Share this article on:

Changes in the Gut Microbiota After Early Administration of Oral Synbiotics to Young Infants in India

Chandel, Dinesh S.*,†; Perez-Munoz, Maria E.‡,§; Yu, Fang||; Boissy, Robert; Satpathy, Radhanath#; Misra, Pravas R.#; Sharma, Nidhi**; Chaudhry, Rama**; Parida, Sailajanandan††; Peterson, Daniel A.‡,‡‡; Gewolb, Ira H.§§; Panigrahi, Pinaki*,||||

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: August 2017 - Volume 65 - Issue 2 - p 218–224
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001522
Original Articles: Nutrition

Objectives: The authors examined the changes in the developing gut microbiota of Indian infants enrolled in a colonization study of an oral synbiotic (Lactobacillus plantarum and fructo-oligosaccharides) preparation.

Methods: Frozen stool samples were available from a previously published clinical study of the synbiotic preparation administered daily for 7 days to full-term Indian infants delivered by C-section. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of fecal bacterial community-DNA was done in 11 infants sampled on day 7 and day 60 of life.

Results: All infants showed changes in bacterial diversity with age. While Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were predominant in all, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were initially low on day 7. In control infants, we observed a significant increase (P = 0.012) in the proportions of Actinobacteria on day 60. In the treated group, during the 60-day period, there was a 10-fold increase in Bacteroidetes, a somewhat smaller increase in Firmicutes, and a reduction in Proteobacteria. Compared to controls, treated infants were increasingly colonized by different Gram-positive genera including Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium. Relatively less known taxa and some unassigned sequence reads added to enriched diversity observed in the treated group.

Conclusions: There was a high level of bacterial diversity among infants examined in the present study. Synbiotic treatment induced an increase in overall taxa and Gram-positive diversity, especially in the first week of life. Changes in the microbiota during early infancy should be used as a rationale for selecting probiotics in diverse clinical settings.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

*Center for Global Health and Development

Department of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE

§Department of Agriculture, Food Science and Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

||Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health

Center for Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

#Asian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

**Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

††Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India

‡‡Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

§§Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

||||Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Pinaki Panigrahi, MD, PhD, Professor of Epidemiology and Pediatrics & Director, Center for Global Health and Development, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984385 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4385 (e-mail:

Received 12 August, 2016

Accepted 13 January, 2017

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal's Web site (

This study was funded by grants U01 HD 40574 and R01 HD 53719 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, USA. Program staff was involved in study design for the clinical trial under the co-operative agreement. Funding agency had no further role on data analysis or genesis of this manuscript, although program officials provided overall guidance and monitoring.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

What Is Known

  • Enterobacteriaceae, followed by microaerophiles, and finally strict anaerobes colonize the human gut during early infancy.
  • Limited number of sequence-based analyses in Western countries show predominance of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and subsequent rise in Bacteroidetes when solid food is introduced.

What Is New

  • Utilizing 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, the present study shows low proportion of Proteobacteria and high abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in 2-month-old Indian infants.
  • The present study also demonstrates a high level of microbiota diversity among infants in early infancy.
  • Synbiotic treatment for 1 week induces and maintains diversity for 2 months in life.

Although the nascent microbiome acquired during or after birth may influence infant gut development and immunity, disrupted colonization patterns early in infancy can lead to morbidity later in life (1). It is conceivable that interventions during this early infancy period could have a long-lasting effect on human health and disease. Although investigators in the Western world have engaged in research addressing the role of gut microbiota in allergy and other infectious and inflammatory diseases (2–5), studies in the developing world are extremely limited. Because of the early and overall high level of exposure to a relatively polluted environment in South Asia and India (where most of the 1 million neonatal deaths due to infection take place), changes in the infant microbiota demands critical attention. Except for a limited number of culture-based studies (6,7), few reports have, however, used sequence-based approaches for an in-depth analysis of the gut microbiota of infants (8).

Although many different probiotics are used rampantly in India, limited studies have described changes in gut microbiology induced by such therapy in 1- to 6-year-old children (9,10). No study in newborns or young infants using 16S rRNA gene sequencing approaches has been reported to date, nor has the effect of probiotic or other interventions been examined in this population.

Utilizing samples from a previously published hospital trial (11), we examined the effect of a 1-week administration of a synbiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus plantarum, and Fructo-oligosaccharide on the developing gut microbiota of Indian infants. Changes were compared using 454 pyrosequence–based 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of fecal community DNA extracted from controls and synbiotic-treated infants sampled on day 7 and day 60 post-treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on microbiota of Indian neonates using a sequencing approach, and also describes for the first time the synbiotic-mediated changes in the infant gut.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Design

The present study used a subset of frozen stool samples from a previously published hospital-based clinical study of a synbiotic preparation containing L plantarum (ATCC-202195) and fructo-oligosaccharide, or control (maltodextrin) in full-term Indian infants (11). The study population involved newborn infants 35 weeks or older gestational age and ≥1800 g birth weight born by Caesarean section who were >12 and <72 hours old, had breast-feeding established, were not on antibiotics, not likely to receive antibiotics in their first 7 days postpartum, and did not have major congenital anomalies. Infants were randomized in a 2:1 (treated: control) allocation. Administered synbiotics were dissolved in 2.0 mL of dextrose saline and given by spoon feeding. A total of 7 daily oral doses were administered, some of which were at the infant's home. At study entry, there was no difference between the 2 groups in maternal age or in babies’ sex, gestational age, birth weight, length, and head circumference. Fecal samples were collected and immediately transferred to laboratory (in coolant boxes) and stored frozen (−80°C) until further processing. Informed parental consent was obtained and the study was approved by US institutional review board and local ethics committees in India.

Protocol details for the isolation of bacterial community DNA from infant stool and sample preps for 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a Roche's 454-pyrosequencing platform has been appended as supplemental digital content (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, Methods,

Back to Top | Article Outline

16S rRNA Gene Sequence and Statistical Analyses

Sequences generated by pyrosequencing were submitted to the open source software package—Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME; for removal of low-quality sequences (12). Sequences that met the following filtering parameters were used for analysis: between 300 and 430 nucleotides long, sequences with no ambiguous bases, average base-call quality score ≥30, no mismatches in primers, and no mismatches in barcodes. After sequences were quality controlled, chimera check was performed using the Chimera Slayer method in QIIME, and the reads were subsequently binned by barcode. Taxonomic-based analysis was performed using the CLASSIFIER program of the Ribosomal Database Project to assign taxonomic status to each sequence (13). The reads in each taxonomic bin were normalized to the proportion of the total number of reads per sample.

The analysis was restricted to a given taxonomic unit (bacteria) with at least 1 call from a control infant, and an average of at least 3 calls per infant from either control or synbiotic-treated groups during the entire study period. This filtering method was applied to focus on bacteria with some presence in the control infant, and reasonable presence in at least 1 group under comparison. The abundance levels of the bacteria were descriptively summarized using the mean proportion of the bacteria for each group at 2 time points (D-7 and D-60). The generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assuming Poisson distribution for count data with a log link and the total counts of bacteria called from each infant as an offset were used for modeling. In the GEE models, we considered 2 different variance structures including compound symmetry to account for the correlation between repeated measures from the same infant, and a simpler independent structure. Because the model with independent structure provides better performance based on its smaller QIC values (quasi-likelihood under the independence model criteria), we reported the results based on the GEE model with independent structure. Comparisons were made between the synbiotic-treated and control samples collected at D-7 and D-60, and also within treated and control infants at same time points. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to control for the false discovery rate (14).

Comparison of microbial communities was done by taxonomic-independent analysis. Sequences were clustered using a threshold of 97% pairwise identity for assignment into operational taxonomic units (OTU), and binned by sample using QIIME. To assess and discard overlapping OTUs, representative sequences were selected from each OTU and reclustered keeping the 97% identity cutoff. The entire dataset was then compared to the database of nonoverlapping OTUs and the single best BLAST (Basic local alignment search tool) hit was identified for all sequences in the dataset using local BLAST in the BioEdit Blastall function. Alpha-diversity analyses were performed using QIIME. Significance of alpha-diversity was measured by analysis of variance test using GraphPad Prism version 7.0a. Beta-diversity was assessed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis metrics (15). Adonis PERMANOVA tests using R was performed to test significance of Bray-Curtis distance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Relative Abundance of Major Phyla in Study Infants

16S rRNA gene sequence data from synbiotic-treated and control infants showed abundance of 4 major phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria (Fig. 1). In the controls, Firmicutes (28%) and Proteobacteria (64%) were predominant at D-7. By D-60, Proteobacteria were, however, significantly reduced (64%–13%, P = 0.016), whereas the other 3 phyla showed increases in abundance. Treated infants at D-7 showed high levels of Firmicutes (48%) and Proteobacteria (51%), with relatively low proportions of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. We observed a significant increase in levels of Actinobacteria (P = 0.012) at D-60 in treated infants. Also, there was a 10-fold increase in Bacteroidetes and somewhat smaller increase in Firmicutes (48%–57%) with a reduction in Proteobacteria (51%– 31%) from D-7 to D-60 in the treated group.



