This is the second of three articles that summarize recommendations for low back disorders from the ACOEM's Low Back Disorders Guideline. This article focuses on the non-invasive treatment sections from the 862-page ACOEM Low Back Disorders Guideline (2456 references). The first article1 addresses assessment and diagnostic evaluation, while the third article will address invasive treatments.
The ACOEM's Low Back Disorders Guideline is designed to provide health care providers with evidence-based guidance for management of low back disorders among working-age adults. Guidance in this article has been developed for acute (up to 1-month duration), subacute (1 to 3 months’ duration), and chronic (more than 3 months’ duration) clinical timeframes. This guideline does not address several broad categories including congenital disorders or malignancies. It also does not address specific intra-operative procedures. This article addresses the following multi-part questions by treatment phase (acute, subacute, chronic, postoperative) by the Evidence-based Practice Spine Panel:
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with medications?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with complementary/alternative treatments?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with exercise?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with manipulation?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with massage?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with electrical therapies?
- What evidence supports the treatment of low back disorders with heat or cold therapies?
Evidence for, and guidance development, was sought for the treatment of several spine disorders including low back pain (LBP), sciatica/radiculopathy, spondylolisthesis, facet arthrosis, degenerative disc disease, failed back surgery syndrome, and spinal stenosis.
The search strategies used seven databases (PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Ebsco, CINAHL). A total of 1,134,216 articles were screened, of which 1093 articles’ abstracts were reviewed and evaluated against specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 775 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 42 systematic reviews were included in these guidelines that addressed non-invasive treatment of low back disorders. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and graded from (A) to (C) in favor and against the specific diagnostic test, with (A) level recommendations having the highest quality literature. Expert consensus was employed for insufficient evidence (I) to develop consensus guidance. This guideline achieved 100% Panel agreement for all of the developed guidance in this article with the sole exception of systemic glucocorticosteroids for radicular pain (see below).
Guidance was developed with sufficient detail to facilitate assessment of compliance (Institute of Medicine [IOM]) and auditing/monitoring (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation [AGREE]).2,3 Alternative options to manage conditions are provided when comparative trials are available.4–12 All AGREE,13 IOM,14 AMSTAR,15 and GRADE3 criteria were adhered to.16 In accordance with the IOM's Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, this guideline underwent external peer review, and detailed records of the peer review processes are kept, including responses to external peer reviewers.3
The Evidence-based Practice Spine Panel and the Research Team have complete editorial independence from ACOEM and Reed Group, which have not influenced the guideline. The literature is continuously monitored and formally appraised for evidence that would materially affect this guidance. This guideline is planned to be comprehensively updated at least every 5 years or more frequently should evidence require it. All treatment recommendations are guidance based on synthesis of the evidence plus expert consensus. These are recommendations for practitioners, and decisions to adopt a particular course of action must be made by trained practitioners on the basis of available resources and the particular circumstances presented by the individual patient.
GENERAL TREATMENT PRINCIPLES
General treatment principles are addressed in a separate guideline, Initial Approaches to Treatment.17 A succinct summary of a few of those principles are warranted prior to discussing individual treatment recommendations, as they impact the management of low back disorders.
Patients should be provided a medication with evidence of efficacy. Limited numbers of medications should be prescribed. The effects of a medication should be recorded, with a particular focus on documenting objective and/or functional improvements (Table 1).17 Ineffective medication(s) should be discontinued prior to provision of alternate medication(s). Multiple medications should not be simultaneously provided at the same visit except with some acute severe patients and occasionally when there is a change of provider with a need to institute efficacious medications from a non-evidence-based regimen.
Patients should be provided a physical method that has quality evidence of efficacy. The effects of treatment should be documented, with attention to objective and/or functional improvements. Ineffective treatment(s) should be discontinued prior to provision of alternate treatment(s). Multiple treatments should generally not be simultaneously provided at the same visit except, for example, occasionally when there is a change of provider with a need to institute efficacious treatments from a non-evidence-based regimen.
NON-INVASIVE CLINICAL TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW
Activity levels, aerobic exercise, and directional preference exercises (stretching in the direction that centralizes or abolishes the pain, see below) should be addressed (see Algorithms – Figures 1, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A702, 2, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A703, 3, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A704). Nonprescription analgesics may provide sufficient pain relief for most patients with acute and subacute LBP. If the treatment response is inadequate (ie, if symptoms and activity limitations continue) or the provider judges the condition limitations to be more significant, prescribed pharmaceuticals and/or physical methods can be added. Comorbid conditions, invasiveness, adverse effects, cost, and provider and patient preferences help guide the provider's choice of recommendations. Initial care may include exercises, advice on activities, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, heat, cryotherapy, and manipulation. Education about LBP should begin at the first visit, including principles of fear avoidance belief training (FABT) for those with fear avoidance beliefs. Throughout the treatment phases, any given treatment should be assessed for efficacy and ineffective treatments should be discontinued rather than accumulated.
It is increasingly believed that chronically impaired LBP patients begin a course towards disability at, or before, their first clinical encounter. As such, those who do not respond to appropriate treatment should have their treatment, compliance, and psychosocial factors assessed early (see Algorithms – Figures 1, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A702, 2, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A703, 3, http://links.lww.com/JOM/A704). Additionally, those patients whose course ventures beyond the abilities of the provider should be referred to others with greater experience in evaluation and functional recovery of complex LBP patients.
The remainder of this document discusses evidence of efficacy for many LBP interventions used for spinal conditions. This evidence and consequent guidance are further subdivided, when possible, into acute, subacute, and chronic LBP, radicular pain syndromes, postoperative, and when evidence is available, other spinal conditions including spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, facet joint osteoarthrosis, and failed back surgery syndrome. A rigorous attempt has been made to ascertain evidence for radicular versus non-radicular pain in the development. However, the literature largely lacks specification of clear inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. Most trials did not report lower extremity symptoms and those that did nearly always reported percentages of subjects with “leg pain” without clarifying whether this was general lower extremity pain or anatomically consistent nerve root pain. A minority of such studies reported stratified analyses to detect if such patients responded differently. However, where identifiable radicular pain patients were included, these have been noted.
ACTIVITIES AND ACTIVITY MODIFICATION
There has been a major revision in the management of activity limitations in patients with LBP over the past 10 to 20 years. Previously, bed rest was prescribed. It is now widely recognized that prescriptions of bed rest are ineffective (see following discussion), reinforce a belief that the injury is severe and likely contribute to debility and delayed recovery. Recommendations have been developed for posture, lumbar supports, and mattresses. The approach to exercise, or physical activity has been significantly revised. Revisions have also resulted from the greater understanding that the natural history of LBP is for there to be episodic recurrences and persistence, while “most workers do continue working or return to work while symptoms are still present: if nobody returned to work till they were 100% symptom free, only a minority would ever return to work.”18–21
In general, activities causing a significant increase in low back symptoms should be reviewed with the patient and modifications advised when appropriate. Heavy lifting, awkward postures, prolonged duration of a single posture, workstation design, and other activities may require at least temporary modification. Usually these activities are obvious to the patient, yet, this is not always true. For example, patients may not realize the importance of monitoring symptoms and adjusting their positions or activities prior to experiencing excessive back stiffness. It is important to emphasize that a modest increase in pain does not represent or document damage. Instead, such symptoms may actually be beneficial to the patient to experience some short-term pain. For example, arising from bed is usually painful for a patient with acute LBP. Yet, it is beneficial to the patient's overall recovery to arise and maintain as nearly normal a functional status as possible (see Bed Rest, Exercise, and Fear Avoidance Belief Training). While the patient is recovering, activities that do not aggravate symptoms should be maintained and exercises should be advised to prevent debilitation due to inactivity. Evidence suggests aerobic exercise is a beneficial cornerstone therapeutic management technique for acute, subacute, and chronic LBP (see Aerobic Exercise). The patient should be informed that such activities might temporarily increase symptoms.
There are no quality studies identified to address this topic of work activity and limitations. Work activity modifications are often necessary. A patient's return-to-work expectations are typically set prior to the first appointment,22 thus education may be necessary to (re)set realistic expectations and goals. Advice includes how to avoid aggravating activities that result in more than a minor, temporary increase in pain. A review of work duties assists in decisions regarding whether or not modifications may be accomplished with or without employer notification and to determine whether modified duty is appropriate. Maintaining maximal levels of activity, including work activities, is recommended as not returning to work has detrimental effects on pain ratings and functionality.23
Work modifications should be tailored taking into consideration three main factors: (1) job physical requirements; (2) severity of the problem; and (3) the patient's understanding of his or her condition. A fourth factor, employer expectations, does not influence the writing of limitations, but does influence whether the limitations will be accepted and/or enacted. Sometimes it is necessary to write limitations or prescribe activity levels that are above what the patient feels he or she can do, particularly when the patient feels that bed rest or similar non-activity is advisable. In such cases, overly restricting the patient should be avoided as it is clearly not in the patient's best interest. Education about LBP and the need to remain active should concomitantly be provided.
Common limitations involve modifying the weight of objects lifted, frequency of lifts, and posture all while considering the patient's capabilities. For cases of acute, severe LBP with or without radicular symptoms, frequent initial limitations for occupational and non-occupational activities include:
- No lifting over 10 pounds,
- No prolonged or repeated bending (flexion), and
- Alternate sitting and standing as needed.
Activity guidelines are generally reassessed every week in the acute phase with gradual increases in activity recommended. The patient's activity level should be kept at maximal levels and gradually advanced. Work activity limitations should be written whether the employer is perceived to have modified duty available or not. Written activity limitations guidance communicates the patient's status and also provides the patient information on activity expectations and limitations at home.
There are 11 moderate-quality RCTs incorporated into this analysis.24–31 Bed rest was long used for the treatment of LBP,24–30,32–36 particularly acute LBP. Bed rest likely evolved from beliefs that LBP represented anatomical injury that necessitated activity limitations to improve recovery, without consideration of whether there might be any adverse short- or long-term implications. Evidence supports that bed rest is not recommended for the management of acute, subacute, chronic, radicular LBP, or stable spinal fractures all with High Confidence: Strongly Not Recommended (A) (Acute); Moderately Not Recommended (B) (Subacute, Chronic); Not Recommended (C) (Radicular); Not Recommended (I) (Stable Spinal Fractures). Bed rest is recommended for unstable spinal fractures Recommended (I), also with High Confidence. Bed rest is not recommended for other low back problems. Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence. Specific beds or other commercial sleep products are not recommended for prevention or treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP, Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence.
FEAR AVOIDANCE BELIEF TRAINING (KINESIOPHOBIA)
There are no quality studies incorporated into this analysis. The Fear Avoidance Belief Model (aka, kinesiophobia) was developed to attempt to explain differences between patients who had resolution of acute LBP versus those who progressed to chronic LBP.37–39 Fear Avoidance Belief Training (FABT) was developed to help individuals overcome fears that result in avoidance of activities and become self-fulfilling and self-reinforcing. FABT has been evaluated in acute, subacute, and chronic LBP patients. The single quality study of acute LBP that included FABT found those with elevated fear avoidance beliefs benefitted.40 The other studies also suggest that those with elevated fear avoidance beliefs benefited from the intervention40–43 with one exception; that exception was in Norway among individuals on disability pensions, thus applicability to the United States or to acute, subacute, or even chronic LBP settings is questionable.44,45 Those with elevated fear avoidance beliefs are particularly successfully treated with these interventions, while those without may not benefit. Thus, FABT is Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for acute, subacute, or chronic LBP patients with elevated fear avoidance beliefs at baseline with or without referred pain.
There are strong beliefs and little supportive quality evidence that achieving and/or maintaining lordotic postures are superior for LBP treatment and prevention. Lordotic sitting posture is recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP, radicular pain and postoperative pain, Recommended (I), Low Confidence. A pillow or an existing feature of a motor vehicle seat is not invasive, has few adverse effects, is low cost and is recommended. There are no quality data supporting specific commercial products.
There are no quality studies reported on sleep posture to prevent or treat LBP. Certain sleep postures have been sometimes thought of as superior. The controversy appears largely driven by a posture-based theory that a “straight or neutral” spine while sleeping is beneficial. As supportive quality evidence is lacking, and absence of sleep is detrimental, sleep posture(s) that are most comfortable for the patient are instead recommended (Recommended (I), Low Confidence).
MATTRESSES, WATER BEDS, AND OTHER SLEEPING SURFACES
There are one high-quality46 and one moderate-quality47 studies incorporated into this analysis. There are no quality studies on waterbeds or sleeping on the floor. Sleep disturbance is common with LBP.48 Dogma holds that a firm mattress is superior for LBP treatment and/or prevention.49 Commercial advertisements also advocate brand-name mattresses to treat LBP,50 however, there are no quality data supporting specific commercial products. One moderate-quality study of chronic LBP patients reported a medium firm mattress was superior to a firm mattress,46 but it neither discussed sleep position nor prior mattress firmness which may be important issues. Thus, while the most comfortable sleeping surface and posture may be preferable, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence (I) for or against specific mattresses, bedding, and water beds.
Most articles regarding exercise have mixed various forms of exercise, thus this summary evidence review analyzed evidence of specific exercises when available. There are 18 moderate-quality studies incorporated into the analysis of aerobic exercise.43,51–67 There are two high-quality68,69 and 107 moderate-quality RCTs (one with multiple reports) incorporated into the analyses of directional preference, slump stretching, and strengthening exercise.27,43,54,60,63,66,70–170
Exercises have been considered among the most important therapeutic options for the treatment and rehabilitation of LBP.77,96,129,131,137,160,171–210 While there are many ways to categorize and analyze exercise, this guideline evaluates exercise in four broad groupings: (1) aerobic exercise; (2) directional exercises; (3) stretching; and (4) strengthening. Additional subsequent sections include reviews of aquatic therapy, yoga, tai chi, and Pilates. An exercise prescription is Moderately Recommended (B), High Confidence for acute, subacute, chronic, postoperative, and radicular LBP patients. This may be self-administered or enacted through formal therapy appointments.
Aerobic exercises, most commonly a progressive walking program targeting either time or distance, are recommended for all patients from the initial appointment as follows: Moderately Recommended (B) for acute and subacute LBP, Strongly Recommended (A) for chronic LBP, Recommended (C) for radicular pain, Recommended (I) for postoperative patients109,166,211–213 all with High Confidence. Regarding quantification, one successful program for chronic LBP targeted progressive walking at least 45 minutes, four times a week at 60% of predicted maximum heart rate (220 – age = predicted maximum heart rate).52
Directional exercises which centralize or abolish the pain are Recommended (C) for acute LBP, Recommended (I) for subacute, chronic, and radicular LBP77,137,214–218 all with Moderate Confidence. These exercises are appropriate when a beneficial pattern of pain response (directional preference, pain centralization, or elimination) is identified during patient testing with standardized directions of end-range spinal movements. When appropriate, the exercises are initially performed every 2 hours (8 to 10 repetitions) to fully centralize and abolish the pain along with posture modifications that also honor the patient's directional preference. The same exercise typically also serves to protect the patient from symptoms returning during and after recovery. Slump stretching exercises three to five times a day are an option and are Recommended (C) for acute LBP, and Recommended (I) for subacute, and chronic LBP,77 all with Low Confidence. Stretching exercises as an isolated LBP prevention program are Not Recommended (C), Low Confidence, and there is a lack of evidence that generic, non-specific stretching exercises are of assistance in treating patients with acute LBP.121,134 Stretching exercises for treatment of chronic LBP in the absence of significant range of motion deficits may result in lack of adherence to functional goals including aerobic and strengthening exercises and thus, are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.
Strengthening exercises are Recommended (C), High Confidence for nearly all LBP patients other than those with acute LBP that resolves rapidly or acute LBP in the early acute treatment phase when strengthening could aggravate the pain.70,75,76,93,110,114,155,219–222 Specific strengthening exercises, such as stabilization exercises, are also helpful for the prevention and treatment (including postoperative treatment) of LBP and thus are Recommended (C), High Confidence.89,93,114,221 Abdominal strengthening exercises as a sole or central goal of a strengthening program for treatment or prevention of LBP are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.223
There are seven moderate-quality RCTs incorporated into this analysis.51 Aquatic therapy has indications to make it a select recommendation (eg, extreme obesity, significant degenerative joint disease, etc), as a progressive walking program is generally preferable for longer term exercise program maintenance in the vast majority of patients. Yet, those select indications are where aquatic therapy may be successful. Aquatic therapy is Recommended, Evidence (C) for select chronic LBP and Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for subacute LBP patients.60,224–228 Aquatic therapy is Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for all other subacute and chronic LBP patients.225
There is one moderate-quality RCT incorporated into this analysis.111 Lumbar extension machines are intended to address LBP through the development of muscle strength in specific muscle groups through specific exercises,111,229–231 yet in the absence of quality evidence of efficacy, they are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.
