Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Probiotics in Allergy Management

Vanderhoof, Jon A

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: November 2008 - Volume 47 - Issue - p S38-S40
doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000338810.74933.c1
  • Free



Normal microbial flora of the gut comprises more than 400 species, most of which are acquired perinatally via the maternal vagina and faecal flora. The microbial composition of the gut in infants born by caesarean section may differ. In all infants, some environmental acquisition may occur early in life. The microbiota of the gut is important for a variety of reasons including immune regulation, gut barrier function, and nutrient metabolism in absorption, and it is a potential source of infection.


Gut microbiota can be modified via the use of probiotics or prebiotics (Table 1). Probiotics are human derived and are usually exogenous strains of bacteria that may be supplied via the diet or supplements to provide a specific health benefit. Conversely, prebiotics are poorly digested oligosaccharides that promote the growth of desirable strains of commensal bacteria.

Modification of the gut microbiota: prebiotics versus probiotics

The most common probiotics are several strains of bacteria (Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium), yeast (Saccharomyces boulardii), or killed organisms and subfractions. The benefits of probiotics are strain specific, and the benefits of some strains have been proven in robust clinical trials. It is important to note that not all strains with proven efficacy are suitable for use in all indications.


In individuals with acute diarrhoea, probiotics (eg, L reuteri, LGG) have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of viral diarrhoea, the risk of traveller's diarrhoea, and the incidence of diarrhoea in day care centres. In addition, probiotics also reduce the incidence of relapsing diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile, and the incidence of antibiotic-related diarrhoea.

A number of mechanisms of action have been proposed for probiotics in the protection from diarrhoeal disease, including competitive exclusion, stimulation of intestinal mucin secretion, and stimulation of the immune response. A meta-analysis of 9 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in adults and children demonstrated that probiotics were effective in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. The odds ratio in favour of active treatment was 0.39 (P < 0.001) for yeast and 0.34 (P < 0.01) for Lactobacilli(1).

A modest but clinically significant benefit has been demonstrated in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis, especially with LGG. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of other strains and firm conclusions cannot be made regarding prevention because of heterogeneity of studies.


Inflammatory Bowel Disease

VSL#3, a combination of 8 different strains of bacteria, prevents recurrence of pouchitis and may be useful in ulcerative colitis, but to date no conclusive benefits have been demonstrated in Crohn disease. The Escherichia coli strain Nissle may be effective, but studies with LGG have yielded disappointing results. In a study of 75 children 5 to 21 years old with Crohn disease in remission, no apparent benefit of probiotics was evident. Children had a slightly but not significantly shorter time to relapse following treatment with LGG (9.8 months vs 11 months for placebo) (2). Overall, 31% of patients receiving LGG relapsed compared with 17% of patients receiving placebo.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

In adults with irritable bowel syndrome (n = 77), B infantis 35624 was more effective than L salivaricus in reducing pain, bloating, and difficulty with defecation and increased the peripheral blood mononuclear cell interleukin (IL)-10/IL-12 ratio (3). As yet, there are no positive studies in paediatric patients with irritable bowel syndrome.


LGG has demonstrated beneficial effects in atopic dermatitis in allergic infants (4). It is likely that a few other strains will be effective; however, more data are necessary. These benefits are likely to be limited to infants and small children and do not yet include asthma.

Probiotic therapy has also been shown to prevent atopic disease in 1 of 2 similarly designed studies (4,5). In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Finland, LGG was administered to pregnant women with a first-degree relative with atopic eczema. The newborn infants then continued to receive LGG and were evaluated at the age of 2 years (4). The frequency and severity of atopic eczema was reduced in infants receiving LGG (Figure 1). The second study in a German population of infants at high risk found no such advantage (5). The investigators suggested that the difference in results could be attributed to the baseline or demographic differences between the patient populations, such as gene-pool-profile differences [eg, Finnish (4) vs German (5)] or differences in risk for atopic dermatitis (5). The researchers concluded that additional studies could clarify whether particular patient subgroups are more likely to benefit from supplementation with probiotics.

FIG. 1
FIG. 1:
Efficacy of LGG in 2-year-old children with atopic eczema; adapted from Kalliomaki et al (4).


Probiotics are useful in a variety of diarrhoeal diseases and they may also have some utility in the treatment of inflammatory and allergic disorders. The effects of probiotics have been proven to be strain specific, and clinical studies are required to determine the efficacy of each strain in specific diseases. Probiotics appear to be safe, even for infants, unless they have central lines. To date, the most positive data are for Lactobacillus strains (LGG and L reuteri). There is considerable enthusiasm for the routine use of probiotics in neonates, despite a lack of knowledge about the long-term effects. Previous studies suggest that inactivated probiotic bacteria, their DNA, and/or soluble products are likely to provide the beneficial properties of live bacteria, but may be safer alternatives because the dose of these agents can be readily controlled and they are less likely to establish lifelong niches. Probiotics should be considered in much the same way as antibiotics. The most effective and the appropriate probiotic should be selected for a particular indication. There are no data to suggest value in treating everyone with probiotics.


1. D'Souza AL, Rajkumar C, Cooke J, et al. Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: meta-analysis. BMJ 2002; 324:1361.
2. Bousvaros AS, Guandalini S, Baldassano RN, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial of lactobacillus GG versus placebo in addition to standard maintenance therapy for children with Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005; 11:833–839.
3. O'Mahony L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:541–551.
4. Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, et al. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357:1076–1079.
5. Kopp MV, Hennemuth I, Heinzmann A, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for primary prevention: no clinical effects of Lactobacillus GG supplementation. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e850–e856.
© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.