Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article: Nutrition

Family-centered Outcomes that Matter Most to Parents: A Pediatric Feeding Disorders Qualitative Study

Simione, Meg∗,†; Dartley, Anna Nicole; Cooper-Vince, Christine; Martin, Victoria; Hartnick, Christopher§; Taveras, Elsie M.∗,||; Fiechtner, Lauren∗,†

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: August 2020 - Volume 71 - Issue 2 - p 270-275
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002741
  • Free

Abstract

What Is Known/What Is New

What Is Known

  • Pediatric feeding disorders encompass a broad range of difficulties resulting in oral intake impairments.
  • To date, most research has been impairment-based and limited information exists on the daily life, social impacts, and what matters most to families.

What Is New

  • The findings of this study suggest that feeding disorders impact the daily lives of children and their families.
  • Evidence-based treatment approaches should incorporate principles of family-centered care, focus on meaningful outcomes to improve health and quality of life, and address modifiable sociocontextual determinants.

Pediatric feeding disorders are highly prevalent and encompass a broad range of difficulties resulting in oral intake impairments, including, for example, food selectivity, oral motor dysfunction, or limited appetite (1–3). Impairments in oral intake, defined as the “inability to consume sufficient food and liquids to meet nutritional and hydration requirements” may be associated with medical, nutritional, feeding skill, and/or psychosocial dysfunction (4). Pediatric feeding disorders can affect nutrition, growth, health, development, and overall well-being (5,6). Given the consequential effects of feeding disorders, it is imperative that treatment approaches focus on functional outcomes that improve overall health and quality of life (7). By capturing and understanding the experiences and perspectives of families, we can ensure treatment approaches focus on outcomes that are meaningful to families.

The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) provides a framework to describe and organize information about health and functioning (8). It conceptualizes how impairments affect a person's functioning and participation while accounting for contextual factors (ie, environmental and personal factors). By using the ICF to understand the health, functioning, and needs of children with feeding disorders, it can assist in developing standardized treatment approaches that focus on function and participation, plan future research, and inform social and healthcare policy (9–11). To date, few studies have focused on how feeding disorders affect activities and participation of daily life.

Interviews with caregivers of children with feeding disorders have revealed that feeding difficulties are perceived to be more impactful than other physically related issues, and also depicted the challenges of mealtimes and attending social functions that involve food (12,13). Treatment efficacy studies have reported outcomes that include impairment-based outcomes, as well as functional outcomes (14–16). Few research studies have, however, explored the treatment outcomes that are most meaningful to families and the contextual determinants that impact achieving those outcomes, which could be incorporated into targeted treatment approaches.

The purpose of this present study is to examine the perspectives of family caregivers of children, ages 2 to 5 years, with feeding disorders and understand their feeding impairments through the lens of the family, the impact the feeding impairment has on daily life and social participation; what matters most to caregivers; contextual determinants affecting achieving desired goals; and to characterize how treatment approaches and healthcare professionals can optimally support families. This study is a preliminary exploration of themes.

METHODS

Setting and Caregiver Interviewees

The present study was conducted at MassGeneral Hospital for Children's Center for Feeding and Nutrition in Boston, MA. The Center for Feeding and Nutrition is an interdisciplinary clinic that cares for children with feeding disorders. At the time of their child's appointment, a clinical research coordinator asked caregivers if they were interested in participating in the research study. Eligible caregivers had a child between the ages of 2 and 5 years diagnosed with a feeding disorder by a physician (as documented by ICD-10 coding) who received some proportion of oral feedings and spoke English. All caregivers were the legal custodians of their child. All children had a feeding disorder diagnosis, but their primary cause of the feeding disorder varied across the sample. Children's primary medical diagnosis collected from the medical record included neurologic/genetic, gastrointestinal, cardiac, airway, and no known diagnosis. These groupings were created based on existing classifications in the literature (17–19).

Interview Procedure

Research staff conducted semistructured interviews between December 2017 and June 2018. Study investigators, including 1 from pediatric gastroenterology and 1 from speech-language pathology, developed the interview guide reflecting the study's aims. Two parent advisors then reviewed the guide, and modifications were made accordingly. The guide was developed to mirror the ICF by including questions about feeding impairments, activities, participation, and contextual factors and to focus on modifiable determinants for future intervention development. Caregivers consented to participate and gave permission for the interview to be audio recorded. Interviews were conducted over the phone and lasted between 45 and 60 minutes. Caregivers received $30 as compensation for their participation. The Partners Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved all study procedures.

