Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Executive Function Profiles at Home and at School in 11-Year-Old Very Low Birth Weight or Very Low Gestational Age Children

Nyman, Anna Psyc Lic*,†; Munck, Petriina PhD†,‡; Koivisto, Mari MSc§; Hagelstam, Camilla Psyc Lic*; Korhonen, Tapio PhD*; Lehtonen, Liisa MD, PhD; Haataja, Leena MD, PhD‖,¶

Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics: May 21, 2019 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - p
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000689
Original Article: PDF Only
Buy
PAP

Objective: Executive function (EF) problems of children born at very low birth weight (VLBW; ≤1500 g) or very low gestational age (VLGA; <32 gestational weeks) may present differently at school compared to the home environment. Ecological assessment of EF including parent- and teacher-rated profiles and associated risk factors of 11-year-old children born at VLBW or VLGA was evaluated.

Methods: A total of 125 VLBW or VLGA children and 132 controls were assessed using the Behavior Rating Inventory of EF, which includes 8 subscales that form the Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition Indexes. For VLBW or VLGA children, full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence scale for Children, Fourth Edition. Neonatal data were collected systematically.

Results: VLBW or VLGA children with full-scale IQ ≥ 70 had clinically significant problems in the Working Memory subscale at school. Although they had clinically significant problems at home in the Behavioral Regulation Index, the difference disappeared when adjusted for paternal education. Lower gestational age, lower birth weight z-score, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, low paternal and maternal education, and lower full-scale IQ were identified to be risk factors for higher scores in ecological assessment of EF.

Conclusion: VLBW or VLGA children in this cohort exhibit fewer EF problems in ecological assessment of EF compared to previous literature. EF problems of this study population vary by home and school setting and are emphasized in working memory at school. Screening for EF problems in school environment is recommended to target the support.

*Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland;

Department of Pediatrics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;

Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;

§Turku Clinical Research Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;

Children's Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;

Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Address for reprints: Anna Nyman, Psyc Lic, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, 20500 Turku, Finland; e-mail: anna.nyman@utu.fi.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received October 03, 2018

Accepted April 10, 2019

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.