Decrease in Health-Related Quality of Life and Post–COVID-19 Syndrome in Health Care Workers After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cohort Study : Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

ONLINE-ONLY: ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Decrease in Health-Related Quality of Life and Post–COVID-19 Syndrome in Health Care Workers After SARS-CoV-2 Infection

A Cohort Study

D'Ávila, Karen Gomes MD; Monaiar, Luciana Rott MD; Dantas, Lia Dias Pinheiro MD; Freitas, Alana Ambos MD; Loureiro, Marcelle Martinez MD; Bonamigo, Renan Rangel MD, PhD; Dantas Filho, Fábio Fernandes MD; Silva, Denise Rossato MD, PhD

Author Information
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 65(1):p e1-e3, January 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002727
  • Free

Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide. The spectrum of acute symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection ranges from mild to critical.1 However, the long-term health effects of COVID-19 are largely unknown. A large variety of physical, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments have been described. Some survivors report persistent symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression.2–6 Huang et al7 showed that the most common symptoms at 6 months after acute infection were fatigue or muscle weakness in 63% of patients and sleep difficulties in 26%. The incidence of post–COVID-19 syndrome in outpatients is between 10% and 35%, reaching almost 85% in those hospitalized.8 In addition, a large proportion of patients report impairments in major dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after COVID-19.5,9–14

Health care workers (HCWs) are at a higher risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and can be vectors of the disease, transmitting it to patients and accelerating its spread.15 Considering that COVID-19 prevalence among HCWs varies between 7% and 11%,16,17 it is important to assess long-term effects after the acute phase. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the persistence of symptoms, the prevalence of post–COVID-19 syndrome, and the HRQOL among HCWs 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

Study Design and Location

We conducted a prospective cohort study in a general, tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre on September 14, 2020 (number 200459). All participants signed an informed consent form before inclusion in the study.

Patients

All HCWs with confirmed COVID-19 during the period from January to June 2021 were invited to participate in the study. We considered a confirmed case of COVID-19 if reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected. Those HCWs who did not want to participate in the study were excluded.

Data Collection

Enrolled subjects were interviewed after COVID-19 (on return to work) and in 6 months using a standardized questionnaire. The following data were collected: demographic data (sex, age), persistence of symptoms post–COVID-19, and HRQOL data. Health-related quality of life was evaluated in three moments: before COVID-19, after COVID-19 (on return to work), and after 6 months. As quality-of-life data are not routinely collected from HCWs in the hospital, we asked HCWs to complete the HRQOL questionnaire (before COVID-19) based on their pre–COVID-19 health. Post–COVID-19 syndrome was defined by symptoms that continue for more than 12 weeks, not explained by an alternative diagnosis.

To assess quality of life, the EuroQol-5D scale (EQ-5D) and the EuroQol visual analog scale were used. The EQ-5D defines health through five dimensions, namely, mobility, personal care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.18 Each dimension is divided into three severity levels, and together, they define 243 distinct health states, each of which is labeled with a unique five-digit code; for example, 11,111 represents full health status defined as having no problems in any dimension, whereas 33,333 represents the worst health status with extreme problems in all five dimensions. The EQ-5D Portuguese version was validated by Ferreira et al.19 The EuroQol visual analog scale was used to question patients about their quality of life, from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health), before COVID-19, after COVID-19 (on return to work), and in 6 months. A 10-point difference between two assessments was used to define worsening of quality of life.

Statistical Analyses

Data analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL). Data were presented as number of cases, mean ± standard deviation, or median with interquartile range (IQR). Categorical comparisons were performed by Pearson's chi-squared test. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.

To calculate the sample size, a previous study with patients with COVID-19 was used.20 In this study, the visual analog scale EuroQol score was 77 pre–COVID-19 and 65.8 after 6 months. Thus, considering an α error of 5% and a study power of 80%, it would be necessary to include at least 39 patients.

RESULTS

During the study period, 641 HCWs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection; 289 accepted to participate and were included in the study. All study participants had COVID-19 only once (during the study period). These HCWs were evaluated regarding HRQOL before and after COVID-19 (on return to work). After 6 months, the same HCWs were contacted by phone to have their quality of life evaluated again; at this moment, 174 HCWs agreed to participate. Among the 289 HCWs, the mean age was 42.2 ± 9.5 years, and 56 (19%) were male.

Table 1 shows the results of EQ-5D scale and the EuroQol visual analog scale. The dimensions most affected before COVID-19 were anxiety/depression (40.8% moderately or extremely anxious or depressed) and pain/discomfort (33.6% with moderate or extreme pain or discomfort). A statistically significant worsening was observed in all dimensions of the scale after COVID-19 (on return to work). Self-rated health on EuroQol visual analog scale revealed a median score of 90 (IQR, 80 to 95) before COVID-19, 80 (IQR, 70 to 90) after COVID-19 (on return to work), and 87.5 (IQR, 80 to 90) after 6 months (P < 0.0001).

TABLE 1 - EuroQol-5D Scale and EuroQol Visual Analog Scale Results
Before COVID-19 After COVID-19 (on Return to Work) After COVID-19 (6 mo) P Value
Mobility
 I have no problems to walk about 277 (95.8) 250 (86.5) 165 (94.8) <0.0001*
 I have some problems in walking about 12 (4.2) 39 (13.5) 9 (5.2)
 I am confined to bed 0 0 0
Self-care
 I have no problems with self-care 287 (99.3) 278 (96.2) 171 (98.3) 0.032*
 I have some problems washing or dressing myself 2 (0.7) 11 (3.8) 3 (1.7)
 I am unable to wash or dress myself 0 0 0
Usual activities
 I have no problems with performing my usual activities 273 (94.5) 218 (75.4) 149 (85.6) <0.0001*
 I have some problems with performing my usual activities 16 (5.5) 71 (24.6) 25 (14.4)
 I am unable to perform my usual activities 0 0 0
Pain/discomfort
 I have no pain or discomfort 192 (66.4) 152 (52.6) 115 (66.1) 0.005*
 I have moderate pain or discomfort 95 (32.9) 132 (45.7) 58 (33.3)
 I have extreme pain or discomfort 2 (0.7) 5 (1.7) 1 (0.6)
Anxiety/depression
 I am not anxious or depressed 171 (59.2) 131 (45.3) 95 (54.6) 0.020*
 I am moderately anxious or depressed 113 (39.1) 150 (51.9) 76 (43.7)
 I am extremely anxious or depressed 5 (1.7) 8 (2.8) 3 (1.7)
EuroQol visual analog scale, median (interquartile range) 90 (80–95) 80 (70–90) 87.5 (80–90) <0.0001
*P for the difference between before and after COVID-19 (on return to work).
For example, work, study, housework, family, or leisure activities.
P for the difference between the three moments.

Sixty-three of 174 HCWs (36.2%) were diagnosed with post–COVID-19 syndrome. The most frequent persistent symptoms were as follows: fatigue (23/63, 36.5%), sleep disturbances (9/63, 14.3%), dyspnea (8/63, 12.7%), and cough (6/63, 9.5%). Among patients who had reduced quality of life at 6 months (n = 85), 63 (74.1%) were due to post-COVID syndrome.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found a statistically significant worsening in all dimensions of HRQOL among HCWs after COVID-19. After 6 months of acute disease, self-rated health on EuroQol visual analog scale did not return to pre–COVID-19 values. Among HCWs who had reduced HRQOL at 6 months, 74.1% had post–COVID-19 syndrome. At total, 36.2% of HCWs were diagnosed with post–COVID-19 syndrome, and the most common persistent symptoms were fatigue, sleep disturbances, dyspnea, and cough.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that measured HRQOL before and after COVID-19 among HCWs. Reductions in HRQOL have been demonstrated among patients in general.6,9,12,14 Wong et al9 showed at least moderate impairments in quality of life in 33% of patients. Health-related quality of life lower than the healthy population was found 3 months after discharge.14 In another study,12 25% of patients had reductions in physical and mental global health after a median of 7.8 months of follow-up. Even nearly 1 year after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, one third of patients still have reduced HRQOL.6

We found a median EuroQol visual analog scale score of 80 after COVID-19. This score is similar to previous studies in China7 and Denmark.13 The dimensions of anxiety/depression, pain and discomfort, and usual activities were the most affected in this study. Daher et al11 described reduced HRQOL, with mobility being the mainly changed dimension. Pain and discomfort, usual activities, and mobility were the most altered dimensions in other investigations. We observed that before having acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, more than 40% of HCWs already reported anxiety/depression. Indeed, it has already been demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic influences the quality of life of HCWs who are on the front lines of caring for COVID-19 patients, with a high prevalence of depression and anxiety.21,22

The reduction in HRQOL after COVID-19 can be largely explained by the persistence of symptoms and post–COVID-19 syndrome. Although COVID-19 predominantly affects the lungs, it can also damage many other organs, including the heart, kidneys, and brain.23,24 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that 80% of patients had post–COVID-19 sequelae, and the most frequent residual symptoms were fatigue (58%) and dyspnea (24%).4 In accordance with our findings, studies have shown that dyspnea and/or fatigue may persist for months after discharge.2,3 Hellemons et al5 demonstrated a prevalence of dyspnea of 68% in 2 months and 36% after 3 months. Fatigue may persist up to 6 months after acute disease, with an important impact in HRQOL.5 In fact, nearly 1 year after COVID-19, two thirds of patients still referred at least one residual symptom.6

This study has some limitations. First, it was carried out in a single tertiary university hospital; however, we do not think that this is a limitation for generalizing the results. Second, we did not use a control group, which precludes comparison of HRQOL with those who did not suffer from COVID-19. Last, measurement bias cannot be ruled out because participants were asked to rate their quality of life before COVID-19 on return to work. On the other hand, this is the first study that evaluated HRQOL before and after COVID-19 among HCWs and also brings evidence of high prevalence of post–COVID-19 syndrome in these patients.

In conclusion, our study showed a significant deterioration in HRQOL among HCWs who had COVID-19. We demonstrated also a high frequency of post–COVID-19 syndrome at 6 months after COVID-19. Our results highlight the need for a long-term follow-up of HCWs after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

REFERENCES

1. Abu-Raya B, Migliori GB, O'Ryan M, et al. Coronavirus disease-19: an interim evidence synthesis of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAIDID). Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:572485.
2. Motiejunaite J, Balagny P, Arnoult F, et al. Hyperventilation: a possible explanation for long-lasting exercise intolerance in mild COVID-19 survivors?Front Physiol. 2021;11:614590.
3. Goërtz YMJ, Van Herck M, Delbressine JM, et al. Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome?ERJ Open Res. 2020;6:00542-2020.
4. Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, et al. More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2021;11:16144.
5. Hellemons ME, Huijts S, Bek L, et al. Persistent health problems beyond pulmonary recovery up to 6 months after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2; a longitudinal study of respiratory, physical and psychological outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;19:551–561.
6. Tortajada C, Navarro A, Andreu-Ballester JC, Mayor A, Añón S, Flores J. Prevalence and duration of symptoms among moderate and severe COVID-19 patients 12 months after discharge. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17:929–934.
7. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397:220–232.
8. Pavli A, Theodoridou M, Maltezou HC. Post-COVID syndrome: incidence, clinical spectrum, and challenges for primary healthcare professionals. Arch Med Res. 2021;52:575–581.
9. Wong AW, Shah AS, Johnston JC, Carlsten C, Ryerson CJ. Patient-reported outcome measures after COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2003276.
10. Townsend L, Dowds J, O'Brien K, et al. Persistent poor health after COVID-19 is not associated with respiratory complications or initial disease severity. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18:997–1003.
11. Daher A, Balfanz P, Cornelissen C, Müller A, Bergs I. Follow up of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease sequelae. Respir Med. 2020;174:106197.
12. Lapin B, Katzan IL. Health-related quality of life mildly affected following COVID-19: a retrospective pre-post cohort study with a propensity score–matched control group. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37:862–869.
13. Vejen M, Hansen EF, Al-Jarah BNI, et al. Hospital admission for COVID-19 pneumonitis—long-term impairment in quality of life and lung function. Eur Clin Respir J. 2022;9:2024735.
14. Algamdi MM. Assessment of post-COVID-19 quality of life using the quality of life index. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021;15:2587–2596.
15. World Health Organization. Events as they happen. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen. Accessed September 14, 2022.
16. Soebandrio A, Kusumaningrum T, Yudhaputri FA, et al. COVID-19 prevalence among healthcare workers in Jakarta and neighbouring areas in Indonesia during early 2020 pandemic. Ann Med. 2021;53:1896–1904.
17. Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, et al. COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190:161–175.
18. EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
19. Ferreira PL, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN. Contributos para a Validação da Versão Portuguesa do EQ-5D Contribution for the Validation of the Portuguese Version of EQ-5D [Internet]. Available at: www.actamedicaportuguesa.com. Accessed September 14, 2022.
20. Walle-Hansen MM, Ranhoff AH, Mellingsæter M, Wang-Hansen MS, Myrstad M. Health-related quality of life, functional decline, and long-term mortality in older patients following hospitalisation due to COVID-19. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:199.
21. Choi HJ, Yang CM, Lee SY, Lee HJ, Jang SH. Mental health and quality of life for healthcare workers in a university hospital under COVID-19. Psychiatry Investig. 2022;19:85–91.
22. Mert S, Peker Karatoprak A, Demirhan Y, et al. COVID-19, anxiety, and hopelessness: quality of life among healthcare workers in Turkey. Eval Health Prof. 2022;45:97–107.
23. Klok FA, Boon GJAM, Barco S, et al. The post-COVID-19 functional status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:10–12.
24. Wiertz CMH, Vints WAJ, Maas GJCM, et al. COVID-19: patient characteristics in the first phase of postintensive care rehabilitation. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;3:100108.
Keywords:

quality of life; COVID-19; post–COVID-19 cases; health care workers; health-related quality of life

Copyright © 2022 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine