Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Case Report

Endoscopic Cure of Pancreatic Pseudocyst in a Child

Falchetti, Diego; Ubertazzi, Michele; Torri, Fabio; Salucci, Paolo; Alberti, Daniele; Caccia, Guido

Author Information
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition: October 1998 - Volume 27 - Issue 4 - p 446-448
  • Free

Pseudocysts of the pancreas (PP) are collections of pancreatic secretions that eventual include necrotic debris and blood and are walled by fibrous tissue, within or adjacent to the pancreas (1). Usually they are caused by blunt trauma (in approximately 55% of cases) or pancreatitis. Incidence is high during early school age, with boys affected twice as often as girls (2,3). Pancreatic pseudocysts, whatever their origin, may have spontaneous resolution, although they can raise a variety of complications, including infection, bleeding, fistulations, jaundice, and compression on adjacent structures (4,5). They also may cause chronic pain, probably related to their mass effect (1). Treatment is needed for symptomatic or large PPs. Surgical ablation or drainage has been traditionally considered the gold standard, although complete removal can be challenging and possibly harmful (6). Among draining procedures, internal drainage is superior to cystostomy in reducing infection and recurrence rates (7). During the past 2 decades, refinements in ultrasound (US) imaging and endoscopic techniques have improved diagnostic accuracy and promoted percutaneous transgastric internal draining procedures (8-10). Recently the same goal has been achieved endoscopically in adults (4,5).

CASE REPORT

A 4-year-old boy, who was affected by adrenogenital syndrome during replacement therapy was referred to our institution for a cystic mass in the upper abdomen, seen during routine investigation for recurrent episodes of epigastric pain. There was a vague history of abdominal blunt trauma.

At admission, the child had indistinct abdominal pain, mostly after meals, with no other gastrointestinal symptoms. He had never had jaundice. The abdomen was slightly tender, chubby, with no palpable mass. Laboratory data were at normal levels. Upper abdominal US and computed tomographic (CT) scan confirmed a thickwalled 7 × 6-cm cyst in the pancreatic head-body junction (Fig. 1). Otherwise, the pancreas was homogeneous and not enlarged, and there was no dilation of the pancreatic duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was considered an excessive method to use at that moment, although direct access to the cyst could have been both diagnostic and therapeutic. Internal drainage through the stomach was planned. Because the cyst was adjacent to the stomach, an endoscopic approach was tried first, after informed consent was received from the parents. With the patient under general anesthesia and the abdominal skin prepared as for a laparotomy, a pediatric videoduodenoscope (JF 200; Olympus; Lake Success, NY, U.S.A.) was introduced. There was no appreciable bulging of the cyst inside the stomach; therefore, the puncture site was selected with pre-operative US. A hole was made through both gastric and cyst walls with a sting papillotome (Pre-cut KD-10Q; Olympus) at the thinnest section of the diaphragm between both cavities. When a flow of a brownish fluid was observed, the sting was withdrawn and its sleeve pushed into the cyst: 80 ml with 19,450 Ul/ml of amylase content were evacuated, and the PP was outlined with contrast medium for confirmation (Fig. 2). The papillotome was then replaced by a guide wire on which a polyethylene double pig-tail stent (PDB-7Z; Olympus; the shortest, with 3 cm between the curls) was introduced into the PP. When the guide wire was removed, the opposite end of the double pig-tail stent drained freely into the stomach (Fig. 3).

FIG. 1
FIG. 1:
Computed tomographic scan image of a walled 7 × 6-cm cyst impending on the small curvature of the stomach. There is no enlargement of the pancreas or of the pancreatic duct (not visible in this frame).
FIG. 2
FIG. 2:
Double pig-tail stent (small) in place, draining the pancreatic pseudocyst into the stomach (note the drop of blood-stained fluid).
FIG. 3
FIG. 3:
Gastroscopic view of the stent in place, draining the pseudocyst content into the stomach (see the drop of blood-stained fluid).

RESULTS

No problems occurred during the whole procedure, and the child was allowed to eat normally the next day. The early postoperative period was uneventful; US showed a shrinking PP, and the boy was dismissed asymptomatic in a week with the stent in place. Subsequent US examinations performed every other week in the patient's town confirmed marked decrease in the PP's size.

The child was readmitted 3 months later. Ultrasound and CT scan showed the PP had completely disappeared. There was no evidence of the stent itself, which was eliminated spontaneously without significant discomfort. The internal remnants of the cystostomy were barely perceivable during gastroscopy. The child was still symptom free without recurrence after a 2-year follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The management of PP has changed with the times, mainly during the past decade. Former surgical management in children was described in 1922 and consisted of an external drainage procedure (11). In recent years, internal drainage procedures have become the preferred surgical approach because of their superior results, but they may carry complications and at times cause death (12-14). With the advent of US and CT techniques, percutaneous internal drainage has proved more feasible and attractive. This procedure has shown lower morbidity and mortality; its drawback is a slightly higher recurrence rate (6,13,15). Since 1985, there have been reports in adults of PP internal drainage using a stent put endoscopically into the first gastrointestinal tract, with further benefits manifested in less morbidity and mortality (4,5,16-18).

To our knowledge, this is the youngest patient reported with endoscopic pseudocystogastrostomy for PP. Modern endoscopes and tools, although designed for other purposes, allow such a procedure to be performed in children, rather than waiting, as we used to, for a miniaturization of adult instruments.

The main risks of the endoscopic approach include bleeding from puncture through an intramural vessel or leakage from entering the PP more than 10 mm away from the gastric lumen (17). Both eventualities can be avoided by a careful technique, but the procedure is best managed in a well-equipped surgical environment.

The PP in our case was cured in a short time, because it was not supplied by a large duct disruption. The technique of long-term PP cystostomy using a stent could be fairly effective also in provided PP, as it can induce the maturation of a permanent fistula (6,19).

The endoscopic procedure is less invasive and achieves the same results of surgical internal drainage. The technique is a worthy alternative to surgery for treatment of PP that impends on the stomach in children.

REFERENCES

1. Etzkorn KP, DeGuzman LJ. Holderman WH, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: Patient selection and evaluation of the outcome by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1995;27:329-33.
2. Dahaman B, Stephens CA. Pseudocysts of the pancreas after blunt abdominal trauma in children. J Pediatr Surg 1981;16:17-21.
3. Cooney DR, Grosfeld JL. Operative management of pancreatic pseudocysts in infants and children: A review of 75 cases. Ann Surg 1975;182:590-6.
4. Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Harlan J, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 1985;31:322-8.
5. Cremer M, Devière J, Engelholm L. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: Long term follow-up after seven years' experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:1-9.
6. Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira LS, Bastid C, Sastre B, Sahel J. Management of cysts and pseudocysts complicating chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993;17:270-6.
7. Kagan RJ, Reyes HM, Asokan S. Pseudocyst of the pancreas in childhood. Arch Surg 1981;116:1200-3.
8. Barkin JS, Hyden SA. Changing concepts in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:62-3.
9. Adams DB, Anderson MC. Changing concepts in the surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am Surg 1992;58:173-80.
10. Karaguzel G, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N, Hicsonmez A. Surgical management of the pancreatic pseudocyst in children: A long-term evaluation. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:777-80.
11. Drennen E. Traumatic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1922;76:488-90.
12. Pökorny WJ, Raffensperger JG. Pancreatic pseudocysts in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980;151:182-4.
13. Gumaste VV, Dave PB. Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: The needle or the scalpel (editorial)? J Clin Gastroenterol 1991;13:500-5.
14. Sahel J, Bastid C, Sarles H. Dérivation endoscopique des pseudokystes et abcès au cours des pancréatites aigues. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1988;12:431-5.
15. Safioleas M, Misiakos E, Karatzas G, et al. Therapeutic strategies for pancreatic pseudocysts. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1995;40:192-5.
16. Grewal HP, London NJM, Carr-Locke D, et al. Endoscopic drainage of a recurrent pseudocyst. Postgrad Med J 1990;66:1081-3.
17. Savides TJ, Gress F, Sherman S, et al. Ultrasound catheter probe-assisted endoscopic cystogastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:145-8.
18. Sahel J, Bastid C, Pellat B, Schurgers P, Sarles H. Endoscopic cysto-duodenostomy of cysts of chronic calcifying pancreatitis. Report of twenty cases. Pancreas 1987;2:447-53.
19. Sacks BA, Greenberg JJ, Porter DH, et al. An internalized double-J catheter for percutaneous transgastric cystogastrostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:523-6.
© 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.