Efficacy of Rice-based Oral Rehydration Solution Containing Recombinant Human Lactoferrin and Lysozyme in Peruvian Children With Acute Diarrhea : Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles: Hepatology & Nutrition

Efficacy of Rice-based Oral Rehydration Solution Containing Recombinant Human Lactoferrin and Lysozyme in Peruvian Children With Acute Diarrhea

Zavaleta, Nelly*; Figueroa, Dante; Rivera, Juan; Sánchez, Julia; Alfaro, Segundo; Lönnerdal, Bo§

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: February 2007 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 258-264
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31802c41b7
  • Free



Diarrhea remains 1 of the 2 most important causes of morbidity and mortality in children under 5 years of age. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that as many as 1.8 million children die from diarrhea each year (1). Peru has a high rate of diarrheal disease and it is estimated that 20% to 25% of the 36,000 pediatric deaths each year in Peru are caused by diarrhea (2). In Peru and other less privileged countries, diarrhea is generally of infectious origin and can be associated with Escherichia coli, Giardia, rotavirus, Shigella, Salmonella, and Campylobacter, among others (3). Repeated attacks of diarrhea in children can lead to undernutrition, growth failure, and compromised immune function (2,4). The cornerstone of treatment for children with diarrhea and associated dehydration is oral rehydration therapy. Since the development of a glucose-based oral rehydration solution (ORS) (4), millions of childhood deaths have been avoided (5–7). One limitation of the original WHO-ORS formulation was failure to reduce the severity of diarrhea. Substitution of a rice-based ORS (R-ORS) was successful in reducing the volume of diarrhea in patients with cholera (8). One suggested mechanism of action was the reduction of osmolarity in the R-ORS. Recently, WHO recommended a new formulation with low osmolarity, 245 mOsm/L as compared with 311 mOsm/L in the original formulation, which has proven to be more efficacious (9). In Mexico R-ORS was able to reduce the rate of intravenous fluid intervention; however, for other diarrhea outcomes, low osmolarity G-ORS and R-ORS were similar (10).

Breast-fed infants have a lower incidence of diarrhea, as well as other infections, when compared with non–breast-fed infants (4,11). In vitro data suggest that the milk proteins lactoferrin and lysozyme play an important part in the protective role of breast milk (12). Lactoferrin and lysozyme individually and in combination have demonstrated activity against a wide spectrum of bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi (12). The addition of human lactoferrin and lysozyme to an ORS may result in a reduced duration of diarrheal disease and enhanced rate of recovery. The availability of an ORS that provides bioactive proteins found in breast milk, along with rehydration, would provide a potential major advance in the management of infectious diarrhea.

To produce human lactoferrin and lysozyme in large quantities, recombinant technology has been used with rice as the host organism (13,14). This was achieved by inserting the genes for human milk lactoferrin and lysozyme, respectively, into rice. The recombinant proteins produced were tested extensively in the laboratory and found to be substantially equivalent to the native proteins in all biochemical and functional tests (13,14). Expression of human lactoferrin and lysozyme in rice is an attractive approach because rice is among the first foods recommended for introduction to infants. It has good nutritional value and low allergenicity. Thus, any residual materials from rice introduce no risk and may be viewed as nutritionally sound. Because human lactoferrin and lysozyme are a major part of the diet of breast-fed infants, we hypothesized that the addition of recombinant human lactoferrin and lysozyme to ORS at concentrations found in breast milk may provide additional benefits in the treatment of diarrhea.


Design, Setting, Participants

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized protocol conducted at the Oral Rehydration Units (ORU) of the Instituto Especializado de Salud del Niño (IESN), Lima, Peru, and the Hospital Belén, Trujillo, Peru. The study enrolled male children ages 5 to 33 months with acute diarrhea (≥3 watery stools per day) of <72 h duration without antibiotic treatment or evidence of blood in the stool. Children exclusively breast-fed, children with severe malnutrition (weight for height z-score <2 SD below the National Center for Health Statistics reference population (15), and children with chronic or severe illnesses were excluded from the study. Subjects were enrolled after written informed consent by the parent or guardian. Children were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups in blocks of 6 (http://www.randomization.com). Treatment material was randomized and consecutively labeled by the formulator.

Ethical Considerations

The protocol was approved by the Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) from the Ministry of Health of Peru, the Ethics Committees of the IESN, Instituto de Investigación Nutricional (IIN), and the University of California, Davis.


The study included 3 treatment groups: glucose-ORS based on the WHO recommended low-osmolarity formulation (G-ORS), an R-ORS CeraLyte 70 (Cera Products, Columbia, MD), and the R-ORS with added recombinant human lactoferrin and human lysozyme (Lf/Lz-R-ORS), expressed in rice as described earlier. The transgenic rice was grown and harvested; recombinant lactoferrin was purified from rice powder using salt extraction and ion exchange chromatography (16). Following purification, the iron was removed from the lactoferrin creating apo-Lf. The final lactoferrin product for inclusion in the ORS was 96% protein, 92% lactoferrin, and 0.013 mg/g solid total iron. Recombinant lysozyme was also purified by salt extraction and ion exchange chromatography. The final lysozyme product for inclusion in the ORS was 79% protein and 83.6% lysozyme. The final composition of the 3 ORS solutions in 1 L of boiled water is shown in Table 1.

Final composition of ORS solutions in 1 L of boiled water

Study Procedure

Children with acute diarrhea and mild to moderate dehydration were assessed by a pediatrician at the ORU. The ORS solutions were packaged in multipacket bags, randomized by the sponsor, and then numbered consecutively. An eligible child was given the next consecutive number and the ORS packets were labeled with that number. During the first 4 h of the rehydration phase, children were given ORS according to WHO guidelines, 50 to 80 mL/kg body weight. At the end of the 4-h period, the children were clinically reassessed, 24 children (17.1%) needed 1 to 2 more hours for rehydration, with no difference by treatment group. The maintenance phase was initiated and continued until the children had completed 48 h in the ORU. During the maintenance phase ORS was given to replace measured loss of stool; at this time children were offered water and age-appropriate food ad libitum.

Monitoring of Participants

All intake and output was measured and recorded until the cessation of diarrhea or a maximum of 14 d or upon withdrawal from the study. Stool output was measured throughout the study using preweighed disposable diapers. Urine was collected in urine bags during the first 48 h while the children were in the rehydration unit. Stool consistency was recorded using a scale of 1 to 5: solid, soft, semiliquid, brown liquid, and watery. A score of 1 or 2 for 48 h was considered end of diarrhea. The presence of blood in the stool was detected by visual inspection. ORS was prepared in 1-L gradation marked bottles. Parents were instructed to boil and cool water before mixing the ORS and to discard unused material after 24 h.

Children were monitored in the hospital ORU for the first 48 h. At the end of the 48 h, children were examined by the pediatrician before discharge and returned home. Families were visited daily from days 3 to 6 by a health worker from the IIN. They collected diapers, recorded ORS intake, and provided more sachets of ORS if necessary. On day 7, children returned to the clinic for evaluation. If the child was still experiencing diarrhea, then a health worker continued to visit on days 9, 11, and 13. All of the children returned to the clinic for a final visit on day 14. On day 14, a capillary blood sample was taken and hemoglobin was measured immediately using a portable HemoCue B-hemoglobin photometer (HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden).

Stool Culture

Stool samples, collected at study entry, were placed in stool culture transport vials (Cary-Blair) and sent from the ORU at the IESN to the IIN laboratory; in Trujillo stool culture was done at the reference laboratory of the National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Region La Libertad. For isolation of Salmonella, Shigella, E coli, and V. cholerae, samples were cultured directly onto commonly used selective enteric media (SS agar, XLD agar, MacConkey agar, and TCBS agar plates) enriched in selenite broth and alkaline peptone water. For isolating Campylobacter, samples were cultured directly onto Butzler agar. E coli isolates were tested using a Multiplex Real Time SYBR Green-based polymerase chain reaction for detection of enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, Shiga toxin–producing, enteroinvasive, enteroaggregative, and diffusely adherent bacteria (17). E coli polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed on samples from 130 children in the Lima group.

Rotavirus Detection

Presence of rotavirus was assessed with an enzyme immunoassay for detection of rotavirus (Group A) in human fecal specimens from IDEIA Rotavirus (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA).


For parasite analysis, merthiolate-iodine-formaldehyde was used for preserving, staining, and fixing the stool specimens (http://www.dpd.cdc.gov/dpdx/HTML/DiagnosticProcedures.htm). We used an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Giardia-specific antigen (GSA 65) in aqueous extracts of fecal specimens (ProSpecT Giardia Microplate assay, Alexon-Trend, Lenexa, KS).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.0 (SAS, Cary, NC). χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables and ANOVA tests were used to compare continuous variables among the 3 groups. For nonparametric variables the Mann-Whitney U test was used. z Scores were calculated using Epi-Info version 3.2.2 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze and display the proportion of unresolved diarrhea. There were no significant differences between the 2 conventional ORS treatment groups (G-ORS and R-ORS) and data were therefore pooled (CC-ORS) for comparisons with the experimental group (Lf/Lz-R-ORS).


The 3 ORS were similar in content of electrolytes; the R-ORS contained 41 g rice carbohydrate/L, equivalent to 20 g glucose/L in the G-ORS. The experimental Lf/Lz-R-ORS contained recombinant human lactoferrin at 1 g/L and recombinant human lysozyme at 0.2 g/L, concentrations similar to those found in human milk. Osmolarity was similar in the 3 ORS studied (Table 1).

One hundred and forty boys ages 5 to 33 months were randomized into the study; 130 children were enrolled at the IESN Hospital, Lima, and 10 at Belén Hospital, Trujillo. Of these, 135 completed the 14-d study. A flowchart of the study is shown in Fig. 1. Two subjects were lost to follow-up, 2 were excluded from analysis because inclusion criteria were not met, and 1 subject withdrew because of an adverse event unrelated to the test product. No child was severely malnourished (W/H) and 76 of 135 children (56%) had anemia at study completion (hemoglobin <110 g/L) with no differences between groups. The 3 groups were comparable in age, entry weight, hemoglobin, degree of dehydration, and duration of diarrhea at enrollment (Table 2). More children in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group had an identified pathogen in the stool and the pathogen was more frequently bacterial and E coli (Table 3). Clinical outcomes in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group compared with the combined controls (CC-ORS) are shown in Table 4.

FIG. 1:
Flowchart of enrollment
Baseline characteristics of children in the 3 treatment groups
Pathogens identified in stool samples
Clinical outcome measures

Stool Volume and Duration of Diarrhea

Duration of diarrhea was shorter (P = 0.05) in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group than in the CC-ORS group, 3.67 versus 5.21 d. Stool volume did not significantly differ between groups, but percentage of children with solid stool for 48 h was significantly higher (P = 0.04) in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group (85.1%) than in the control (CC-ORS) group (69.2%). The percentage of children with relapse after 48 h was lower in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group than in controls (8.5 vs 18.7%); however, because of large interindividual variations, this difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in total intake of ORS.

The proportion of unresolved diarrhea by duration of treatment (Kaplan-Meier plot) for the 3 groups is shown in Fig. 2. The Lf/Lz-R-ORS group was lower than the other groups at days 1 and 2 and after day 6 of treatment.

FIG. 2:
Kaplan-Meyer survival curves showing proportion of subjects with unresolved diarrhea

Adverse Events

Twelve children experienced 16 adverse events; 11 were mild respiratory infections, 2 had vomiting and from this group 1 required intravenous therapy, 1 swallowed a coin, 1 had periorbital cellulitis, and 1 had solid skin lesions consistent with insect bites. No adverse events were related to the treatment group. None of the children had persistent diarrhea.


This randomized, double-blind study showed that in 5- to 33-month old boys with acute diarrhea and mild to moderate dehydration, the addition of 2 recombinant human milk proteins, lactoferrin and lysozyme, to a rice-based ORS significantly decreased the duration of diarrhea and increased the percentage of children with solid stool for 48 h. For other endpoints, the Lf/Lz-R-ORS subjects showed improvement compared with the controls; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no adverse events associated with Lf/Lz-R-ORS.

In this study, we evaluated both the standard G-ORS treatment (regular clinical practice) and a commercial R-ORS. Use of R-ORS has been shown to have a significant beneficial effect on the outcome of cholera diarrhea (18,19), but has not been found to result in significantly improved outcomes in noncholera diarrhea in children (18–20). Our results are similar; we did not find any significant difference between these 2 control treatments in any outcome studied. The R-ORS was included as a control because the recombinant lactoferrin and lysozyme were produced in rice. If this treatment is proven effective, then extensive purification of the proteins from rice may not be needed for inclusion in ORS, which would reduce production costs and thus the cost of the product.

It has been shown that breast-feeding is associated with a lower incidence of illness in infants, even in affluent countries (21). Furthermore, the duration of illness was found to be significantly shorter in breast-fed than in non–breast-fed infants. Although it has not been proven that lactoferrin and lysozyme are the factors in breast milk responsible for the reduced duration of illness, it is interesting to note that addition of these proteins significantly decreased the duration of diarrhea. Lactoferrin has been shown to have both bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, regardless of its iron saturation (22). Lactoferrin has also been shown to have antiviral activity (23). Lysozyme is known to be able to kill gram-positive bacteria in vitro by hydrolyzing the bacterial outer membrane (24). In addition, Ellison and Giehl have shown in vitro that these 2 proteins can kill pathogens in a synergistic fashion, with lactoferrin releasing and binding lipopolysaccharide from the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, literally opening holes in the membrane, allowing lysozyme access to the inner proteoglycan matrix (25). Similarly, lactoferrin and lysozyme have been shown to have antistaphylococcal activity (26). Although we do not know the mechanism(s) behind the reduced duration of diarrhea we observed in the Lf/Lz-R-ORS group in this study, it is plausible that these bioactive proteins affected the pathogens and their viability. The higher frequency of bacterial pathogen isolation in the stool of children receiving the Lf/Lz-R-ORS would support this mechanism. Activity against E coli was demonstrated by both proteins during the characterization studies (13,14). Because the study was done during the warmer months, there were not enough children with a viral pathogen to allow a separate statistical analysis. In addition, 15 of the 24 children with rotavirus had bacterial or parasitic pathogen(s) isolated. It is also possible that these proteins facilitated the development of a beneficial gut microflora. Lactoferrin has been shown to stimulate the growth of Bifidobacteria, which have health benefits and are frequently used in probiotic applications (27).

We did not observe any adverse effects of adding these proteins to R-ORS. The recombinant form of lysozyme is identical to native lysozyme because this protein is not posttranslationally modified (ie, no glycosylation or phosphorylation). The lactoferrin protein is also identical to native human lactoferrin (14); however, because lactoferrin is a glycosylated protein, the glycans attached to the protein backbone are of rice origin (16). This means that some terminal carbohydrate residues consist of xylose, which is not the case in human proteins, and sialic acid is lacking, which is a common terminal residue in native human lactoferrin. It has previously been shown that recombinant human lactoferrin produced in rice is functionally equivalent to native human lactoferrin with regard to iron-binding, anti-microbial activity and receptor binding (14). Although not all of the functions of lactoferrin may be related to its intestinal receptor (28), it is evident that absence of the glycans, differences in glycosylation pattern, or composition do not affect receptor binding (29). Thus, it is highly likely that recombinant human lactoferrin, even with a somewhat different glycosylation pattern than native human lactoferrin, will have the same biological function in vivo.

It is not certain that the effects observed were caused by the combination of lactoferrin and lysozyme, even though in vitro data support this notion. Lysozyme alone could have exerted an antibacterial effect because of its enzyme activity; however, lysozyme is not known to have any antirotaviral activity and is therefore more narrow in its anti-infectious role than lactoferrin, which has been shown to have both antiviral and antibacterial activities (22,23,28). It should also be noted that lactoferrin is known to affect the immune function of the host, either locally (gut mucosal immunity) or systemically (30). Furthermore, proteolytic digestion of human lactoferrin has been shown to result in the formation of a well-characterized antibacterial peptide, lactoferricin (31), and possibly several such peptides (32). When examining the proportion of unresolved diarrhea by duration of treatment (Fig. 2), it is possible that there is an immediate antimicrobial effect (days 1–2) and a later effect (days 7–9) that appears more pronounced and because of the time delay may be mediated by an effect on immune function. This speculation needs to be investigated further.

The design of our study does not allow any estimate of the relative potency of the lactoferrin and lysozyme because only 1 concentration of each was used. It is possible that lower concentrations may achieve a similar effect because breast milk concentrations vary considerably among lactating women. It is also possible that higher concentrations may achieve a more pronounced effect. Further studies are needed to resolve these questions.

In conclusion, the addition of recombinant forms of the human milk proteins lactoferrin and lysozyme to ORS had a beneficial effect on acute diarrhea in children. In this study we used concentrations of these proteins similar to those found in human breast milk. It is not yet known whether lower concentrations would be as effective; future studies should evaluate this question.


We would like to thank the parents and children who generously participated in the study, as well as the study team, the staff of IESN, and Hospital Belén, Trujillo, Peru.


1. Bern C, Martines J, de Zoysa I, et al. The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: a ten-year update. Bull WHO 1992; 70:705–714.
2. Lanata CF, Black RE, Gilman RH, et al. Epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of acute vs. persistent diarrhea in periurban Lima, Peru. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1991; 12:82–88.
3. Lanata CF, Black RE. Diarreal diseases. In: Semba RD, Bloem MW, editors. Nutrition and Health in Developing Countries. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2001. pp. 93–129.
4. Cash RA, Nalin DR, Rochat R, et al. A clinical trial of oral therapy in a rural cholera-treatment center. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1970; 19:653–656.
5. Water with sugar and salt. Lancet 1978; 2(8084):300–1.
6. Mahalanabis D, Choudhuri AB, Bagchi NG, et al. Oral fluid therapy of cholera among Bangladesh refugees. Johns Hopkins Med J 1973; 132:197–205.
7. Pierce NF, Hirschhorn N. Oral fluid—a simple weapon against dehydration in diarrhoea: how it works and how to use it. WHO Chron 1977; 31:87–93.
8. Zaman K, Yunus M, Rahman A, et al. Efficacy of a packaged rice oral rehydration solution among children with cholera and cholera-like illness. Acta Paediatr 2001; 90:505–510.
9. Santosham M, Fayad I, Abu Zikri M, et al. A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose. J Pediatr 1996; 128:45–51.
10. Maulen-Radovan I, Gutierrez-Castrellon P, Hashem M, et al. Safety and efficacy of a premixed, rice-based oral rehydration solution. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 38:159–163.
11. Lopez de Romana G, Brown KH, Black RE, et al. Longitudinal studies of infectious diseases and physical growth of infants in Huascar, an underprivileged peri-urban community in Lima, Peru. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129:769–784.
12. Lönnerdal B. Biochemistry and physiological function of human milk proteins. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 42:1299–1317.
13. Huang J, Nandi S, Wu L, et al. Expression of natural antimicrobial human lysozyme in rice grains. Mol Breed 2002; 10:83–94.
14. Nandi S, Suzuki YA, Huang J, et al. Expression of human lactoferrin in transgenic rice grains for the application in infant formula. Plant Sci 2002; 163:713–722.
15. Hamill PVV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL. National Center for Health Statistics Growth Curves for Children: Birth to 18 years: United States. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1977.
16. Nandi S, Yalda D, Lu S, et al. Process development and economic evaluation of recombinant human lactoferrin expressed in rice grain. Trans Res 2005; 14:237–249.
17. Ochoa TJ, Guion GE, Cleary TG. Rapid diagnosis of diarrheagenic E. coli using real time multiplex PCR. Paper presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, April 29–May 2, 2006.
18. Gore SM, Fontaine O, Pierce NF. Impact of rice based oral rehydration solution on stool output and duration of diarrhoea: meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials. BMJ 1992; 304:287–291.
19. Molla AM, Ahmed SM, Greenough WB 3rd. Rice-based oral rehydration solution decreases the stool volume in acute diarrhoea. Bull WHO 1985; 63:751–756.
20. Dutta P, Dutta D, Bhattacharya SK, et al. Comparative efficacy of three different oral rehydration solutions for the treatment of dehydrating diarrhoea in children. Indian J Med Res 1988; 87:229–233.
21. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr 1995; 126:696–702.
22. Arnold RR, Brewer M, Gauthier JJ. Bactericidal activity of human lactoferrin: sensitivity of a variety of microorganisms. Infect Immun 1980; 28:893–898.
23. Harmsen MC, Swart PJ, de Bethune MP, et al. Antiviral effects of plasma and milk proteins: lactoferrin shows potent activity against both human immunodeficiency virus and human cytomegalovirus replication in vitro. J Infect Dis 1995; 172:380–388.
24. Proctor VA, Cunningham FE. The chemistry of lysozyme and its use as a food preservative and a pharmaceutical. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1988; 26:359–395.
25. Ellison RT 3rd, Giehl TJ. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Clin Invest 1991; 88:1080–1091.
26. Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Elucidation of the antistaphylococcal action of lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Med Microbiol 1999; 48:867–871.
27. Petschow BW, Talbott RD, Batema RP. Ability of lactoferrin to promote the growth of Bifidobacterium spp in vitro is independent of receptor binding capacity and iron saturation level. J Med Microbiol 1999; 48:541–549.
28. Lönnerdal B, Iyer S. Lactoferrin: molecular structure and biological function. Annu Rev Nutr 1995; 15:93–110.
29. Suzuki YA, Kelleher SL, Yalda D, et al. Expression, characterization, and biologic activity of recombinant human lactoferrin in rice. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003; 36:190–199.
30. Guillén C, McInnes IB, Vaughan DM, et al. Enhanced Th1 response to Staphylococcus aureus infection in human lactoferrin-transgenic mice. J Immunol 2002; 168:3950–3957.
31. Bellamy W, Takase M, Yamauchi K, et al. Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1992; 1121:130–136.
32. Odell EW, Sarra R, Foxworthy M, et al. Antibacterial activity of peptides homologous to a loop region in human lactoferrin. FEBS Lett 1996; 382:175–178.

Acute diarrhea; Oral rehydration solution; Human lactoferrin; Human lysozyme

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.