Study Design:
This was a retrospective study.
Objective:
To compare the treatment efficacy of hybrid therapy (HT) with that of total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in patients with solitary radioresistant high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) spinal metastases.
Summary of Background Data:
Both HT and TES can yield good results for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC. However, there is still a lack of comparative studies on the treatment efficacy of these 2 methods.
Materials and Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed patients with the above-mentioned tumors between January 2012 and May 2019. A total of 157 patients underwent surgery, 64 of whom received HT and 93 were treated with TES. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) allowed the generation of best-matched pairs for the 2 categories. Local control rates and survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The longest follow-up period was 88 months. The survival rates and local progression-free survival rates after HT were comparable with those after TES at 1 year (84.6% vs. 83.1% and 90.2% vs. 90%, respectively), 2 years (60.8% vs. 64.3% and 64.1% vs. 62.1%, respectively), and 5 years (18.8% vs. 24.1% and 24.4% vs. 28.4%, respectively). There were no significant differences in pain control, improvement in neurological status, spine stabilization restoration, incidence of perioperative complications, and improvement in quality of life between the groups. However, HT showed more advantages than TES in that it had a shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss.
Conclusions:
HT can obtain satisfactory results comparable to TES for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC. In addition, HT has a shorter operative time and fewer perioperative complications than TES. HT may be a promising treatment for solitary radioresistant metastatic spinal tumors with high-grade ESCC.
