Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Anatomical Relationships of Burch Colposuspension Sutures

Kinman, Casey L. MD; Agrawal, Anubhav MD; Deveneau, Nicolette E. MD; Meriwether, Kate V. MD; Herring, Nicole R. PhD; Francis, Sean L. MD

Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery: March/April 2017 - Volume 23 - Issue 2 - p 72–74
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000341
AUGS Conference Submissions

Objectives The prevalent use of minimally invasive midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in the last several decades has resulted in fewer Burch procedures being performed and diminished surgical experience in performing the Burch colposuspension. However, recent antimesh media has resulted in more patients requesting nonmesh anti-incontinence procedures and a subsequent need for surgeons to refamiliarize themselves with the Burch procedure and its relevant anatomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships of Burch sutures to surrounding neurovascular anatomic structures in the human cadaver.

Methods The retropubic space of 11 unembalmed female cadavers was dissected, and a Burch procedure performed. The distance from the Burch sutures’ location through both Cooper’s ligament and the vagina to the obturator neurovascular bundle and external iliac vessels was measured.

Results The mean distance from the most lateral stitch in Cooper’s ligament to the obturator bundle was 25.9 ± 7.6 mm and to the external iliac vessels was 28.9 ± 9.3 mm, and in some instances, these structures were less than 1.5 cm away.

Conclusions The obturator bundle and external iliac lie, on average, within 3 cm of sutures placed during a Burch colposuspension. Knowledge of these anatomical relationships is valuable when dissecting the space of Retzius and placing sutures for a Burch to avoid injury.

Sutures placed when performing a Burch colposuspension in female cadavers were found to lie within 3 cm of the obturator bundle and external iliac vessels.

From the *Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and †University of Louisville, Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Reprints: Casey L. Kinman, MD, 550 S. Jackson St 1st Floor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisville, KY 40202. E-mail:

No funding was received for this study.

S.L.F. has provided medicolegal testimony within the past 36 months. The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.