Back to Top | Article Outline

Microbiota Changes at the Family Level

Table 1 shows abundance of the major taxonomic families in both synbiotic and control groups. At D-7, compared to controls, synbiotic-treated infants showed a relatively high abundance of families: Streptococcaceae (P = 0.002) and Lactobacillaceae (P = 0.10). Enterococcaceae were significantly low (10.3% vs 0.2%, P < 0.001) at D-7 in the treated group. Treated infants showed higher relative increases in the proportion of Bacteroidaceae (0.9%–10.1%, 10-fold) compared to controls (6.4%–36.4%, 5-fold) between D-7 and D-60. We also observed Streptococcaceae to be lower in the treated group at D-60 (44% vs 12%, P = 0.13). Although Enterococcaceae were significantly lower at D-7 in the treated compared with controls (0.2% vs 10%, P < 0.001), this change was reversed at D-60 with a significant increase in the treated group (29.5% vs 1.7%, P = 0.021).



Back to Top | Article Outline

Microbiota Changes Discerned at the Genus Level

At the genus level (Table 2), control infants at D-7 were predominant in Escherichia/Shigella (45%), Enterococcus (10%), Clostridium (8%), Bacteroides (6%), and Staphylococcus (5%), including some unclassified bacterial sequences (∼20%). At D-60, these infants showed significant increases in bifidobacteria (P < 0.001), Streptococcus (P < 0.001), and Acinetobacter (P < 0.001), with a more than 5-fold increase in Bacteroides (6%–37%; P = 0.19). From D-7 to D-60 there was a significant reduction in numbers of Clostridium (8%–0.3%, P < 0.001), Escherichia/Shigella (45%–5%, P = 0.007), Staphylococcus (5%–0.05%, P < 0.001), and unclassified Enterobacter (19%–7%, P = 0.03) in the controls.



Synbiotic-treated infants at D-7 also showed a predominance of Escherichia/Shigella (21%), Clostridia (19%), Streptococcus (12%), Staphylococcus (8%), Lactobacillus (7%), and Klebsiella (5%). Unclassified Enterobacter sequences also accounted for a high proportion (23.6%). At D-60, there was a marked increase in levels of Enterococcus (0.25%–30%, P < 0.001), Bacteroides (0.9%–10%; P = 0.22), and bifidobacteria (0.06%–0.12%; P = 0.37). Reduced proportions of Klebsiella (5.2%–0.3%, P = 0.015), Clostridia (19%–4.7%, P < 0.001), lactobacilli (7.1%–0.6%, P = 0.021), and Staphylococcus (8.2%–0.1%, P < 0.001) were, however, observed in the treated infants at D-60 compared with D-7. Compared to controls, synbiotic-treated infants at D-7 showed increased abundance of Lactobacillus (0.004%–7%, P < 0.001), bifidobacteria (0.004%–0.06%, P = 0.035), and Streptococcus (1.4%–12%, P = 0.003). There were, however, marked reductions in levels of Enterococcus (10%–0.25%, P = 0.001), Bacteroides (7%–0.9%), and Escherichia/Shigella (45%–21%; P = 0.43) in the treated group at D-7. Bacteroides, bifidobacteria, and Streptococcus were relatively low in treated infants at D-60. We also observed increases in Clostridium (0.03%–5%, P < 0.001), Enterococcus (1.7%–30%, P = 0.02), Escherichia/Shigella (5%–13%; P = 0.21), Klebsiella (0.005%–0.3%, P = 0.002), Lactobacillus (0.01%–0.64%, P < 0.001), and Staphylococcus (0.05%–0.1%; P = 0.56) in the treated group at D-60, compared to control infants. Overall, synbiotic treatment increased colonization by many different Gram-positive genera including lactobacilli at D-7, Enterococcus and Clostridia at D-60.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Alpha and Beta Diversity Among Study Groups

