Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory and Relationship With Hospital Departments and Staff: A Record-Based Study : Journal of Patient Safety

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Studies

Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory and Relationship With Hospital Departments and Staff: A Record-Based Study

Dundar, Cihad MD; Bahadir, Ozkan MD

Author Information
Journal of Patient Safety 19(4):p 239-242, June 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001115

Abstract

Objective 

Despite many efforts to improve the overall quality of clinical laboratory service, errors that compromise patient safety and increase healthcare costs continue to occur even infrequently. We aimed to determine the causes of preanalytical errors and related factors by evaluating the laboratory records of a tertiary hospital.

Methods 

In this retrospective study, 7,762,981 requests that were registered in the biochemistry laboratory records of Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center during 2019 were examined. All rejected samples were analyzed according to the department where they were collected and the reasons for rejection.

Results 

Of the total sample rejections, 99,561 (74.8%) were preanalytical and 33,474 (25.2%) belonged to the analytical phase. The preanalytical rejection rate was 1.28%, with the highest rejection rate in the inpatients (2.26%) and the lowest in the outpatients (0.02%). Insufficient sample (43.7%), clotted sample (35.1%), and inappropriate sample (11.1%) were the first 3 rows of rejection reasons. It was determined that sample rejection rates were low during routine working hours and high during nonworking hours.

Conclusions 

Preanalytical errors were most common in inpatient wards and were most likely due to incorrect phlebotomy techniques. Education of health personnel on good laboratory practices, systematic monitoring of errors, and the development of quality indicators will play an important role in reducing the vulnerability of the preanalytical phase.

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid