Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Radiographic Healing of Far Cortical Locking Constructs in Distal Femur Fractures

A Comparative Study With Standard Locking Plates

Plumarom, Yanin MD*,†; Wilkinson, Brandon G. MD*; Marsh, J. Lawrence MD*; Willey, Michael C. MD*; An, Qiang MPH*; Gao, Yubo PhD*; Karam, Matthew D. MD*

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma: June 2019 - Volume 33 - Issue 6 - p 277–283
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001464
Original Article
Buy
SDC

Objectives: To investigate the radiographic healing of far cortical locking (FCL) construct fixation in distal femur fractures compared with traditional locking plate (LP) constructs.

Design: A retrospective cohort of 143 consecutive patients with 146 distal femur fractures.

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patients/Participants: After excluding patients with OTA/AO type B fractures, referred nonunion cases, patients younger than 16 years, and patients with less than 24 weeks of follow-up, 69 patients with 70 total fractures were included for analysis.

Intervention: AP and lateral knee radiographs were blinded to type of screws and individually reviewed by 3 orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

Outcome Measurements: The modified RUST (mRUST) score was our primary outcome measure. mRUST scores were assigned at 6, 12, and 24 weeks and final follow-up based on AP and lateral radiographs and compared between FCL and LP groups as a tool for evaluating fracture healing. Secondary outcomes compared between FCL and LP included union rate and postoperative complications.

Results: Statistically significant differences in mRUST scores were noted between FCL and LP groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.040), 12 weeks (P = 0.034), 24 weeks (0.044), and final follow-up (P = 0.048). There was no significant difference in union or specific complication rates between the 2 groups. The union rate was 90.5% and 82.1% for the FCL and LP groups, respectively, at final follow-up.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study between FCL and LP constructs. The FCL group was noted to have significantly higher mRUST scores at all periods indicating increased callus formation, but the differences seen were small and there were no differences in healing rates or complications between the 2 groups, thus bringing the clinical benefit of FCL into question. Further prospective study designs are needed to compare FCL with LP constructs and to investigate the role of interfragmentary motion on callus formation in distal femur fractures.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

*Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; and

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand.

Reprints: Yanin Plumarom, MD, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242 (e-mail: yaninyo24@gmail.com).

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Trauma Association, October 14, 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Annual Meeting of American of Orthopaedic Surgeons, March 8, New Orleans, LA; and Annual Meeting of the Mid-America Orthopaedic Association, April 19, 2018, San Antonio, TX.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.jorthotrauma.com).

Accepted February 13, 2019

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.