Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Ankle-Foot Orthoses: Proprioceptive Inputs and Balance Implications

Aruin, Alexander S. PhD, DSc; Rao, Noel MD

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics: October 2010 - Volume 22 - Issue 10 - p P34-P37
doi: 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181f25071
Original Article
Free

Individuals with a loss of sensation in the lower limbs frequently experience postural instability, altered gait patterns, and an increased risk of falling culminating in a decreased quality of life. Previous studies have documented that using ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) help such individuals to maintain their balance. This study was conducted to investigate whether somatosensory cues delivered to the intact tissues of the lower limbs above the ankle joints enhance the control of posture in individuals with peripheral neuropathy. The study involved 12 individuals with sensory neuropathy because of diabetes who participated in static and dynamic balance tests with and without specially designed AFOs that provided auxiliary sensory cues to the lower limbs without stabilizing the ankle joints. During the tests, the subjects were required to alternately stand on a fixed and moving platform with their eyes alternately open or closed. Equilibrium scores and response latencies were obtained. The results showed that equilibrium scores were significantly higher in experiments with the specially modified AFOs compared with conditions without AFOs. Smaller latency scores were recorded in conditions with AFOs as well. The outcome indicates that AFOs that substitute for the lack of proprioceptive feedback may improve automatic postural responses in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It also highlights the need for further research focused on the design of assistive means that could improve the balance and the performance of activities of daily living in individuals with proprioceptive deficits.

ALEXANDER S. ARUIN, PhD, DSc, is affiliated with the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois and the Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital, Wheaton, Illinois.

NOEL RAO, MD, is affiliated with the Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital, Wheaton, Illinois.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant HD51628.

Correspondence to: Alexander S. Aruin, PhD, DSc, Department of Physical Therapy (MC 898), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street (4th Floor), Chicago, IL 60612; e-mail: aaruin@uic.edu

The ability to maintain balance is a critical factor for performing many activities of daily life. Humans maintain their balance by controlling the center of mass (COM) position relative to the base of support (BOS). However, because the BOS (described as the area inside the outline of the two feet) is relatively small and the COM is located well above the ground at approximately the S2 level (approximately 55% of body height), human vertical posture is inherently unstable.

The central nervous system uses sensory information to produce the appropriate muscle forces to control the COM position, so that the balance is maintained. Sensory systems contributing to balance include the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems.1 Although the role of each of these three systems in control of posture are important, there are indications that the somatosensory system is the biggest contributor of feedback for postural control.2 Receptors in the muscles, tendons, and joint capsules provide information about muscle length, contractile speed, muscle tension, and joint position: this information is commonly referred to as proprioception.3 The importance of proprioception in the performance of daily activities, including maintenance of posture, reaching and grasping tasks, and locomotion, has been documented in multiple studies.2,4 Concurrently, literature data suggest that loss of proprioception in the lower limbs contributes significantly to instability and falls.2,5

In particular, the elderly and individuals with diabetic neuropathy frequently experience proprioceptive deficits such as the loss of position, vibration and light touch sense, and sensory ataxia with the loss of ankle reflexes.6 The loss of sensation secondary to diabetic distal sensory neuropathy has a markedly detrimental effect on postural stability7 and contributes to altered gait patterns, feeling less safe while standing and walking, increased risk of falling,8,9 and decreased quality of life.10 Proprioceptive deficit was also reported in individuals who had knee ligament injuries,11 osteoarthritis,12,13 and ankle sprains.14,15

Several approaches have been developed to address these problems. Among them are therapeutic shoes, foot orthoses, and ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), each of which influence the tactile and proprioceptive mechanisms in the lower legs, resulting in improvements to the sense of position15 and balance and a reduced risk for falling.16 Thus, it was reported that improvements in balance while using these devices is associated with the increased feedback from cutaneous receptors in the foot and ankle.16,17

It has also been shown that subsensory mechanical noise applied to the soles of the feet through vibrating insoles leads to reduced postural sway in healthy, young, and elderly individuals18 and individuals with diabetic neuropathy.19 In addition, reports indicate that wearing shoes with high collars are associated with better balance than when wearing shoes with low collars.20 Furthermore, it has been suggested that the application of an AFO increases the afferent feedback from cutaneous receptors in the foot and shank, which may in turn lead to an improved ankle joint position sense.21

It has been also reported that the utilization of additional somatosensory cues could help in balance maintenance.22 For example, the contact of the index finger against a stationary surface at a nonsupportive force level while standing has been associated with the reduction of postural sway in healthy individuals22,23 and individuals with peripheral neuropathy.24

Several reports suggest that the ability of humans to obtain early, directionally sensitive proprioceptive information is not limited to finger touch. Postural sway has also been reduced when contact with a stable surface is provided against the forehead, nose, or leg at nonsupportive force levels.25 Similarly, proprioceptive input from more proximal muscles, such as gluteus medius and paraspinals, can provide early, directionally sensitive proprioceptive information.26

Accordingly, in the presence of compromised distal sensation and proprioception, the provision of somatosensory cues to the lower limbs may constitute one approach to assist individuals better control their posture while standing and walking (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Along these lines, it has been shown that AFOs, which provide auxiliary sensory cues to the intact tissues of the lower limbs, improve automatic postural responses in individuals with peripheral neuropathy because of diabetes.27,28 However, as suggested in our previous study,28 the observed improvements in automatic postural responses could have been a result of either the auxiliary sensory cues or the additional mechanical support provided by the AFOs. Thus, the aim of this study was to clarify whether specially modified AFOs, which provide somatosensory information without additional stabilization of the ankle joints, could be responsible for the improvement of automatic postural responses.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHOD

A group of individuals with sensory neuropathy because of diabetes (N = 12) participated in static and dynamic balance tests with and without specially modified AFOs. Each of the AFOs was designed with the shank of the brace (1) connected to the foot plate (2) via a semi-rigid element (3). Velcro calf straps (4) were used to secure the shank of the brace to the leg (Figure 2). The AFOs provided sensory information to the calf through the shank of the brace and to the middle tibia through the calf straps, but because of the inclusion of the semirigid element, they did not provide any ankle stabilization in a sagittal plane. During the test, subjects were required to stand on a computer-controlled platform that was alternately stationary or moving with their eyes alternately open or closed. The efficiency of the subject's proprioception in balance control was assessed by measuring the sensory organization test scores and latency.29 The sensory organization test score is a measure of postural stability based on the observed degrees of the subject's offset from the centered position in the anterior-posterior plane. The latency is the time between the onset of the force platform translation and the start of a mechanical response initiated by the subject.30

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

For all tests, equilibrium scores were significant with the AFOs and their associated auxiliary sensory cues in comparison with conditions without cues (repeated measures analysis of variance, p < 0.05). Similarly, smaller latency scores were recorded in the AFO conditions (Figure 3). The results indicate that auxiliary sensory cues provided to the intact tissues of the lower limbs could improve automatic postural responses in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Proprioception plays an important role in the control of balance,3 occupational tasks, activities of daily living, and in sports.31 Because the ankle joint is located in close proximity to the body's BOS, the ankle plays an integral role in maintaining balance.32 As such, ankle proprioception is critical to balance during functional activities such as standing, walking, and running.33,34

It was previously suggested that ankle orthoses can improve postural stability or proprioceptive thresholds in young or athletic individuals.35–37 The results of this study demonstrate that using AFOs, which allow sensory information to bypass the disrupted pathways in the lower legs, can substitute for the lack of proprioceptive feedback and, therefore, help individuals with peripheral neuropathy to generate faster and more sensitively scaled postural responses while standing.

These findings are consistent with previous studies on the effect of external vibrotactile biofeedback on stance38,39 and gait.38 Conversely, it was recently shown that wearing AFOs that provided mediolateral support did not influence ankle inversion or eversion proprioceptive thresholds in older persons with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.40 However, in that study, AFOs were limited in their contact to the area of the anatomic ankle joints as their calf section did not extend proximally to the neck of the fibular head. The design of the AFOs used in this study was such that the shanks of the braces were in contact with the upper parts of the lower legs, allowing more sensory information to be used in balance control. Hence, it should be observed that the ability of AFOs to augment sensory information for postural control and substitute for the lack of proprioceptive feedback seems to depend on their design.