Comparison of bacterial communities confirms a high degree of variability between control subjects at D-60 and probiotic-treated groups independent of time point. Although the Adonis PERMANOVA test of Bray-Curtis distance was not statistically significant (P = 0.9130), the NMDS plot (Fig. 2) shows greater diversity between the microbial communities of control subjects at D-7 and D-60 when compared to the microbial communities of synbiotic-treated subjects at the same time points. Overlap between D-7 and D-60 demonstrates larger shared taxa between the treated groups compared to controls. In addition, although not statistically significant, the synbiotic treatment increased diversity within subjects as measured by alpha diversity metrics. Measurement of Chao 1 index and the number of observed species show greater alpha diversity in treated subjects compared to controls (Fig. 3). The bacterial communities of some treated infants, however, resemble that of control at D-7, while the same applies to individuals at D-60. Thus, it seems that the high degree of intravariability among individuals dampened the synbiotic effect. Nevertheless, these observations taken together, point toward interesting and potentially important trends. Because no clinical endpoints are being measured in the present study, relevance of such observations remains to be seen.





Back to Top | Article Outline


Early colonizers of the mammalian gut can play an important role in the development of infant microbiome, in turn, driving immunity (16). Hence, the microbiota is of special interest in the care of newborn and for prevention of morbidity in early infancy and childhood. Although many clinical trials in the Western world have used a range of probiotics to prevent or treat inflammatory and infectious conditions in neonates such as necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, and allergy/atopy, very little has been done in developing country settings in which infections continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this age group. Also, most of the small probiotic trials conducted in the developing world have used preparations/ strains already in use in the developed world without any attention to the pre-existing or changing gut microbiota of the infants in their own setting. In the present study, we used frozen stool samples from our clinical trial of synbiotics, where culture-based results revealed a high rate of stool colonization by L plantarum starting day 3 of dosing (11). Control infants in the present study provided us with the opportunity to examine the natural development of microbiota in the growing infants. The role of prebiotic sugars, such as fructo-oligosaccharides used in the current synbiotic is well known to promote the growth of anaerobic strains. Maltodextrin used as an excipient in both synbiotic and placebo groups can also be used by probiotic strains for their growth. In addition, we cannot rule out the many environmental exposures during the first 60 days of life of infants in the Indian home settings. Because these factors were present in both groups, for the purpose of this report, we are attributing the changes in the microbiota in our study to the combined effect of the probiotic strain and fructo-oligosaccharides.

In our 2-month-old control infants, we observed higher abundances of Firmicutes (49%) and Bacteroidetes (36%) compared to the much lower proportions seen in a 16S rDNA microarray–based study in American infants (32% Firmicutes and 20% Bacteroidetes) (17). Infants in our study harbored only approximately 13% Proteobacteria compared to 46% in US infants (17). On the contrary, Actinobacteria appeared to be low in both settings (<2%). In another US-based study, following infants from day 3 through 84 of life, Koenig et al (18) observed the predominance of Firmicutes, with a subsequent increase of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria; high levels of Bacteroides were seen later in life (172–297 days) after introduction of solid foods.

Our study shows higher alpha diversity in the treated subjects than controls (Fig. 3). The greater dispersal of Trt-7 data points seen in the NMDS plot suggests that changes at Trt-7 were greater than Ctrl-7 or Trt-60. The partial overlap of Trt-7 and Trt-60 shows sharing of some taxa, whereas almost no overlap in Ctrl-7 and Ctrl-60 points toward distinct diversity between the timepoints (Fig. 2). This could be due to a competitive exclusion between the species favored by the synbiotic treatment and the microbial consortia to which infants are exposed in their intimate environments. Because lactobacilli and bifidobacteria have previously been associated with health benefits, we are tempted to speculate similar effect of our synbiotic treatment in which these species were increased. Lacking a clear definition for a “healthy core microbiome” in a developing world setting (or for that matter in any setting), it is, however, difficult to ascertain if overall changes induced by our synbiotic treatment indeed resulted in a healthy microbiome.

Our study infants were all hospital-born, discharged after 4 to 6 days of hospital stay, and were exposed to a home environment until they were 60 days old. There was no indication of acquisition of any specific microbial patterns that could be attributed to the hospital environment. Rather, these infants were all different and showed unique interindividual diversity at every taxonomic level (Supplemental Digital Content 2, Fig. S1,, displays this unique diversity for all infants at Phyla(a), Family (b), and Genus (c) levels, irrespective of treatment status). This is similar to observations in a study by La Rosa et al in which the gut of term infants at birth showed diverse bacterial colonization, especially anaerobes. It was quite intriguing to note that in the confined neonatal intensive care unit environment, while factors such as mode of delivery, age, antibiotics, and diet influenced the pace, they did not affect the sequence of progression. The authors described such a preprogrammed gut microbiota development to be similar to a “choreographed” event (19). Pandey et al (8) utilizing rDNA cloning and sequencing techniques reported absence of bifidobacteria, and predominance of Citrobacter sp, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium difficile in fullterm hospital born (C-section) infants in India. Although we found bifidobacteria in low numbers, we also observed Clostridium to be a major genus and the presence of Acinetobacter and Citrobacter, similar to Pandey et al's observations.

Although our previous culture-based (where isolation of strict anaerobes is difficult) results had shown an increase of bifidobacteria only during months 3 and 6 (11), we were quite surprised to observe low proportions in our current sequence-based analysis. Reports on bifidobacteria using sequencing techniques have been contradictory in the literature. Apart from extraction procedures (that can be controlled and optimized), base mismatches between the primers used in the 454 platform and some bifidobacterial species have been incriminated as one of the causes (20). These equivocal results are supported by a recent report from the Microbiome Quality Control Project Consortium revealing 50 to 150 different OTUs in a defined positive control pool that had only 20 species to start with. The authors have described the many variables in such studies including problems with primers (21,22). In a recent study, Patel et al, however, confirmed their 454 sequencing-based results on low bifidobacteria by quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays (23) pointing that there is no single approach that can be considered as criterion standard at this point in time and protocols need to be tailor-made based on the aim of the investigation. Because identification or quantitation of specific species was not the aim of the present study, we did not conduct additional quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Although we observed overall low proportions of bifidobacteria, a significant increase (0.004%–0.06%) was demonstrated in the treated group at D-7 in our study infants. We also observed Bacteroides to be high in abundance and ubiquitous in our study infants irrespective of treatment status. Higher abundances of Bacteroides also have been previously reported with lower counts of bifidobacteria (23–25). Although intriguing, we do not know whether such a ratio (bifidobacteria to Bacteroides) among strict anaerobic genera is a universal phenomenon in the human gut microbial ecology.

We were surprised to observe the interindividual variability and how diverse and unstable the microbiotal milieu was. In spite of such diversity, compared with controls at D-7, infants given synbiotic containing L plantarum exhibited relatively high proportions of Streptococcus (1.39–12.38), Bifidobacterium (0.004–0.058), and a remarkable increase (0.004–7.12, P < 0.001) in Lactobacillus (Table 2). Although there was a high degree of variability among all infants independent of time points, NMDS analysis showed a higher number of taxa shared among treated subjects at D-7 and D-60 indicating the effect of synbiotic treatment during the 60-day period. On the contrary, control infants at the 2 time points were uniquely different with minimal sharing of taxa (Fig. 2).

The total number of studies in the literature is small, and the number of infants examined in each study is also small (including ours which used 22 samples for an in-depth analysis). Although larger studies are warranted and are now feasible with a lower price tag (eg, MiSeq), our study strongly points toward an inherent diversity of microbiota in growing infants in the Indian population and the ability of specific probiotic strains to modulate the same at least over a 2-month period (26).

Rodenas et al (27) have recently described the ability of L reuteri to increase diversity and abundance of bifidobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and enterococci in C-section babies but not in vaginally born infants. The present study also used samples from C-section babies. Because gut microbiota of vaginally born infants are more diverse and populated with reduced Enterobacteriaceae compared to C-section babies, it will be intriguing to examine the effect of similar synbiotics on their microbiota. The observed effect on increasing diversity in the current population may not be as distinct when we start seeding the neonatal gut that is already colonized with a more diverse group of bacteria. At the same time, if lactobacilli or L plantarum present in larger numbers even in the meconium compared to stools of babies several weeks old (28) are natural and early colonizers, the effect may be similar or better in a more natural gut environment.

Infections and stunting in early childhood remain a daunting challenge that the global health community needs to address. Early and severe crowding of the infant gut by bacteria in these settings gives rise to tropical enteropathy and undernutrition in the first 1000 days of life. The time has come for selecting the right probiotic, for specific age groups, appropriate for specific environments, for reducing the incidence of defined, preventable disease states. A critical look at the developing microbiota and its utilization for generating the best symbiosis and optimal immunity during early childhood is indispensable in this context (16).