Data Analysis

Interviews were audiorecorded, professionally transcribed (Landmark Associates), and then imported into NVivo QRS 10.0 (QRS International Pty Ltd, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia). Two researchers read the first 5 transcribed interviews and created codes based on the interview guide. The individual analyses were compared, interrater reliability calculated, and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was achieved. To test interrater reliability, percentage agreement (96.2%) and a kappa coefficient (92.3) were calculated between the 2 researchers developing the codes. A third researcher then reviewed the codebook and minor modifications were made. Content analysis was used for the remaining interviews using principles of immersion-crystallization (20). This approach consists of repeatedly reviewing the interview transcriptions and determining after reflection the dominant themes that emerge. Researchers independently read the transcripts and made analytical notes and then came together as a group to identify and discuss coding, content, and emerging themes. If consensus was not achieved during the meetings, a third researcher reviewed discrepancies. Interviews and analysis continued until saturation was reached, which was the point that no new concepts were generated. Interview content and themes were reviewed weekly to determine thematic saturation among the 3 researchers. Direct quotes from the interviews were then selected to represent the themes.

After the data analyses were complete and direct quotes were selected, 2 parent advisors independently reviewed a document with the emergent themes and representative quotes and then discussed their impressions with the first author to ensure the interpretation of the data accurately represented the caregiver perspective. The parent advisors were in agreement with the themes and the discussion focused on implications of the emergent themes, specifically how services and treatment approaches can address the issues that were identified.

RESULTS

We interviewed 30 caregivers of children with feeding disorders; 83.3% of the interviewees were mothers and the mean (SD) age was 35.9 (4.7) years. The mean age of the children was 43 (13.4) months, and 66.7% were white, 13.3% were Asian, 10% were black, and 10% were more than 1 race. 30% were Hispanic (see Table 1). We identified the following themes: feeding impairments impact the daily life and social participation of children and caregivers; enhancing child health and child and family quality of life is most important to caregivers; child, caregiver, and community factors were facilitators of achieving desired outcomes; whereas time, financial, access, and knowledge factors were barriers to achieving desired outcomes; and caregivers preferred health professionals and treatment approaches that incorporated principles of family-centered care. The themes and representative quotes are shown in Table 2, and the frequency or number of caregivers who discussed different aspects of each of the themes is provided below.

T1
TABLE 1:
Sociodemographic characteristics of interview participants, n = 30
T2
TABLE 2:
Illustrative caregivers’ quotes representing the emergent themes

Impairments in Feeding Impact Daily Life and Social Participation

When asked how feeding was challenging for their child, caregivers described their child's feeding impairments, which included food selectivity (38%), limited appetite (34%), oral motor dysfunction (19%), and pharyngeal dysphagia (9%). For food selectivity, caregivers discussed their children only eating certain foods based on, for example, texture, color, or taste. Other caregivers described their child as eating a variety of age-appropriate foods, but only in small volumes. For oral motor dysfunction, children were described as having difficulty using the muscles of their mouth to eat. Finally, other caregivers discussed their children having swallowing difficulty.

We found that the feeding impairments detailed by the caregivers impacted activities of daily life, particularly during meal and snack times. The impacts included meals being longer than developmentally appropriate (n = 14), the child having difficulty sitting at the table for the duration of the meal (n = 6), and the child being messier when eating than developmentally expected (n = 5). Caregivers reported that their children required special assistance or supports when eating, such as verbal prompting, being fed by an adult, or using specialized utensils (n = 11). Caregivers also discussed their child eating better for other people than the primary caregiver, whereas for some families, the child would only eat for the primary caregiver (n = 6). In addition to activities of daily life, participation at school and social outings, including play dates, birthday parties, and family functions were also affected by the child's feeding difficulties (n = 26).

The impact of feeding disorders also affected caregivers. Because of the consequential effects of feeding disorders, caregivers felt very high-levels of stress and had challenges balancing the needs of their child with other personal, family, and work responsibilities (n = 22). Caregivers reported that they often worried about their child's health, nutrition, and weight (n = 19), and felt pressure to have their child eat and gain weight because of societal and cultural expectations (n = 7).

What Matters Most to Caregivers

Outcomes that improved their child's health and quality of life mattered most to caregivers. Caregivers reported that health-related outcomes including expanding their child's diet (n = 19), eating healthy foods and meeting nutritional needs (n = 14), and their child maintaining or gaining weight (n = 8) was of high importance to them. Quality of life-related outcomes were also important to caregivers. These included mealtimes being enjoyable and stress-free (n = 20), and the child being able to eat without medical interventions, such as medications, tube feedings, or parental prompting and assistance (n = 13).

Facilitators and Barriers to Achieving Outcomes that Mattered Most

Caregivers identified child, parent, and community factors that helped to facilitate the achievement of meaningful outcomes. Child factors included the child being healthy and free of intercurrent illnesses (n = 5), the child having an awareness of their hunger (n = 6), and establishing a child-led environment (n = 7). Caregivers reported that by providing consistent routines and approaches to feeding and minimizing pressure on the child to eat facilitated improved outcomes (n = 9). Caregivers also acknowledged the importance of their own acceptance of their child's (n = 10) and the extended family's (n = 6) acceptance of the child's feeding difficulties, and providing support was key (n = 21). Community factors, such as the availability of health care services (n = 15), connections to other caregivers of children with feeding difficulties to create a support network (n = 14), and opportunities in daycares, schools, and other community settings for the child to eat with peers (n = 5), were described by caregivers as essential to achieving meaningful outcomes.

Caregivers identified time, financial, access, and knowledge barriers that hindered their ability to achieve their desired outcomes. Caregivers discussed the time spent scheduling and traveling to the frequent appointments for their child, and the time spent shopping and preparing specialized foods (n = 13). These responsibilities often conflicted with other work and family obligations (n = 6). Caregivers discussed the expense of treatment services and purchasing the variety of specialized foods (n = 12). The lack of community-based feeding treatment services impacted caregivers being able to access services for their child (n = 11). Lack of knowledge of a “pediatric feeding disorder” was identified as a barrier. This knowledge barrier resulted in not understanding why the child was struggling to eat and family members pushing their own feeding advice (n = 7).

Characteristics of Healthcare Professionals and Treatment Approaches

Caregivers preferred healthcare professionals and treatment approaches that incorporated principles of family-centered care. Caregivers identified characteristics of healthcare professionals that were most important to them: being knowledgeable and experienced (n = 13), personable (n = 16), and available (n = 7). Healthcare professionals collaborating with caregivers and other professionals were important (n = 10). Caregivers also wanted services to be accessible in their community, and covered by insurance (n = 12).

DISCUSSION

Our study of family caregivers of children with feeding disorders revealed 4 emerging themes: feeding impairments impact the daily life and social participation of both children and their caregivers; improvements to health and quality of life are most important to caregivers; facilitators of achieving desired outcomes include child, parent, and community factors, and barriers include time, financial, access, and knowledge factors; and caregivers prefer treatment approaches that incorporate family-centered principles.

Our findings expand on previous studies by providing an in-depth and systematic understanding of the daily life and social participation impacts of pediatric feeding disorders and how to best support families. Previous studies report that the daily life of caregivers of children with feeding disorders revolves around feeding, and families are “living life on the margins” because of their child's feeding difficulties (12,13). Hewetson and Singh (12) found that caregivers perceived feeding-related issues more challenging to cope with than other physically related issues. Consistent with our findings, other qualitative and quantitative studies report that caregivers feel high-levels of worry and stress (21–23). Lefton-Greif and colleagues (22) found that caregivers, despite the presence or absence of a feeding tube, experienced similar amounts of stress and impact on their family. We enrolled children with a wide variety of medical diagnoses and found many commonalities across these children and their caregivers.

Caregivers often discussed the same concerns and challenges despite the heterogeneity in primary medical diagnoses and presence or absence of a feeding tube. For example, these concerns and challenges included participation in social activities, extended family's knowledge, and financial and time constraints. Our findings are also consistent with the literature regarding children with special healthcare needs. Studies have shown that, similarly, families of children with special health care needs experience daily life impacts, constant worry, and their social participation is affected (24,25). Additionally, families faced financial burdens related to their child's healthcare needs (25,26).

Our study used the ICF as a guide to systematically examine levels of health, functioning, and sociocontextual factors. This information has far-reaching clinical implications and can be used to improve upon existing treatment approaches, develop new approaches, and to prioritize social, educational, and healthcare policy reform (7,9). Overall, our findings reinforce the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary management approaches delivered in ecologically valid settings and that multiple agencies must be involved in the management of these children (ie, early intervention programs, early childhood programs, schools, medical centers) (27,28). We identified facilitators and barriers that impacted achieving meaningful outcomes. Some of the determinants we identified can be incorporated into existing approaches, whereas other of these determinants will require a shift in service delivery, reimbursement, and policy. Caregivers reported the lack of access to services in their community (in regards to proximity and insurance reimbursement), and similar barriers identified by Winston (13), including time and financial expenses involved with scheduling, attending, and traveling to appointments. These barriers could be addressed through the development of community-based services rather than specialized services that are predominately offered in academic medical centers. Also, by ensuring clinicians in community-based programs, such as early intervention or schools, have adequate training we can begin to decrease barriers to treatment (29,30). Caregivers also identified the lack of knowledge about feeding disorders as a factor that negatively affected outcomes; whereas having support systems that understood the feeding disorder positively affected outcomes. Treatment approaches that focus on family education and offer familial support through individual therapy or support groups can promote overall family well-being. They can also position primary caregivers to better attend to their child's needs and cope with the high levels of stress experienced when having a child with a feeding disorder (12,29).

Treatment approaches should focus on outcomes that are meaningful to caregivers and incorporate principles of family-centered care. Caregivers in this study identified meaningful outcomes that improve their child's overall health and quality of life. The process of developing meaningful goals provides an opportunity to help caregivers operationalize how these goals could be achieved. Healthcare professionals should collaborate with families to set treatment goals that are explicitly tied to concrete health and quality of life improvements and routinely measure meaningful progress towards these goals (31–34). For example, training a caregiver (ie, daycare provider, teacher) to follow a feeding protocol to expand the child's feeding skills across people and social settings could help to reduce family stress and social isolation (35). This approach also provides an additional opportunity to help caregivers and extended family members understand that supporting their child in feeding is a process of unknown duration (36,37). As discussed by caregivers in this study and other studies, evidence-based feeding treatment approaches need to incorporate principles of family-centered care to ensure family members are active members of the team and their strengths, expertise, and culture are honored (23,36). Family-centered care leads to better experiences with services and improvement in child and family health and quality-of-life outcomes (38,39). This might be achieved, for example, by asking families questions about their cultural feeding values and expectations.

As with qualitative studies, our findings are not representative of all caregivers and children with feeding disorders. Rather this study was intended to provide an in-depth understanding. We only interviewed caregivers who had children with a feeding disorder diagnosis who were receiving medical care, spoke English, and attended a center that predominately served the Greater Boston area. Our findings may have differed if our sample varied on those factors. For example, if we included caregivers who were not yet receiving medical care, we may have identified other determinants and meaningful outcomes as the period before diagnosis and initiating care can be stressful and challenging for families (40). We did not explore the heterogeneity of this population, and therefore, are unable to draw conclusions about differences between etiologies or types of feeding dysfunction. Two parent advisors reviewed the interview guide and the emergent themes but caregivers did not assist with the development of these materials or analysis, which would have provided a different perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric feeding disorders impact the lives of children and their families, and thus creating effective treatment approaches that incorporate what matters most to families can greatly improve the quality of life of children and their caregivers. Caregivers preferred outcomes that improved their child's health and quality of life. Some of the sociocontextual determinants we identified that facilitated or impeded progress towards meaningful outcomes were modifiable and can be incorporated into new or existing treatment approaches, whereas others will require paradigm shifts and policy changes. Given the tremendous impacts of feeding disorders, it is important that clinicians use evidence-based treatment approaches and incorporate principles of family-centered care to best support caregivers and children.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the parent advisors for this study, Lindsey Baker and Laura Putnam, and all the parents who participated in interviews.

REFERENCES

1. Linscheid TR, Budd KS, Rasnake LK. Pediatric feeding problems. Handbook of Pediatric, Psychology 3rd ed.New York: Guilford Press; 2003; 482–498.
2. Miller CK. Updates on pediatric feeding and swallowing problems. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17:194–199.
3. Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of pediatric voice and swallowing problems in the United States. Laryngoscope 2014; 125:746–750.
4. Goday PS, Huh SY, Silverman A, et al. Pediatric feeding disorder: consensus definition and conceptual framework. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68:
5. Grantham-McGregor SM, Ani CC. Fernstrom JD, Uauy R, Arroyo P. Undernutrition and mental development. Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series Clinical & Performance Program. Basel: Vevey/S. Karger AG; 2001. 1–18.
6. Manikam R, Perman JA. Pediatric feeding disorders. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 30:34–46.
7. Lefton-Greif MA, Arvedson JC. Pediatric feeding/swallowing: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Semin Speech Lang 2016; 1:298–309.
8. Functioning, Disability Reference Group. The ICF: An Overview. World Health Organization. 2010. pp. 1--10.
9. Threats TT. Use of the ICF in dysphagia management. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28:323–333.
10. Lefton-Greif MA, Arvedson JC. Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders: state of health, population trends, and application of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 1:161–165.
11. Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 2006; 86:726–734.
12. Hewetson R, Singh S. The lived experience of mothers of children with chronic feeding and/or swallowing difficulties. Dysphagia 2009; 24:322–332.
13. Winston K. Feeding a child with mealtime challenges: a mother's work. Work 2015; 50:443–450.
14. Sharp, William G, Jaquess DL, et al. Pediatric feeding disorders: a quantitative synthesis of treatment outcomes. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2010; 13:348–365.
15. Gosa MM, Carden HT, Threadgill AY, et al. Evidence to support treatment options for children with swallowing and feeding disorders: a systematic review. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2017; 10:107–136.
16. Marshall J, Ware R, Ziviani J, et al. Efficacy of interventions to improve feeding difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev 2014; 41:278–302.
17. Rommel N, De Meyer A-M, Feenstra L, et al. The complexity of feeding problems in 700 infants and young children presenting to a tertiary care institution. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003; 37:75–84.
18. Burklow KA, Phelps AN, Schultz JR, et al. Classifying complex pediatric feeding disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 27:143–147.
19. Rybak A. Organic and nonorganic feeding disorders. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 66:16–22.
20. Borkan J. Immersion/crystallization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.
21. Franklin L, Rodger S. Parents’ perspectives on feeding medically compromised children: Implications for occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J 2003; 50:137–147.
22. Lefton-Greif MA, Okelo SO, Wright JM, et al. Impact of children's feeding/swallowing problems: validation of a new caregiver instrument. Dysphagia 2014; 29:671–677.
23. Sleigh GN. Mothers’ voice: a qualitative study on feeding children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2005; 31:373–383.
24. Thomson J, Shah S, Simmons J, et al. Financial and social hardships in families of children with medical complexity. J Pediatr 2016; 172:187–193.
25. Caicedo C. Families with special needs children: family health, functioning, and care burden. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 2014; 20:398–407.
26. Lindley L, Mark B. Children with special health care needs: Impact of health care expenditures on family financial burden. J Child Fam Stud 2010; 19:79–89.
27. Sharp WG, Volkert VM, Scahill L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intensive multidisciplinary intervention for pediatric feeding disorders: How standard is the standard of care? J Pediatr 2017; 181:116–124.
28. Mccomish C, Brackett K, Kelly M, et al. Interdisciplinary feeding team: a medical, motor, behavioral approach to complex pediatric feeding problems. Am J Matern Nurs 2016; 41:230–236.
29. Stoner JB, Bailey RL, Angell ME, et al. Perspectives of parents/guardians of children with feeding/swallowing problems. J Dev Phys Disabil 2006; 18:333–353.
30. Zimmerman E. Pediatric dysphagia: a rise in preterm infants and a need for more formal training for speech-language pathologists. Int J Gynecol Obstet Neonatal Care 2016; 3:15–20.
31. Petersen TJ, Sprich SE, Wilhelm S. Humana Press, The Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. New York:2016.
32. Kazantzis N, Shinkfield G. Conceptualizing patient barriers to nonadherence with homework assignments. Cogn Behav Pract 2007; 14:317–324.
33. Silverman AH. Interdisciplinary care for feeding problems in children. Nutr Clin Pract 2010; 25:160–165.
34. Bruns DA, Thompson SD. Feeding challenges in young children: toward a best practices model. Infants Young Child 2010; 23:93–102.
35. Bruns D, Thomson S. Turning mealtimes into learning opportunities: integrating feeding goals into IEPs. Teach Except Child 2014; 46:179–186.
36. Estrem HH, Pados BF, Thoyre S, et al. Concept of pediatric feeding problems from the parent perspective. MCN Am J Matern Nurs 2016; 41:212–220.
37. Estrem HH, Thoyre SM, Knafl KA, et al. It's a long-term process”: description of daily family life when a child has a feeding disorder. J Pediatr Heal Care 2019; 32:340–347.
38. King S, Teplicky R, King G, et al. Family-centered service for children with cerebral palsy and their families: a review of the literature. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2004; 11:78–86.
39. Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Arango P, et al. Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16:297–305.
40. Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Linn C, Thompson HL, et al. Preliminary study of a caregiver- based infant and child feeding and swallowing screening tool. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017; 64:979–983.
Keywords:

caregiver experiences; children; feeding problems; pediatric dysphagia

Copyright © 2020 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition