Timing of Fixation of Major Fractures in Blunt Polytrauma: Role of Conventional Indicators in Clinical Decision Making : Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Journal Logo

Special Interest

Timing of Fixation of Major Fractures in Blunt Polytrauma

Role of Conventional Indicators in Clinical Decision Making

Pape, Hans-Christoph MD*; Giannoudis, Peter V MD; Krettek, Christian MD, FRACS*; Trentz, Otmar MD

Author Information
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 19(8):p 551-562, September 2005. | DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000161712.87129.80

Abstract

Grading of the clinical status in patients with multiple trauma is important regarding the treatment plan. In recent years, 4 different clinical conditions have been described: stable, borderline, unstable, in extremis. Clinical parameters have been widely used in patients with penetrating injuries, and 3 categories were found to be important: shock, hypothermia, coagulopathy. However, in blunt trauma patients, the role of conventional parameters for decision making regarding the timing of fracture treatment is poorly described. After blunt trauma, additional factors seem to play a role, because the injuries affect multiple body regions. These additional factors are summarized under the term, “soft-tissue injuries,” which may include the soft tissues of the extremities, lung, abdomen, and pelvis. The study describes four pathophysiologic cascades that are relevant to the clinical conditions listed above. Threshold values for separation of the patient conditions are documented, leading to a staged surgical strategy.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid