Application of Human Error Theory in Case Analysis of Wrong Procedures

Abstract

Objectives: 

The goal of this study was to contribute to the emerging body of literature about the role of human behaviors and cognitive processes in the commission of wrong procedures.

Methods: 

Case analysis of 5 wrong procedures in operative and nonoperative settings using James Reason's human error theory was performed.

Results: 

The case analysis showed that cognitive underspecification, cognitive flips, automode processing, and skill-based errors were contributory to wrong procedures. Wrong-site procedures accounted for the preponderance of the cases. Front-line supervisory staff used corrective actions that focused on the performance of the individual without taking into account cognitive factors.

Conclusions: 

System fixes using human cognition concepts have a greater chance of achieving sustainable safety outcomes than those that are based on the traditional approach of counseling, education, and disciplinary action for staff.