NASPGHAN Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children: Recommendations from the Expert Committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) : Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Society Paper

NASPGHAN Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children: Recommendations from the Expert Committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN)

Vos, Miriam B.∗,†; Abrams, Stephanie H.‡,§; Barlow, Sarah E.‡,§; Caprio, Sonia||; Daniels, Stephen R.¶,#; Kohli, Rohit∗∗,††; Mouzaki, Marialena‡‡,§§; Sathya, Pushpa||||,¶¶; Schwimmer, Jeffrey B.##,∗∗∗; Sundaram, Shikha S.¶,#; Xanthakos, Stavra A.∗∗,††

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 64(2):p 319-334, February 2017. | DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001482
  • Free


What Is Known

  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a highly prevalent liver disease in children.
  • Guidance is needed for clinical care decisions for pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

What Is New

  • The following recommendations are based on a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature (PubMed and EMBASE search through May 2015), guidelines from other societies when applicable, and the experience of the expert committee.
  • Recommendations for clinical practice, including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and public health considerations are covered in this pediatric guideline.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease resulting from excessive fat accumulation in the liver. Because of its close association with obesity, it has become the most common liver disease in children in the United States. NAFLD can result in progressive fibrosis and lead to end-stage liver disease. Within the last decade, it has become one of the leading indications for liver transplantation in adults (1).

Best practices in management of pediatric NAFLD are not clearly defined. A guideline focused primarily on care of adults with NAFLD was released in 2011 (2). Recommendations addressing diagnosis of pediatric NAFLD were published in 2012 (3); however, it did not include screening, treatment, and public health implications. The North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) commissioned the Expert Committee on NAFLD to address this gap. The committee included specialists in general pediatrics, hepatology, gastroenterology, nutrition, cardiology, endocrinology, and pediatric obesity management.

The following recommendations are based on a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature (PubMed and EMBASE search through May 2015), guidelines from other societies when applicable, and the experience of the expert committee. These guidelines are intended for pediatricians, allied health professionals caring for children, pediatric gastroenterologists, hepatologists, endocrinologists, and preventive cardiologists. They suggest preferred evidence-based approaches for the clinical care of children related to NAFLD but remain flexible and adjustable for individual patients and circumstances. In areas in which insufficient evidence existed, the committee drew on the collective experience of the members to provide guidance.

The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to classify the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (Table 1). The strength of recommendation in the GRADE system is classified as strong or weak. The quality of evidence for each recommendation is characterized as high, moderate, or low quality. The GRADE system assesses the quality of evidence available. Specifically, it evaluates the methodological limitations of studies, whether the results of different studies are consistent or generalizable, and whether treatment approaches have been found to be effective ( In this guideline, the term “children” includes 0 to 18 years.

Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation


Pediatric NAFLD is defined as chronic hepatic steatosis in children (18 years or younger), which is not secondary to genetic/metabolic disorders, infections, use of steatogenic medications, ethanol consumption, or malnutrition. In most children, NAFLD is associated with insulin resistance, central or generalized obesity, and dyslipidemia characterized by high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels.

Based on histology, NAFLD can be divided into nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), which denotes bland steatosis, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is marked by steatosis and lobular inflammation and hepatocellular injury (Table 2). A further characterization is presence of fibrosis, which may indicate a more severe phenotype even in the absence of NASH. In some children, a unique periportal pathologic pattern of injury exists that has been termed “portal predominant NASH.” The significance of the periportal pattern for future clinical events is unknown and it is rarely seen in adults. In this document, the terms for NAFLD phenotypes are defined in Table 2.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease definitions and phenotypes


At the time of the guideline development, there were no studies describing the incidence of NAFLD in children. Prevalence of NAFLD has been described both in the United States and internationally. The prevalence varies by method of detection, which may include screening by alanine aminotransferase (ALT), imaging for steatosis, or confirmation by liver biopsy. In North American studies, NAFLD prevalence ranges from 0.7% in young children ages 2 to 4 years (confirmed at autopsy), to 29% to 38% in obese children (by studies of ALT elevation and an autopsy study) (4–8). Moreover, the prevalence of NAFLD increased 2.7-fold from the late 1980s to the current era (2007–2010), and at a more rapid rate than childhood obesity, based on analysis of ALT elevation in serial National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cohorts (7).

Prevalence varies by race/ethnicity. US studies have revealed a 4-fold increased risk of hepatic steatosis in Hispanic, compared with non-Hispanic adolescents (11–22 years old) (8). White and Asian children also have high prevalence, compared to African-American children (5). The prevalence also differs by sex, with most studies showing higher percentages in male compared to female children (5,9,10). Prevalence is higher in obese children compared with normal weight, although not all children with NAFLD are obese (5).

Several comorbidities have been associated with increased prevalence and/or severity of pediatric NAFLD, although the pathophysiology of these associations remains incompletely understood. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with the presence of NASH in 2 pediatric studies, independent of body mass index (BMI) and standard metabolic risk factors (11,12). It is not known whether OSA treatment ameliorates NASH. Among children newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), elevated ALT is more frequent in Hispanic children compared to African American children (13). In addition, pediatric patients with panhypopituitarism appear to have increased risk of NAFLD, NASH, and even cirrhosis (14,15), similar to the increased prevalence (77%) and severity of NAFLD reported among adults with hypopituitarism (16).

In summary, NAFLD is highly prevalent in children, with a greater risk in certain subpopulations; obese children; male children; Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic children; and those with prediabetes, diabetes, OSA, and panhypopituitarism.


Two small retrospective studies reported results of repeat liver biopsies done for clinical indications in children receiving usual clinical care for NAFLD. The first study showed that fibrosis remained stable or resolved in 11 of 18 patients after an average of 28 months (17). Worsening fibrosis was reported in 4 out of 5 patients reviewed in a retrospective study at a mean time frame of 41 months (18).

The natural history of pediatric NAFLD in the setting of lifestyle counseling was represented by the placebo arm of the TONIC trial, a 2-year randomized control trial designed to compare vitamin E, metformin, and placebo with liver biopsies at baseline and at 2-year follow-up (19). All 3 arms received nutrition and physical activity (lifestyle) advice. In the placebo cohort, 28% had resolution of NASH, 40% improved fibrosis, 40% improved steatosis, and 43% improved lobular inflammation. Progression of disease was seen in 25%. The mean change in ALT from baseline to week 96 was −35 (−57 to −14).

Longitudinal studies in adults demonstrate that patients with NAFLD have increased mortality compared with matched control populations (20). The increased mortality in adults is secondary to cardiovascular disease (CVD), cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In adults, fibrosis stage at baseline is the most predictive feature of future liver disease–related mortality (21). Pediatric NAFLD may be more severe compared to NAFLD identified in adulthood (22). Limited data suggest that children diagnosed with NAFLD have increased morbidity and mortality in adulthood (18).

Although limited, the pediatric data on the natural history of pediatric NAFLD support some conclusions. Fifteen percent of children with NAFLD have stage 3 fibrosis or higher at diagnosis (23) and disease in children appears to be more severe compared with adults (22). Given that pediatric disease is by definition early onset disease, it may represent an aggressive phenotype of the disease. Reports show that a few children have rapid progression to clinical events from NAFLD (death, transplant, diabetes, CVD). Because such clinical events from pediatric NAFLD typically do not occur under the age of 21 years, studies determining clinical outcomes from pediatric NAFLD will require long-term follow-up into adulthood. Extrapolation from adult natural history studies may not be sufficient because today's children are more likely to experience early onset of obesity, increased severity of obesity, and exposure in utero to maternal obesity and insulin resistance compared to children of prior decades (24).


Similar to other chronic liver diseases, NAFLD is often asymptomatic. Historically, NAFLD was frequently identified incidentally due to blood liver biochemistries or abdominal imaging, such as ultrasound or computed tomography (CT), ordered for other indications. Screening for NAFLD is appropriate because it can be detected before the onset of irreversible, end-stage liver disease. Identification of children with NAFLD is important because effective treatment is available (weight management through lifestyle improvements). Although more challenging to implement than prescribing a medication, lifestyle intervention can be effective at reversing NAFLD and even NASH, particularly if initiated early in the course of disease, before advanced fibrosis has developed.

Screening Tests

The currently recommended screening test, ALT, is an inexpensive, universally available blood test. ALT is minimally invasive and has an acceptable sensitivity. The assay is standardized between facilities; however, the reporting of normal values is not. Several studies have evaluated upper limits of normal in children. In the United States, sex-specific biologically based cutoffs have been determined from nationally representative data and have been validated in a fairly diverse cohort (25). These cutoffs are 22 mg/dL for girls and 26 mg/dL for boys. A Canadian study found the upper limit of normal for ALT to be 30 mg/dL in children 1 to 12 years of age, and 24 mg/dL in those between 13 and 19 years (26). For the diagnosis of NAFLD, the use of 2 times the sex-specific ALT (ALT ≥50 for boys and ≥44 for girls) in overweight and obese children age 10 years or older has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 26% (27). NASH is more common in children with ALT ≥80 U/L compared to those with ALT <80 U/L (41% compared to 21%, respectively) (27).

Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) have not been independently tested as screening tools for NAFLD in children. In the context of elevated ALT, higher AST and higher GGT are associated with worse histology (27). Elevated AST or GGT in the context of normal ALT may, however, represent a condition other than NAFLD.

Imaging has also been used as a screening tool for NAFLD. Clinically available, routine ultrasonography performs poorly for the detection of steatosis in children because of its low sensitivity and specificity particularly in children who have lower degrees of steatosis (ie, involving <33% of hepatocytes) (28). In addition, ultrasound is inaccurate for quantification of steatosis in children with NAFLD. More precise ultrasound methodology has been developed (29); however, it is not widely available. The limitations of ALT and ultrasonography as screening tools for NAFLD can lead to inconsistencies, as patients with NAFLD can have an ALT <40 U/L in the context of ultrasonography that suggests the presence of steatosis and vice versa (27). Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRI and MRS) have been validated and shown to be accurate for detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in both adults and children (30,31). Clinical applications for MRI- and MRS-based measurement of hepatic steatosis are rapidly becoming available in pediatric centers. At this time, MR-based methods are not used widely for screening because of cost, lack of availability, and lack of validated cutoffs to determine NAFLD. This area is rapidly developing however, and some pediatric centers are already using MRI in clinical practice for the quantification of steatosis. Hepatic steatosis is sometimes also identified by CT scans, often performed for other clinical indications. Combined adult and pediatric data show that CT detects steatosis with a sensitivity of 46% to 72% and specificity 88% to 95% but is not typically performed as a screening test for NAFLD due to concerns about radiation exposure (32). When hepatic steatosis is incidentally identified by imaging studies performed for other clinical indications, further diagnostic work-up to determine the cause of steatosis is needed (see Diagnosis section).

The relative cost-effectiveness of these various screening modalities (ALT vs imaging) has not been studied. ALT is significantly less expensive compared to imaging modalities and therefore is preferred as the first-line screening test for NAFLD, despite its limitations.

At-Risk Populations to Screen

Overweight and obese children are at increased risk for NAFLD. Risk increases in the setting of cardiometabolic risk factors, including insulin resistance, prediabetes, diabetes, dyslipidemia, central adiposity, and in certain races and ethnicities as discussed above. Nonoverweight children with these cardiometabolic risk factors are also at risk for NAFLD. Genetic predisposition strongly affects the risk of NAFLD development and the overweight siblings and overweight parents of patients with NAFLD are at high risk of NAFLD (33). Siblings who are 10 years or older and have a BMI of ≥85th percentile are at high risk of NAFLD.

The optimal age to screen for NAFLD and the need for repeat screening are undetermined because of the lack of pediatric studies on incidence and natural history. A cross-sectional, autopsy-based study revealed a large prevalence difference between children ages 5 to 9 years and 10 to 15 years (5). A limitation of the present study was relatively few subjects within the mid-ages and the cross-sectional nature. Certain groups, such as Hispanics, may be at risk for earlier onset disease (34).


1. Selected children should be screened for NAFLD. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

Screening should be considered beginning between ages 9 and 11 years for all obese children (BMI ≥95th percentile) and for overweight children (BMI ≥85th and <94th percentile) with additional risk factors (central adiposity, insulin resistance, prediabetes or diabetes, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea, or family history of NAFLD/NASH). Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

Earlier screening can be considered in younger patients with risk factors such as severe obesity, family history of NAFLD/NASH, or hypopituitarism. Strength: 2, Evidence: B.

Consider screening of siblings and parents of children with NAFLD if they have known risk factors for NAFLD (obesity, Hispanic ethnicity, insulin resistance, prediabetes, diabetes, dyslipidemia). Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

2. Currently, the best screening test for NAFLD in children is ALT; however, it has substantial limitations. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

Interpretation of ALT should be based upon sex-specific upper limits of normal in children (22 U/L for girls and 26 U/L for boys) and not individual laboratory upper limits of normal. Strength: 1, Evidence: A.

Persistently (>3 months) elevated ALT more than twice the upper limit of normal should be evaluated for NAFLD or other causes of chronic hepatitis. Strength: 1, Evidence: C.

ALT of >80 U/L warrants increased clinical concern and timely evaluation, as the likelihood of significant liver disease is higher. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

Clinically available routine ultrasound is not recommended as a screening test for NAFLD in children due to inadequate sensitivity and specificity. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

3. Follow-up screening for NAFLD is recommended. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

When the initial screening test is normal, consider repeating ALT every 2 to 3 years if risk factors remain unchanged. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

Consider repeating screening sooner if clinical risk factors of NAFLD increase in number or severity. Examples include excessive weight gain or development of other medical problems that increase risk of NAFLD, such as type 2 diabetes or OSA. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.


Initial Evaluation

NAFLD is a diagnosis of exclusion requiring presence of hepatic steatosis and exclusion of other causes of hepatic steatosis besides NAFLD (Table 3). Importantly, an obese or overweight child with chronically elevated liver enzymes should not be assumed to have NAFLD. Evaluating the cause of chronically elevated liver enzymes to establish a diagnosis is of NAFLD is important because it excludes other hepatic conditions, which may require specific treatments distinct from treatment of NAFLD. This cost-effectiveness of this approach is unknown but consequences of missing another liver disease requiring alternate treatment can be significant and serious. Until a test is developed specifically for NAFLD, it remains a diagnosis of exclusion.

Differential diagnosis for pediatric hepatic steatosis

The utility of noninvasive tools for the diagnosis of NAFLD has been assessed against the currently accepted clinical reference, which is hepatic histology. A review of the literature suggests that to date surrogate markers and scores developed to predict steatosis (eg, “NAFLD liver fat score,” “fatty liver index,” “hepatic steatosis index,” and the “pediatric prediction score”) are not accurate enough or sufficiently validated to be clinically useful (35). Other scores have also been shown to be inadequate in predicting the presence of steatosis (36) or remain to be validated (37).

Similar to the issues noted under screening, clinically available ultrasound technology is not accurate for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis because of its low sensitivity and specificity (28,38). Although ultrasound is widely available and can exclude hepatic masses, cysts, or gallbladder pathology, a normal hepatic ultrasound cannot exclude the presence of NAFLD and therefore is not useful for the diagnosis or follow-up. CT although reasonably sensitive and specific for hepatic steatosis is not recommended for diagnosis due to radiation risk. When available, MRI and MRS are highly accurate for estimating steatosis (31,39,40). Further studies are needed in children to identify and validate cutoffs that have diagnostic accuracy for NAFLD.

Assessment of Steatosis Severity

It is currently not known whether the severity of steatosis in children with NAFLD predicts short- or long-term clinical outcomes. Noninvasive techniques for quantifying the degree of steatosis include investigative ultrasonography techniques and MR-based technologies, but these are not widely available. (31,41). Steatosis involving >5% of hepatocytes or liver tissue by weight is considered abnormal (42,43). The validated NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) is a semiquantitative assessment of NAFLD histopathology frequently used in clinical trials and research (44,45). The NAS uses a semiquantitative scale of 0 to 3 to assess steatosis seen on histology (<5% of hepatocytes, 5%–33%, 34%–66%, and >67%).

Diagnosing Steatohepatitis and Determining Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Severity

NASH is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis with necroinflammation and hepatocellular injury with or without fibrosis (45). Identification of fibrosis in children with NASH and NAFLD is important because these phenotypes are expected to be more likely to progress to cirrhosis (46). Clinical parameters, such as the degree of obesity or the severity of metabolic dysregulation (47), and noninvasive markers of hepatocellular injury (eg, keratin 18) do not adequately distinguish patients with NAFL from those with NASH (48–55). ALT is not sensitive enough to predict with certainty the NAFLD phenotype or severity; however, NASH is more common in children with ALT ≥80 U/L compared to those with ALT <80 U/L (41% and 21%, respectively) (27).

Liver biopsy is the current standard to define the presence and severity of NAFLD, including the presence of NASH, and to eliminate alternative and/or concurrent diagnoses. Liver biopsy has inherent limitations for staging NAFLD because of the nonuniformity of disease throughout the liver in reference to the small sample of liver obtained. Adequate sample length (≥2 cm) and width decreases the risk of misclassification, but does not eliminate it. The NAS is a research tool for semiquantitatively rating features of the histology and its use was not intended to include the confirmation of a clinical diagnosis (56).

Liver biopsy is generally safe in children (57–60), including those who are overweight or obese (61), as it is associated with a low risk of complications. Children who are extremely obese (BMI ≥120% of the 95th percentile or BMI >35 kg/m2, whichever is lower) may present special challenges due to difficulty assessing the position of the liver and increased depth of the subcutaneous adipose tissue layer, and may warrant referral to interventional radiology. The optimal timing of liver biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of NAFLD and to follow-up on its progression has not been established. Currently, clinical practice varies widely. Proceeding to liver biopsy should be a shared decision with the child's caregiver made after discussion of the benefits and risks. Benefits of liver biopsy include identifying those with more severe or progressive disease so that they can pursue more intensive treatment if office-based lifestyle counseling fails. More intensive weight-management options may include referrals to multidisciplinary intensive lifestyle interventions or even surgical weight loss in a severely obese adolescent who meets additional clinical criteria. Importantly, liver biopsy differentiates other chronic liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis, which can be challenging to exclude noninvasively.

Assessment of Fibrosis

Fibrosis in the setting of NAFLD is currently determined by liver histology and staged using a semiquantitative scale of 0 to 4 (56). Children with NAFLD may have fibrosis without NASH. In general, clinical signs and symptoms of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis may include fatigue, splenomegaly, low platelets, AST/ALT ratio >1, spider angiomata and palmar erythema. Decompensated cirrhosis can also present with abnormal bruising, variceal bleeding, ascites, jaundice, pruritus, and encephalopathy. Overt signs and symptoms of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis are, however, uncommon in children with NAFLD and NASH. Limited data suggest that clinical markers, such as higher BMI and increased waist circumference, are associated with the presence of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD/NASH (62,63). In a predominantly adult population, the NAFLD fibrosis score predicts the presence of fibrosis with moderate accuracy (64). The Pediatric NAFLD fibrosis score is less accurate; however, these results remain to be validated (65). Limited data suggest that the combined Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Index and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis scores are accurate in estimating fibrosis in children with NAFLD; however, the Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Index alone and the Pediatric NAFLD fibrosis score are less accurate (65–67). The accuracy of currently marketed fibrosis biomarker tests in children, and markers such as AST to platelet ratio and hyaluronic acid (and their optimal cutoffs), remain to be determined (68–72). In a predominantly Hispanic cohort of children presenting to an outpatient gastroenterology clinic for suspected fatty liver disease, an ALT ≥80 was associated with advanced fibrosis (bridging or cirrhosis) with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 59% (27).

In terms of imaging modalities for the assessment of fibrosis, acoustic radiation force impact, transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography have predominantly been assessed in adults and are becoming more widely available at many centers. The pediatric literature is, however, characterized by small sample size, and particularly small numbers of patients with clinically significant fibrosis (≥2). Transient elastography has been shown to have a performance of 0.79 to 1.0 for predicting clinically significant fibrosis (73–75). MRE detects clinically significant fibrosis with a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 and is scanner and reader independent (76). These technologies would benefit from further validation studies to determine optimal cut-points and ability to longitudinally track fibrosis in children.

Additional testing for chronic liver diseases to consider:

Screening labs: Complete blood count (CBC) with differential, AST, bilirubin (total, conjugated), alkaline phosphatase, GGT, international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, total protein, hemoglobin A1c

Exclude infections (eg, hepatitis A IgM, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, other chronic viral infections)

Exclude endocrine disorders (thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH], free thyroxine [T4])

Exclude autoimmune causes of ALT elevation (total IgA, total IgG and tissue transglutaminase antibody, antinuclear antibody, antismooth muscle antibody, anti–liver-kidney microsomal antibody)

Exclude genetic causes of ALT (ceruloplasmin and/or 24-hour urine copper, lysosomal acid lipase, alpha-1 antitrypsin phenotype)

Imaging: Abdominal ultrasound to rule out anatomical abnormalities or assess features of portal hypertension, magnetic resonance imaging, or spectroscopy to measure hepatic fat

Liver biopsy (histology, copper measurement, stain for microvesicular fat, assess fibrosis)

Red flags for advanced liver disease—chronic fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, jaundice, splenomegaly, firm liver on examination, enlarged left lobe of the liver, low platelets, low white blood cell count, elevated direct bilirubin, elevated international normalized ratio (INR), long history of elevated liver enzymes (>2 years).


4. When evaluating a child suspected to have NAFLD, it is recommended to exclude alternative etiologies for elevated ALT and/or hepatic steatosis and investigate the presence of coexisting chronic liver diseases (Fig. 1). Strength: 1, Evidence: A.

An algorithm proposed by the expert committee on NAFLD (ECON) group. Further research is likely to alter the algorithm. The steps are suggested courses of action and should be interpreted within the clinical scenario of individual patients. ALT = alanine aminotransferase; GI = gastrointestinal; NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ULN = upper limit of normal.

5. Liver biopsy should be considered for the assessment of NAFLD in children who have increased risk of NASH and/or advanced fibrosis. Potential clinical signs of increased risk of fibrosis in children with NASH may include higher ALT (>80 U/L), splenomegaly, and AST/ALT >1. Known clinical risk factors for NASH and advanced fibrosis include panhypopituitarism and type 2 diabetes. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

6. The use of ultrasound is not recommended for the determination or quantification of steatosis due to poor sensitivity and specificity. Ultrasound may be useful for assessing other causes of liver disease such as masses, gallbladder disease, changes associated with portal hypertension, and so on. Strength: 1, Evidence: B

7. The use of CT is not recommended for determination or quantification of steatosis due to radiation risk. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.


In the review of treatment of pediatric NAFLD, 42 clinical trials performed in children with NAFLD were identified. Limitations of the studies included a lack of standardization in the diagnostic criteria used, nonrandomization or lack of adequate control groups, insufficient treatment (eg, lifestyle intervention of short duration or subtherapeutic medication dose), inconsistent or inadequately defined outcomes, and varying approaches to data analysis. Conducting treatment trials for NAFLD in children remains challenging because of the lack of validated noninvasive biomarkers and insufficient knowledge of the natural history of the disease. High-quality treatment studies require histologic assessment of liver outcomes or, at minimum, a quantitative noninvasive measurement of liver fat and/or fibrosis, and a biochemical measurement of liver inflammation (ALT). Substantial ALT decrease (if elevated at entry) or normalization may also be an acceptable surrogate in NAFLD treatment trials, particularly in early phase studies, but is less accurate than histology or imaging.

Treatment Population

All children with NAFLD should be offered lifestyle intervention counseling if overweight or obese. It is unknown how to prioritize which children with NAFLD should receive more intensive treatment. Because of the lack of natural history data, it is also unknown if children with NAFL have a lower risk of developing NASH or fibrosis in the future, as is generally the case in adults with NAFL. For the same reason, it is unknown whether or to what degree children with NASH are more likely to have progressive fibrosis or increased risk of CVD. NAFLD progression may be linear or wax and wane with environmental changes, growth changes, or weight loss. Given the uncertainty, most treatment trials for pediatric NAFLD have included a wide range of disease severity.

Goals of Treatment

The most commonly accepted goal of treatment is regression of NAFLD, defined as decrease in steatosis, inflammation, and/or fibrosis. A second accepted goal is resolution of NASH. The durability of these histologic changes in children is unknown. Decrease in ALT is commonly used as a surrogate marker of improvement in histology of NAFLD, because there is some evidence to support its use in pediatric clinical trials (19,77). Although an ALT at a single time-point has poor correlation to phenotype, a decrease in ALT of 10 U/L during 96 weeks is associated with 1.28 relative odds of improvement in histology and 1.37 relative odds of resolution of NASH (77). In studies of NAFLD detected in adulthood, presence of fibrosis was more predictive of clinical outcome compared presence of NASH (46,78). Both NAFL and NASH have been shown to progress in stage of fibrosis (79). Until natural history studies are completed in children, these data are the best information available and can help inform current practice.

Ultrasound is not able to reliably detect changes in steatosis and therefore does not have a role in assessing steatosis longitudinally. Likewise, CT and MRI/MRS modalities have not been adequately studied in children with NAFLD as surrogate markers for NAFLD or NASH improvement. Liver biopsy remains the clinical standard for determining improvement in liver histology after treatment, but frequency and timing of a follow-up biopsy must be weighed against the risks of the procedure.

An additional and overarching goal of treatment for patients with NAFLD is to decrease excess adiposity to improve dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and central adiposity, all of which are closely associated with NAFLD, and with T2DM and CVD risk. In children, the NAFLD comorbidities (diabetes, CVD, and hypertension) are important considerations of treatment to improve future clinical outcomes.


8. Pending the development of more accurate biomarkers to noninvasively assess improvement in NAFLD, sustained decrease in ALT from baseline may be used as a surrogate marker of response to treatment, particularly for durations of ≤1 year. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

9. Assessment of change in fibrosis over time is reasonable as a treatment outcome in children over longer time periods (≥2 years) and currently requires a liver biopsy for staging. Strength: 2, Evidence: – C.

Treatment of Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Lifestyle Changes

At this time, dietary improvements and increasing physical activity (lifestyle modifications) are the primary treatment for pediatric NAFLD because of the strong association with excess weight gain and obesity. Seventeen lifestyle intervention studies were identified in the literature search, but these were heterogeneous in design, including varying duration (1 month to 1 year), entry criteria, outcome measures, and lifestyle approaches. Nonetheless, there were a number of nonrandomized, uncontrolled cohorts that together demonstrate a trend of improvement in noninvasive markers of NAFLD (ALT and steatosis) with combined lifestyle and exercise (80–96). Multidisciplinary clinics designed to treat obesity have also reported improved liver enzymes and histology in children with NAFLD (81,97,98). Multidisciplinary lifestyle approaches of moderate to high intensity (>25 contact hours during 6 months) have been shown to be most effective in pediatric weight management (99). In these studies, there was not sufficient evidence to determine whether or to what degree BMI improvement or weight loss is required for improvement in NAFLD in children; however, in adult studies weight loss of ≥10% of baseline weight was associated with ≥90% resolution of NASH.

The available data do not support a specific diet over others for the treatment of NAFLD (eg, low glycemic index vs low fat). Two large randomized controlled trials (RCT) have demonstrated that reduction of sugar-sweetened beverages decreases adiposity in children (100,101) and may benefit overweight and obese children with NAFLD. An RCT also supports both aerobic and resistance exercise as beneficial for reducing hepatic fat in children. Aerobic exercise intervention was compared with resistance exercise and no exercise in obese boys and the results suggested significant reduction in hepatic fat as measured by MRS in both exercise groups (82). Few children had NAFLD at baseline, but among those that did, there was a promising response to exercise with both hepatic fat reduction and improvement in total and visceral fat. There are clear comprehensive health benefits to a healthier diet and increasing physical activity (102) and these remain the first line approach to treatment of NAFLD in children (Fig. 2).

Treatments for pediatric NAFLD. NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.


10. Lifestyle modifications to improve diet and increase physical activity are recommended as the first-line treatment for all children with NAFLD. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

11. Avoidance of sugar-sweetened beverages is recommended as a strategy to decrease adiposity. Strength: 1, Evidence: A.

12. Increasing moderate to high-intensity physical activity and limiting screen time activities to <2 hours per day is recommended for all children including those with NAFLD. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

Medications and Supplements

A number of medications and supplements have been considered for use in pediatric NAFLD. Multiple clinical trials or cohort studies have focused on metformin (19,103–106) or vitamin E (19,107–110) as potential treatments for NAFLD. Metformin and lifestyle counseling or vitamin E and lifestyle counseling were each tested against placebo and lifestyle counseling in a large, multicenter, 3-arm RCT; the TONIC trial (19). Sustained ALT reduction was the primary endpoint and change in histology the secondary endpoint in the present study, which included 173 children ages 8 to 17 years. Although the primary outcome of sustained reduction of ALT was not different between either drug or placebo, vitamin E treatment was associated with statistically significant improvements in histology, as shown by a lower NAS (via improvement in ballooning) and greater resolution of NASH. The latter was shown in a smaller subset of participants who had biopsy-confirmed NASH. Concerns about the safety of high dose vitamin E have been raised in adults, following meta-analyses of clinical trials, which have indicated an increased mortality with vitamin E, and increased adverse cardiovascular events and prostate cancer (111,112). Interestingly, other meta-analyses have not had similar results (113). Although no significantly greater risk of adverse events were noted in the children receiving high-dose vitamin E in the TONIC trial over a 2-year period, the long-term benefits and risks remain unknown.

The TONIC study found that metformin administered at 500 mg twice daily dose in combination with lifestyle counseling was not different than placebo in terms of NAS score or ALT improvement (19). There was also no significant decrease in homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance in the metformin group. It remains unknown whether improvement in insulin sensitivity in children with NAFLD would lead to improvement in NAFLD or whether certain subsets of patients with NAFLD could benefit from metformin when given at typical clinical doses.

Vitamin E, as a treatment for biopsy-confirmed NAFLD, has also been tested in a smaller RCT in combination with lifestyle counseling and vitamin C; the 2 antioxidants taken together were, however, not superior to lifestyle intervention alone (109). High rates of vitamin D insufficiency have been identified in pediatric NAFLD (114–116), but there are no trials in children evaluating vitamin D supplementation as a treatment for NAFLD. In a small study of ursodeoxycholic acid in children, diet alone compared to ursodeoxycholic acid plus diet or ursodeoxycholic acid without diet did not show any benefit of the drug (117). This concurs with adult data that do not support its use in NAFLD (118).

Both docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and fish oil have been considered for treatment of NAFLD. A small RCT testing 6 month supplementation with either 250 or 500 mg DHA compared with placebo for pediatric NAFLD found no improvement in ALT (119). An adult study suggests that fish oil worsens NASH (120). Probiotics (Lactobacillus GG and VSL 3) have been tested in 2 small studies of short duration (2–4 months); however, both studies were limited by the use of sonographic outcome measures (121,122). ALT improved significantly in 1 study compared to placebo and this could represent an area for future research.

In summary, no medication or supplement has been shown to be of significant value for the management of NAFLD in children.


13. No currently available medications or supplements are recommended to treat NAFLD because none have been proven to benefit the majority of patients with NAFLD. Strength: 2, Evidence: C

Weight Loss Surgery as a Treatment for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Children

Bariatric or weight loss surgery (WLS) can lead to clinically meaningful weight loss in severely obese adolescents (minimum BMI ≥35 kg/m2) with average BMI reductions of approximately 30% at 1 year postoperatively after both Roux-en-y gastric bypass and vertical sleeve gastrectomy in a large multicenter adolescent cohort (123). At 3 years after surgery, an average 28% weight reduction was maintained in the cohort. This reduction in BMI is typically associated with substantial improvement and even resolution of many obesity-related comorbid conditions, including dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, diabetes, and sleep apnea at 1 to 2 years postoperatively (124,125). Because these conditions are often associated with the presence of NAFLD and because studies in adults undergoing bariatric surgery have suggested a high degree (up to 89%) of NASH resolution 1 to 2 years postoperatively (126), severe NASH has been proposed as a criterion for WLS in several published adolescent bariatric surgery guidelines (127).

There is paucity of data on the natural history of NAFLD and NASH in adolescents undergoing WLS. There are only 4 WLS outcome studies in this population that have included an assessment of NAFLD status at baseline (128–132), and among those only 1 included histological evaluation of NAFLD (130). In terms of outcome after WLS, only 1 study provided data on the progression of the liver disease. The present study did not include histological outcomes but instead followed the change in ALT and AST in 81 adolescents undergoing Roux-en-y gastric bypass over a 2-year period (132). Mean ALT and AST improved significantly at 1 and 2 years (mean decrease of approximately 50%); however, no data on ALT/AST change were provided for the adolescent group undergoing conventional care (controls); therefore, it is unknown whether this intervention was superior to lifestyle intervention. It should be noted that similar to adult cohorts, the proportion of patients with severe NASH among adolescents undergoing WLS tend to be low (130). It is unclear whether this is related to selection/referral bias or due to potential biological differences among the more severely obese. Therefore, the generalizability of the overall positive NAFLD outcomes reported among adults undergoing bariatric surgery to children with histologically advanced or fibrotic NASH is limited.


14. Bariatric surgery is not recommended as a specific therapy for NAFLD given lack of outcome data in adolescents. Bariatric surgery may be considered for selected adolescents with BMI ≥35 kg/m2, who have noncirrhotic NAFLD and other serious comorbidities (eg, T2DM, severe sleep apnea, idiopathic intracranial hypertension) that are likely to improve with WLS. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.


