulging into the floor of the right maxillary sinus, partially obliterating its lumen [Figure 2]. The lesion was filled with a mixed-density fluid and had caused expansion and thinning of both lingual and buccal cortexes with multifocal full-thickness defects. Fine-needle cytology from the lesion demonstrated benign epithelial cells and cystic macrophages in a proteinaceous background, suggesting a benign cystic lesion.

F2
Figure 2:
Computed tomogram coronal and axial sections, showing a single, smooth-walled cystic lesion (white arrow) involving the right side maxilla

Under general anesthesia, the lesion was approached via the right sublabial route, the mucoperiosteal flap was elevated [Figure 3], and the thin bone overlying the cyst was fractured and removed piecemeal. The straw-colored fluid contents of the cyst were aspirated to decompress it. The capsule of the cyst was raised from the bone, and the cyst was excised completely [Figure 4]. The bony wall of the cyst was subjected to mechanical curettage using a micromotor drill. The cavity was connected with the maxillary sinus and medicated ribbon gauze was packed, with its loose end brought in the nasal cavity after endoscopic middle meatal antrostomy, the preferred drainage pathway of the maxillary sinus. It is stressed here that the healthy maxillary sinus mucosa was preserved, unlike Caldwell-Luc, where diseased maxillary sinus mucosa is stripped and inferior meatal antrostomy was done for drainage. The wound was closed by inverting, interrupted absorbable suture. The pack was removed after 48 h via the nostril. The final histopathology reported a fibrocollagenous cyst wall lined by 2–4-layer-thick parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium, which is ulcerated at places and subepithelium showing granulation tissue with chronic inflammatory infiltrate. This was compatible with the diagnosis of OKC, a parakeratinized variant. There is no recurrence of the cyst in the last 3-year follow-up.

F3
Figure 3:
Intraoperative clinical picture showing right sublabial incision with elevated mucoperiosteal flap and exposed cyst bulge
F4
Figure 4:
Intraoperative clinical picture showing the bone defect in the anterior wall of the maxilla and the cyst wall lifted with elevator from the surrounding bone

DISCUSSION

OKC commonly occurs in the posterior body and ramus of the mandible.[2] Rarely, they may develop in the maxilla, frequently in the incisor-canine region as in our case.[6] They are often painless swelling with potential for local destruction and, occasionally, may present with pain and secondary infection.[6] They may occur following trauma, as in our case, due to implantation of the basal cell layer of the surface epithelium. They expand due to forces exerted on the surrounding tissue, by the fluid secreted from the epithelium and because of enzymatic activity by the fibrous wall.[1]

The OKCs are aggressive in nature and have a high rate of recurrence due to a variety of local factors such as collagenase production, matrix metalloproteinases, interlukin-1 alpha, parathyroid hormone-related protein, Bcl-2, and cytokeratin 10 and additionally the presence of satellite cysts or occasionally an incomplete removal.[1,7] There is histologic evidence that the overlying mucosa may lead to recurrence, hence its removal has been recommended.[8] However, in our case, there was no visible connection with alveolar mucosa. Evidence suggests that the parakeratinized variant has more aggressive behavior and a higher recurrence rate as compared to orthokeratinized.[9]

Radiological appearance may differ; it may be a unilocular lesion to a large multilocular radiolucent mass, similar to an ameloblastoma, a dentigerous, lateral periodontal, or radicular cyst.[10] Usually, OKC has identifying features of being unilocular with smooth borders, without adjacent tooth displacement or unerupted tooth or root resorption.[11] Multiple OKCs may exist in nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS), referred to as Gorlin-Goltz syndrome. Besides nevoid basal cell carcinomas, these patients may have frontal bossing, bifid ribs, epidermoid cysts, falx cerebri calcification, and medulloblastoma.[1]

The marsupialization and enucleation may have a high recurrence rate (25%–50%).[12] More aggressive treatment includes complete resection supplemented with Carnoy’s solution (chloroform, absolute alcohol, ferric chloride, and glacial acetic acid) with or without peripheral ostectomy, which has a lower recurrence rate (10%).[12,13] The aggressive technique is recommended in patients with NBCCS, large OKC, and recurrent lesions.[1] In our case, we used mechanical curettage using a rotary microdrill with cutting burr for peripheral ostectomy to ensure complete removal of cyst lining. This procedural technique provides a safety margin, helps in smoothening the walls, and eliminates any residual cystic epithelium.[12] Thus, our case highlights how a large maxillary parakeratinized OKC in a female can be managed with marsupialization and enucleation with peripheral ostectomy which is a much lesser aggressive surgical technique ensuring complete resection without resorting to downright maxillary bone resection. Fortunately, there has been no recurrence in the last 3 years.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the successful management of a large maxillary OKC parakeratinized variant in a young female. These cysts may be asymptomatic during the initial stages as they are slow growing. They may mimic other cystic tumors closely, therefore a careful radiological and histopathological evaluation is required. These also have a high rate of recurrence, thus they should be treated aggressively and followed up periodically.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Madras J, Lapointe H. Keratocystic odontogenic tumour: Reclassification of the odontogenic keratocyst from cyst to tumour. J Can Dent Assoc 2008; 74: 165-h
2. Barnes L, Everson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. WHO classification of tumours series. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press. 2005. Available from: https://screening.iarc.fr/doc/BB9.pdf. [Last accessed on 2022 Nov 28]
3. Soluk-Tekkeşin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization classification of odontogenic lesions: A summary of the changes of the 2017. 4th edition Turk Patoloji Derg 2018; 34. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01410
4. Veena KM, Rao R, Jagadishchandra H, Rao PK. Odontogenic keratocyst looks can be deceptive, causing endodontic misdiagnosis. Case Rep Pathol 2011 2011; 159501
5. Morgan TA, Burton CC, Qian F. A retrospective review of treatment of the odontogenic keratocyst. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 635-9
6. Myoung H, Hong SP, Hong SD, Lee JI, Lim CY, Choung PH, et al. Odontogenic keratocyst: Review of 256 cases for recurrence and clinicopathologic parameters. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91: 328-33
7. Zhong WQ, Chen G, Zhang W, Ren JG, Wu ZX, Zhao Y, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in keratocystic odontogenic tumor: Possible role in locally aggressive behavior. Biomed Res Int 2015 2015; 168089
8. Stoelinga PJ. Long-term follow-up on keratocysts treated according to a defined protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30: 14-25
9. Kaczmarzyk T, Mojsa I, Stypulkowska J. A systematic review of the recurrence rate for keratocystic odontogenic tumour in relation to treatment modalities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 756-67
10. Mozaffari E, Marmor DS, Alawi F. Odontogenic keratocyst with a misleading clinical and radiologic appearance. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 837-41
11. Kitisubkanchana J, Reduwan NH, Poomsawat S, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Wongchuensoontorn C. Odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: Radiographic evaluation. Oral Radiol 2021; 37: 55-65
12. Kolokythas A, Fernandes RP, Pazoki A, Ord RA. Odontogenic keratocyst: To decompress or not to decompress?A comparative study of decompression and enucleation versus resection/peripheral ostectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 640-4
13. Ribeiro Junior O, Borba AM, Alves CA, de Gouveia MM, Coracin FL, Guimarães Júnior J. Keratocystic odontogenic tumors and Carnoy's solution: Results and complications assessment. Oral Dis 2012; 18: 548-57
Keywords:

Maxilla; odontogenic keratocyst; surgery

Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice