Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Research Report

Public Health Across Partisan Lines: What Has Changed Since the Onset of COVID-19

Sellers, Katie DrPH, CPH; Leider, Jonathon P. PhD; Gollust, Sarah PhD; Gendelman, Moriah MPH; Castrucci, Brian DrPH, MA

Author Information
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice: January/February 2021 - Volume 27 - Issue - p S5-S10
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001293
  • Free


As the United States contends with COVID-19, there is a renewed understanding of the importance of robust, well-funded public health systems. Historically, Americans support public health and public health agencies but express dissatisfaction toward specific functions of public health systems and have mixed feelings about their own public health system.1,2 Specifically, the public has long viewed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) favorably and has continued to do so throughout the pandemic.3 However, in the last decade, the CDC's budget has fallen by nearly 10%, which is closely tied to the funding of state and local public health systems, hindering the effectiveness of those systems.4

Studies suggest the public has some ambivalence about public health—indicating that an assessment of public support for public health must ask about public health systems generally as well as support for specific agencies, functions, and policy tools that collectively comprise the public health enterprise.1,2,5 Support for these different aspects of the public health system likely vary, and this variation may be particularly pronounced between Democrats and Republicans, as past research demonstrated.1 The large and persistent partisan gap documented over the last decade in support of the Affordable Care Act suggests that partisan differences in evaluating other public health policy issues may also have grown.5,6

These patterns are exemplified by the partisan response to COVID-19, as numerous polls have shown partisan differences in attitudes about the threat of and response to COVID-19. While Democrats and Republicans express similar concern about the effect of COVID-19 on the economy, Democrats are far more likely to see COVID-19 as a major threat to the health of the US population and more likely to see the importance of social distancing and testing in responding to COVID-19.7,8 President Trump's handling of COVID-19, as well as politicized responses by Republican and Democratic leaders across the United States, has created diverging narratives and may have signaled to the public that they should interpret public health and health policy issues in partisan ways.9 Understanding how the public perceives public health services, especially during a divisive and dangerous pandemic, is critical to determine how to mobilize the broad support that is needed for a robust public health infrastructure to protect and promote the health of the public.


Analysis in this article is drawn from national opinion poll data. Two polls were conducted by an independent firm, Public Opinion Strategies, in the first week of September 2018 and the second week of July 2020. The sample was drawn randomly from state voter files, with state-specific sample size determined on the basis of individual votersʼ selection probability proportional to size (PPS) of the state voter population, relative to the national population of registered voters. Quotas were set by specific demographics such as state, region, age, gender, and ethnicity based on data from the US Census and voter files in order to ensure the sample was representative of the US registered voter population nationally. Interviews were conducted by phone using CATI software with trained live interviewers. Nonresponse weights were used in the analysis to adjust the resulting estimates to be nationally representative. Overall, 1800 individuals participated in the 2 polls—1000 in 2018 and 800 in 2020.

Respondents were asked how important it was for their health department to perform certain activities, on a scale of 1 (“not at all important”) through 10 (“very important”). The full list of items can be found in Appendix Table 1. For the purposes of analysis, particular emphasis was placed on identifying which respondents felt items were “very important” (ie, responded as 8-10) and so results were dichotomized as done in a previous study asking about the importance of various determinants of health.10 Similarly, respondents were asked to what extent a number of social services were important for creating a healthy community, including public health departments (see Appendix Table 1). Similarly, responses were dichotomized at 0-7/8-10.

One item has changed between 2018 and 2020. The exact wording for the “Communicable Disease” item in 2018 was as follows: Using a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 meaning it is NOT AT ALL important your local health department does this and 10 meaning it is VERY important that your local public health department does this. The (first/next) one is ... Help stop the spread of communicable diseases, such as meningitis (men-en-jigh-tus), Salmonella, and the flu. In 2020, half of the sample received this same language, with the other half receiving the following: Help stop the spread of communicable diseases, such as coronavirus (kuh-roe-nuh-virus), meningitis (men-en-jigh-tus), Salmonella, and the flu. The primary covariate of interest is political affiliation, which was categorized into Democrat (“lean” through “strongly”), Independent, and Republican (“lean” through “strongly“). Bivariate comparisons were conducted using a Rao-Scott adjusted chi-square. Data were analyzed and visualized in Stata 16.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas).


In 2018, 36% of respondents identified as Republican and 42% as Democrat; this shifted to 40% and 44%, respectively, in the 2020 sample. Fifty-three percent of respondents were women in 2018 and 2020. Thirty-four percent of respondents were people of color in 2018 and 36% in 2020.

When asked how familiar they were with public health departments, 49% of respondents (95% CI, 46-52) said “somewhat” or “very familiar” in 2018 and 60% in 2020 (95% CI, 57-64, P < .001). When asked, on a scale of 1 to 10, how important public health departments were to community health, 57% (95% CI, 53-60) responded 8 or higher (“very important”) in 2018 and 73% did so in 2020 (95% CI, 70-76, P < .001). Perceptions of public health department importance differed significantly by political affiliation. In 2018, 71% (95% CI, 67-75) of Democrats rated public health departments very important compared with 42% of Republicans (95% CI, 37-48). In 2020, 85% of Democrats (95% CI, 81-88) and 62% of Republicans (95% CI, 56-68) rated public health agencies very important (Figure 1). This represents an upward shift of 14% for Democrats (95% CI, 8-19, P < .001) and 20% for Republicans (95% CI, 12-28, P < .001).

Perception That Health Departments Are Very Important to Community Healtha aBars represent 95% confidence intervals. The y-axis represents the percentage of respondents who rated a public health department as 8-10 (“very important” to community health). D indicates Democrat; I, Independent; R, Republican.

Respondents were also asked how important it was for a public health department to provide a particular service. Responses of 8 or higher on a scale of 1 to 10 are grouped as “very important.” Differences were observed between respondents identifying as Republican versus Democrat for every item except “Disaster Response” in 2020 (Figure 2). Eighty-four percent of Democrats rated this item very important in 2018 compared with 80% in 2020 (P = .219). Seventy-one percent of Republicans rated this item very important in 2018 and 75% in 2020 (P = .8126). The interparty difference between Democrats and Republicans in 2020 was not statistically significant (5%; P = .0925). In 2020, ratings increased for all items except “Communicable Disease.” The only service for which the increase was significantly different by political party was the “Prevention” item, where Democrats increased by 4.7% and Republicans increased by 14.2% (P = .0489).

Respondent Perceptions of the Importance of Public Health Departments Providing Specific Services in Their Communities, 2018 and 2020, by Political Affiliationa aBars represent 95% confidence intervals. The y-axis represents the percentage of respondents who rated a given item as 8-10 (“very important” to provide). D indicates Democrat; I, Independent; R, Republican. Full-item descriptions are available in Appendix Table 1. The “Communicable Disease” item shows only respondents receiving the 2018 version of the question (n = 758 in 2018; n = 399 in 2020), whereas the “Comm. Disease (COVID)” item shows respondents who received the original version in 2018 (n = 758) and the modified version in 2020 (n = 398).

Both sets of services relating to policy development saw a substantial partisan divide. For the “Create Health Policy Locally” item (“Work with partners to help create strong local policies that support health, such as smoke-free workplace laws”), 73% of Democrats in 2018 (95% CI, 69-76) and 48% of Republicans in 2018 (95% CI, 44-52, P < .001) indicated the item was very important compared with 75% (95% CI, 70-79) and 47% (95% CI, 42-53, P < .001), respectively, in 2020. Similarly, the “Promote Health Policies” item (“Promote policies that protect people's health such as increasing seatbelt use and encouraging employers to offer paid maternity leave”) saw 74% of Democrats (95% CI, 70-78) and 45% of Republicans in 2018 (95% CI, 41-50, P < .001) rate it as highly important, increasing to 82% of Democrats (95% CI, 77-86) and 49% of Republicans in 2020 (95% CI, 43-55, P < .001).

Responses to the “Communicable Disease” item varied by party and according to which version of the question was used. When asked with the original language about the importance of the “Communicable Disease” item, 71% of Republican respondents (95% CI, 65-76) said it was very important in 2018, which decreased to 68% in 2020 (95% CI, 60-75). Among those asked about the “Communicable Disease” item using the coronavirus language, 74% of Republicans said it was an important service (95% CI, 65-75). For Democrats, the rating increased from 86% in 2018 to 92% for the original language and to 91% for item with the coronavirus language. None of the differences on the “Communicable Disease” item between 2018 and 2020 were statistically significant.


The coronavirus pandemic has put governmental public health departments in the spotlight—and in a positive way. Respondents to the 2020 poll indicated increased familiarity with local public health departments than that in 2018. Respondents to the 2020 poll also rated the importance of the public health department to community health higher than their 2018 counterparts.

Consistent with other research, Democrats reported more support for public health departments and services than did Republicans. However, increased support for public health departments was marked, particularly among Republicans (20 percentage points or 47% increase). Given the extreme polarization around certain strategies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic (eg, mask wearing and business closures), these findings are noteworthy and reassuring.

These findings counter a prevailing national narrative that would lead us to believe that there is intense opposition to certain public health measures. Despite a vocal minority, most Americans agree that governmental public health is very important to their community's health. Reported support for the work of public health departments also has increased across the board—from environmental health to maternal and child health to multisector collaboration. Certain services are still less popular than others, especially policy development and especially among Republicans. It is clear that among a nationally representative cross-section of the general public, support for public health departments is higher in 2020 than in 2018.

These data should encourage political candidates and elected officials to stand up for public health leaders and denounce the harassment that has contributed to retirement, resignation, or termination of 49 state and local health officials since April.11 Public health departments cannot effectively improve community health when their leaders are targeted, frightened, or undermined for partisan reasons. Policy makers, elected officials, and political candidates should leverage this and share in detail how they plan to support state and local health departments—giving their constituents the best opportunity to live in a healthy and safe community.


Public health advocates have a unique opportunity to advocate for sustained funding for the public health system. American voters are more familiar with and more supportive of public health departments now than they were before the pandemic. Republicans and Democrats alike see the importance of the work of the governmental public health system. While public health's role in encouraging health-promoting policies is critical for protecting and improving health, these results suggest that highlighting that role may not be the best way to solidify bipartisan gains in public support.

Implications for Policy & Practice

  • COVID-19 has given the field of public health a unique opportunity to advocate for sustained funding for the public health system.
  • Advocates should leverage bipartisan support to secure funding for the public health system.
  • When characterizing public health to more conservative audiences, advocates should emphasize areas of practice other than policy development.


1. Blendon RJ, Benson JM, SteelFisher GK, Connolly JM. Americans' conflicting views about the public health system, and how to shore up support. Health Aff. 2010;29(11):2033–2040.
2. Morain S, Mello MM. Survey finds public support for legal interventions directed at health behavior to fight noncommunicable disease. Health Aff. 2013;32(3):486–496.
3. Pew Research Center. Public Holds Broadly Favorable Views of Many Federal Agencies, Including CDC and HHS. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2020.
4. McKillop M, Ilakkuvan V. The Impact of Chronic Underfunding on America's Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2019. Washington, DC: Trust for Americaʼs Health; 2019.
5. Brodie M, Hamel EC, Kirzinger A, Dijulio B. Partisanship, polling, and the Affordable Care Act. Public Opin Q. 2019;83(2):423–449.
6. Brodie M, Hamel EC, Kirzinger A, Altman DE. The past, present, and possible future of public opinion on the ACA. Health Aff. 2020;39(3):462–470.
7. Funk C, Tyson A. Partisan differences over the pandemic response are growing. Scientific American. May 30, 2020.
8. Tyson A. Republicans Remain Far Less Likely Than Democrats to View COVID-19 as a Major Threat to Public Health. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2020.
9. Gollust SE, Nagler RH, Fowler EF. The emergence of COVID-19 in the U.S.: a public health and political communication crisis. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020. doi:10.1215/03616878-8641506.
10. Robert SA, Booske BC. US opinions on health determinants and social policy as health policy. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(9):1655–1663.
11. Mello MM, Greene JA, Sharfstein JM. Attacks on public health officials during COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(8):741–742.

APPENDIX TABLE 1. List of Services

Full question:

Using a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 meaning it is NOT AT ALL important to you and 10 meaning it is VERY important to you that your local public health department does this in your community. You can choose any number between 1 and 10 depending on how important this is to you personally.

(Probe if necessary, after first 2-3 items read) Using a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 meaning it is NOT AT ALL important your local health department does this and 10 meaning it is VERY important that your local public health department does this.

The (first/next) one is... (RANDOMIZE)

APPENDIX TABLE 2. Importance of Public Health Department

Full question:

Thinking about your community...

At the local level, many factors go into having a healthy community where people can live, work, and play. I am going to read you a list of some different types of organizations or things that can help create a healthy community. For each, please tell me how important of a role you think it has in creating a healthy community for you and your family?

Please use a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 meaning it is NOT AT ALL important in creating a healthy community and 10 meaning it is VERY important in creating a healthy community. You can choose any number between 1 and 10 depending on how you feel.

(Used in this article)

  • Public Health Departments

D4A. And, in politics today, do you consider yourself... (Rotate)

  • a Republican,
  • a Democrat,

or something else?

(If Republican or Democrat, ask) Would you call yourself a STRONG (Republican/Democrat) or a NOT-SO-STRONG (Republican/Democrat)?

(If something else, ask) Do you think of yourself as closer to (Rotate) the Republican or to the Democratic Party?

  1. Strong Republican
  2. Not-So-Strong Republican
  3. Lean Republican
  4. Unaffiliated/Independent/Something Else
  5. Lean Democrat
  6. Not-So-Strong Democrat
  7. Strong Democrat
  8. Donʼt Know (Do Not Read)
  9. Refused (Do Not Read)

COVID-19; partisan gap; perception of public health; public health system; voters

© 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.