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors are thankful to the Government of Odisha, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, for making the necessary arrangements to conduct this research study. The authors extend their thanks to the Indian Council of Medical Research for expediting all required reviews and approvals. This study could not have been possible without the unconditional support and faith of the parents of all newborns screened for this study.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Penders J, Stobberingh EE, Van den Brandt PA, et al. The role of the intestinal microbiota in the development of atopic disorders. Allergy 2007; 62:1223–1236.
2. Rautava S, Luoto R, Salminen S, et al. Microbial contact during pregnancy, intestinal colonization and human disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 9:565–576.
3. Berrington JE, Stewart CJ, Cummings SP, et al. The neonatal bowel microbiome in health and infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2014; 27:236–243.
4. Li M, Wang M, Donovan SM. Early development of the gut microbiome and immune-mediated childhood disorders. Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32:74–86.
5. Isolauri E, Salminen S. The impact of early gut microbiota modulation on the risk of child disease: alert to accuracy in probiotic studies. Benef Microbes 2015; 6:167–171.
6. Agarwal R, Sharma N, Chaudhry R, et al. Effects of oral Lactobacillus GG on enteric microflora in low-birth-weight neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003; 36:397–402.
7. Sharma N, Chaudhry R, Panigrahi P. Quantitative and qualitative study of intestinal flora in neonates. J Glob Infect Dis 2012; 4:188–192.
8. Pandey PK, Verma P, Kumar H, et al. Comparative analysis of fecal microflora of healthy full-term Indian infants born with different methods of delivery (vaginal vs cesarean): Acinetobacter sp. prevalence in vaginally born infants. J Biosci 2012; 37:989–998.
9. Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Hiremath G, et al. Prebiotic and probiotic fortified milk in prevention of morbidities among children: community-based, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12164.
10. Basu S, Paul DK, Ganguly S, et al. Efficacy of high-dose Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in controlling acute watery diarrhea in Indian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43:208–213.
11. Panigrahi P, Parida S, Pradhan L, et al. Long-term colonization of a Lactobacillus plantarum synbiotic preparation in the neonatal gut. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 47:45–53.
12. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010; 7:335–336.
13. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73:5261–5267.
14. Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, et al. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res 2001; 125:279–284.
15. Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, et al. Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 2011; 14:19–28.
16. Wopereis H, Oozeer R, Knipping K, et al. The first thousand days—intestinal microbiology of early life: establishing a symbiosis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2014; 25:428–438.
17. Palmer C, Bik EM, DiGiulio DB, et al. Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e177.
18. Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108 (suppl 1):4578–4585.
19. La Rosa PS, Warner BB, Zhou Y, et al. Patterned progression of bacterial populations in the premature infant gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:12522–12527.
20. Jost T, Lacroix C, Braegger CP, et al. New insights in gut microbiota establishment in healthy breast fed neonates. PLoS One 2012; 7:e44595.
21. Wang M, Li M, Wu S, et al. Fecal microbiota composition of breast-fed infants is correlated with human milk oligosaccharides consumed. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60:825–833.
22. Sinha R, Abnet CC, White O, et al. The microbiome quality control project: baseline study design and future directions. Genome Biol 2015; 16:276.
23. Patel AL, Mutlu EA, Sun Y, et al. Longitudinal survey of microbiota in hospitalized preterm very-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 62:292–303.
24. Harmsen HJ, Wildeboer-Veloo AC, Raangs GC, et al. Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast-fed and formula-fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 30:61–67.
25. Chang JY, Shin SM, Chun J, et al. Pyrosequencing-based molecular monitoring of the intestinal bacterial colonization in preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53:512–519.
26. Endo A, Prtty A, Kalliomki M, et al. Long-term monitoring of the human intestinal microbiota from the 2nd week to 13 years of age. Anaerobe 2014; 28:149–156.
27. Rodenas CL, Lepage M, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Effect of formula containing Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on fecal microbiota of infants born by cesarean-section. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 63:681–687.
28. Moles L, Gomez M, Heilig H, et al. Bacterial diversity in meconium of preterm neonates and evolution of their fecal microbiota during the first month of life. PLoS One 2013; 8:e66986.

16S rRNA gene sequencing; gut microbiota; infant; Lactobacillus plantarum; probiotics; synbiotics

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2017 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology,