Surgical treatment options for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia in children: cross-union versus other options: a systematic review

Abstract

The systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive update on various surgical treatment options for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia (CPT) in children and the outcome achieved in terms of union, union time and complications of non-union and refracture. A literature search was performed in PubMed (including Medline) database for broad keywords: ‘Congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia and children’. Studies selected included full-text articles on surgical treatments of CPT following: intra-medullary rod (IMR)/Ilizarov/combined IMR with Ilizarov/vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and cross-union. Out of 719 studies, 57(1227 CPT patients/1235 tibias) were included for review. Cross-union group had 100% union rate with no non-unions, least refracture rate (22.5%) and minimal time to primary union (4.5 months). For IMR, Ilizarov, combined IMR with Ilizarov and VFG, the respective results were as follows: primary union rates – 67.7, 84.2, 83.7 and 65.3%; final union – 76.5, 81.5, 92.4 and 87.1%; primary union time – 12.6, 9.3, 5.3 and 9.5 months; non-union rates – 17.0, 13.6, 6.0 and 7.9%; refracture rates – 48.1, 47.7, 33.7 and 34.6%. The success probability was lowest for IMR (35.2%), 44% for Ilizarov, 55.5% for combined IMR with Ilizarov, 42.7% for VFG and highest 77.5% for cross-union group. Outcomes of the more recent cross-union technique fare better than other surgical methods. However, studies on cross-union are few and longer follow-up is lacking. Combined IMR with Ilizarov and VFG have better results compared to IMR or Ilizarov alone.