Maternity Providers' Perspectives on Barriers to Utilization of Intermittent Fetal Monitoring

A Qualitative Study

Abstract

There are 2 approaches to fetal assessment during labor: continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) and intermittent auscultation (IA). The vast majority of healthy labors in the United States use EFM, despite professional organization recommendations against its use for low-risk pregnancies. This qualitative investigation explores maternity care team members' perspectives on why EFM is the dominant approach to fetal assessment instead of IA. Focus groups comprised of nurses, midwives, and physicians were conducted using a semistructured interview guide. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes related to clinical and nonclinical factors influencing the type of fetal assessment employed during labor. Seven focus groups with a total of 41 participants were completed. Seven themes were identified: clinical environment; technology; policies, procedures, and evidence-based protocols; patient-centered influences; fear of liability; providers as members of healthcare team; and deflection of responsibility. All maternity care team members had knowledge of the evidence base supporting IA use for low-risk care. Nurses identified unique challenges in having agency over monitoring decision making and executing best practices. Improved communication among team members can facilitate evidence-based approaches to IA use, facilitating increased utilization for low-risk labor care.