The observed improvements of automatic postural responses suggest that the AFOs providing auxiliary sensory information could potentially benefit the performance of other dynamic activities such as compensatory stepping in response to an unexpected platform perturbation and walking. Indeed, if the AFOs act as a “balance prosthesis,” helping individuals with peripheral neuropathy to generate faster and more sensitively scaled postural responses during the gait cycle, its use could help such individuals to walk with less fear of falling and, thus, contribute toward improvements in their quality of life.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that automatic postural responses in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy could be improved by using AFOs, which allow sensory information to bypass the disrupted pathways in the lower legs. The study outcome also highlights the need for further research in this exciting and relatively unexplored area of designing assistive means that could improve the balance and the performance of activities of daily living in individuals with proprioceptive deficits.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the patients for their exceptional cooperation, Dan Hasso, CPO, for his help in designing AFOs, and Cheryl Carlson, PT, for her help in testing.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
2. van Deursen RW, Simoneau GG. Foot and ankle sensory neuropathy, proprioception, and postural stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999;29:718–726.
3. Konczak J, Corcos DM, Horak F, et al. Proprioception and motor control in Parkinson's disease. J Mot Behav 2009;41:543–552.
4. Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC. Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 1990;82:167–177.
5. Simoneaul G, Ulbrecht J, Derr J, Cavanagh P. Role of somatosesory input in control of human posture. Gait Posture 1995;3:115–122.
6. Vinik AI, Holland MT, Le Beau JM, et al. Diabetic neuropathies. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1926–1975.
7. Simoneau GG, Ulbrecht JS, Derr JA, et al. Postural instability in patients with diabetic sensory neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1994;17:1411–1421.
8. Cavanagh PR, Derr JA, Ulbrecht JS, et al. Problems with gait and posture in neuropathic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1992;9:469–474.
9. Richardson JK, Hurvitz EA. Peripheral neuropathy: a true risk factor for falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995;50:M211–M215.
10. Benbow SJ, Wallymahmed ME, MacFarlane IA. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and quality of life. QJM 1998;91:733–737.
11. Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Buckley SL. Proprioception in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:1–6.
12. Garsden LR, Bullock-Saxton JE. Joint reposition sense in subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:148–155.
13. Sharma L, Pai YC, Holtkamp K, Rymer WZ. Is knee joint proprioception worse in the arthritic knee versus the unaffected knee in unilateral knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1518–1525.
14. Konradsen L, Magnusson P. Increased inversion angle replication error in functional ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000;8:246–251.
15. Missaoui B, Portero P, Bendaya S, et al. Posture and equilibrium in orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases. Neurophysiol Clin 2008;38:447–457.
16. Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU, Postema K. A systematic review of the effects of shoes and other ankle or foot appliances on balance in older people and people with peripheral nervous system disorders. Gait Posture 2007;25:316–323.
17. You SH, Granata KP, Bunker LK. Effects of circumferential ankle pressure on ankle proprioception, stiffness, and postural stability: a preliminary investigation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004;34:449–460.
18. Priplata AA, Niemi JB, Harry JD, et al. Vibrating insoles and balance control in elderly people. Lancet 2003;362:1123–1124.
19. Priplata AA, Patritti BL, Niemi JB, et al. Noise-enhanced balance control in patients with diabetes and patients with stroke. Ann Neurol 2006;59:4–12.
20. Lord SR, Bashford GM, Howland A, Munroe BJ. Effects of shoe collar height and sole hardness on balance in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:681–684.
21. Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, Weiker GG. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med 1994;22:223–229.
22. Jeka JJ, Lackner JR. Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Exp Brain Res 1994;100:495–502.
23. Clapp S, Wing AM. Light touch contribution to balance in normal bipedal stance. Exp Brain Res 1999;125:521–524.
24. Dickstein R, Shupert CL, Horak FB. Fingertip touch improves postural stability in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Gait Posture 2001;14:238–247.
25. Lackner JR, Rabin E, DiZio P. Stabilization of posture by precision touch of the index finger with rigid and flexible filaments. Exp Brain Res 2001;139:454–464.
26. Bloem BR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, et al. Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss. Exp Brain Res 2002;142:91–107.
27. Rao N, Aruin A. The effect of ankle-foot orthoses on balance impairment: single-case study. J Prosthet Orthot 1999;11:15–19.
28. Rao N, Aruin AS. Automatic postural responses in individuals with peripheral neuropathy and ankle-foot orthoses. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;74:48–56.
29. Nashner LM. Computerized dynamic posturography. In: Jacobsen G, Newman C, Kartush J, eds. Handbook on Balance Function Testing. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997:280–307.
30. Camicioli R, Panzer VP, Kaye J. Balance in the healthy elderly: posturography and clinical assessment. Arch Neurol 1997;54:976–981.
31. Lee A, Lin W-H, Huang C. Impaired proprioception and poor static postural control in subjects with functional instability of the ankle. J Exerc Sci Fit 2006;4:117–125.
32. Blackburn J, Prentice W, Guskiewicz K, Busby M. Balance and joint stability: the relative contributions of proprioception and muscular strength. J Sport Rehabil 2006;9:315–328.
33. Isakov E, Mizrahi J. Is balance impaired by recurrent sprained ankle? Br J Sports Med 1997;31:65–67.
34. Leanderson J, Eriksson E, Nilsson C, Wykman A. Proprioception in classical ballet dancers. A prospective study of the influence of an ankle sprain on proprioception in the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:370–374.
35. Baier M, Hopf T. Ankle orthoses effect on single-limb standing balance in athletes with functional ankle instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:939–944.
36. Jerosch J, Hoffstetter I, Bork H, Bischof M. The influence of orthoses on the proprioception of the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995;3:39–46.
37. Vuillerme N, Demetz S. Do ankle foot orthoses modify postural control during bipedal quiet standing following a localized fatigue of the ankle muscles? Int J Sports Med 2007;28:243–246.
38. Dozza M, Horak FB, Chiari L. Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance. Exp Brain Res 2007;178:37–48.
39. Wall C III, Kentala E. Control of sway using vibrotactile feedback of body tilt in patients with moderate and severe postural control deficits. J Vestib Res 2005;15:313–325.
40. Son J, Ashton-Miller JA, Richardson JK. Do ankle orthoses improve ankle proprioceptive thresholds or unipedal balance in older persons with peripheral neuropathy? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010;89:369–375.
Keywords:

ankle-foot orthoses; peripheral neuropathy; postural stability

© 2010 American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists