Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Long-term Treatment With Proton Pump Inhibitors Is Effective in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Gutiérrez-Junquera, Carolina*; Fernández-Fernández, Sonia; Cilleruelo, M. Luz*; Rayo, Ana; Echeverría, Luis; Borrell, Belén; Román, Enriqueta*

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: August 2018 - Volume 67 - Issue 2 - p 210–216
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001952
Original Articles: Gastroenterology: Eosinophilic GI Disorders
Free

Objectives: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is frequently observed in children, but data on long-term treatment are scarce. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of PPIs in children with EoE.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled children with EoE and histological remission to an 8-week esomeprazole trial (1 mg/kg/dose, twice daily). Esomeprazole was maintained at 1 mg/kg/day for 1 year. Symptom recurrence and adverse events were monitored and a follow-up endoscopy was performed at 12 months. Complete histological remission was defined as ≤5 eosinophils/high-power field (eos/hpf), and partial histological remission as >5 and <15 eos/hpf. Patients had no concomitant dietary restrictions or topical steroid.

Results: Fifty-seven children were included. Histological remission on maintenance PPI therapy was present in 40 children (70.1%; 95% CI 56.5–81.5). Long-term remission rate was higher in children with initial complete histological remission than in those with partial remission (81% vs 50%, P = 0.014). Forty-nine children (86%) remained asymptomatic. Pretreatment clinical and histological findings and median PPI dose/kg/day were similar between relapsers and nonrelapsers. Eleven out of 12 children (91.6%) receiving esomeprazole 0.5 mg · kg−1 · day−1 for 12 additional months remained in remission. Mild and transient side effects without requiring PPI avoidance were observed in 5 children.

Conclusions: Up to 70% of children with PPI-responsive EoE remain in histological and clinical remission on a low-dose maintenance treatment at 1-year follow-up, with adequate safety profile. Complete histological remission to an 8-week PPI trial was associated with higher probability of histological remission on maintenance therapy.

*Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid

Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés

Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid, Spain.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Carolina Gutiérrez-Junquera, PhD, Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Calle Manuel de Falla 1, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (e-mail: carolina.gutijun@salud.madrid.org).

Received 16 January, 2018

Accepted 19 February, 2018

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

What Is Known

  • Almost 60% of children with eosinophilic esophagitis respond to high-dose proton pump inhibitor induction treatment.
  • Small case series have suggested that proton pump inhibitor responsiveness in children with eosinophilic esophagitis is a transient phenomenon.
  • Studies in adults with proton pump inhibitor-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis have shown that 70 to 80% present histological remission on maintenance treatment.

What Is New

  • Proton pump inhibitor responsiveness is not a transient phenomenon in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Around 70% of children on a low proton pump inhibitor dose maintain histological remission after 1 year of treatment.
  • Complete histological remission to an 8-week proton pump inhibitor trial was associated with a higher probability of histological remission on maintenance treatment.

See “A New Paradigm in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Proton Pump Inhibitors Are Safe, Aim for “Deep Remission” ” by Ellison and Philpott on page 146.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging disease in children in Western countries with a significant increase in its incidence since 2008 (1). Nowadays, EoE is one of the most prevalent esophageal diseases and is the leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children.

EoE is a chronic disorder characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation confined to the esophagus. Diagnosis criteria established in 2011 included the persistence of ≥15 eosinophil (eos)/high-power field (hpf) after a PPI trial in order to exclude gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) (2). This latter disorder refers to patients with EoE phenotype and esophageal eosinophilia, which respond to PPI treatment.

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that around 50% of adults and children with esophageal eosinophilia respond to PPI (3). In a prospective study, we observed that 68% of children with esophageal eosinophilia and esophageal dysfunction presented histological remission with an 8-week PPI trial (4).

Over the past few years, evolving evidence has emerged that PPI-REE has similar characteristics to those of EoE at clinical, endoscopic, histological, molecular, and genetic levels, which are very different from those of GERD (5). In 2017, this was incorporated into a new definition of EoE as a chronic, local immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation (6). A PPI trial is not needed, and PPI should be considered as another treatment as swallowed steroids or elimination diets.

Chronicity is the main characteristic of EoE, so maintenance treatment is important. Nevertheless, there are scarce efficacy data on long-term PPI treatment in EoE. Clinical-histological recurrence was reported in 2 retrospective series of children with EoE under maintenance PPI treatment (7,8). On the contrary, data from 2 studies in adults with EoE showed that between 73% and 81% of patients stay in remission with long-term, low-dose PPI treatment (9,10).

Although PPI are considered safe drugs, recent concerns about possible adverse events have appeared mainly in adults (11). Data on the safety of chronic PPI use in children are scarce (12).

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term PPI treatment in children with EoE.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted at 2 pediatric hospitals in Madrid between February 2013 and August 2017. We included consecutive children from 1 month to 15 years of age who fulfilled criteria for EoE diagnosis according to the recently published evidence-based European guidelines (6) and presented remission to an 8-week esomeprazole trial. Patients were newly diagnosed with EoE; the results of the initial 8-week esomeprazole trial were previously published (4).

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients or parents gave their consent to participate in the study. Approvals from the Ethics Committee at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda and Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa were obtained.

Inclusion criteria were:

  1. At least one esophageal dysfunction symptom such as heartburn, chest pain, food impaction, abdominal pain, vomiting, regurgitation, dysphagia, and feeding difficulties and;
  2. Esophageal eosinophilia, defined as the presence of ≥15 eos/hpf (peak value) in 1 or more biopsy samples and;
  3. Histological remission to an 8-week esomeprazole trial, defined as <15 eos/hpf.

Children were excluded if they were receiving concomitant treatment with swallowed or oral steroids and/or elimination diet or had eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study Design

Children with esophageal symptoms underwent basal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy sampling. Treatment with esomeprazole (1 mg · kg−1 · dose−1 twice a day, maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) was initiated for 8 weeks and a second upper endoscopy with esophageal biopsies was performed while on-treatment.

Responders continued on PPI treatment at a maintenance dose (esomeprazole 1 · kg−1 · dose−1 once a day, maximum dose 40 mg once a day). Clinical follow-up was performed every 3 months, and possible adverse effects, clinical outcomes, and adherence to treatment were recorded. Endoscopy was performed at the time of clinical recurrence, worsening of symptoms, or at 1 year from diagnosis in cases where patients remained asymptomatic.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Clinical and Laboratory Data

Baseline clinical and demographic data were recorded, including personal and familial history of allergy and previous treatment with food oral immunotherapy (OIT). An absolute blood eosinophil count was also recorded.

Symptoms were registered at baseline, after the 8-week PPI trial, regularly at each 3-month follow-up, and at the 12-month follow-up. Patients or parents were asked to score the symptoms on a written scale as “complete resolution,” “clinical improvement,” or “no change in symptoms.”

Adverse events (headache, rash, episodes of acute gastroenteritis, diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile, and pneumonia) were specifically asked and recorded in each clinical visit.

Laboratory tests (iron, ferritin, calcium, magnesium, and vitamin B12 levels) were performed at the 12-month follow-up.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Endoscopy and Histology

A gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed and the endoscopic signs were recorded and classified according to the Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) proposed and validated by Hirano et al (13). In addition, the presence of esophageal erosions or ulcers and esophageal fungal infection were also recorded.

Biopsy samples were obtained from the esophagus (at least 2 from the distal esophagus and 2 from upper mid esophagus). The maximum number of esophageal eosinophils was counted in a single high-power field corresponding to an area of 0.24 mm2.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Definition of Histological Remission

Complete remission to PPI therapy was defined as ≤5 eos/hpf on all of the esophageal biopsy samples. Partial remission to PPI treatment was defined as >5 and <15 eos/hpf on any esophageal biopsy sample. Histological relapse was defined as ≥15 eos/hpf on any esophageal biopsy sample.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Endpoints

The main endpoint of the study was to assess the percentage of children on PPI maintenance treatment with histological remission at the 12-month follow-up.

Secondary endpoints were to evaluate predictive factors of sustained histological remission, clinical outcome on PPI maintenance treatment, and frequency of clinical or laboratory test-related adverse events.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analysis

A descriptive analysis has been performed by means of absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation), or median (percentiles 25 and 75), as well as minimum and maximum values for quantitative variables.

A univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for quantitative ones. The significance level was established at 0.05, although Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Stata/IC v.15.1. software was used (StataCorp. 2017, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

One hundred and nine children with esophageal symptoms and EoE received an initial 8-week PPI treatment with esomeprazole (1 mg · kg−1 · dose−1 twice a day), and 72 (66%) showed histological remission.

Maintenance treatment with esomeprazole (1 mg · kg−1 · dose−1 once a day) was offered after the 8-week PPI trial. Sixty children completed a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Two patients were lost to follow-up and 1 patient was not included because of parental refusal to perform a new endoscopy. As a result, 57 children (73.7% boys, median age 11 years, range 1–15 years) enrolled in the study (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

A follow-up endoscopy was performed at a median time of 14.5 months (p25; p75: 12.1; 15.6 months). Histological remission on maintenance treatment was present in 40 children (70.1%; 95% CI 56.5–81.5), complete remission (≤5 eos/hpf) in 32, and partial remission (>5 and <15 eos/hpf) in 8 patients (Fig. 1).

Regarding the clinical outcome at 12 months, 49 (86%) children were asymptomatic, 3 (5.3%) had mild symptoms, and 5 patients (8.8%) had unchanged symptoms. A 14-month old infant presented an episode of choking at 8 months into the maintenance treatment; esophageal biopsy performed at that time showed complete histological remission.

Baseline pretreatment clinical data from patients with long-term histological remission and those with histological relapse are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, family, and personal history of atopy. The main clinical symptoms at the time of the first endoscopy were abdominal pain (59.65%), dysphagia (40.3%), vomiting (33.3%), and food impaction (28%), with no differences between both groups. The maintenance PPI dose was similar between patients with sustained histological remission and those who lost remission (median (p25; p75): 0.9 (0.77; 1.06) mg/kg/day versus 0.9 (0.8; 1.08) mg/kg/day, P = 0.9). The median pre-treatment peripheral eosinophils count (cells ×109/L) was higher in children who lost remission.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Four children had received specific OIT (2 for milk and 2 for egg proteins), because of severe IgE-mediated allergy. All 4 children showed histological remission on maintenance treatment at the 12-month follow-up with continued ingestion of the specific food.

Baseline pretreatment endoscopic-histological findings are summarized in Table 1. The most frequently reported findings on the baseline endoscopy were furrows (71.9%), exudates (66%), and oedema (61.4%), with no difference between patients with sustained histological remission and those with histological relapse. A 10-year-old boy with dysphagia and episodes of food impaction presented rings and a stricture in medium esophagus. Eosinophil counts were >80 in distal esophagus and >70 in medium esophagus. He had short- and long-term histological remission to PPI treatment with resolution of stricture.

The pretreatment EREFS and peak eosinophils count (both in distal and medium esophagus) were similar between patients with histological remission or relapse on maintenance treatment. The median ERFES on the follow-up endoscopy at 12 months was 0 (p25; p75: 0;1) in children with histological remission versus 2 (p25; p75: 1; 3) in children with loss of remission (P < 0.001).

Thirty-seven children presented complete histological remission (≤ 5 eos/hpf) after an 8-week PPI trial and 30 of them (81%) showed long-term histological remission. On the contrary, of the 20 children with partial initial histological remission, only 10 (50%) maintained remission on the follow-up endoscopy (P = 0.014; Fig. 2). The median EREFS after the 8-week PPI treatment was 0 (p25; p75: 0; 1) in patients with long-term histological remission versus 1 (p25; p75: 0;1) in patients with histological relapse (P = 0.027).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Adverse events on PPI maintenance treatment occurred in 5 children during high-dose induction treatment (Table 2). No cases of pneumonia or diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile were reported. In 30 children, laboratory analyses were performed at 12 months of treatment. Two of them showed low levels of ferritin (<6 ng/mL) with normal hemoglobin levels. Esophageal candidiasis was not observed during the follow-up endoscopy in any of the cases.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2

Twelve children received esomeprazole at 0.5 mg · kg−1 · day−1 for an additional 12-month period, with a follow-up endoscopy at the end of the second follow-up year. Histological remission at 2 years of treatment was present in 11 children (91.6%; 10 complete histological remission and 1 partial histological remission).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

In this prospective study, we observed that 70% of children with PPI-responsive EoE showed sustained histological remission with maintenance half-dose treatment at 12 months of follow-up. Moreover, sustained histological remission was also observed in 11 out of 12 children in which the dose was tapered down to 0.5 mg · kg−1 · day−1 for an additional year. These data show that PPI remission is not a transient phenomenon in children as initially reported. Dohil et al (7) described 4 children with initial remission to PPI that presented clinical-histological recurrence, despite continued PPI therapy for 5 to 17 months. Schroeder et al (8) reported another 2 children with clinical-histological relapse within 17 to 23 months, while receiving PPI therapy.

Our results in a large group of children corroborate what has been observed in adults. In a prospective study, Gómez Torrijos et al included adult patients with PPI-responsive EoE. They underwent a PPI taper down, observing that 31 of 38 patients (81%) remained in histological remission with omeprazole 40 mg once daily, as well as 15 of 18 patients (83%) who eventually tapered down to 20 mg once daily (10). Molina-Infante et al included 75 PPI-responsive EoE adult patients who had at least 12 months of follow-up in a multicenter retrospective study. PPI dose was tapered to the lowest dose that controlled symptoms, observing that 55 patients (73%) remained in histological remission at a mean follow-up of 26 months. In this latter study, 16 patients had stopped PPI treatment; 14 of them had symptom recurrence in the first year off PPI therapy. The other 2 patients remained asymptomatic, but histological recurrence was observed (9). These data emphasize that EoE is a chronic disease and clinical-histological recurrence occurs after treatment discontinuation, as observed with swallowed steroids (14).

Our study is relevant because it demonstrates a very good efficacy of long-term PPI treatment in pediatric EoE. Dietary therapy is an appealing maintenance treatment strategy in children with EoE because of the absence of adverse effects. Avoiding foods identified as triggers of EoE has been associated with very high rates of sustained histological remission in therapy-compliant adults (15,16). Philpott et al found a sustained remission rate >85% in adult patients at 3 months with all treatment modalities (budesonide, PPI, and elimination diet). At 9 months, only 10 of 18 patients on elimination diet (55%) were compliant and remained in remission (17). Therefore, diet elimination therapy does result in prolonged disease control, but compliance may be difficult. Studies on remission rate on long-term swallowed steroid treatment have shown conflicting results. A sustained histological remission rate of 58% was found in 54 children with topical fluticasone at the same initial dose (18). Topical budesonide at a maintenance dose of 0.5 mg/day in 28 adults was able to maintain esophageal eosinophilia <20 eos/hpf only in 50% of patients. A recent study from the same investigators with follow-up time up to 6 years observed that only 9.4% of 351 adults achieved long-lasting deep remission (clinical, endoscopic, and histological remission) (19).

We observed that clinical remission was more frequent than histological remission and 9 children who presented histological recurrence were asymptomatic. Only 1 child with histological remission showed clinical symptoms: an 8 months old infant with a choking episode, attributed to swallowing incoordination. It is already known that the correlation between clinical data and histological findings is poor in EoE (20,21). Therefore, histological analysis continues to be necessary for the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease.

We did not identify any baseline clinical or histological data, which could predict sustained remission to PPI. Baseline absolute blood eosinophils counts were higher in children who lost remission when compared to those with sustained remission. This could potentially reflect a more important allergic background (9) or a higher pretreatment eosinophilic infiltration in relapsers. However, both a personal history of atopy and peak eosinophil counts/hpf were similar in relapsers and nonrelapsers. Analysis of absolute blood eosinophil counts allows EoE patients to be differentiated from controls and can be correlated to histological activity in treated EoE patients, suggesting a potential role in EoE disease activity monitoring (22–24), but not as a predictor of treatment remission.

We observe that complete histological remission to an 8-week PPI trial was associated with a higher probability of sustained histological remission. Therefore, patients with partial initial remission should be monitored closely for histological recurrence. The underlying mechanisms of PPI responsiveness in EoE may involve anti-inflammatory properties such as the inhibition of T-helper 2 cytokine-induced eotaxin-3 expression in esophageal epithelial cells (25,26). Restoration of esophageal mucosal integrity with high-dose PPI (40 mg dose/twice a day) has been observed (27). Although mislabelling of the initial biopsy sampling cannot be excluded in patients with initial partial remission, it could be speculated that, in some patients, higher doses of PPI might be needed to achieve anti-inflammatory or mucosal restoration mechanisms.

Notably, we included 4 children with EoE under food OIT who presented initial and long-term remission to PPI without food discontinuation. An association between EoE and OIT has been observed in 2.7% to 6.25% of patients after OIT for milk, egg, and peanuts (28,29). Clinical-histological remission can be achieved after food OIT discontinuation (28), but this could be risky for some patients with severe anaphylactic reactions in case of transgressions. Therefore, long-term PPI treatment could be an alternative in children undergoing OIT.

In our study, adverse effects in children under PPI treatment were infrequent and mild; appeared during induction treatment with higher doses and resolved spontaneously or by switching to another PPI agent, without treatment discontinuation. We did not observe esophageal candidiasis as reported in adults (10). In recent years, growing concerns about complications of long-term PPI treatment have emerged, but the general long-term safety of these medications in adults is very good (11,30,31). No major safety concerns arose during 5 to 12 years of continuous PPI therapy in adults in the SOPRAN and the LOTUS study (comparing long-term omeprazole with anti-reflux surgery) (32). Data on the safety of long-term PPI treatment in children are scarce; some studies indicate a potential increased risk of respiratory tract or gastrointestinal infections (12,33). Due to the potential adverse events of long-term PPI treatment, the lowest effective dose should be used to minimize the risk.

The main strength of this study is the prospective design with a uniform protocol for treatment induction, maintenance treatment, and follow-up schedule in both centres. Nevertheless, the study has some potential shortcomings. Adherence to PPI treatment was not specifically assessed by questionnaire and/or recovery of empty medication containers, although it was asked at regular follow-up visits. Clinical outcome was not assessed by a validated questionnaire but was evaluated by means of global remission. As stated before, symptoms are not a good indicator for predicting histological remission (20,21). The CYP2C19 genotype, which has shown to predict long-term response to tapering PPI doses, was not evaluated (9). In addition, in children with loss of response, we did not assess histological response after PPI dose intensification, which was shown to effectively rescue up to 70% of patients who lost response over time (9). We considered that these doses (1 mg · kg−1 · dose−1 twice a day) may be too high to maintain long-term because of possible adverse effects.

In conclusion, our findings indicate that 70% of children with PPI-responsive EoE maintain histological remission with long-term treatment at half of the induction dose. Patients with complete initial histological remission have a higher probability of long-term histological remission. Adverse effects were infrequent, mild, and transient.

Further comparative studies should address, which patients may benefit from long-term treatment, the optimal PPI dose, and treatment duration.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Arias Á, Pérez-Martínez I, Tenías JM. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43:3–15.
2. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 128:3–20.
3. Lucendo AJ, Arias Á, Molina-Infante J. Efficacy of proton pump inhibitor drugs for inducing clinical and histologic remission in patients with symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:13–22.
4. Gutiérrez-Junquera C, Fernández-Fernández S, Cilleruelo ML, et al. High prevalence of response to proton-pump inhibitor treatment in children with esophageal eosinophilia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 62:704–710.
5. Molina-Infante J, Bredenoord AJ, Cheng E, et al. PPI-REE Task Force of the European Society of Eosinophilic Oesophagitis (EUREOS). Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia: an entity challenging current diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic oesophagitis. Gut 2016; 65:524–531.
6. Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á, et al. Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in children and adults. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2017; 5:335–358.
7. Dohil R, Newbury RO, Aceves S. Transient PPI responsive esophageal eosinophilia may be a clinical sub-phenotype of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57:1413–1419.
8. Schroeder S, Capocelli KE, Masterson JC, et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitor on esophageal eosinophilia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56:166–172.
9. Molina-Infante J, Rodriguez-Sanchez J, Martinek J, et al. Long-term loss of response in proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia is uncommon and influenced by CYP2C19 genotype and rhinoconjunctivitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:1567–1575.
10. Gómez-Torrijos E, García-Rodríguez R, Castro-Jiménez A, et al. The efficacy of step-down therapy in adult patients with proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43:534–540.
11. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ. The “dangers” of chronic proton pump inhibitor use. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 141:79–81.
12. Tjon JA, Pe M, Soscia J, et al. Efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors in the management of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pharmacotherapy 2013; 33:956–971.
13. Hirano I, Moy N, Heckman MG, et al. Endoscopic assessment of the oesophageal features of eosinophilic oesophagitis: validation of a novel classification and grading system. Gut 2013; 62:489–495.
14. Philpott H, Dellon ES. The role of maintenance therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis: who, why, and how? J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:165–171.
15. Lucendo AJ, Arias Á, González-Cervera J, et al. Empiric 6-food elimination diet induced and maintained prolonged remission in patients with adult eosinophilic esophagitis: a prospective study on the food cause of the disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131:797–804.
16. Reed CC, Fan C, Koutlas NT, et al. Food elimination diets are effective for long-term treatment of adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 46:836–844.
17. Philpott H, Nandurkar S, Royce SG, et al. A prospective open clinical trial of a proton pump inhibitor, elimination diet and/or budesonide for eosinophilic oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43:985–993.
18. Andreae DA, Hanna MG, Magid MS, et al. Swallowed fluticasone propionate is an effective long-term maintenance therapy for children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111:1187–1197.
19. Greuter T, Bussmann C, Safroneeva E, et al. Long-term treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids: development and evaluation of a therapeutic concept. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112:1527–1535.
20. Safroneeva E, Straumann A, Coslovsky M, et al. International Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index Study Group. Symptoms have modest accuracy in detecting endoscopic and histologic remission in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:581–590.
21. Pentiuk S, Putnam PE, Collins MH. Dissociation between symptoms and histological severity in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009; 48:152–160.
22. Min SB, Nylund CM, Baker TP, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of noninvasive biomarkers for eosinophilic esophagitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 51:127–135.
23. Rodríguez-Sánchez J, Gómez-Torrijos E, de-la-Santa-Belda E, et al. Effectiveness of serological markers of eosinophil activity in monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2013; 105:462–467.
24. Schlag C, Miehlke S, Heiseke A, et al. Peripheral blood eosinophils and other non-invasive biomarkers can monitor treatment response in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42:1122–1130.
25. Cheng E, Zhang X, Huo X, et al. Omeprazole blocks eotaxin-3 expression by oesophageal squamous cells from patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis and GORD. Gut 2013; 62:824–832.
26. Zhang X, Cheng E, Huo X, et al. Omeprazole blocks STAT6 binding to the eotaxin-3 promoter in eosinophilic esophagitis cells. PloS One 2012; 7:e50037.
27. van Rhijn BD, Weijenborg PW, Verheij J, et al. Proton pump inhibitors partially restore mucosal integrity in patients with proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia but not eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:1815–1823.
28. Lucendo AJ, Arias A, Tenias JM. Relation between eosinophilic esophagitis and oral immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113:624–629.
29. Echeverría-Zudaire LÁ, Fernández-Fernández S, Rayo-Fernández A, et al. Primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders in children who have received food oral immunotherapy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2016; 44:531–536.
30. Schnoll-Sussman F, Katz PO. Clinical implications of emerging data on the safety of proton pump inhibitors. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2017; 15:1–9.
31. Eusebi LH, Rabitti S, Artesiani ML, et al. Proton pump inhibitors: risks of long-term use. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:1295–1302.
32. Attwood SE, Ell C, Galmiche JP, et al. Long-term safety of proton pump inhibitor therapy assessed under controlled, randomised clinical trial conditions: data from the SOPRAN and LOTUS studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41:1162–1174.
33. Holbrook JT, Wise RA, Gold BD, et al. Writing Committee for the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers. Lansoprazole for children with poorly controlled asthma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012; 307:373–381.
Keywords:

adolescents; children; efficacy; eosinophilic esophagitis; long-term safety; proton pump inhibitors

© 2018 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology,