INTRODUCTION
A lymph node (LN) is an immunologically effective organ, which is strategically located and scattered throughout the body in large numbers. It is a dynamic, remarkably organised structure and unique in the sense that
- LN has a concept of compartmentalisation or zonation, and its architecture includes capsule, cortex, medulla and para cortex.
- Cellular diversity within the LN creates a unique microenvironment.
- There is an adipose tissue (perinodal fat – PAT) around the LN: It is specialised to provide fatty acids, adipokines and dendritic cells that may influence local immune response.[1]
- Functional adaptation leads to reconstruction or remodeling within the LN.
ANATOMICAL COMPARTMENTS IN NORMAL LN
Cortex
It is a B cell area composed of lymphoid follicles. Primary follicle is round in shape with 1 mm diameter, composed of inactive B lymphocytes. The long axis is oriented at right angle to the capsule. Secondary follicle is formed when an antigen enters the lymph node. Size varies and is composed of heterogeneous population of lymphoid cells of various stages of maturation.[2]
Mantle zone
It is a distinctly appearing corono, which surrounds the germinal centre. It is thicker in the subcapsular aspect of the lymphoid follicle and thinner in the opposite site.[2]
Germinal centre (GC)
It exhibits polarisation where one pole is dark zone facing towards medulla, composed of small and large noncleaved cells (centroblasts), and another pole is light zone facing towards capsule, composed of cleaved cells (centrocytes).[2]
TBM (tingible body macrophage)
They are large histiocytes, which reside in a germinal centre of secondary follicles. They have irregular morphology and abundant cytoplasm with phagocytised apoptotic bodies (referred to as tingible – stainable bodies) in various states of degradation.[3]
Medulla
It is the main site of plasma cell proliferation, differentiation and production of antibodies and is composed of large tortuous sinuses called medullary sinuses, surrounded by lymphoid clusters called medullary cords.[2]
Para cortex (PC)
It is a densely cellular T cell area, which is also called interfollicular cortex. It is anatomically and functionally divided into central and peripheral deep cortical units.[2]
HEV (high endothelial venules)
High endothelial venules are highly distinct vessels seen in PC, which are lined by plump cuboidal endothelial cells with vesiculated nuclei. It has thick basement membrane and seldom, lumen of vessels is obliterated by endothelium. They play a crucial role in recirculation and distribution of lymphocytes.[2]
Lymphatic sinuses
Three sinuses (subcapsular/trabecular/medullary sinuses) carry lymph from afferent lymphatics on the convex surface of LN into the efferent lymphatics in the hilum. They vary in size and composition according to functional demands.[2]
ESSENTIAL PHENOMENON IN LN
Folliculolysis
It is the process where the eosinophilic infiltration into GC causes lysis and disruption of the follicles.[4] It gives a moth-eaten appearance to the follicle. Eosinophilic folliculolysis is a helpful feature in diagnosing Kimura's disease [Figure 1].[5]
Figure 1: Folliculolysis in Kimura disease
Lipomatosis
LN lipomatosis is a common phenomenon, which occurs in an aging human lymph node and is caused by transdifferentiation of fibroblasts into adipocytes in the medulla [Figure 2]. Adipocytes are associated with down regulation of lymphotoxin beta expression. Lipomatosis also induce extensive vascular remodeling with loss of medullary lymphatic vessels and dysfunctional, highly dilated HEVs with lower density of naïve T-cells and trapped plasma cells. Thus, LN lipomatosis is considered as a major factor for decreased immune functions in the elderly.[6]
Figure 2: Lipomatosis
Desmoplasia
Fibrosis in LN can be evident in the form of capsular fibrosis or stromal fibrosis [Figure 3]. The presence of fibrosis in general is a valuable feature in distinguishing Kimura disease from angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE).[5] Fibrosis is characterised by the accumulation of a pronounced number of fibroblasts, deposition of collagen and distortion of normal tissue architecture. It is considered to correlate with multiple immune-mediated mechanisms and cytokine networks and is evident in both benign and malignant LN pathologies. It seems morphologically to be a host induced reaction. It can be a constant feature of some types of lymphomas.[7]
Figure 3: Capsular fibrosis
Necrosis
The presence of necrosis in LN may be challenging to pathologists as it is evident in both benign inflammatory lesions as well as in metastatic malignancies. Necrosis can be focal, diffuse or extensive. Nature of necrosis can vary from fibrinoid to caseation necrosis. Necrotic area is characterised by eosinophilic granular area infiltrated with neutrophils, lymphocytes and macrophages [Figure 4]. Caseation necrosis is the hall mark of tuberculosis and is related to delayed hypersensitivity reaction.[8]
Figure 4: Necrosis
A. Morphological patterns in Reactive Lymph nodes: Reactive is the term used when there is host response due to inflammation in the absence of neoplasia. Reactive lymphadenopathy is the most common cause of lymph node enlargement, which is a non-neoplastic and reversible enlargement of the lymphoid tissue secondary to antigen stimulus. There are three major basic morphological patterns, which are distinctly seen[9] [Table 1, Figure 5].
Table 1: Morphological patterns in a reactive lymph node
Figure 5: Sinus hyperplasia
B. Morphological patterns in Neoplastic Lymph node: LN with a size of more than 1 cm and round shape is considered malignant on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This criterion may demonstrate low specificity, and histopathological analysis accurately determines the presence of malignancy within the LN.[10]
The lymph node expedition in the assembly of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is exhaustive and complex. Complementary chemokine expression by tumour cells and the lymphatic endothelial cells lining the subcapsular sinus may facilitate tumour migration into the cortex. Then, tumor cells proliferate within the cortex and later can migrate and invade and break out of the capsule.[11]
The involved LN in OSCC may exhibit keratinising or non-keratinising tumor islands occupying various compartments of a LN [Figure 6].
Figure 6: Tumor islands in level 1 LN - OSCC
1. Extra nodal extension (ENE): It is the extension of metastatic carcinoma within the lymph node, through the capsule, and into the surrounding connective tissue, regardless of associated stromal reaction.[12] It is categorised as follows:
- ENEn: absence of ENE
- ENEmi: presence of ENE ≤2 mm
- ENEma: presence of ENE ≥2 mm
C. Morphology of lymph node pathologies:
- Kimura disease: Kimura disease is a rare chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology. The exact pathogenesis is still unclear, although it might be a self-limited allergic or autoimmune response triggered by an unknown persistent antigenic stimulus [Table 2].[13]
- Kikuchi Disease: It is an enigmatic, self-limiting nongranulomatous lymphadenitis, which is diagnosed with confidence if careful attention is given to the architectural features [Table 3]. Kuo proposed classification of the histopathologic features of KFD into three evolving histologic stages: proliferative, necrotising and xanthomatous.
- Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: It presents with characteristic histopathological features of well-formed granulomas as a primary component [Table 4]. Ramanathan et al. (1999) have proposed a system for the granulomatous lesions localised only in the LN for a better assessment of the TB. The system includes four types of granulomas: G1 – hyperplastic granuloma, G2 – hyper reactive granuloma, G3 – hypo reactive granuloma and G4 – non-reactive granuloma.[15]
Table 2: Morphological descriptors in Kimura disease[
5]
Table 3: Morphological descriptors in Kikuchi disease[
14]
Table 4: Morphological descriptors in tuberculous lymphadenitis[
16]
D. Morphological patterns in the metastatic lymph node:
- Metastatic lymph nodes in ameloblastoma: The frequency and occurrence of metastasis in odontogenic tumors are a rare event. Lung is the commonest site of metastasis, and cervical lymph nodes are the second most frequent site for metastasis in ameloblsatoma.[17]
The histopathological features will be identical to a primary tumor. Metastatic LNs show a distorted architecture due to the proliferation of odontogenic epithelium in the follicular or plexiform pattern with basal cells showing reversal of polarity and central stellate reticulum like cells [Figure 7]. Predominant cystic areas are also evident.
- Metastatic lymph nodes in Ca-ex-PA: Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is a malignant tumor of salivary gland having proportion of adenoma and carcinoma components. The malignant component of Ca ex PA is most often adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Sometimes, the component may be adenoid cystic carcinoma, muco-epidermoid carcinoma or salivary duct carcinoma.[18]
Figure 7: Metastatic submandibular LN - ameloblastoma
Lymph node metastasis is a rare phenomenon in salivary gland tumors. When there is LN involvement, there can be invasion into the capsule. Infiltrating tumor islands with abundant areas of necrosis can alter the LN architecture [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Metastatic level 1 LN – Ca-ex-PA
Note on gross appearance of lymph node
The following data should be recorded while grossing the LN.[19]
- Total no of LN: Some systemic diseases can cause an increase/decrease in the number of LN.
- Size: Previous radiation/chemotherapy can reduce the size and number of LN.
- Shape: Ovoid/round/bean-shaped/kidney shaped/matted LN [Figure 9]
- Consistency: Normal LN is not palpable. LNs are soft in acute inflammation, firm in chronic inflammation and hard in malignancy. Rubbery LN is a characteristic of lymphomas and matted LN seen in TB.
- Description of the cut surface: Grey–white homogeneous areas, haemorrhagic areas and the presence of necrosis [Figure 10].
Figure 9: Gross appearance of matted LN
Figure 10: Gross appearance of necrotic LN
Grossing
A small LN should be processed in toto, and a large LN should be bisected/trisected. If the size of the lymph node exceeds 2 cm, it should be sectioned like a bread loaf. The section thickness should be 3–4 mm for a LN.[19]
Lymph node yield (LNY): It is defined as the number of lymph nodes retrieved after neck dissection.
Lymph node ratio (LNR): It is defined as the ratio of pathologically positive lymph nodes out of the total number of retrieved lymph nodes after neck dissection.
LNY and LNR are measurable factors with potential prognostic implication. Higher LNY suggests removal of more potential occult pathological tissue. And lower LNR signifies higher the survival rate.[20]
CONCLUSION
Lymph nodes are easily accessible as diagnostic tools, and the pathologists keep a vigilant eye at morphological levels to arrive at the diagnosis. However, lymph node pathologies are enigmatic and at times challenging in diagnostic pathology.
This narrative emphasises on the journey of a lymph node from infection to neoplasm in selective pathologies and its functional adaptability to an antigen or a neoplastic cell, where it proves itself as a reliable source of fragment for diagnosis.
There are many areas where research needs to be addressed in the field of LN. One amongst them is age-related changes to LN stroma and is emerging as an important area of research, and possible molecular targets to rejuvenate the aging LN should be addressed upon as a future perspective.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank and acknowledge Dr Niveditha S R, Professor, Dept of Pathology, KIMS, and Staff members, Dept of Oral Pathology, V S Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore for their significant support towards the case contribution.
REFERENCES
1. Knight SC. Specialized perinodal fat fuels and fashions immunity Immunity. 2008;28:135–8
2. Warnke RA Tumors of the Lymph Nodes and Spleen. 1995 Washington Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
3. Smith JP, Burton GF, Tew JG, Szakal AK. Tingible body macrophages in regulation of germinal centre reactions Dev Immunol. 1998;6:285–94
4. Greaves WO, Wang SA. Selected topics on lymphoid lesions in the head and neck regions Head Neck Pathol. 2011;5:41–50
5. Chen H, Thompson LD, Aguilera NS, Abbondanzo SL. Kimura disease: A clinicopathologic study of 21 cases Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:505–13
6. Bekkhus T, Olofsson A, Sun Y, Magnusson PU, Ulvmar MH. Stromal transdifferentiation drives lipomatosis and induces extensive vascular remodelling in the aging human
lymph node J Pathol. 2023;259:236–53
7. Tataroglu C, Sarioglu S, Kargi A, Ozkal S, Aydin O. Fibrosis in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203:725–30
8. Seo YJ, Shin H, Lee HW, Jung HR. Causes of necrotic features in fine-needle aspirates from cervical lymph nodes J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55:60–7
9. Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, Alinejad S, Ghorbani A, Ghafouri A. Peripheral
lymphadenopathy: Approach and diagnostic tools Iran J Med Sci. 2014;39:158–70
10. Muehe AM, Siedek F, Theruvath AJ, Seekins J, Spunt SL, Pribnow A, et al Differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes in pediatric patients on ferumoxytol-enhanced PET/MRI Theranostics. 2020;10:3612–21
11. Pilborough AE, Lambert DW, Khurram SA. Extranodal extension in oral cancer: A role for the nodal microenvironment? J Oral Pathol Med. 2019;48:863–70
12. Abdel-Halim CN, Rosenberg T, Larsen SR, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Sørensen JA, Rohde M, et al Histopathological definitions of extranodal extension: A systematic review Head Neck Pathol. 2021;15:599–607
13. Dhingra H, Nagpal R, Baliyan A, Alva SR. Kimura disease: Case report and brief review of literature Med Pharm Rep. 2019;92:195–9
14. Bosch X, Guilabert A, Miquel R, Campo E. Enigmatic Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: A comprehensive review Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:141–52
15. Popescu MR, Călin G, Strâmbu I, Olaru M, Bălăşoiu M, Huplea V, et al
Lymph node tuberculosis-an attempt of clinico-morphological study and review of the literature Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014;55:553–67
16. Ahmed HG, Nassar AS, Ginawi I. Screening for tuberculosis and its histological pattern in patients with enlarged
lymph node? Patholog Res Int. 2011;2011:417635 doi: doi: 10.4061/2011/417635
17. Dissanayake RK, Jayasooriya PR, Siriwardena DJ, Tilakaratne WM. Review of metastasizing (malignant) ameloblastoma (METAM): Pattern of metastasis and treatment Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:734–41
18. Antony J, Gopalan V, Smith RA, Lam AK. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: A comprehensive review of clinical, pathological and molecular data Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6:1–9
19. Gillies EM, Luna MA. Histologic evaluation of neck dissection specimens Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31:759–71
20. Iocca O, Farcomeni A, De Virgilio A, Di Maio P, Golusinski P, Malvezzi L, et al Prognostic significance of
lymph node yield and
lymph node ratio in patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, observational study? Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;14:100324 doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100324