Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles: Nutrition

Energy Balance in Critically Ill Children With Severe Sepsis Using Indirect Calorimetry: A Prospective Cohort Study

Ismail, Javed; Bansal, Arun; Jayashree, Muralidharan; Nallasamy, Karthi; Attri, Savita V.

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: June 2019 - Volume 68 - Issue 6 - p 868-873
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002314

Abstract

What Is Known

  • Indirect calorimetry is the criterion standard in measuring energy needs in a clinical setting.
  • Nutritional requirements in critically ill children are dynamic and malnutrition adversely affects outcomes.

What Is New

  • Persistent negative energy and nitrogen balance exist during first week of treatment of critically ill children with severe sepsis.
  • Predictive equations are inaccurate for estimating energy needs in children with severe sepsis.
  • Underweight children have higher baseline resting energy expenditure during critical illness.

Nutritional support is a basic component of clinical management of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Malnutrition in PICU is common, more so in developing countries (1). Common reasons for underfeeding are improper nutritional assessment, delayed initiation, and frequent interruption of feeds. This can lead to calorie and protein deficit which in turn may result in protein catabolism, decreased respiratory muscle strength, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and PICU stay (2). Improper nutritional assessment can also lead to overfeeding, which can cause hepatic steatosis, hyperglycemia, increased risk of infection, and prolonged mechanical ventilation (3). Nutritional status of these children further worsens due to increased metabolic demand during the course of critical illness and may have a negative impact on clinical outcome. Therefore, to fulfill the energy demands of these children, an accurate estimation of energy needs is essential.

Resting energy expenditure (REE) is the amount of energy expended at rest in 24 hours. Commonly, various predictive equations (Schofield equation, Harris-Benedict equation, and FAO/WHO/UNU equations) have been used to estimate the REE. The criterion standard to measure REE is using indirect calorimetry (IC). IC measures the respiratory gas exchange and gives a reliable estimate of REE independent of severity of illness or baseline nutritional status (4). But not many centers follow nutritional guidelines and very few use routine IC. In a worldwide survey of 156 PICU's in 52 countries, only 52% of centers had a nutritional protocol and only 14% use IC (5).

REE depends on the ongoing metabolic demand which in turn depends on the nature of disease. Children with traumatic brain injury and severe burns were found to be hypermetabolic, whereas children admitted in medical PICU were hypometabolic when measured REE (mREE) was measured using IC (3,6,7). Few studies in children with burns, post-op congenital heart disease, and critically ill requiring ventilation have concluded that the predictive equations do not accurately estimate energy needs in PICU (6,8,9). They may either under or overestimate the energy needs. The American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommends the routine use of IC for estimation of REE (10).

There are no studies in ventilated children with “severe sepsis” measuring energy balance using IC and comparing it with predictive equations. Therefore, we planned to study the energy needs using IC in children with severe sepsis. We further planned to calculate the energy balance, nitrogen balance, and to compare the mREE with predicted REE (pREE).

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective observational study. All consecutive children ages 5 to 12 years with severe sepsis (11) requiring mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care PICU of North India from May 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled. We excluded children having chest tube with an active air leak, bronchopleural fistula, ventilator circuit leak >10%, FiO2 ≥60% or those on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee and the study protocol was registered with Clinical Trial Registry, India (CTRI/2017/12/010982). A written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians before enrollment.

OBJECTIVES

Primary

The aim of the study was to study the daily energy balance (difference between mREE and total caloric intake) in children with severe sepsis.

Secondary

  • 1. To determine the nitrogen balance using 24-hour urinary nitrogen method
  • 2. To determine the agreement of mREE with pREE using Schofield (12), Harris-Benedict (13), and FAO/WHO/UNU (14) equations
  • 3. To determine the correlation of severity of illness (using PRISM III, Sequential Organ Function Assessment [SOFA] score, and Vasoactive Inotropic Score [VIS]) with mREE.

Clinical Characteristics

Baseline demographic, anthropometric, severity of illness (PRISM III (15), daily SOFA (16), and daily VIS (17)) and nutritional details were recorded in predesigned proforma. WHO z scores for weight-for-age, height-for-age, and basal metabolic index (BMI) were calculated in all children and then classified as normal (BMI z score ≥ −2 to <+1); underweight (BMI z score <−2 z); overweight (BMI z score ≥1–<2); or obese (if BMI z score ≥2 z) (18).

Nutritional Characteristics

Nutritional data including time of commencement of feeds, route of nutritional support, daily calorie, and protein intakes were measured. As per our unit policy, type of feed, timing of initiation, and hiking of feeds were done uniformly. Volume of feed was based on Holliday-Segar equation (19). Targeted calories were 50 to 60 kcal · kg−1 · day−1 and proteins 1.5 to 2 g · kg−1 · day−1(20).

pREE was calculated using Schofield's (12), Harris-Benedict (13), and FAO/WHO/UNU (14) equations. IC measurements were taken between day 1 and 7 or till extubation, whichever was earlier. First measurement was taken preferably within 24 hours but definitely within 48 hours. Measurements were done by the primary investigator (J.I.) after undergoing required training from the technical experts. Recommended prerequisites and procedure of IC were followed (eTable 1). Calorimetric measurements were made using a portable metabolic cart (Quark RMR, COSMED). It measures resting oxygen consumption (Vo2), carbon dioxide production (Vco2), and respiratory quotient. REE was autocalculated from these parameters using Weir equation.

Nitrogen Balance

Difference between daily total nitrogen intake and loss was calculated as per the equation below.

Nitrogen balance (g/day) = (protein intake (g/day)/6.25) – (UUN g/day × 1.25) (21).

To measure urinary urea nitrogen (UUN), 24-hour urine was collected daily for 7 days or till Foley catheter was in situ. From this, 3 mL of urine was collected daily and frozen at −80oC. UUN was estimated on clinical chemistry analyzer (Advia 1800). Total urinary nitrogen excretion was estimated using a factor of 1.25 to account for nonurea nitrogen (21).

Definitions

Energy balance—difference between mREE and total caloric intake.

Ventilation-free days—1 point for each day during the measurement period that patient is both alive and free of mechanical ventilation.

Schofield equations(12)

3 to 10 years

Boys: (19.6 × weight kg) + (1.033 × height cm) + 414.9 Girls: (16.97 × weight kg) + (1.618 × height cm) + 371.2

10 to 18 years

Boys: (16.25 × weight kg) + (1.372 × height cm) + 515.5 Girls: (8.365 × weight kg) + (4.65 × height cm) + 200

Harris-Benedict equation(13)

Boys: 66.47 + 13.75 × weight in kg + 5.0 × Height − 6.76 × age

Girls: REE = 655.10 + 9.56 × weight in kg + 1.85 × Height − 4.68 × age

FAO/WHO/UNU equation(14)

3 to 10 years

Boys: 22.7 × weight in kg + 495

Girls: 22.5 × weight in kg + 499

10 to 18 years

Boys: 17.5 × weight + 651

Girls: 12.2 × weight + 746

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive analysis of continuous outcomes was summarized as mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile range [IQR]) as appropriate. Analysis of variance was used to compare nonparametric continuous data and Chi square test to compare categorical variables. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine the significance between variables at different time points. Spearman correlation coefficient (rho) was used to determine the correlation between 2 variables. Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between pREE and mREE. Generalized estimate equation model was used to compare the 2 groups of repeated variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant. STATA 11.0 package was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Total of 40 patients (24 boys) with a median (IQR) age 7 (5.2, 10) years were included in the study (Figure, Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/MPG/B610). Seven children (17.5%) were underweight and 1 was obese. Acute CNS infections (n = 18; 45%) and severe pneumonia (n = 7; 17.5%) were the commonest admitting diagnosis. Mean (±SD) PRISM III score was 19 ± 7, with calculated risk of mortality being 30%. Thirty-five children were on vasoactive support. A total of 4 children died (10%). Median (IQR) ventilation-free days were 19 (11, 22) days (Table 1). Four children developed health care–associated infection.

TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Descriptive characteristics

Nutritional Characteristics

All patients were started on enteral feeds by 12 (6, 19) hours of admission. Full feeds were achieved in all by median (IQR) time of 58 (44, 71) hours. Total of 176 IC measurements were obtained in 40 children with an average of 4 per patient. Mean ± SD mREE for all patients was 1123 ± 310 kcal or 51 ± 17 kcal/kg and the mean ± SD respiratory quotient was 0.77 ± 0.07.

Outcomes

Mean daily energy balance was negative on all the days of measurement. Mean ± SD cumulative energy balance per patient over 7 days was −1761 ± 2226 kcal. Nitrogen balance was negative for initial 5 days and then improved on day 6 and 7 (Table 2).

TABLE 2
TABLE 2:
Energy and nitrogen balance

Agreement of Predicted Energy Expenditure and Measured Resting Energy Expenditure

Average predicted energy expenditure by Schofield was 984 ± 176; Harris-Benedict was 1000 ± 132 and FAO/WHO/UNU was 1011 ± 166 kcal. None of these equations were in agreement with mREE on Bland-Altman plots. The mean (2SD) energy difference with mREE for Schofield was 139 (537) kcal (P = 0.002); for Harris-Benedict was 123 (536) kcal (P = 0.006) and for FAO/WHO/UNU was 113 (542) kcal (P = 0.012) (Fig. 2, Supplemental Digital Content 2, https://links.lww.com/MPG/B610). The predictive equations were accurate in estimating REE within ±10% of mREE in 29.5% of measurements using Schofield; 25% using Harris-Benedict and 29.5% using FAO/WHO/UNU equations. In rest, these equations either underestimate (Schofield 44.3%; Harris-Benedict 46%; FAO/WHO/UNU 41%) or overestimate REE (Schofield 26.2%; Harris-Benedict 29%; FAO/WHO/UNU 29.5%) (Table 3).

TABLE 3
TABLE 3:
Number of measurements within ±10% range of measured resting energy expenditure using predictive equation

Correlation of Measured Resting Energy Expenditure With Disease Severity and Baseline Nutrition Status

None of the severity indices such as PRISM III, daily SOFA score, and daily VIS showed any correlation with mREE (Table 4). Cumulative energy balance over 7 days correlated positively with the ventilation-free days (P = 0.048). On regression analysis no parameter was, however, predictive of either mortality or ventilation-free days (Table 4). Mean mREE was significantly higher in underweight group (68 ± 24 kcal/kg) compared to nonunderweight group (48 ± 12 kcal/kg); P = 0.025 (eTable 2).

TABLE 4
TABLE 4:
Correlation of calorie and nitrogen balance with severity of illness and outcomes

DISCUSSION

Optimization of nutrition is critical in the management of septic children. Both undernutrition and overnutrition can lead to delayed recovery and metabolic complications. REE is highly variable in critically ill children as it is influenced by anthropometry (lean body mass) (22,23), disease state, and PICU interventions (sedation, neuromuscular blockade (24,25), ventilation, temperature control (26), and vasoactive medications (27)). Stress response to severe infection may result in variable immunological, metabolic, or endocrine alterations each of which has an influence on REE (28). This makes REE unpredictable, signifying the need for its actual measurement. We measured REE using IC, calculated actual caloric intake, and the difference was computed to derive energy balance daily. In our study, we demonstrated that critically ill septic children have a persistent negative energy and nitrogen balance during initial week of illness.

Metabolic rate increases significantly during stress states like burns, trauma, or head injury. In a cohort of children with head injury, the energy expenditure was found to vary from hyper- to hypometabolic state and was largely influenced by the interventions such as sedation, neuromuscular blockage, and barbiturates (7). In patients with burns, mREE was about 1.5 times higher than that of pREE (6). In a study on 57 children by Taylor et al (29), mainly postsurgery or liver failure, they, however, reported median REE of 37.2 kcal · kg−1 · day−1. Evidence on REE in pediatric severe sepsis is scant. Oosterveld et al (30) in a subgroup analysis of 13 children with sepsis demonstrated a higher mREE (51.4 ± 16 kcal · kg−1 · day−1) compared to subgroup of post-surgery (42.3 ± 14 kcal · kg−1 · day−1) or trauma (35.5 ± 8 kcal · kg−1 · day−1) patients. The mREE in our cohort (51 ± 17 kcal · kg−1 · day−1) was similar to that of Oosterveld et al (30). Higher mREE in sepsis than surgical cases could be due to presumed increase in metabolic needs. An adult study on critically ill septic patients reported poor outcomes with high metabolic rate (31). We also observed high mREE in underweight children. This explains the fact that underweight children have high energy deficit; further precipitated by critical illness and sepsis (32). These children therefore have higher energy requirement.

We could not achieve target energy intake of 50 to 60 kcal · kg−1 · day−1 in 12 of 17 children at day 5 despite starting enteral feeds early (median 12 hours). This implies that majority of our patients were underfed. In contrast, Jotterand Chaparro et al (33) could achieve 58 kcal · kg−1 · day−1 in critically ill to achieve neutral energy and nitrogen balance. The reason for not achieving the target could be due to increased severity of illness, feeding interruptions due to various reasons and majority of patients on vasoactives. Thus, underfeeding predominated in our cohort. This is in contrast to western PICUs where there is a prevalent risk of overfeeding (3). The positive correlation between cumulative energy balance and ventilation-free days in our study implies that underfed are at risk of decreased respiratory muscle strength thereby leading to prolonged ventilation. This is in accordance with Briassoulis et al (34), who reported that, underfeeding negatively influenced the outcomes in these children. We did not find any association between mREE and outcomes like mortality or ventilator-free days.

Previous studies in critically ill postcardiac surgery and head injury children have demonstrated positive nitrogen balance by day 5 with a protein intake of at least 1.5 g · kg−1 · day−1(35–37). We too observed a similar pattern. Negative nitrogen balance during initial 5 days can be explained by sepsis-induced catabolism or protein intake less than target, resulting in increased muscle protein breakdown, halting of anabolic protein synthesis and shunting of metabolites to synthesis of acute phase reactants. This results in fall of circulating serum protein levels as evident with low serum albumin levels (2.6 ± 0.6 g/dL) in our cohort. If prolonged, this may lead to loss of lean body mass. Different methods have been used in calculating total nitrogen loss among various studies (20). Total urinary nitrogen measured directly is more accurate but less feasible compared to others which estimate nitrogen loss from UUN with or without a correction factor. In this study, we estimated UUN and used a correction factor to account for nonurea nitrogen losses. Although this method is less accurate in critically ill children with rapidly changing physiology, this was the only feasible method in our setting. Same method has been used in many other studies as well (35,36,38).

Various studies have tried multiple predictive equations to predict energy needs in different settings. None of these equations have been able to predict REE within ±10% of mREE in >50% of patients (39). Harris-Benedict equation was least accurate of all with adequate prediction in only one fourth of the cases. The reason for this could be that Harris-Benedict was derived from >16-year-old volunteers and extrapolated to infants and children. The other reason for these equations to be inefficient is that all 3 are derived from healthy volunteers and may not be accurate in dynamically evolving critically ill children. Our study showed that the 3 commonly used predictive equations (Schofield, Harris-Benedict, FAO/WHO/UNU) underestimated mREE in severe sepsis children thereby implying that predicted values are lower than the actual energy needs. The recent study by Jotterand Chaparro et al (40) in predominantly postsurgical patients, evaluated the accuracy of 15 equations using differential and proportional bias method and Bland-Altman plots. Most of these equations underestimated or overestimated REE. In contrast to our data, in adults with sepsis, mREE values correlated well with Harris-Benedict and Schofield equation–derived pREE (41). A stress multiplication factor ranging from 1.1 and 1.6 was, however, used to derive pREE, which is not the current practice in children (42).

The metabolic response to critical illness such as trauma, surgery, burns, or sepsis is variable from hypermetabolic to a hypometabolic state in children (6,43,44). Also, the duration of this response is unpredictable with sustained response seen for weeks after severe burns to a short-lived response after surgeries (6,43). Physician's assessment of this metabolic response may not be accurate in approximately 60% of patients (3). This reiterates the fact that these predictive equations are not useful in such metabolically unstable children and may require regular IC measurements as recommended by American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guidelines (10). IC is, however, not available in most of the centers. Main reasons are cost, time-consuming measurements, and difficult to perform in spontaneously breathing or in noninvasive ventilation. Given the inaccuracies of the predictive equations and the wide variability of the REE in critically ill children, IC, however, appears to be the way forward.

In a study by Briassoulis et al (45), nitrogen balance was negatively correlated with PRISM, mortality, and multiorgan dysfunction. Other studies examining correlation of PRISM with mREE, however, found no correlation (46,47). We found that severity of illness has no association with energy needs. Although we hypothesized that use of catecholamines may be associated with a higher metabolic rate, we could not find any significant association of daily VIS score with mREE.

We could demonstrate a significant positive correlation between cumulative energy balance and ventilation-free days rho = 0.31 (P = 0.048). Similar association has been reported in literature with decrease in mortality with increasing enteral feeds (48). Another study showed that increase in caloric intake by 1000 kcal/day significantly decreased mortality in adults (49).

Strengths and Limitations

This is the first study in critically ill children with severe sepsis on ventilator evaluating the energy balance using IC. We followed standard protocols including the prerequisites for calorimetry, appropriate calibration, achieving steady state, and performed calorimetry for a recommended duration of 30 minutes daily. We also calculated daily nitrogen balance. Our study had few limitations. Firstly, it was a single-center study with small sample size. Secondly, the included patients may have been at various stages of their illness which could not be accounted. Thirdly, we did not assess the body composition of our patients and reasons for interruption to feeding. Finally, we did not include children younger than 5 years of age, as our metabolic cart has a minimal bias flow, which could not be attained in them. Data from larger multicentric trials involving different categories of baseline nutritional status and sepsis etiologies will help in developing accurate predictive equations and nutrition guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive equations are inaccurate in estimating the REE in critically ill children with severe sepsis. IC remains the criterion standard for accurate assessment of energy intake and it should be considered in all patients with metabolic disturbances in addition to anthropometry-based nutritional assessment. Underweight children have higher baseline REE. Titration of caloric and protein intake based on individual needs may improve the outcomes.

REFERENCES

1. Bagri NK, Jose B, Shah SK, et al. Impact of malnutrition on the outcome of critically ill children. Indian J Pediatr 2015; 82:601–605.
2. Costa CAD, Tonial CT, Garcia PCR. Association between nutritional status and outcomes in critically-ill pediatric patients—a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2016; 92:223–229.
3. Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Dolan M, et al. Energy imbalance and the risk of overfeeding in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12:398–405.
4. Botrán M, López-Herce J, Mencía S, et al. Relationship between energy expenditure, nutritional status and clinical severity before starting enteral nutrition in critically ill children. Br J Nutr 2011; 105:731–737.
5. Kerklaan D, Fivez T, Mehta NM, et al. Worldwide survey of nutritional practices in PICUs∗. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016; 17:10–18.
6. Suman OE, Mlcak RP, Chinkes DL, et al. Resting energy expenditure in severely burned children: analysis of agreement between indirect calorimetry and prediction equations using the Bland-Altman method. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj 2006; 32:335–342.
7. Mtaweh H, Smith R, Kochanek PM, et al. Energy expenditure in children after severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15:242–249.
8. De Wit B, Meyer R, Desai A, et al. Challenge of predicting resting energy expenditure in children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Crit Care MedV 11 2010; 496–501.
9. Vazquez Martinez JL, Martinez-Romillo PD, Diez Sebastian J, et al. Predicted versus measured energy expenditure by continuous, online indirect calorimetry in ventilated, critically ill children during the early postinjury period. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004; 5:19–27.
10. Mehta NM, Compher C. A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support of the critically ill child. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2009; 33:260–276.
11. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:165–228.
12. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39 (suppl 1):5–41.
13. Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1918; 4:370–373.
14. Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. World Health Organ Tech Rep Se 2007; 935:1–265.
15. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:743–752.
16. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707–710.
17. McIntosh AM, Tong S, Deakyne SJ, et al. Validation of the vasoactive-inotropic score in pediatric sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017; 18:750–757.
18. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450:76–85.
19. Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatr Anesth 1995; 5:96–196.
20. Bechard LJ, Parrott JS, Mehta NM. Systematic review of the influence of energy and protein intake on protein balance in critically ill children. J Pediatr 2012; 161:333.e1–339.e1.
21. Flatt JP, Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR. Urinary urea excretion and evaluation of the nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992; 16:191–192.
22. Cameron JD, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, et al. Body composition and energy intake—skeletal muscle mass is the strongest predictor of food intake in obese adolescents: the HEARTY trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41:611–617.
23. Morrison JA, Alfaro MP, Khoury P, et al. Determinants of resting energy expenditure in young black girls and young white girls. J Pediatr 1996; 129:637–642.
24. Lemson J, Driessen JJ, Van der Hoeven JG. The effect of neuromuscular blockade on oxygen consumption in sedated and mechanically ventilated pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:2268–2272.
25. Vernon DD, Witte MK. Effect of neuromuscular blockade on oxygen consumption and energy expenditure in sedated, mechanically ventilated children. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1569–1571.
26. Holzinger U, Brunner R, Losert H, et al. Resting energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates correlate to temperature and outcome after cardiac arrest—a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Care 2015; 19:128.
27. Briassoulis G, Venkataraman S, Thompson AE. Energy expenditure in critically ill children. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1166–1172.
28. Briassoulis G, Venkataraman S, Thompson A. Cytokines and metabolic patterns in pediatric patients with critical illness. Clin Dev Immunol 2010; 2010:354047.
29. Taylor RM, Cheeseman P, Preedy V, et al. Can energy expenditure be predicted in critically ill children? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003; 4:176–180.
30. Oosterveld MJS, Van Der Kuip M, De Meer K, et al. Energy expenditure and balance following pediatric intensive care unit admission: a longitudinal study of critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7:147–153.
31. Wu C, Wang X, Yu W, et al. Hypermetabolism in the initial phase of intensive care is related to a poor outcome in severe sepsis patients. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 66:188–195.
32. Vásquez-Garibay EM. Gasto energético en niños con parálisis cerebral infantil Y. Nutr Hosp 2015; 31:2062–2069.
33. Jotterand Chaparro C, Laure Depeyre J, Longchamp D, et al. How much protein and energy are needed to equilibrate nitrogen and energy balances in ventilated critically ill children? Clin Nutr 2016; 35:460–467.
34. Briassoulis GC, Zavras NJ, Hatzis MDTD. Effectiveness and safety of a protocol for promotion of early intragastric feeding in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2001; 2:113–121.
35. Botrán M, López-Herce J, Mencía S, et al. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill child: comparison of standard and protein-enriched diets. J Pediatr 2011; 159:27.e1–32.e1.
36. Briassoulis G, Filippou O, Kanariou M, et al. Temporal nutritional and inflammatory changes in children with severe head injury fed a regular or an immune-enhancing diet: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7:56–62.
37. Chaloupecký V, Hucín B, Tláskal T, et al. Nitrogen balance, 3-methylhistidine excretion, and plasma amino acid profile in infants after cardiac operations for congenital heart defects: the effect of early nutritional support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114:1053–1060.
38. Van Waardenburg DA, De Betue CT, Van Goudoever JB, et al. Critically ill infants benefit from early administration of protein and energy-enriched formula: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr 2009; 28:249–255.
39. Jotterand Chaparro C, Moullet C, Taffé P, et al. Estimation of resting energy expenditure using predictive equations in critically ill children: results of a systematic review. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2018; 42:976–986.
40. Jotterand Chaparro C, Taffé P, Moullet C, et al. Performance of predictive equations specifically developed to estimate resting energy expenditure in ventilated critically ill children. J Pediatr 2017; 184:220.e5–226.e5.
41. Subramaniam A, McPhee M, Nagappan R. Predicting energy expenditure in sepsis: Harris-Benedict and Schofield equations versus the Weir derivation. Crit Care Resusc 2012; 14:202–210.
42. Mehta NM, Skillman HE, Irving SY, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2017; 41:706–742.
43. Jaksic T, Shew SB, Keshen TH, et al. Do critically ill surgical neonates have increased energy expenditure? J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36:63–67.
44. Van de Wiele B, Askanazi J. Energy metabolism in injury and sepsis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1986; 5:25–29.
45. Briassoulis G, Tsorva A, Zavras N, et al. Influence of an aggressive early enteral nutrition protocol on nitrogen balance in critically ill children. J Nutr Biochem 2002; 13:560.
46. White MS, Shepherd RW, McEniery JA. Energy expenditure in 100 ventilated, critically ill children: improving the accuracy of predictive equations. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:2307–2312.
47. Coss-Bu JA, Klish WJ, Walding D, et al. Energy metabolism, nitrogen balance, and substrate utilization in critically ill children. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74:664–669.
48. Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Cahill N, et al. Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children—an international multicenter cohort study∗. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2204–2211.
49. Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1728–1737.
Keywords:

indirect calorimetry; predictive equations; resting energy expenditure; severe sepsis

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2019 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition