Dosage-Related Bifidogenic Effects of Galacto- and Fructooligosaccharides in Formula-Fed Term Infants : Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Dosage-Related Bifidogenic Effects of Galacto- and Fructooligosaccharides in Formula-Fed Term Infants

Moro, G.*; Minoli, I.*; Mosca, M.; Fanaro, S.; Jelinek, J.§; Stahl, B.§; Boehm, G.§

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 34(3):p 291-295, March 2002.
  • Free


In utero, the fetus is sterile until the rupture of the fetal membranes. During vaginal delivery, the infant will acquire the initial microflora from the mother. After this initial inoculation of bacteria, the intestinal flora is modulated by several extrinsic factors (1–3). The type of diet is one factor that determines the composition of the intestinal microflora of breast-fed infants, which differs from the microflora of bottle-fed infants (4). In breast-fed infants, the intestinal microflora is dominated by Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, and this microbial pattern produces beneficial effects on intestinal function and on development of the immune system (5,6). Although the mechanisms of these effects are very complex and not fully understood, dietary interventions to establish an intestinal microflora dominated by Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli are recommended (7–9).

The effect of human milk on the intestinal flora is caused by its content of selective agents that can stimulate the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli. Oligosaccharides, which are a major component of human milk (10), have been identified as a “bifidogenic” factor of human milk (11,12). Recently, human milk oligosaccharides were shown resistant to enzymatic digestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract (13). Nondigestibility and selective fermentation by potentially beneficial bacteria in the colon are prerequisites for a prebiotic effect of dietary ingredients (7–9).

The composition of neutral human milk oligosaccharides is very complex (10–15), and the relation between these different structures and their function is not well understood. Galactooligosaccharides and fructooligosaccharides have been used to stimulate Bifidobacteria, and several human studies have demonstrated the prebiotic effect of these compounds (16–19).

In a previous study performed in preterm infants, we tested the prebiotic capacity of an oligosaccharide mixture consisting of 90% galactooligosaccharides (derived from lactose) (20) and 10% fructooligosaccharides (high-molecular-weight fraction of inulin extracted from chicory roots) (16). The mixture was combined to mimic the molecular size distribution of human milk oligosaccharides and to benefit from a possible synergistic effect of both compounds to stimulate the growth of Bifidobacteria (21).

The mixture was used in a concentration of 1 g/dL, similar to the oligosaccharide content of human milk (10). The data of this study of preterm infants demonstrate that this mixture cannot stimulate intestinal Bifidobacteria in formula-fed infants. The number of Bifidobacteria found in the infants fed a formula supplemented with this oligosaccharide mixture was in the upper range of the values found in infants fed human milk (21), possibly indicating that a lower dosage also may be effective.

Several environmental differences exist between preterm infants who are treated in an intensive care unit and term infants treated under normal home conditions that influence the development of intestinal flora (22,23). Consequently, conclusions from the study of preterm infants cannot be extrapolated to healthy term infants.

Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether the mixture of galacto- and fructooligosaccharides also has a bifidogenic effect in term infants and whether this effect is dose dependent.


Ninety term infants, appropriate for gestational age, admitted to the Macedonio Melloni Maternity Hospital (n = 75) and to the Mangiagalli Hospital (n = 15), University of Milan, Italy, were eligible for the study. The ethics committees of the two hospitals approved the study, and parents gave informed consent before enrollment in the study.

Enteral nutrition was started with breast-feeding for all infants, according to the practice of the two hospitals. When the mother was not able to or decided not to breast-feed, the infant was randomly assigned to one of three formula groups. The composition of the three formulas was, apart from the supplemented oligosaccharides, identical. Two formulas were supplemented with the oligosaccharide mixture at different concentrations: 0.8 g/dL and 0.4 g/dL. The control formula was supplemented with maltodextrins as placebo. Table 1 shows the composition of the three formulas. Table 2 gives the most relevant clinical data of the formula-fed infants.

Composition of the two studied formulas per deciliter
Clinical data of the infants enrolled in the study

The infants were evaluated first when formula feeding started (study day 1) and then evaluated 28 days later (study day 2). At each study day, stools were collected, fecal flora and pH of the stool were determined, and stool characteristics and any side effects were recorded. Breast-feeding of more than 14 days or receiving antibiotic treatment were exclusion criteria.

For the microbiologic analysis, 0.2 g of a fresh fecal sample was homogenized in a cryoprotective glycerol transport medium (glycerol 10 mL, oxoid 0.1 g, H2O up to 100 mL volume) and immediately frozen at −80°C. The samples were transported on dry ice. To identify Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, selective media were used (Bifidobacteria, disseminated intravascular coagulation medium [Bonaparte 1997];Lactobacilli, Rogosa), as described previously (24). The fecal samples also were analyzed for Bacteroides, Clostridium species, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Proteus, Klebsiella, and Candida. The numbers are given as colony forming units (cfu)/g stool.

The pH was measured in the fresh stool sample using a multicolor indicator paper (accuracy ± 0.2, Spezialindikatorpapier Merck Eurolab GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).

Stool characteristics were recorded with respect to consistency (score 1–5: 1 = watery; 2 = soft; 3 = seedy; 4 = formed; 5 = hard) and frequency. Stool consistency and color were evaluated using the appearance of the fresh sample. The consistency of each stool sample collected in the 2 study days was recorded and the mean of the scores obtained for each day was used to characterize the stool consistency of that day.

The incidence of crying (score 1–3: 1 = practically not crying; 2 = crying in connection with feeding; 3 = crying independently from the meals), regurgitation (score 1–3: 1 = 0 regurgitation; 2 = 1–2 regurgitations; 3 = > 2 regurgitations per day), and vomiting (score 1–3: 1 = 0 vomiting; 2 = 1 episode of vomiting; 3 = > 1 episode of vomiting per day) were recorded on the basis of the mother's interview.

For all infants, growth parameters were measured at each study day. Body weight was measured using a scale with an accuracy of ± 5 g. The crown–heel length was measured using a special board for newborn infants that has an accuracy of ± 1 mm.


Anthropometric data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Respective homogeneity of groups was tested by one-way analysis of variance.

To account for data not normally distributed, the data for microflora and stool frequency and consistency were described as the median and interquartile ranges (25–75th percentile). Therefore, the influence of the feeding regimens on these parameters was investigated using nonparametric tests. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for overall group effect. In case of significance, the Mann-Whitney test was performed for single group comparisons.

For comparison of the frequency of positive cultures for Bacteroides, Clostridium species, E. coli, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Proteus, Klebsiella, and Candida the χ2 test was performed.

All tests were performed on an α-level of 5%. P values greater than 0.05 were considered significant. StatView 5.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, U.S.A.) was used.


At the first study day, the numbers of fecal Bifidobacteria did not differ among the groups, median (interquartile range): placebo, 8.8 (6.1) cfu/g; formula supplemented with 0.4 g/dL oligosaccharides, 8.5 (1.9) cfu/g; formula supplemented with 0.8 g/dL oligosaccharides, 7.7 (6.1) cfu/g). During the study period, the number of fecal Bifidobacteria increased in both groups that received the supplemented formulas but remained nearly constant in the placebo group. Therefore, at the end of the 28-day feeding period, the number of Bifidobacteria in the stools was significantly higher in both groups fed the supplemented formulas than in the stools of the placebo group, median (interquartile range): placebo, 7.2 (4.9) cfu/g; formula supplemented with 0.4 g/dL oligosaccharides, 9.3 (1.6) cfu/g; formula supplemented with 0.8 g/dL, 9.7 (0.8) cfu/g), but there was also a statistically significant difference between the group fed the 0.4 g/dL formula and the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.:
Influence on the counts of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli of various oligosaccharide supplementations to infant formulas after a 28-day feeding period. IQR = interquartile range.

At the beginning of the study period, the number of Lactobacilli in the stools did not differ among the groups: placebo, 3.4 (0.2); 0.4 g/dL formula, 3.3 (0.2); 0.8 g/dL formula, 3.4 (0.2). During the study period, the number increased in both groups that received supplemented formulas, and at study day 2, the number was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in both groups fed the supplemented formulas than in the placebo group: median (interquartile range): placebo, 3.4 (1.8) cfu/g; 0.4 g/dL formula, 5.9 (1.5) cfu/g; 0.8 g/dL formula, 5.6 (2.1) cfu/g). There was no statistically significant difference between the group fed the 0.4 g/dL formula and the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula (Fig. 1).

Oligosaccharide supplementation had not significant effect on the number of infants with positive culture for Bacteroides, Clostridium species, E. coli, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Proteus, Klebsiella, and Candida. The fecal pH increased in the placebo group from 5.50 ± 0.63 at the beginning of the study to 6.1 ± 0.66 at the end of the study. In the group fed the 0.4 g/dL formula, there was no significant change in pH (first measurement, 5.48 ± 0.48; second measurement, 5.44 ± 0.53). In the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula, the pH decreased from 5.64 ± 0.58 at the first measurement to 5.19 ± 0.40 at the end of the feeding period. The influence of the diet on the change in fecal pH was significant (P < 0.05).

Stool frequency increased only in the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula (Fig. 2). The range of the stool frequency in this group was between 1 to 5, and no infant had diarrhea during the study period.

FIG. 2.:
Influence on stool frequency and consistency of various oligosaccharide supplementations to infant formulas after a 28-day feeding period. IQR = interquartile range.

Supplementation significantly influenced the stool consistency scores (Fig. 2). In the placebo group, the score increased, that is, the stools became harder. There was no significant change in the group fed the 0.4 g/dL formula. In the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula, the consistency changed to softer stools, close to the scores found in the reference group (Fig. 2).

The different diets did not influence the incidence of crying, regurgitation, or vomiting (data not shown). Weight gain and length increment were similar among the groups (Table 2).


Infant formula supplementation with a mixture of galactooligosaccharides and fructooligosaccharides with high molecular weight leads to increased numbers of the fecal Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli. A change in consistency to softer stools and, less pronounced, to a higher stool frequency accompanies this increase. Supplementation also significantly influences the pH of the stools.

The effect of supplementation on the number of Bifidobacteria, stool consistency, and stool pH was dose dependent, indicating that oligosaccharides reach the colon and interact quantitatively with the intestinal flora.

The effect of the supplementation on stool characteristics is of practical importance because it may decrease the adverse effects associated with the higher incidence of hard stools or constipation in infants fed standard infant formula as compared with breast-fed infants (24,25). Increased formula osmolarity also could influence stool consistency. In the current study, 0.8 g carbohydrates were added to all study formulas, increasing the osmolarity within a small range (< 5 mOsmol/L). Because the effect of this supplementation on stool consistency could not be seen in the placebo group, which received formula supplemented with maltodextrins, the stool characteristics probably were influenced mainly by changes in the intestinal flora.

Regarding the optimal dosage of the galacto- and fructooligosaccharide mixture, our data demonstrate that a concentration of 0.4 g/dL is bifidogenic and influences stool characteristics and fecal pH as well. However, these supplementation effects were more pronounced in the group fed the 0.8 g/dL formula. Furthermore, the bifidogenic effect is much more homogenous in the group fed the 0.8g/dL formula, indicated by nearly similar counts of Bifidobacteria in all infants after 28 days. This supports the results of a study in adults using different dosages of short-chain fructooligosaccharide (26). In that adult study, a dose-dependent increase of fecal Bifidobacteria was also observed.

In our study, galactooligosaccharides derived from lactose were the dominating oligosaccharides in the formula supplement. In human milk, galactose is a major component of human milk oligosaccharides, even if with a different structure. Furthermore, the galactooligosaccharides used in this study have been widely used in infant feeding (17), because they are present in all lactose-reduced or lactose-free products in which lactose has been enzymatically digested (21). To date, no side effects have been reported. More recently, Guesry et al. (27) studied fructooligosaccharides as the only supplement in a formula for term infants at an intake of up to 3 g/day, which is approximately 10 times higher than in our study. They could not demonstrate a bifidogenic effect, nor did they observe side effects. In our study, supplementation also did not influence the incidence of regurgitation, vomiting, or crying, which underlines the safety of the oligosaccharides mixture.

Using the current data, we cannot evaluate to what extent the galactooligosaccharides or the fructooligosaccharides are responsible for the observed effects. However, from the data in the literature (17), a synergistic effect of both ingredients can be assumed. The intensity of the bifidogenic effect of the mixture may indicate that such a synergistic effect took place.

In summary, supplementation of a formula for term infants with a mixture of galacto- and fructooligosaccharides stimulates the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli in the intestine and results in softer stools in a dose-dependent manner. A dosage of 0.4 g/dL results in significant effects, but the effects can be enhanced homogeneously to a level observed in breast-fed infants by increasing the dosage to 0.8 g/dL.


The authors thank D. Krämer and A. Knosmann for their literature search and M. Mank (Numico Research, Germany) for performing the MALDI-MS analyses.


1. Orrhage K, Nord CE. Factors controlling the bacterial colonization of the intestine in breast fed infants. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 47–57.
2. Mackie RI, Sghir A, Gaskins HR. Developmental microbial ecology on the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69(suppl):1035S–45S.
3. Al-Saleh AA, Zahran AS, Abu-Tarboush HM. Growth of Bifidobacteria: environmental conditions and adherence to epithelial cells. Milchwissenschaft 1998; 53:187–90.
4. Harmsen HJM, Wildeboer-Veloo ACM, Raangs GC, et al. Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast-fed and formula fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 30:61–7.
5. Hanson LA, Telemo E, Wiedermann U, et al. Immunological mechanisms of the gut. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1995; 6(suppl 8): 7–12.
6. Grönlund MM, Arvilommi H, Kero P, et al. Importance of intestinal colonisation in the maturation of humoral immunity in early infancy: a prospective follow up study of healthy infants aged 0–6 months. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000; 83:F186–92.
7. Fooks, LJ, Fuller R, Gibson GR. Prebiotics, probiotics and human gut microbiology. Intern Dairy J 1999; 9:53–61.
8. Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of probiotics. J Nutr 1995; 125:1401–12.
9. Walker WA, Duffy LC. Diet and bacterial colonization: role of probiotics and prebiotics. J Nutr Biochem 1998; 9:668–75.
10. Thurl S, Müller-Werner B, Sawatzki G. Quantification of individual oligosaccharide compounds from human milk using high-pH anion-exchange chromatography. Anal Biochem 1996; 235:202–6.
11. Newburg DS. Oligosaccharides in human milk and bacterial colonisation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 30:S8–17.
12. Kunz C, Rudloff S. Biological functions of oligosaccharides in human milk. Acta Paediatr 1993; 82:903–12.
13. Engfer MB, Stahl B, Finke B, et al. Human milk oligosaccharides are resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 71:1589–96.
14. Stahl B, Thurl S, Zeng J, et al. Oligosaccharides from human milk as revealed by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 1994; 223:218.
15. Finke B, Stahl B, Pfenninger F, et al. Analysis of high molecular weight oligosaccharides from human milk by liquid chromatography and MALDI-MS. Anal Chem 1999; 71:3755–62.
16. Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, et al. Selective stimulation of Bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology 1995; 108:975–82.
17. Dombo M, Yamamoto H, Nakajima H. Production, health benefits and applications of galacto-oligosaccharides. In: Yalpani M, ed. New Technologies for Healthy Foods and Neutraceuticals. ATL Press; Shrewsbury, MA, 1997:143–56.
18. Bouhnik Y, Flourié B, Bisetti N, et al. Effects of prolonged ingestion of fructo-oligosaccharides on faecal Bifidobacteria and selected metabolite indices of colon carcinogenesis in healthy humans. Nutr Cancer 1996; 26:21–9.
19. Bouhnik Y, Flourié B, d'Agay-Abensour L, et al. Administration of transgalacto-oligosaccharides increases fecal Bifidobacteria and modifies colonic fermentation metabolism in healthy humans. J Nutr 1997; 127:444–8.
20. Zarate S, Lopez-Leiva MH. Oligosaccharide formation during enzymatic lactose hydrolysis: a literature review. J Food Protection 1990; 53:262–8.
21. Boehm G, Marini A, Jelinek J, et al. Bifidogenic oligosaccharides in a preterm formula. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 31(suppl 2): S26.
22. Sakata H, Yoshioka H, Fujita K. Development of the intestinal flora in very low birth weight infants compared to normal full-term newborns. Eur J Pediatr 1985; 144:186–90.
23. Gewolb IH, Schwalbe RS, Vicki LT, et al. Stool microflora in extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 80:F167–73.
24. Quinlan PT, Lockton S, Irwin J, et al. The relationship between stool hardness and stool composition in breast- and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1995; 20:81–90.
25. Boehm G, Chierici R, Corrazola B, et al. Fecal flora measurements of breast fed infants using an integrated transport and culturing system. Prenat Neonatal Med 2000; 5(suppl 2):76.
26. Bouhnik Y, Vahedi K, Achour L, et al. Short chain fructo-oligosaccharides administration dose-dependently increases fecal Bifidobacteria in healthy humans. J Nutr 1999; 129:113–6.
27. Guesry PR, Bodanski H, Tomsit E, et al. Effect of 3 doses of fructo-oligosaccharides in infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 31(suppl 2):S252.

Galactooligosaccharides; Fructooligosaccharides; Bifidobacteria; Lactobacilli; Term infants; Dosage

© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.