Citation and Characteristic Analysis of Physician Assistant Programs Placed on Accreditation–Probation, 2015–2017

Abstract

Purpose 

The Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant (ARC-PA) is responsible for accrediting the current 236 entry-level physician assistant (PA) programs in the United States. This study analyzes citations levied against PA programs by the ARC-PA and how those citations relate to the commission's ultimate accreditation decisions; in addition, this study compares PA program characteristics and assesses those characteristics as they relate to recent accreditation outcomes.

Methods 

This study used citations for specific violations of ARC-PA Standards to analyze the ARC-PA's accreditation decisions from September 2015 through September 2017. The institutional characteristics of programs that received an accreditation–probation decision were compared with those that received an accreditation–continued or accreditation–provisional decision. Where possible, outcome decisions were benchmarked using national data obtained from publications distributed by the Physician Assistant Education Association.

Results 

On average, programs that were placed on accreditation–probation during the time frame of this study had received their initial accreditation 16 years before being placed on probation. Altogether, 393 citations were levied against those programs (range: 2–60 citations; median: 13.5 citations). Physician assistant programs that were awarded provisional or continued accreditation were cited for slightly different Standards violations than PA programs that were placed on probation. The average 5-year pass rate for students taking the Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination for the first time was not very different for students from PA programs that were placed on probation and all other programs.

Conclusions 

Faculty members, institutions, and entities that support PA program development can use this information to compare PA programs. The results of this study can help PA programs identify areas of frequent noncompliance with the ARC-PA's Standards; provide context that PA programs can use to assess their performance against other programs in the accreditation process; and help PA programs identify areas in need of priority attention nationwide.