Longitudinal studies in adults demonstrate an independent increase in CVD associated with markers of NAFLD (133–136). This risk (ranging from 1.23 to 4.82 increase in odds of events or disease) appears to be independent of classical risk factors such as BMI, obesity, or other components of the metabolic syndrome (136). In several adult studies, CVD has been found to be the leading cause of mortality in patients with biopsy proven NAFLD (20,137). To date, there are no studies reporting the effect of NAFLD diagnosed in childhood on the risk of CVD in adulthood. Abundant evidence, however, demonstrates that CVD risk factors, and specifically dyslipidemia, are commonly associated with NAFLD in children (138,139). The most common pattern of dyslipidemia is high triglycerides and low HDL, typical of the insulin-resistant state. Studies evaluating surrogate markers of atherosclerosis and autopsy findings of atherosclerosis confirm that children with NAFLD frequently have early atherosclerosis (140–144).

There are no studies in the pediatric population using lipid-lowering drugs as a treatment of NAFLD. The effect of lipid-lowering medications on NAFLD histology is also unknown. In adults, statins are recommended as safe for treating dyslipidemia in the setting of NAFLD; however, they are not used as a treatment of NAFLD (2). A few studies in children have evaluated the response of plasma lipids to treatments of NAFLD. In a 2-year trial testing the effect of DHA supplementation versus placebo for treating NAFLD in children, triglycerides improved in the DHA group compared with placebo (145). In the TONIC trial, resolution of NASH was associated with improvement in LDL and non-HDL cholesterol but not with improvement in triglycerides (19,146). Finally a small pilot study of a low-fructose diet demonstrated improved levels of oxidized LDL, a marker of CVD risk in children with NAFLD (96).

Despite the lack of pediatric data specifically on NAFLD, there is evidence to support the approach to CVD risk reduction in children. The “Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents: Summary Report” delineates current practice recommendations for screening and treating children (147). At the time of this document, universal screening with a lipid panel is recommended for all children ages 9 to 11 years (147). For ages 2 to 8 years, a lipid panel is recommended if risk factors exist or if there is a family history of dyslipidemia or of CVD. Management algorithms are detailed in the Summary Report and are useful when evaluating dyslipidemia in children with NAFLD.

Children with NAFLD are at increased risk of hypertension compared with obese children without NAFLD, a risk that persists over time (23,139). Guidelines exist on monitoring and treating hypertension in overweight children that are applicable to children with NAFLD (148).


15. Children with NAFLD should be screened for dyslipidemia at diagnosis and periodically as indicated by current lipid guidelines for children. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

16. It is recommended to monitor blood pressure in children with NAFLD. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.


Limited pediatric data exist on the prevalence of prediabetes or T2DM in subjects with NAFLD. A retrospective analysis of a pediatric cohort with T2DM revealed the prevalence of elevated serum aminotransferases to be 48%, with 60% of these elevations being 2 or more times above the upper limit of normal (149). Recent cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have described an association between NAFLD and glucose dysregulation (150). In a cohort of 677 children with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD, prediabetes and diabetes were associated with significantly higher odds of having NASH (odds ratio 1.8 and 2.6, respectively) (151). Assessment of a relatively large multiethnic cohort of obese adolescents revealed that the prevalence of prediabetes and metabolic syndrome increases significantly with increases in hepatic fat content measured with MRI (152).

Studies also indicate that hepatic steatosis is related to metabolic parameters in the longitudinal setting. A cohort of 76 children with obesity showed that both glucose (fasting and 2-hour blood glucose and area under the curve 2-hour blood glucose) and insulin sensitivity (whole body insulin sensitivity index) indices at a mean follow-up of 1.9 years are significantly correlated with baseline hepatic fat content (150). More importantly, during the follow-up, a significant improvement of β-cell function in subjects with low compared with high liver fat content occurred. These relevant correlations were further confirmed by the multiple, stepwise, linear regression analysis showing an independent relation between baseline hepatic fat and longitudinal metabolic parameter (2-hour blood glucose and whole body insulin sensitivity index) even after adjusting for confounding factors (age, sex, ethnicity, BMI z-score, change in BMI z-score, and duration of follow-up).


17. It is recommended to screen children with NAFLD for diabetes at diagnosis and annually (or sooner if clinical suspicion arises) using either a fasting serum glucose level or a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. A glucose tolerance test may be useful if the fasting glucose or HbA1c are in the prediabetic range (Table 4). Strength: 1, Evidence: A

Table 4:
Definitions of prediabetes and diabetes by the American Diabetes Association


Clinical Care

Clinical care and intensity of follow-up may depend on the severity of the disease (more advanced NASH vs NAFL), similar to other chronic liver diseases that occur in the same age range (autoimmune hepatitis, hepatitis B (HB), hepatitis C, and primary sclerosing cholangitis). The optimal frequency of follow-up or laboratory/biopsy reassessment has not been studied in children with NAFLD; however, more frequent visits are known to be beneficial for nutrition and physical activity counseling in overweight and obese children (97,153) and may contribute to success of NAFLD treatment as well (97,153), as shown in adults (154). A decrease in ALT is commonly used as a surrogate marker of improvement in histology of NAFLD, and there is some evidence to support its use in pediatric clinical trials (19,77). Importantly, in the individual patient, it does not always reliably correlate with improvement or worsening of disease. At this time, there are no noninvasive modalities adequately validated for detecting progression or regression of fibrosis in children. Therefore, at this time liver biopsy remains the best available method for assessing change in fibrosis in children with NAFLD.


18. It is recommended to follow children with NAFLD on a yearly basis at a minimum to monitor for progression of disease and provide treatment. Strength: 1, Evidence: C.

19. When providing lifestyle counseling, more frequent visits (more contact hours with program staff) are associated with better weight management outcomes in overweight and obese children and therefore may also benefit overweight children with NAFLD/NASH. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

20. A repeat liver biopsy to assess progression of disease (particularly fibrosis) and to guide treatment is reasonable to consider 2 to 3 years after the first liver biopsy, especially in patients with new or ongoing risk factors, such as T2DM, NASH, or fibrosis at diagnosis. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

Exposures to Liver Toxins

Adolescence is a time of increased participation in high-risk behaviors with concurrent opportunities for establishing better health habits. Although emerging epidemiologic evidence suggests that light to moderate drinking may have a favorable effect on NAFLD (155), underage alcohol consumption is not recommended. A threshold effect may occur, with heavy, episodic drinking (eg, “binge drinking”) in adults associated with an increased risk of fibrosis progression (156). Binge drinking is common amongst adolescents, with a potential negative effect in those affected by NAFLD. Prolonged cigarette smoking has been associated with advanced histologic severity of NAFLD in adults (157). A cross-sectional study of 355 American children revealed that secondhand smoke exposure was associated with an increased prevalence of ultrasonographic evidence of hepatic steatosis (158).


21. In addition to standard counseling of adolescents, healthcare providers should counsel adolescents regarding the potential effects of increased fibrosis progression with binge drinking. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

22. Families of children with NAFLD should be counseled about risks of secondhand smoke exposure and adolescents with NAFLD should be counseled against smoking and use of electronic nicotine delivery devices. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

Prevention of Hepatitis A and B

Children with chronic liver disease are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality if infected with hepatitis A or B, vaccine-preventable diseases. Although data specific to pediatric NAFLD are lacking, children with other chronic liver diseases seroconvert after 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccination (159,160). The Red Book currently recommends that all children with liver diseases should receive hepatitis A vaccine (161).

Universal vaccination for HB as infants began in 1991, so the vast majority of children and adolescents with NAFLD have been vaccinated. Children vaccinated for HB as infants frequently have low levels of HB surface antibody (anti-HBs) (162). Despite this, they usually have persistence of immune memory as demonstrated by Spradling et al (163) in which of those with no detectable HB surface antibody, 82% had immune protection. The Red Book recommends against routine postimmunization testing for anti-HBs unless the child falls into specific risk groups.


23. Children with NAFLD should be vaccinated routinely against hepatitis A. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.

