Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles: Hepatology and Nutrition

Serum Markers May Distinguish Biliary Atresia From Other Forms of Neonatal Cholestasis

Wang, Hongtao*; Malone, James P; Gilmore, Petra Erdmann; Davis, Alan E; Magee, John C§; Townsend, R Reid; Heuckeroth, Robert O*

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: April 2010 - Volume 50 - Issue 4 - p 411-416
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181cb42ee

Abstract

Biliary atresia (BA) is a severe neonatal liver disease resulting from sclerosing cholangiopathy of unknown etiology (1–4). It causes one third of all cholestatic neonatal diseases and is the most common indication for liver transplantation in children. Unfortunately, there are no noninvasive diagnostic methods that clearly identify children with BA. Definitive diagnosis requires surgery, cholangiogram, and liver biopsy. Early diagnosis is particularly important for BA because early surgical intervention by Kasai portoenterostomy correlates with good long-term outcome (5). Thus, there is a real need for novel blood tests that facilitate differentiation between BA and other neonatal cholestatic diseases.

Previous studies examining the potential for changes in individual serum or hepatic markers to distinguish BA from other neonatal liver diseases identified differences in extracellular matrix proteins and modifying enzymes, cell adhesion molecules, cytoskeletal proteins, cell proliferation and death markers, immunologic markers, and growth factors and their receptors that may be useful in BA diagnosis or to evaluate prognosis. Although some of these approaches appear promising, a more global approach is still needed to identify BA-specific changes in serum protein abundance. New proteomic technology, including sensitive and accurate techniques of 2-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D DIGE) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), significantly facilitates identification of new disease biomarkers (6). Although this approach has been used for cancer biomarker identification (7), to our knowledge, there are no reports using this technique to identify BA biomarkers. For this work, we used high-throughput proteomic technology and advanced data mining software to identify 11 proteins whose relative abundance distinguishes children with BA from infants with non-BA cholestasis in our cohort. This work provides new hope that a blood test for BA can be developed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient Population and Serum Samples

Serum samples from infants with newly recognized cholestatic disease were obtained from the Biliary Atresia Research Consortium (BARC), a multicenter collaborative study group supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and established to investigate BA and neonatal cholestasis (8). Children enrolled are followed by expert hepatologists from 10 large pediatric medical centers for as long as they remain cholestatic. We are confident that all of the children with BA were correctly identified based on operative cholangiogram and liver pathology. Entry criteria for the BARC study include age younger than 180 days and serum direct or conjugated bilirubin greater than 20% of total and greater than 2 mg/dL. Children with liver failure, malignancy, hypoxia, shock, ischemic hepatopathy within the preceding 2 weeks, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–associated cholestasis were excluded as were children with prior hepatobiliary surgery. Children with primary hemolytic disease, drug- or total parenteral nutrition–associated cholestasis, bacterial or fungal sepsis, or birth weight less than 1500 g are also excluded unless they are definitively diagnosed with BA or another cholestatic disease being studied by the network. Two children in the non-BA group had α-1-antitrypsin (α1AT) deficiency (ZZ pi type). One child had a positive cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M antibody. The etiology of the liver disease in other non-BA infants is unknown, reflecting the ongoing challenge of diagnosing cholestatic infants. These children are called “indeterminate intrahepatic cholestasis” (IIC), a term now preferred by BARC investigators, and accounting for 33% of children enrolled in BARC.

Blood collected in BD Vacutainer SST serum separation tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was allowed to clot (30–45 minutes, room temperature) before centrifugation (1100g, 10 minutes). Serum was stored at −80°C before analysis. Detailed deidentified clinical data from BARC was available for analysis. The protocol was approved by Washington University's Human Research Protection Office.

Proteomic Analysis

Detailed methods are provided in the online-only supplemental material. Briefly, serum samples thawed in the presence of protease inhibitors were depleted of the 12 most abundant serum proteins and subjected to 2D DIGE (9) after labeling 1% of each protein sample with Cy2, Cy3, or Cy5 fluorescent dye. Each gel contained 1 BA sample, 1 non-BA sample, and 1 sample that was a mixture of all of the proteins (ie, pooled sample to facilitate cross-gel alignments). Selected proteins were identified using MS/MS. The Protein MASCOT score for the proteins shown in Table 2 ranged from 36 to 1360. Detailed protein identification data are provided in Supplemental Table 1 (http://links.lww.com/MPG/A15).

TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Demographic and clinical data for children at the time of diagnosis

Data Analysis and Statistics

GE Healthcare's DeCyder Differential In-gel Analysis (DIA) software was used to determine spot boundaries and normalize differences between images from each gel. Normalization eliminated nonsample differences due to fluorescent response of different Cy dyes and sample loading. Pooled samples were used by DeCyder Biological Variation Analysis (BVA) software (GE Healthcare) for cross-gel alignment. DeCyder Extended Data Analysis (EDA) module (GE Healthcare) was used for statistical comparisons and to perform predictive modeling. To generate the classifier we used EDA's Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA) algorithm, a statistical approach specifically designed for this type of analysis (10). Standard clinical parameters (Table 1) were evaluated by Mann-Whitney rank sum or t test.

RESULTS

Patient Selection Criteria

Our goal was to identify novel BA biomarkers that may be useful when children were first recognized to have cholestasis. Therefore, we evaluated serum samples from children enrolled in the BARC study whose serum was obtained within a few days of enrollment. Clinical data are in Table 1. Workflow is outlined in Figure 1. Final diagnosis for each child was BA (n = 19), α-1-antitrypsin deficiency (n = 2), or IIC (n = 16). One additional child had positive cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M antibody. The critical importance of distinguishing children with BA from those with non-BA cholestatic disease is emphasized by the difference in outcome between BA and non-BA groups. All of the children with BA had a Kasai portoenterostomy. Eight of 19 children with BA were alive with a normal bilirubin at follow-up. Ten of 19 children with BA had a liver transplant and 2 infants with BA died. In contrast, none of the non-BA children had a liver transplant or died of liver disease. There were no significant differences in any routinely measured laboratory values between BA and non-BA groups, although elevated GGT and elevated direct/total bilirubin ratio in the BA group almost reached statistical significance.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
Workflow for biomarker discovery. BVA = Biological Variation Analysis; DIGE = difference gel electrophoresis; EDA = Extended Data Analysis.

Proteomic Analysis of Serum From BA and Non-BA Cholestatic Infants

We analyzed 38 serum samples using 19 large-format DIGE gels. Samples were depleted of abundant proteins, labeled with fluorescent dyes, and then separated by 2D DIGE (Fig. 2). Using DeCyder BVA, 491 ± 69 spots were manually matched to provide gel alignment “landmarks.” Automated matching produced an additional 584 ± 78 spots. All of the matches were manually verified across each gel to generate a list of 1110 ± 181 properly matched spots. Some protein spots were absent on individual gels. Protein spots matched across at least 16 of 19 gels were used for EDA statistical analyses; 571 spots meeting these criteria were analyzed to identify potential biomarkers that may distinguish infants with BA from non-BA liver disease.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2:
Representative 2D and 3D DIGE gels. Identical images are shown in A and B. (A) Highlighted spots are more abundant in BA than in non-BA liver disease. (B) Highlighted spots are more abundant in non-BA than in BA liver disease. Numbers beside spots correspond to numbers in Table 2. (C and D) Representative 2D and 3D images of single spots demonstrating quantitative differences between individuals. (C) Spot 4, figure (A). (D) Spot 11, figure (B). BA = biliary atresia.

Identification of Potential Biomarkers

From our 38 serum samples we randomly selected 28 samples to use as a “training set” to identify biomarkers (14 BA and 14 non-BA). The remaining 10 samples were used as a “test set” to determine whether the classifier algorithm generated could correctly distinguish between BA and non-BA liver disease. Average serum protein abundance differences between BA and non-BA groups were compared using t tests. One hundred thirty-eight spots had more than 1.2-fold difference between the groups (P < 0.1), but only 47 spots were completely resolved from neighboring peptides. Of these spots, 42 (90%) were present on at least 18 of 19 gels; 28 spots (67%) were identified by MS/MS and used for classifier generation and testing. Interestingly, many identified potential protein biomarkers were found in multiple spots, suggesting protein isoforms or posttranslational processing.

Generation of a Classifier to Distinguish BA From Non-BA Cholestasis

No identified protein individually distinguished BA from non-BA serum. We hypothesized that combinations of protein abundance ratios may, however, distinguish these groups. To generate a classifier, we analyzed peptide abundance data of the training set using EDA's RDA (10), a statistical approach well suited to large numbers of observations and small sample sizes (ie, spot number >> patient number). This method generates classifiers with nonlinear boundaries between groups where γ and λ parameters can be varied to change the shape of decision borders and generate stable boundaries. Using this approach, we identified 11 spots whose abundance correctly identified 9 of 10 “test set” serum samples randomly selected before quantitative image analysis (Table 2, Fig. 3A). A heat map shows relative abundance of these proteins in serum of children with BA or non-BA cholestasis (Fig. 4). To evaluate specificity and sensitivity of the classifier, a ROC curve was generated (Fig. 3B) by varying γ and λ parameters for the RDA classifier. The C-statistic (area under the curve) for these data was 0.8. In combination with other clinical or diagnostic criteria, this C-statistic suggests that serum proteomic analysis may become a useful adjunct to medical decision making for cholestatic infants (11).

TABLE 2
TABLE 2:
Proteins used to differentiate BA from non-BA neonatal cholestasis
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3:
Classifier validation. (A) The relative abundance of 11 proteins in Table 2 correctly classified 9 of 10 of the children in the “test set.” (B) Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA) algorithms are influenced by λ and γ parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated by varying λ and γ, but maintaining the same 11 peptide spots as biomarkers. Sensitivity indicates the likelihood that the classifier generates an accurate classification. Specificity indicates the likelihood that the classifier generates an inaccurate classification. BA = biliary atresia.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4:
Heat map. Relative abundance of potential biomarker proteins in infants with BA or non-BA cholestasis. Each column represents an individual child's serum. Each row represents an individual protein. Colors show the protein abundance relative to that protein's abundance in pooled samples. A scale bar is at the bottom. The abundance of single proteins cannot be used to classify serum samples, but trends in peptide abundance are evident. The top 7 proteins tend to be more abundant in serum of non-BA cholestatic infants than in children with BA. The bottom 4 proteins tend to be more abundant in children with BA than in those with non-BA liver disease. *Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, #cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M positive. BA = biliary atresia.

DISCUSSION

BA is a devastating disease for which current diagnostic and treatment methods are inadequate. Because early diagnosis is essential for effective drainage via Kasai portoenterostomy, better noninvasive diagnostic techniques are needed. This is especially important because many neonatal diseases can be confused with BA, and diagnosis currently requires operative cholangiogram and liver biopsy (1,2). Thus, although children with BA have a more severe form of liver disease than children with many other types of cholestasis, this may not be initially apparent based on clinical presentation or routinely investigated laboratory parameters as supported by data in Table 1. For this study we hypothesized that liver injury in infants with BA is distinct enough from other types of neonatal cholestasis that combinations of serum biomarkers may distinguish infants with BA from other cholestatic children. For these studies we started with serum from 38 infants, aligned more than 1100 spots across 19 large-format DIGE gels, and used bioinformatics techniques to identify 11 proteins whose abundance could classify serum from cholestatic infants into BA or non-BA groups. We recognize that this work will need replication with independent serum samples. Nonetheless, these promising data suggest that noninvasive tests for BA are achievable, especially if serum biomarkers are combined with additional imaging and clinical parameters. Test methods, however, will need to be simplified before these biomarkers could be used clinically.

Before discussing the potential significance of proteins in our classifier, we note that a recent analysis demonstrated changes in serum apolipoprotein C-II and transthyretin in infants with BA at early and late stages of disease (12). Although these proteins were among our diagnostic biomarkers, comparing their data with ours is difficult because of the few control samples in their study (n = 2) and their emphasis on changes in serum proteins with disease progression in BA versus our emphasis on differential diagnosis between BA and other cholestatic disease. In both studies, changes identified are “relative” protein abundance levels, but diagnostic tests will require alternative approaches to determine absolute serum biomarker levels. Nonetheless, their data suggest that biomarkers for BA could change as disease progresses. Our data only apply to children at initial contact with pediatric gastroenterologists (ie, at the time of initial diagnosis).

