Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Transition to College and Adherence to Prescribed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Medication

Gray, Wendy, N., PhD*; Kavookjian, Jan, PhD; Shapiro, Steven, K., PhD*; Wagoner, Scott, T., MA*; Schaefer, Megan, R., MS*; Resmini Rawlinson, Alana, PhD; Hinnant, James, B., PhD§

Erratum

In the January 2018 issue of The Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, in the article “Transition to College and Adherence to Prescribed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Medication,” Table 1 incorrectly labeled the participant populations on immediate-release and extended-release medications. The labels “Immediate-release” and “Extended-release” in the first column were reversed. The table should have stated that 85.29% of Freshmen, 76.47% of Upperclassmen, and 82.35% of the Total Sample were on Extended-release medication, and 14.71% of Freshmen, 23.53% of Upperclassmen, and 17.65% of the Total Sample were on Immediate-release medication. These data are correctly represented in the text of the article.

Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 39(3):269, April 2018.

Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics: January 2018 - Volume 39 - Issue 1 - p 1–9
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000511
Original Articles

Objective: As youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) transition to adulthood, they must learn how to manage their ADHD treatment independently. This may be challenging because many of the skills necessary to adhere to treatment (e.g., organization, planning) are impaired in those with ADHD. Using electronic monitoring, we examine trajectories of adherence to medication in a cohort of college students with ADHD. Further, we examine the effect of transitioning to college and executive functioning on adherence.

Methods: Electronic monitors tracked adherence for 51 undergraduate students with ADHD across an academic semester. Multilevel modeling examined individual trajectories in monthly adherence and the role of transition status and self-reported executive functioning on these trajectories.

Results: Overall, participants adhered to 53.53% of prescribed doses. Transition status predicted the linear slope in adherence (β = −8.95, standard error [SE] = 3.61, p < .05), with lower initial adherence among undergraduates transitioning to independence (34.17%) compared with post-transition undergraduates (67.63%; β = 33.46, SE = 8.00, p < .001). Adherence demonstrated a curvilinear change (β = −7.23, SE = 1.25, p < .001). It increased from the beginning of the semester to midterms before subsequently declining through the rest of the semester, including during final exams. Executive functioning did not predict adherence (β = −.10, SE = .02, p = .54).

Conclusion: Only half of all doses were taken as prescribed. Adolescents transitioning to independence demonstrated the lowest levels of adherence, suggesting that the transition to independence is a high-risk period for poor self-management of ADHD.

Departments of *Psychology,

Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL;

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL;

§Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.

Address for reprints: Wendy N. Gray, PhD, Thach 22, Department of Psychology, Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, AL 36849; e-mail: wng0001@auburn.edu.

This study was funded by a grant from the Auburn University Intramural Grant Program awarded to the first 3 authors.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

See related commentary on page 77

Received February , 2017

Accepted August , 2017

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.