24. Children with NAFLD should have prior receipt of HB vaccine verified and be immunized if no prior vaccination was received. Strength: 1, Evidence: A

Initiation and Monitoring of Potentially Hepatotoxic Medications

Children with NAFLD occasionally require medications for other conditions such as diabetes, infections, attention deficient hyperactivity disorder, psychiatric illness, or other chronic illnesses. Certain medications commonly used for these conditions, are potentially hepatotoxic and require increased frequency of monitoring. A common example is the utilization of metformin for T2DM in patients who have both NAFLD and diabetes. Current recommendations are to evaluate transaminases before starting metformin and to check liver enzymes at the time of diagnosis of T2DM. Evidence is, however, lacking on how often to monitor liver enzymes after initiating therapy. Atypical antipsychotic drugs can also cause rapid and severe weight gain and emergence of cardiometabolic risk factors, and elevated liver enzymes in previously normal weight children. Liver enzymes therefore should be checked before starting atypical antipsychotics and are typically monitored during the course of therapy.


25. Baseline liver enzyme levels should be obtained in children with NAFLD before starting any medication known to be hepatotoxic. There is insufficient evidence to guide frequency of monitoring for enzyme elevation after initiation of potentially hepatotoxic medications and monitoring should be guided by the baseline severity of the liver disease and the relative potential for hepatotoxity of the medication. Strength: 1, Evidence: C.

26. If potentially hepatotoxic drugs are being considered in patients with NAFLD, a baseline liver biopsy may be reasonable to consider for assessing the severity of liver disease before beginning the medication. Strength: 2, Evidence: C.

Quality of Life

Because NAFLD is a chronic disease, it has the potential to affect more than just physical health in children. Quality of life is decreased among children with obesity with NAFLD compared to children with obesity without NAFLD (164). Indirect effects such as the emotional toll of worrying about a chronic liver disease may also be a contributor.


27. Providers should remain alert to psychosocial issues and screen children with NAFLD for these when indicated. Strength: 1, Evidence: B.


The emergence of NAFLD has been an important change in the landscape of pediatric liver disease. The recommendations in this guideline are summarized in Table 5. Substantial gaps in knowledge, however, remain and are research priorities. These gaps include the following:

  • 1. Delineating the natural history of pediatric NAFLD and identifying risk factors in childhood that predict progression versus regression and identify those at greater risk of adverse health outcomes.
  • 2. Noninvasive detection of NAFLD and NASH and quantification of steatosis, inflammation, hepatocellular injury, and fibrosis. Longitudinal studies of imaging and biomarkers are needed to better determine their role in clinical care.
  • 3. Well-designed clinical trials to determine optimal treatment approaches, including the role of specific dietary interventions, type and duration of exercise, validation of pilot studies of promising therapies, and identification of novel medications, and role of weight loss surgery.
  • 4. Cost-effective strategies for screening, diagnosis, and long-term follow-up, including frequency of visits, laboratory versus biopsy reassessment.

Summary of recommendations


This practice guideline was developed as a collaboration of the NASPGHAN NAFLD scientific advisory board, the NASPGHAN Hepatology committee, and the NASPGHAN Nutrition committee. In addition, the guideline was reviewed by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Executive Committee, the AAP Committee on Nutrition, the AAP Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management, the AAP Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, the AAP Committee on Child Health Financing, and the Committee on Infectious Diseases and the AAP Section on Tobacco Control. The authors are grateful to all these individuals for their thoughtful reviews and suggestions.


1. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015; 148:547–555.
2. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012; 55:2005–2023.
3. Vajro P, Lenta S, Socha P, et al. Diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: position paper of the ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 54:700–713.
4. Louthan MV, Theriot JA, Zimmerman E, et al. Decreased prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in black obese children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005; 41:426–429.
5. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, et al. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2006; 118:1388–1393.
6. Strauss RS, Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Prevalence of abnormal serum aminotransferase values in overweight and obese adolescents. J Pediatr 2000; 136:727–733.
7. Welsh JA, Karpen S, Vos MB. Increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among United States adolescents, 1988–1994 to 2007–2010. J Pediatr 2013; 162:496.e1–500.e1.
8. Rehm JL, Connor EL, Wolfgram PM, et al. Predicting hepatic steatosis in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of adolescent girls. J Pediatr 2014; 165:319.e1–325.e1.
9. Wiegand S, Keller KM, Robl M, et al. Obese boys at increased risk for nonalcoholic liver disease: evaluation of 16,390 overweight or obese children and adolescents. Int J Obesity 2010; 34:1468–1474.
10. Malespin M, Sleesman B, Lau A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese American children. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49:345–349.
11. Nobili V, Cutrera R, Liccardo D, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome affects liver histology and inflammatory cell activation in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, regardless of obesity/insulin resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:66–76.
12. Sundaram SS, Sokol RJ, Capocelli KE, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and hypoxemia are associated with advanced liver histology in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr 2014; 164:699.e1–706.e1.
13. Hudson OD, Nunez M, Shaibi GQ. Ethnicity and elevated liver transaminases among newly diagnosed children with type 2 diabetes. BMC Pediatr 2012; 12:174.
14. Adams LA, Feldstein A, Lindor KD, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with hypothalamic and pituitary dysfunction. Hepatology 2004; 39:909–914.
15. Nakajima K, Hashimoto E, Kaneda H, et al. Pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis associated with hypopituitarism. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40:312–315.
16. Nishizawa H, Iguchi G, Murawaki A, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adult hypopituitary patients with GH deficiency and the impact of GH replacement therapy. Eur J Endocrinol 2012; 167:67–74.
17. A-Kader HH, Henderson J, Vanhoesen K, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a single center experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6:799–802.
18. Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, et al. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut 2009; 58:1538–1544.
19. Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Van Natta ML, et al. Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2011; 305:1659–1668.
20. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology 2006; 44:865–873.
21. Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 2015; 61:1547–1554.
22. Holterman AX, Guzman G, Fantuzzi G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in severely obese adolescent and adult patients. Obesity 2013; 21:591–597.
23. Schwimmer JB, Zepeda A, Newton KP, et al. Longitudinal assessment of high blood pressure in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112569.
24. Kelly AS, Barlow SE, Rao G, et al. Severe obesity in children and adolescents: identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128:1689–1712.
25. Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Molleston JP, et al. Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: TONIC trial design. Contemp Clin Trials 2010; 31:62–70.
26. Colantonio DA, Kyriakopoulou L, Chan MK, et al. Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children. Clin Chem 2012; 58:854–868.
27. Schwimmer JB, Newton KP, Awai HI, et al. Paediatric gastroenterology evaluation of overweight and obese children referred from primary care for suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38:1267–1277.
28. Awai HI, Newton KP, Sirlin CB, et al. Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:765–773.
29. Lin SC, Heba E, Wolfson T, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and quantification of liver fat using a new quantitative ultrasound technique. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13:1337.e6–1345.e6.
30. Murphy P, Hooker J, Ang B, et al. Associations between histologic features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI measurements in adults. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41:1629–1638.
31. Schwimmer JB, Middleton MS, Behling C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and liver histology as biomarkers of hepatic steatosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2015; 61:1887–1895.
32. Bohte AE, Van Werven JR, Bipat S, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:87–97.
33. Schwimmer JB, Celedon MA, Lavine JE, et al. Heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:1585–1592.
34. Leung DH, Williams K, Fraley JK, et al. Age- and ethnic-specific elevation of ALT among obese children at risk for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): implications for screening. Clin Pediatr 2009; 48:50–57.
35. Koot BG, Van der Baan-Slootweg OH, Bohte AE, et al. Accuracy of prediction scores and novel biomarkers for predicting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21:583–590.
36. Walker RW, Sinatra F, Hartiala J, et al. Genetic and clinical markers of elevated liver fat content in overweight and obese Hispanic children. Obesity 2013; 21:E790–E797.
37. Maffeis C, Banzato C, Rigotti F, et al. Biochemical parameters and anthropometry predict NAFLD in obese children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53:590–593.
38. El-Koofy N, El-Karaksy H, El-Akel W, et al. Ultrasonography as a non-invasive tool for detection of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in overweight/obese Egyptian children. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3120–3123.
39. Lee MJ, Bagci P, Kong J, et al. Liver steatosis assessment: correlations among pathology, radiology, clinical data and automated image analysis software. Pathol Res Pract 2013; 209:371–379.
40. Tang A, Desai A, Hamilton G, et al. Accuracy of MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction for classification of dichotomized histologic steatosis grades in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Radiology 2015; 274:416–425.
41. Vos MB. Is it time to advance pediatric NAFLD diagnosis to the magnetic resonance imaging era? Hepatology 2015; 61:1779–1780.
42. Ralli EP, Paley K, Rubin SH. The liver lipids and their distribution in disease. An analysis of 60 human livers. J Clin Invest 1941; 20:413–417.
43. Brunt EM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Oliver D, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: histologic features and clinical correlations with 30 blinded biopsy specimens. Hum Pathol 2004; 35:1070–1082.
44. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005; 41:1313–1321.
45. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathologic patterns and biopsy evaluation in clinical research. Semin Liver Dis 2012; 32:3–13.
46. Loomba R, Chalasani N. The hierarchical model of NAFLD: prognostic significance of histologic features in NASH. Gastroenterology 2015; 149:278–281.
47. Singh DK, Sakhuja P, Malhotra V, et al. Independent predictors of steatohepatitis and fibrosis in Asian Indian patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:1967–1976.
48. Puri K, Nobili V, Melville K, et al. Serum bilirubin level is inversely associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57:114–118.
49. Feldstein AE, Alkhouri N, De Vito R, et al. Serum cytokeratin-18 fragment levels are useful biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:1526–1531.
50. Fitzpatrick E, Mitry RR, Quaglia A, et al. Serum levels of CK18 M30 and leptin are useful predictors of steatohepatitis and fibrosis in paediatric NAFLD. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51:500–506.
51. Miele L, Forgione A, La Torre G, et al. Serum levels of hyaluronic acid and tissue metalloproteinase inhibitor-1 combined with age predict the presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a pilot cohort of subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Transl Res 2009; 154:194–201.
52. Nobili V, Donati B, Panera N, et al. A 4-polymorphism risk score predicts steatohepatitis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 58:632–636.
53. Eng K, Lopez R, Liccardo D, et al. A non-invasive prediction model for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in paediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46:1008–1013.
54. Adams LA, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The prevalence of autoantibodies and autoimmune hepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:1316–1320.
55. Niwa H, Sasaki M, Haratake J, et al. Clinicopathological significance of antinuclear antibodies in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Res 2007; 37:923–931.
56. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatology 2011; 53:810–820.
57. Govender P, Jonas MM, Alomari AI, et al. Sonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsies in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:645–650.
58. Matos H, Noruegas MJ, Goncalves I, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42:1322–1325.
59. Scheimann AO, Barrios JM, Al-Tawil YS, et al. Percutaneous liver biopsy in children: impact of ultrasonography and spring-loaded biopsy needles. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 31:536–539.
60. Westheim BH, Aagenaes I, Ostensen AB, et al. Effect of operator experience and frequency of procedure performance on complication rate after ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57:638–643.
61. Harwood J, Bishop P, Liu H, et al. Safety of blind percutaneous liver biopsy in obese children: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44:e253–e255.
62. Iacobellis A, Marcellini M, Andriulli A, et al. Non invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:7821–7825.
63. Manco M, Bedogni G, Marcellini M, et al. Waist circumference correlates with liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut 2008; 57:1283–1287.
64. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007; 45:846–854.
65. Alkhouri N, Mansoor S, Giammaria P, et al. The development of the pediatric NAFLD fibrosis score (PNFS) to predict the presence of advanced fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One 2014; 9:e104558.
66. Alkhouri N, Carter-Kent C, Lopez R, et al. A combination of the pediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and enhanced liver fibrosis test identifies children with fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9:150–155.
67. Nobili V, Alisi A, Vania A, et al. The pediatric NAFLD fibrosis index: a predictor of liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med 2009; 7:21.
68. Kim E, Kang Y, Hahn S, et al. The efficacy of aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for assessing hepatic fibrosis in childhood nonalcoholic steatohepatitis for medical practice. Korean J Pediatr 2013; 56:19–25.
69. Flores-Calderon J, Moran-Villota S, Ramon-Garcia G, et al. Non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease in a group of Mexican children. A multicenter study. Ann Hepatol 2012; 11:364–368.
70. Kaneda H, Hashimoto E, Yatsuji S, et al. Hyaluronic acid levels can predict severe fibrosis and platelet counts can predict cirrhosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21:1459–1465.
71. Nobili V, Alisi A, Torre G, et al. Hyaluronic acid predicts hepatic fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Transl Res 2010; 156:229–234.
72. Lebensztejn DM, Wierzbicka A, Socha P, et al. Cytokeratin-18 and hyaluronic acid levels predict liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Biochim Pol 2011; 58:563–566.
73. Alkhouri N, Sedki E, Alisi A, et al. Combined paediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and transient elastography to predict clinically significant fibrosis in children with fatty liver disease. Liver Int 2013; 33:79–85.
74. Fitzpatrick E, Quaglia A, Vimalesvaran S, et al. Transient elastography is a useful noninvasive tool for the evaluation of fibrosis in paediatric chronic liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56:72–76.
75. Nobili V, Vizzutti F, Arena U, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of transient elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2008; 48:442–448.
76. Xanthakos SA, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD, et al. Use of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease. J Pediatr 2014; 164:186–188.
77. Vuppalanchi R, Jain AK, Deppe R, et al. Relationship between changes in serum levels of keratin 18 and changes in liver histology in children and adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:2121.e1–2–2130.e1–2.
78. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2015; 149:389.e10–397.e10.
79. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, et al. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13:643.e1–9–654.e1–9.
80. Nobili V, Manco M, Devito R, et al. Effect of vitamin E on aminotransferase levels and insulin resistance in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24:1553–1561.
81. Nobili V, Marcellini M, Devito R, et al. NAFLD in children: a prospective clinical-pathological study and effect of lifestyle advice. Hepatology 2006; 44:458–465.
82. Lee S, Bacha F, Hannon T, et al. Effects of aerobic versus resistance exercise without caloric restriction on abdominal fat, intrahepatic lipid, and insulin sensitivity in obese adolescent boys: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes 2012; 61:2787–2795.
83. Gronbaek H, Lange A, Birkebaek NH, et al. Effect of a 10-week weight loss camp on fatty liver disease and insulin sensitivity in obese Danish children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 54:223–228.
84. Ramon-Krauel M, Salsberg SL, Ebbeling CB, et al. A low-glycemic-load versus low-fat diet in the treatment of fatty liver in obese children. Child Obes 2013; 9:252–260.
85. Jin R, Welsh JA, Le NA, et al. Dietary fructose reduction improves markers of cardiovascular disease risk in Hispanic-American adolescents with NAFLD. Nutrients 2014; 6:3187–3201.
86. Wang CL, Liang L, Fu JF, et al. Effect of lifestyle intervention on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese obese children. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14:1598–1602.
87. Van Der Heijden GJ, Wang ZJ, Chu Z, et al. Strength exercise improves muscle mass and hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42:1973–1980.
88. Tazawa Y, Noguchi H, Nishinomiya F, et al. Effect of weight changes on serum transaminase activities in obese children. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1997; 39:210–214.
89. Reinehr T, Schmidt C, Toschke AM, et al. Lifestyle intervention in obese children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: 2-year follow-up study. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94:437–442.
90. Pozzato C, Verduci E, Scaglioni S, et al. Liver fat change in obese children after a 1-year nutrition-behavior intervention. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51:331–335.
91. Vajro P, Fontanella A, Perna C, et al. Persistent hyperaminotransferasemia resolving after weight reduction in obese children. J Pediatr 1994; 125:239–241.
92. Campos RM, De Piano A, Da Silva PL, et al. The role of pro/anti-inflammatory adipokines on bone metabolism in NAFLD obese adolescents: effects of long-term interdisciplinary therapy. Endocrine 2012; 42:146–156.
93. Koot BG, Van der Baan-Slootweg OH, Tamminga-Smeulders CL, et al. Lifestyle intervention for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: prospective cohort study of its efficacy and factors related to improvement. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96:669–674.
94. De Piano A, De Mello MT, Sanches Pde L, et al. Long-term effects of aerobic plus resistance training on the adipokines and neuropeptides in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease obese adolescents. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24:1313–1324.
95. Tock L, Prado WL, Caranti DA, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease decrease in obese adolescents after multidisciplinary therapy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18:1241–1245.
96. Vos MB, Weber MB, Welsh J, et al. Fructose and oxidized low-density lipoprotein in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163:674–675.
97. DeVore S, Kohli R, Lake K, et al. A multidisciplinary clinical program is effective in stabilizing BMI and reducing transaminase levels in pediatric patients with NAFLD. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57:119–123.
98. Sylvetsky A, Welsh JA, Walsh SM, Vos MB. Action-oriented counseling attains weight stabilization and improves liver enzymes among overweight and obese children and adolescents. Open J Pediatr 2012; 2:236–243.
99. Force USPST, Barton M. Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2010; 125:361–367.
100. De Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, et al. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1397–1406.
101. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, et al. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1407–1416.
102. Waters E, De Silva-Sanigorski A, Hall BJ, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 12:CD001871.
103. Schwimmer JB, Middleton MS, Deutsch R, et al. A phase 2 clinical trial of metformin as a treatment for non-diabetic paediatric non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21:871–879.
104. Nadeau KJ, Ehlers LB, Zeitler PS, et al. Treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with metformin versus lifestyle intervention in insulin-resistant adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2009; 10:5–13.
105. Freemark M. Liver dysfunction in paediatric obesity: a randomized, controlled trial of metformin. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96:1326–1332.
106. Nobili V, Manco M, Ciampalini P, et al. Metformin use in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an open-label, 24-month, observational pilot study. Clin Ther 2008; 30:1168–1176.
107. Lavine JE. Vitamin E treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children: a pilot study. J Pediatr 2000; 136:734–738.
108. Vajro P, Mandato C, Franzese A, et al. Vitamin E treatment in pediatric obesity-related liver disease: a randomized study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 38:48–55.
109. Nobili V, Manco M, Devito R, et al. Lifestyle intervention and antioxidant therapy in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2008; 48:119–128.
110. Akcam M, Boyaci A, Pirgon O, et al. Therapeutic effect of metformin and vitamin E versus prescriptive diet in obese adolescents with fatty liver. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2011; 81:398–406.
111. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud C. Meta-regression analyses, meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses of the effects of supplementation with beta-carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E singly or in different combinations on all-cause mortality: do we have evidence for lack of harm? PLoS One 2013; 8:e74558.
112. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, et al. Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3:CD007176.
113. Gerss J, Kopcke W. The questionable association of vitamin E supplementation and mortality--inconsistent results of different meta-analytic approaches. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2009; 55 (suppl):Ol1111–Ol1120.
114. Black LJ, Jacoby P, She Ping-Delfos WC, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations associate with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescents independent of adiposity. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29:1215–1222.
115. Hourigan SK, Abrams S, Yates K, et al. Relation between vitamin D status and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60:396–404.
116. Nobili V, Giorgio V, Liccardo D, et al. Vitamin D levels and liver histological alterations in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 170:547–553.
117. Vajro P, Franzese A, Valerio G, et al. Lack of efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of liver abnormalities in obese children. J Pediatr 2000; 136:739–743.
118. Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Heathcote EJ, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of a randomized trial. Hepatology 2004; 39:770–778.
119. Nobili V, Bedogni G, Alisi A, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation decreases liver fat content in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96:350–353.
120. Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, et al. Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of omega 3 fatty acids for the treatment of diabetic patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49:137–144.
121. Alisi A, Bedogni G, Baviera G, et al. Randomised clinical trial: the beneficial effects of VSL#3 in obese children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39:1276–1285.
122. Vajro P, Mandato C, Licenziati MR, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG in pediatric obesity-related liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 52:740–743.
123. Inge TH, Courcoulas AP, Jenkins TM, et al. Weight loss and health status 3 years after bariatric surgery in adolescents. N Engl J Med 2016; 14:113–123.
124. Messiah SE, Lopez-Mitnik G, Winegar D, et al. Changes in weight and co-morbidities among adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery: 1-year results from the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Rel Dis 2013; 9:503–513.
125. Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi MO, Al Qahtani A. Co-morbidity resolution in morbidly obese children and adolescents undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2014; 10:842–850.
126. Barker KB, Palekar NA, Bowers SP, et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:368–373.
127. Nobili V, Vajro P, Dezsofi A, et al. Indications and limitations of bariatric intervention in severely obese children and adolescents with and without nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee Position Statement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60:550–561.
128. Boza C, Viscido G, Salinas J, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese adolescents: results in 51 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012; 8:133–137.
129. Holterman AX, Browne A, Tussing L, et al. A prospective trial for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in morbidly obese adolescents: an interim report of weight loss, metabolic and quality of life outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45:74–78.
130. Holterman AX, Holterman M, Browne A, et al. Patterns of surgical weight loss and resolution of metabolic abnormalities in superobese bariatric adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47:1633–1639.
131. Jarvholm K, Olbers T, Marcus C, et al. Short-term psychological outcomes in severely obese adolescents after bariatric surgery. Obesity 2012; 20:318–323.
132. Olbers T, Gronowitz E, Werling M, et al. Two-year outcome of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in adolescents with severe obesity: results from a Swedish Nationwide Study (AMOS). Int J Obes (Lond) 2012; 36:1388–1395.
133. Stepanova M, Younossi ZM. Independent association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular disease in the US population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:646–650.
134. Wong VW, Wong GL, Yip GW, et al. Coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2011; 60:1721–1727.
135. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Takeda N, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a novel predictor of cardiovascular disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:1579–1584.
136. Schindhelm RK, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, et al. Alanine aminotransferase predicts coronary heart disease events: a 10-year follow-up of the Hoorn Study. Atherosclerosis 2007; 191:391–396.
137. Soderberg C, Stal P, Askling J, et al. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatology 2010; 51:595–602.
138. Nobili V, Alkhouri N, Bartuli A, et al. Severity of liver injury and atherogenic lipid profile in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Pediatr Res 2010; 67:665–670.
139. Schwimmer JB, Pardee PE, Lavine JE, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Circulation 2008; 118:277–283.
140. Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, et al. Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005; 42:641–649.
141. Pacifico L, Anania C, Martino F, et al. Functional and morphological vascular changes in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010; 52:1643–1651.
142. Pacifico L, Cantisani V, Ricci P, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and carotid atherosclerosis in children. Pediatr Res 2008; 63:423–427.
143. Caserta CA, Pendino GM, Amante A, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and carotid artery intima-media thickness in an adolescent population in southern Italy. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171:1195–1202.
144. Gokce S, Atbinici Z, Aycan Z, et al. The relationship between pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk factors and increased risk of atherosclerosis in obese children. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34:308–315.
145. Nobili V, Alisi A, Della Corte C, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid for the treatment of fatty liver: randomised controlled trial in children. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 23:1066–1070.
146. Corey KE, Vuppalanchi R, Vos M, et al. Improvement in liver histology is associated with reduction in dyslipidemia in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60:360–367.
147. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents, National Heart L, Blood I. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (suppl 5):S213–S256.
148. Barlow SE, Expert C. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (suppl 4):S164–S192.
149. Nadeau KJ, Klingensmith G, Zeitler P. Type 2 diabetes in children is frequently associated with elevated alanine aminotransferase. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005; 41:94–98.
150. Kim G, Giannini C, Pierpont B, et al. Longitudinal effects of MRI-measured hepatic steatosis on biomarkers of glucose homeostasis and hepatic apoptosis in obese youth. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:130–136.
151. Newton KP, Hou J, Crimmins NA, et al. Prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170:e161971.
152. Cali AM, De Oliveira AM, Kim H, et al. Glucose dysregulation and hepatic steatosis in obese adolescents: is there a link? Hepatology 2009; 49:1896–1903.
153. Svetkey LP, Stevens VJ, Brantley PJ, et al. Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299:1139–1148.
154. Dudekula A, Rachakonda V, Shaik B, et al. Weight loss in nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease patients in an ambulatory care setting is largely unsuccessful but correlates with frequency of clinic visits. PLoS One 2014; 9:e111808.
155. Dunn W, Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, et al. Modest alcohol consumption is associated with decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Hepatol 2012; 57:384–391.
156. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Holmqvist M, et al. Alcohol consumption is associated with progression of hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44:366–374.
157. Zein CO, Unalp A, Colvin R, et al. Smoking and severity of hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2011; 54:753–759.
158. Lin C, Rountree CB, Methratta S, et al. Secondhand tobacco exposure is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Environ Res 2014; 132:264–268.
159. El-Karaksy HM, El-Hawary MI, El-Koofy NM, et al. Safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine in children with chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:7337–7340.
160. Majda-Stanislawska E, Bednarek M, Kuydowicz J. Immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in children with chronic liver disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23:571–574.
161. Diseases AAoPCoI. Red Book®: 2015 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 30th edElk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2015.
162. Leuridan E, Van Damme P. Hepatitis B and the need for a booster dose. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53:68–75.
163. Spradling PR, Kamili S, Xing J, et al. Response to challenge dose among young adults vaccinated for hepatitis B as infants: importance of detectable residual antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 36:529–533.
164. Kistler KD, Molleston J, Unalp A, et al. Symptoms and quality of life in obese children and adolescents with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:396–406.

children; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; recommendations; treatment

Copyright 2016 by ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.