In addition to potential diagnostic significance, identified biomarkers can be tied to prior observations about BA and cholestatic disease. Although we need to avoid overinterpretation, it is worth considering the potential biological significance of our findings. Both apolipoprotein C-II and E were more abundant in serum from BA than non-BA infants, consistent with previously reported apolipoprotein E elevations in individuals with biliary tract obstruction (13–15). These proteins are linked on chromosome 19, and their expression is regulated by 2 hepatic control region cis-acting liver enhancers (16) that are activated by the farnesoid X-activated receptor (FXR; NR1H4), a nuclear hormone receptor that induces gene expression in response to several bile acids (17). Remarkably, expression of complement component 3, another protein that was more abundant in BA than in non-BA serum, is also activated by FXR (18). Collectively, these data suggest that FXR activity is higher in liver of infants with BA than in non-BA cholestasis, but there are other possible explanations.

Elevated apolipoprotein C-II in infants with BA correlates with old observations about dyslipoproteinemia in cholestatic disease. In particular, lipoprotein-X (LP-X) was previously suggested to help distinguish BA from other types of neonatal cholestasis (19). LP-X is an unusual lamellar particle with high free cholesterol and phospholipid levels that accumulate in serum during biliary tract obstruction (20,21). LP-X is also found in individuals with deficiency in lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase, an enzyme that produces cholesterol ester from free cholesterol and lecithin. Interestingly, apolipoprotein C-II inhibits lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (22) consistent with the idea that LP-X may be elevated in children with BA compared with other neonatal cholestatic diseases because of increased apolipoprotein C-II.

The identified potential biomarkers also suggest a more significant proinflammatory state in BA than other neonatal cholestatic diseases consistent with prior observations (23–25). For example, complement C3 and factor B are acute phase reactant proteins that were more abundant in BA versus non-BA serum. These same proteins are elevated in adults with large bile duct obstruction or viral hepatitis (26–28) and in primary biliary cirrhosis (29,30). In contrast, serum levels of C3 and factor B were reduced in chronic active hepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis, suggesting that their abundance may be useful as part of a diagnostic fingerprint that distinguishes BA from other neonatal liver diseases. Note, however, that although recent data suggest that complement may be activated in BA (31), our data do not provide insight into complement activation.

Low serum levels of transthyretin (prealbumin), apolipoprotein H, and α2-HS glycoprotein are also consistent with a proinflammatory state in infants with BA because these proteins are negative acute phase reactants (32–35). Furthermore, although low serum transthyretin is often assumed to reflect malnutrition, transthyretin falls rapidly in rats after biliary tract obstruction (36) and inflammation is among the most potent transthyretin regulators (35,37). Interestingly, mannose-binding lectin (MBL2) is a component of the innate immune system (38,39), but amyloid P, an acute phase reactant in mice closely related to C-reactive protein, is not a human acute phase reactant (40). Collectively, elevated levels of positive acute phase proteins and reduced levels of negative acute phase proteins in serum of infants with BA are consistent with a proinflammatory state in BA compared with other forms of neonatal cholestasis. Caution must be used while interpreting these data, however, because FXR mRNA is repressed in mouse liver during the acute phase response (41), at least after treatment with some inflammatory mediators. Although this may seem to contradict the hypothesis outlined above that FXR activity is elevated in liver of infants with BA, FXR mRNA levels and FXR activity need not be related because FXR is activated by bile acids that accumulate more significantly in cholestatic than inflammatory liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing rapid noninvasive diagnostic tests that clearly distinguish BA from other forms of neonatal cholestasis is important. Our studies suggest that although no single marker reliably separates BA from non-BA serum samples, combinations of markers could be valuable. In particular, application of modern statistical methods to complex data sets provides a new opportunity to distinguish BA from other types of liver disease. Interpretation of the biological significance of identified potential biomarkers, however, is challenging. First, because we compared serum from infants with BA to serum from non-BA cholestatic infants, these data provide no insight into how these protein levels may compare with healthy infants. In addition, these analyses provide limited insight into hepatic function, liver pathology, or the extent of hepatic injury. Comparable proteomic analyses of liver tissue may provide additional valuable information, but they would likely require analysis of relatively large biopsy samples to avoid the complex issues that arise in sampling heterogeneous tissue. Finally, although it is tempting to speculate that these biomarkers reflect specific disease processes as we have done, the complexity of BA and non-BA liver disease makes it possible to generate hypotheses but not to draw conclusions about disease etiology or pathogenesis based on our data. Nonetheless, these new data provide a rationale for additional studies to validate and extend our observations with the goal of developing reliable noninvasive diagnostic testing for BA. This work will require quantitative analysis of serum protein abundance for selected biomarkers (eg, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and the analysis of serum from many additional children with BA and non-BA liver disease. Definitive diagnosis may require a combination of serum biomarkers, clinical criteria, and imaging results to provide an unambiguous diagnosis without liver biopsy or cholangiogram. These results also support further investigations into the role of FXR and inflammation in BA.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the BARC investigators, coordinators, and families who participated, as they made this work possible. We thank Dr Richard LeDuc for assistance in bioinformatics and preparation of Supplemental Table 1. We thank Michael R. Narkewicz for providing serum samples to generate preliminary data as we began this study and David Rudnick, Ross Shepherd, Frances White, and Rosemary Nagy for helpful comments.

REFERENCES

1. de Carvalho E, Ivantes CA, Bezerra JA. Extrahepatic biliary atresia: current concepts and future directions. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007; 83:105–120.
2. Bassett MD, Murray KF. Biliary atresia: recent progress. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42:720–729.
3. Sokol RJ, Mack C, Narkewicz MR, Karrer FM. Pathogenesis and outcome of biliary atresia: current concepts. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003; 37:4–21.
4. Sokol RJ, Shepherd RW, Superina R, et al. Screening and outcomes in biliary atresia: summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop. Hepatology 2007; 46:566–581.
5. Wadhwani SI, Turmelle YP, Nagy R, et al. Prolonged neonatal jaundice and the diagnosis of biliary atresia: a single-center analysis of trends in age at diagnosis and outcomes. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e1438–e1440.
6. Chakravarti B, Gallagher SR, Chakravarti DN. Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) using CyDye DIGE fluor minimal dyes. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2005;Chapter 10:Unit 10.23.
7. Maurya P, Meleady P, Dowling P, Clynes M. Proteomic approaches for serum biomarker discovery in cancer. Anticancer Res 2007; 27:1247–1255.
8. Hoofnagle JH. Biliary Atresia Research Consortium (BARC). Hepatology 2004; 39:891.
9. Bredemeyer AJ, Lewis RM, Malone JP, et al. A proteomic approach for the discovery of protease substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:11785–11790.
10. Friedman J. Regularized discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 84:165–175.
11. Ohman EM, Granger CB, Harrington RA, Lee KL. Risk stratification and therapeutic decision making in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2000; 284:876–878.
12. Lee CW, Lin MY, Lee WC, et al. Characterization of plasma proteome in biliary atresia. Clin Chim Acta 2007; 375:104–109.
13. Seidel D. Lipoproteins in liver disease. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987; 25:541–551.
14. Coulhon MP, Tallet F, Yonger J, Agneray J, Raichvarg D. Changes in human high density lipoproteins in patients with extra-hepatic biliary obstruction. Clin Chim Acta 1985; 145:163–172.
15. Danielsson B, Ekman R, Johansson BG, Nilsson-Ehle P, Petersson BG. Lipoproteins in plasma from patients with low LCAT activity due to biliary obstruction. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1978; 150:214–217.
16. Allan CM, Taylor S, Taylor JM. Two hepatic enhancers, HCR.1 and HCR.2, coordinate the liver expression of the entire human apolipoprotein E/C-I/C-IV/C-II gene cluster. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:29113–29119.
17. Kast HR, Nguyen CM, Sinal CJ, et al. Farnesoid X-activated receptor induces apolipoprotein C-II transcription: a molecular mechanism linking plasma triglyceride levels to bile acids. Mol Endocrinol 2001; 15:1720–1728.
18. Li J, Pircher PC, Schulman IG, Westin SK. Regulation of complement C3 expression by the bile acid receptor FXR. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:7427–7434.
19. Tazawa Y, Yamada M, Nakagawa M, et al. Significance of serum lipoprotein-X and gammaglutamyltranspeptidase in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. A preliminary study in 27 cholestatic young infants. Eur J Pediatr 1986; 145:54–57.
20. Miller JP. Dyslipoproteinaemia of liver disease. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 4:807–832.
21. Felker TE, Hamilton RL, Havel RJ. Secretion of lipoprotein-X by perfused livers of rats with cholestasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978; 75:3459–3463.
22. Albers JJ, Lin J, Roberts GP. Effect of human plasma apolipoproteins on the activity of purified lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase. Artery 1979; 5:61–75.
23. Narayanaswamy B, Gonde C, Tredger JM, et al. Serial circulating markers of inflammation in biliary atresia—evolution of the post-operative inflammatory process. Hepatology 2007; 46:180–187.
24. Mack CL, Tucker RM, Sokol RJ, et al. Biliary atresia is associated with CD4+ Th1 cell-mediated portal tract inflammation. Pediatr Res 2004; 56:79–87.
25. Bezerra JA, Tiao G, Ryckman FC, et al. Genetic induction of proinflammatory immunity in children with biliary atresia. Lancet 2002; 360:1653–1659.
26. Potter BJ, Elias E, Fayers PM, Jones EA. Profiles of serum complement in patients with hepatobiliary diseases. Digestion 1978; 18:371–383.
27. Potter BJ, Trueman AM, Jones EA. Serum complement in chronic liver disease. Gut 1973; 14:451–456.
28. Thompson RA, Carter R, Stokes RP, Geddes AM, Goodall JA. Serum immunoglobulins, complement component levels and autoantibodies in liver disease. Clin Exp Immunol 1973; 14:335–346.
29. Gardinali M, Conciato L, Cafaro C, et al. Complement system is not activated in primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1998; 87:297–303.
30. Lindgren S, Laurell AB, Eriksson S. Complement components and activation in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 1984; 4:9–14.
31. Bezerra JA. The next challenge in pediatric cholestasis: deciphering the pathogenesis of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 43(suppl 1):S23–S29.
32. Sellar GC, Keane J, Mehdi H, et al. Characterization and acute phase modulation of canine apolipoprotein H (beta 2-glycoprotein I). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993; 191:1288–1293.
33. Mehdi H, Nunn M, Steel DM, et al. Nucleotide sequence and expression of the human gene encoding apolipoprotein H (beta 2-glycoprotein I). Gene 1991; 108:293–298.
34. Ando Y. Immunological and serological laboratory tests: transthyretin. Rinsho Byori 2005; 53:554–557.
35. Lo WK. Serum parameters, inflammation, renal function and patient outcome. Contrib Nephrol 2006; 150:152–155.
36. Imamine T, Okuno M, Moriwaki H, et al. Impaired synthesis of retinol-binding protein and transthyretin in rat liver with bile duct obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41:1038–1042.
37. Fuhrman MP, Charney P, Mueller CM. Hepatic proteins and nutrition assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 2004; 104:1258–1264.
38. Jack DL, Turner MW. Anti-microbial activities of mannose-binding lectin. Biochem Soc Trans 2003; 31(Pt 4):753–757.
39. Turner MW, Hamvas RM. Mannose-binding lectin: structure, function, genetics and disease associations. Rev Immunogenet 2000; 2:305–322.
40. Bijl M, Bootsma H, Van Der Geld Y, et al. Serum amyloid P component levels are not decreased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and do not rise during an acute phase reaction. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:831–835.
41. Kim MS, Shigenaga J, Moser A, Feingold K, Grunfeld C. Repression of farnesoid X receptor during the acute phase response. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:8988–8995.
Keywords:

biliary atresia; biomarker; neonatal cholestasis; proteomics

Supplemental Digital Content

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.