YOGA AND TAI CHI
There are two high-quality68,232 and nine moderate-quality112,233–240 studies incorporated into this analysis. Yoga for treatment of LBP has not been standardized, but tends to involve postures, stretches, breath control, and relaxation. Traditional yoga is different and involves rules for personal conduct, postures, breath control, sense withdrawal, concentration, meditation, and self-realization,239,241 and different versions are practiced (eg, Ashtanga, Iyengar, Hatha). Exercise aspects of yoga and tai chi for select, motivated patients with chronic LBP are Recommended (C),68,232,233,235–237,238,240,242,243 and for acute and subacute LBP patients, there is No Recommendation (I), all with Low Confidence.204,244–246 There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for treatment of LBP with pilates as quality evidence is lacking (Figs. 1–3).112,234
NON-STEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY MEDICATIONS
There are 12 high-quality247–258 and 37 moderate-quality studies (one with two reports)98,259–295 incorporated into this analysis. NSAIDs have been widely used for treatment of painful back conditions, including acute LBP, subacute LBP, chronic LBP, radicular, and postoperative patients and other back disorders296–304 and have consistent evidence of superiority to placebo, such that NSAIDs are Strongly Recommended (A), High Confidence for acute, chronic, and radicular syndromes and Moderately Recommended (B), High Confidence for subacute and postoperative pain.248,249,252–254,259,267,270,280 In most acute LBP patients, scheduled NSAID dosage rather than as needed (“PRN”) is generally preferable. As needed prescriptions and over-the-counter dosing may be reasonable for mild and some moderate LBP. If there is consideration for needing another medication, then scheduled NSAID dosing should generally be prescribed. The results of the RCT with the largest numbers of comparison groups for treatment of acute LBP are graphed in Fig. 4 and indicate the best pain relief was in the NSAID groups, which outperformed paracetamol and an opioid (dextro-propoxyphene). Acetaminophen is an acceptable alternative with some evidence of efficacy, but is inferior to NSAIDs and thus is Recommended (C), High Confidence.280,281,303,305Although gastrointestinal bleeding is rarely problematic in employed populations, when there is increased risk and as NSAIDs are superior, concomitant prescription of proton pump inhibitors are Strongly Recommended (A), sucralfate is Moderately Recommended (B), and H2 blockers are Recommended (C), all with High Confidence.306–310 Aspirin or acetaminophen are Recommended (I), High Confidence for those with known cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risks and the degree of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition is believed to be related to cardiovascular risk among the NSAIDs.306,311–318
There is one high-quality319 and one moderate-quality study320 incorporated into this analysis. Antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg/125 mg TID for 100 days) have been used of highly selective treatment of LBP that includes Modic changes and bone edema.319,321 Evidence conflicts. Accordingly, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for use in LBP patients other than proven infection.
There are four high-quality322–325 and 14 moderate-quality326–339 studies or crossover trials incorporated into this analysis. Anti-depressants have been widely utilized for the treatment of chronic LBP, and evidence suggests submaximal doses are generally effective. Norepinephrine blocking appears required for efficacy, and thus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, and trazodone are ineffective and Strongly Not Recommended (A), Moderate Confidence for chronic LBP and Not Recommended (I) for other LBP syndromes.322,324,328,332 Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants (eg, tricyclic anti-depressants—amitriptyline, imipramine, nortriptyline, desipramine, maprotiline, doxepin) and mixed serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (eg, duloxetine) are Strongly Recommended (A) for chronic LBP and Recommended (C) for acute and subacute pain, both with Moderate Confidence.322,323,326,330,331,335–337,339 There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for treatment of postoperative and radicular LBP.323,326,334,335
There are seven high-quality340–346 and nine moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.286,347–354Anti-convulsant agents have been utilized off-label particularly for chronic radicular and neuropathic pain.355–360 Gabapentin is an anti-convulsant also approved for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Anti-convulsants including gabapentin have evidence showing a lack of efficacy and thus they are Not Recommended (C), Low Confidence for acute, subacute, and chronic LBP.340,345,352–354,361–363 Anti-convulsants, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are not recommended for chronic radicular pain syndromes.345,346,353,354 Topiramate is Recommended (C), Low Confidence for chronic LBP patients with depression or anxiety,340 although it is generally recommended after exercises and trials of NSAIDs and anti-depressants. Gabapentin or pregabalin for perioperative pain management to reduce the need for opioids, particularly in patients with adverse effects from opioids, are efficacious and are Strongly Recommended (A), High Confidence.342,343 There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for use of other anti-convulsants for perioperative management. Gabapentin is Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of severe neurogenic claudication with limited walking distance.350
BISPHOSPHONATES, CALCITONIN, AND THIOCOLCHICOSIDE
There are no quality studies incorporated into these analyses. Bisphosphonates and calcitonin are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for chronic LBP management. However, they may have uses for osteoporosis management. Oral and intravenous colchicine are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP.364–366 There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for or against use of thiocolchicoside for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP.367,368
LIDOCAINE PATCHES, NMDA RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
There is one high-quality369 and one moderate-quality370 study incorporated into this analysis. Lidocaine patches are increasingly used to treat numerous pain conditions ranging from LBP to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) to postherpetic neuralgia.369,371 However, a moderate quality trial suggests lack of efficacy370 and thus lidocaine patches are Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of chronic LBP and there is No Recommendation (I) for other spine conditions. There are no quality studies incorporated into the analysis of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor/antagonists. These medications including dextromethorphan are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence.
Opioids have been reviewed in the Opioids Guideline.372,373 Opioids are Strongly Not Recommended (A), High Confidence for treatment of non-severe pain. Opioids are Recommended (C), High Confidence for highly selective use to treat severe acute pain from severe injuries, and postoperative pain (see Opioids Guideline for numerous recommendations).372,373 Adjunctive treatments should nearly always be used (eg, NSAIDs, exercises). Screening for increased risk of adverse effects should be performed. The maximum morphine equivalent dose should generally not exceed 50 mg per day, and only those with incremental functional gain beyond that achieved up to 50 mg per day may be candidates for increased doses up to 90 mg per day374,375 (see Opioids Guideline for additional recommendations).372
SKELETAL MUSCLE RELAXANTS
There are three high-376–378 and 33 moderate-quality289,292,379–409 RCTs or crossover trials incorporated into this analysis.
Skeletal muscle relaxants comprise a diverse set of pharmaceuticals designed to produce “muscle relaxation” purportedly through different mechanisms of action—generally considered to be effects on the central nervous system (CNS) and not directly on skeletal muscle.410,411 Therapeutic exercises and NSAIDs are considered first line agents, ahead of muscle relaxants. As sedative effects are reported in approximately 25% to 50% of patients, muscle relaxants should generally be used when not at work, and not prior to starting a work shift, operating a motor vehicle, machinery or performing safety-sensitive work.412,413 Daytime use is acceptable in circumstances where there are minimal CNS-sedating effects and little concern about sedation compromising function or safety. Muscle relaxants (not including carisoprodol) are Moderately Recommended (B), Moderate Confidence as a second-line treatment in moderate to severe acute LBP that has not been adequately controlled by NSAIDs.377,379,391,403,408,414 Muscle relaxants are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute mild to moderate LBP. They are selectively Recommended (I), Low Confidence for acute exacerbations of chronic LBP or postoperative muscle spasm,378,379,389,409 but otherwise are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence for treatment of chronic LBP. Carisoprodol and diazepam are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence due to their abuse potential and lack of superiority to other muscle relaxants.299,382,415-418
There are three high-quality419–421 and three moderate-quality422–424 studies incorporated into this analysis. Glucocorticosteroids are used to treat symptomatic herniated discs both through local injections (eg, epidural glucocorticosteroid injections) and oral agents to attempt to reduce localized inflammation and swelling.425–452 The single blinded trial of a 15-day course of oral prednisone (5 days at 60 mg, then 5 days at 40 mg, then 5 days at 20 mg) for treatment of radicular pain that included long-term follow-up suggested long-lasting benefits compared with placebo suggesting apparent efficacy.420 Other studies also suggest modest efficacy, thus systemic glucocorticosteroids are Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute and subacute radicular pain. However, Panel agreement was 56% compared with 44% who felt glucocorticosteroids should be not recommended in part due to the adverse effect profile. There is No Recommendation (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of chronic radicular pain syndromes. Glucocorticosteroids have been found to be ineffective for management of LBP419,420,422,424 and thus they are Moderately Not Recommended (B) for acute LBP and Not Recommended (I) for subacute or chronic LBP, both with High Confidence.
TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA INHIBITORS
There are two high-quality453,454 and 2 moderate-quality studies455,456 incorporated into this analysis. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is theorized to have a role in resorption of herniated intervertebral discs and also in producing the pain associated with herniated discs. Adalimumab and infliximab are monoclonal antibodies against TNF-α. Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor receptor inhibitor. They have been used for a number of rheumatological conditions, as well as in uncontrolled trials of sciatica.457–459 Most RCTs failed to find beneficial effects of infliximab for lumbar radicular pain syndromes454–456 in contrast with results from non-RCTs, and thus, TNF-α are Moderately Not Recommended (B), Moderate Confidence. TNF-α are also Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for other spine conditions.
There is one moderate-quality study incorporated into this analysis.460 Theramine, an amino acid formulation (AAF), has been used as a prescription medical food to purportedly reduce pain and inflammatory processes through dietary management.460 There are no placebo-controlled trials identified. There is one moderate-quality trial comparing theramine with low dose naproxen.460 This may have biases similar to a non-treatment or wait-listed control group. Thus, in the absence of quality trials, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for treatment of spine disorders.
HERBAL AND OTHER PREPARATIONS
There are two high-quality461,462 and four moderate-quality463–466 studies incorporated into this analysis. Herbal treatments have been utilized to treat LBP, including Camphora molmol, Salix alba, Melaleuca alternifolia, Angelica sinensis, Aloe vera, Thymus officinalis, Menthe piperita, Arnica montana, Curcuma longa, Tanacetum parthenium, Harpagophytum procumbens, and Zingiber officinale. Herbal treatments/supplements are not well regulated in the United States and research regarding therapeutic and biologically available dosage is limited. There is a potential for a placebo effect to be misinterpreted as a sign of efficacy.461,462,467 Evidence of efficacy varies across these compounds, but dosing is not well controlled and there is no quality evidence for efficacy of these. Therefore, there is No Recommendation (I) for all of these with the exception that willow bark (salix)463,464,468 is Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence. If salicylates are used as treatment, generic aspirin is preferable to willow bark or salicin.
CAPSAICIN, OTHER CREAMS, OINTMENTS, AND TOPICAL AGENTS
There are two high-quality469,470 and three moderate-quality464,471,472 studies incorporated into this analysis. Capsaicin is applied to the skin as a cream or ointment and is thought to reduce pain by stimulating other nerve endings, thus it is thought to be potentially effective through distraction. Rado-Salil ointment is a proprietary formulation of 14 agents, the two most common of which are menthol (55.1%) and methylsalicylate (26.5%). There are many other commercial products that similarly cause either a warm or cool feeling in the skin. All of these agents are thought to work through a counter-irritant mechanism (ie, feeling the dermal sensation rather than the LBP). These compounds may also be used in those patients who prefer topical treatments over oral treatments and other more efficacious treatments but have only mild LBP. There is some evidence that capsaicin compounds should not be used chronically due to reported adverse effects on neurons.473 Capsaicin appears superior to Spiroflor. While other treatments appear likely to have greater efficacy (eg, NSAIDs, progressive exercise program, etc), capsaicin may be a useful adjunct and is Moderately Recommended (B), Moderate Confidence for short-term but not long-term treatment of acute or subacute LBP or temporary flare-ups of chronic LBP.464,469–472 Spiroflor is Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP as it appears less efficacious than capsaicin and there are other treatments that are efficacious. The use of topical NSAIDs or other creams and ointments for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP have No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence. For treatment of chronic LBP, DMSO, N-acetylcysteine, EMLA, and wheatgrass cream are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.
There is one moderate-quality RCT incorporated into this analysis.474 Vitamins have been used to treat spine disorders, especially anti-oxidants, although all anti-oxidants are simultaneously pro-oxidants,475,476 thus evidence of potential harm from vitamins, particularly vitamin E, is accumulating.477–479 Vitamins, minerals, and supplements include glucosamine, bromelain, variations of B vitamins, vitamin C, zinc, and manganese.480 Studies have suggested a correlation between non-specific musculoskeletal pain and vitamin D deficiency, but no significant correlation has been demonstrated in patients with LBP and vitamin D deficiency.481,482 RCTs are needed for better understanding vitamin D repletion in patients with chronic LBP.474,483As there is an absence of quality evidence of efficacy of vitamins for treatment of spine disorders in the absence of documented deficiencies, vitamin supplementation is Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.
KINESIOTAPING (INCLUDING KT TAPE AND ROCKTAPE) AND TAPING
There are no high quality and four moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.484–487 Taping and kinesiotaping (including KT tape and Rocktape) are used on the extremities and the spine particularly in sports settings. There are no consistent quality studies demonstrating kinesiotaping and taping are efficacious for the treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP or radicular pain syndromes or other back-related problems. While one moderate-quality study suggested it may be effective, three others found it ineffective,484–487 and thus kinesiotaping is Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of spine conditions.
SHOE INSOLES AND SHOE LIFTS
There are no high quality and three moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.488–490 There is one quality study reported comparing shoe insoles in patients with LBP, apparently mostly in chronic LBP patients. All of these studies, even those attempting blinding, suffer from probable unblinding of participants and placebo effects.488–490 Shoe lifts are Recommended (I), Low Confidence for treatment of chronic or recurrent LBP among individuals with significant leg length discrepancy of more than 2 cm, otherwise they are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of other spine disorders. Shoe insoles or lifts are Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for prevention of LBP. There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for shoe insoles for those with prolonged walking requirements.
There are 10 moderate-quality RCTs incorporated into this analysis.491–500 Lumbar supports range from soft wrap-around appliances to reinforced braces to rigid braces and have been used to treat various phases of lumbar pain493,494,501–504 and post-surgical rehabilitation. They have also been used for prevention of LBP.498,505–508 The rigid devices have been used particularly in postoperative lumbar fusion with a goal to facilitate boney union, and while there are no quality studies for that purpose, they are Recommended (I), High Confidence for that discrete indication. Most of the highest quality studies suggest lack of efficacy of lumbar supports for either the prevention or treatment of LBP, and thus they are Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence.491–500
Two moderate-quality RCTs suggest a lack of efficacy and none support efficacy,509,510 thus magnets are Moderately Not Recommended (B), High Confidence for treatment of any LBP disorder.
There are no high- or moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis. Iontophoresis is a drug delivery system utilizing electrical current to transdermally deliver typically either glucocorticosteroids or NSAIDs and that has apparent efficacy in select disorders of the extremities where the dermis and adipose tissue overlying the target tissue is thin and penetration of the medicine to the target tissue is plausible. As there are no quality studies showing iontophoresis is effective for any of the LBP disorders, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence.
There are no high-quality and 14 moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.110,137,273,494,511–519 Massage is a commonly used treatment for LBP.299,304,520–527 Massage is theorized to aid muscle and mental relaxation which could hypothetically result in increased pain tolerance through endorphin release.528–530 Relatively few higher quality trials of massage have been reported, varying massage methods have been used, methods and patient populations differed substantially between trials, and long-term follow-up is largely lacking494,531 resulting in heterogeneous results. Many trials have utilized massage as a control treatment for other interventions.494 Most trials suggest modest benefits. Massage is Recommended (C), Low Confidence for select use in subacute or chronic LBP as an adjunct to more efficacious treatments consisting primarily of a graded aerobic and strengthening exercise program.110,137,273,494,511–519,532 Objective improvements should be shown approximately half way through the regimen to continue a treatment course. Massage is Recommended (I), Low Confidence for select use in acute LBP or chronic radicular pain syndromes in which LBP is a substantial symptom component. Mechanical devices for administering massage are Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence.514,515
There are no high-quality and two moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.533,534 Reflexology focuses on massage of reflex points which are believed to be linked to physiological responses and healing of other tissues including those in the back.535 Reflexology has not been shown to be clearly efficacious for the treatment of chronic LBP in either of two moderate-quality studies,533,534 and is thus Not Recommended (C) for chronic LBP and Not Recommended (I) for other LBP disorders, both with Moderate Confidence.
There are no high-quality and one moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.536 Myofascial release is a manual soft tissue technique to attempt to stretch and apply traction on target tissue(s). It is most commonly used in the periscapular area to treat non-specific upper thoracic muscle soreness. There are no placebo or sham-controlled trials for treatment of LBP. There is one comparative trial and it does not show clear efficacy,536 thus there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for treatment of any of the LBP disorders with myofascial release.
There is one high- (with two reports)537,538 and 19 moderate-quality157,174,381,492,515,539–552 studies incorporated into this analysis. Traction is the distraction of structures within the lumbar spine by application of tension along the axis of the spinal column that has been most frequently used to treat radicular syndromes.179,531,541,553–560 Types of traction include motorized, manual, bed rest, pulley-weight, gravitational, suspension, and inverted, with manual and motorized being most commonly used. Trials with subgroups of patients have appeared promising for a minority of patients, but full validation studies are yet to be reported.174,556 Nearly all of the highest quality studies for treatment of LBP patients failed to show meaningful benefits from traction.174,537,538,548–550 Its theoretical utility in radicular pain patients has also not been borne out as more studies show a lack of efficacy537,539,546,547 than show efficacy.540,544,548 Thus, traction is Strongly Not Recommended (A) for treatment of subacute or chronic LBP, Moderately Not Recommended (B) for radicular pain, and Not Recommended (I) for acute or postoperative LBP, all Moderate Confidence.
DECOMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSIVE DEVICES
There are no high-quality and two moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.561,562 Decompression through traction is a treatment that utilizes a therapeutic table and traction mechanism. Its intent is to reduce intradiscal pressure, thus allowing for disc decompression. There is no clear quality evidence for efficacy,554,561–563 analogy to other traction trials is not promising, thus decompression through traction and spinal decompressive devices is Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic, postoperative LBP, or radicular pain syndromes.
There is one moderate-quality RCT incorporated into this analysis.564 Inversion therapy has been used for treatment of patients with herniated discs564 and LBP, but as there is no quality evidence of efficacy, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence.
MANIPULATION AND MOBILIZATION
There are one high-quality252 and 36 moderate-quality RCTs incorporated into this analysis (five with multiple reports).53,95,154,155,160,211,263,273,492,493,547,565–594 Manipulation and mobilization include widely different techniques.568,571,595–598 In general, mobilization involves assisted, low-force, low-velocity movement. Manipulation involves high-force, high-velocity, and low-amplitude action with a focus on moving a target joint. As commonly used, “adjustment” is generally a synonym for manipulation. There are numerous types of manipulation utilized in different studies. It seems unlikely that if there is an effect of manipulation, that it should be the same regardless of diagnosis, technique, or any other factors. This results in difficulties with comparing methods, techniques, or results across the available literature. These differences appear to be largely unstated in the available systematic reviews, which have aggregated all studies.
The highest quality sham-manipulation trial suggested no benefits of manipulation.593 A clinical prediction rule (CPR) appeared quite promising,53,574 yet, was unable to be validated.130,135 Of the five highest quality studies of manipulation, three found no benefit,252,576,599 one resulted in the CPR not being subsequently validated53 and only one was positive for comparing manipulation with non-thrust manipulation.565 However, most of the evidence continues to suggest manipulation is approximately as efficacious as common physiotherapy interventions such as stretching or strengthening exercises for treatment of acute and chronic LBP. There are many additional moderate-quality studies evaluating manipulation, although there are problems with quality of the available literature,600–602 use of mixtures of manipulation with exercises and other treatments precluding conclusions on efficacy of spinal manipulation, and suboptimal statistical testing.598,603 There are comparative trials with “usual care” (which often is not modern quality evidence-based treatment and/or contain numerous uncontrolled co-interventions) but no quality studies demonstrating superiority of manipulation for LBP patients compared with the other evidence-based treatment strategies (eg, NSAIDs, progressive walking program, directional exercises, and heat) contained in this guideline. One comparative trial suggested adjunctive manual-thrust manipulation was modestly superior to mechanical-assisted manipulation (MAM) at 4 weeks but not longer-term. Both also treated with ibuprofen, with no differences between MAM and largely unstructured “usual medical care.”571 These weaknesses have resulted in a decrease in the prior strength of evidence rating for manipulation for acute pain to “I” from “B.”
Manipulation or mobilization of the lumbar spine is Recommended (I), Low Confidence for select treatment of acute or subacute LBP, or radicular pain syndromes without neurological deficit, generally if needed after treatment with NSAIDs, directional and aerobic exercise. Patient preference is an indication for early use of manipulation. Manipulation may also be considered for treatment of severe, acute LBP concurrently with directional exercises, aerobic exercise, and NSAIDs with the goal to improve motion and hopefully to decrease pain and enable more efficient exercise. Objective improvements should be shown approximately halfway through the regimen to continue a treatment course. There is no quality evidence that more than 12 visits are helpful for an episode of LBP, thus ongoing manipulation is not indicated.
Manipulation or mobilization for short-term relief of chronic pain while used as a component of an active exercise program is also Recommended (C), Low Confidence. While “leg pain” was included in some studies, nearly all excluded patients with symptoms consistent with sciatica589 and essentially all have eliminated those with neurological deficits. Manipulation is Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence for treatment of radicular pain syndromes with progressive motor loss. Manipulation or mobilization of regions outside of/not adjacent to the lumbopelvic area (eg, cervical spine, lower extremity) when treating LBP is Not Recommended (I), High Confidence.
MANIPULATION UNDER ANESTHESIA (MUA) AND MEDICATION-ASSISTED SPINAL MANIPULATION (MASM)
There is one moderate-quality RCT incorporated into this analysis.604 Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and medication-assisted spinal manipulation (MASM) involves the administration of anesthesia or medication followed by manipulation of the spine with the intended effect of relieving LBP.605–610 MUA and MASM have been evaluated in chronic LBP patients in one RCT; however, that study used a complex mixture of interventions and changed multiple interventions between the two groups.604 Thus, there is no quality study reported comparing these with either a non-interventional control or other evidence-based treatment. There are also no quality studies that solely evaluate MUA or MASM. Thus, MUA and MASM are Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP.
HOT AND COLD THERAPIES
There is one moderate-quality RCT incorporated into this analysis.611 Theoretical constructs for heat and cold therapies are rich, for example, cryotherapy purportedly delays or reduces inflammation.612 Dogma is also strong for initial acute LBP treatment with ice followed by heat, yet quality supportive evidence is absent. Many believe the primary purpose of these treatments is distraction. There are no quality studies of cold or cryotherapy. Small moderate-quality trials of a commercial heat wrap device compared, eg, with ibuprofen 400 mg TID suggesting heat is effective,283,613–616 although there are no quality trials of heat compared with prescriptions doses of an NSAID or an exercise program. Heat or cryotherapies are thought to be reasonable self-treatments for moderate to severe acute LBP patients with sufficient symptoms that an NSAID/acetaminophen and progressive graded activity are believed to be insufficient and may be reasonable for treatment of subacute or chronic LBP617; however, they are commonly used by patients as a substitute for compliance with active exercise regimens and thus require close monitoring. Self-applications of low-tech heat therapies are Recommended (C) and cryotherapies are Recommended (I), both with Low Confidence.611 High-tech devices or provider-based applications of heat and/or cryotherapy are costly, have no quality evidence of efficacy for treatment of LBP and thus are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence.
There are six moderate-quality RCTs (one with four reports) incorporated into this analysis.83,85,263,550,575,584,618–620 Two studies were primarily designed to evaluate the efficacy of manipulative therapies and utilized diathermy as a control group. Diathermy is a type of heat treatment that has been used clinically to heat tissue, is believed to heat tissue deeper than hot packs and heating pads, and has been used to treat LBP.621 Yet, its most common use in clinical trials is as a no-effect or low-effect control group.550,575,584 The highest quality trials of diathermy suggest a lack of efficacy,550,584 and thus, diathermy is Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of any type of LBP.
There are five moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis.100,542,547,622,623 Infrared is a heat treatment created by various devices producing electromagnetic radiation in the infrared spectrum. As available evidence conflicts,100,542,547,622,623 there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for or against the use of infrared therapy for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic, radicular or postoperative LBP.
There are one high-quality624 and 19 moderate-quality RCTs incorporated into this analysis.51,52,60,65,85,104,107,154,164,167,263,381,512,599,625–629 Ultrasound has been used for treatment of LBP.531,630–633 There is only one small study,625 no sizable quality studies of ultrasound for the treatment of LBP, and thus, there is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for or against the use of ultrasound for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic, radicular, or postoperative LBP. In situations where deeper heating is desirable, a limited trial of ultrasound may be reasonable for treatment of acute LBP, but only if performed as an adjunct with exercise.
LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY
There are three high-quality634–636 and five moderate-quality studies264,623,634,637–639 incorporated into this analysis. There are multiple trials of low-level laser therapy available with the highest quality studies having successful randomization mostly indicating a lack of efficacy.634–637,639 Thus, low-level laser therapy is Not Recommended (C), Moderate Confidence for treatment of LBP.264,623,634–639
There are 10 high-quality640–650 (one with two reports) and 25 moderate-quality273,396,511,623,637,638,651–670 studies (one with two reports) incorporated into this analysis. Trials enrolling only the elderly were not included.401,671–673 Acupuncture has long been used for treatment of LBP.520,630,641,674–677 Acupuncture is Recommended (C), Low Confidence for selective use to treat chronic moderate to severe LBP as an adjunct to more efficacious treatments as there is no quality evidence of lasting effects.273,396,511,623,637,638,640–670 The Chinese meridian approach is not necessary, as either needling the affected area or sham needle insertion is sufficient.641,642,649 Chronic LBP patients should have had NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen, strengthening and aerobic exercise instituted and have insufficient results. Acupuncture may be considered as a treatment for chronic LBP as a limited course during which time there are clear objective and functional goals to be achieved and it is an adjunct to a conditioning program with aerobic and strengthening exercise components. Objective improvements should be shown approximately halfway through the regimen to continue a treatment course. For treatment of acute, subacute, radicular, or postoperative LBP, there are no quality studies, there are other effective treatments for those patients, and thus, acupuncture is Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence.
TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS)
There are five high-quality678–682 and 25 moderate-quality studies514,562,653,658,661,662,671,682–699 incorporated into this analysis. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has conflicting evidence among the quality studies evaluating the utility to treat chronic LBP. There are studies evaluating TENS for sciatica patients. Of the high-quality studies for chronic LBP, three678,681,682 suggest benefit and two679,680 suggest no benefit. While the highest quality study682 did find benefit, not all of the higher quality trials did, thus the evidence conflicts. There is no study finding strong evidence of major benefits, thus any benefit appears likely to be modest. TENS is Not Recommended (I), Moderate Confidence for treatment of acute or subacute LBP or acute radicular pain syndromes. TENS is Recommended (I), Low Confidence for select use in treatment of chronic LBP or chronic radicular pain syndrome as an adjunct to more efficacious treatments. Chronic LBP should be insufficiently managed with prior NSAIDs, aerobic exercise, and strengthening exercise with which compliance is documented. Many providers would also require failure with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) and/or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) anti-depressants. TENS (single or dual channel) may be recommended as treatment for chronic LBP when clear objective and functional goals are being achieved which includes objective functional improvements such as return to work, increased exercise tolerance, and reductions in medication use. There is no quality evidence that more complex TENS units beyond the single or dual channel models are more efficacious; thus, those models are not recommended. TENS units should be trialed prior to purchase to demonstrate efficacy and increase function.
MICROCURRENT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
There is one moderate-quality study incorporated into this analysis for microcurrent electrical stimulation.700 There are no high-quality and 15 moderate-quality studies incorporated into this analysis for percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.52,56,57,65,159,160,688,690,701–707 There are no quality studies evaluating H-Wave® Device (Electronic Waveform Lab, Inc, Huntington Beach, CA) stimulation for the treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic LBP or radicular pain syndromes. All of the following are Not Recommended (I), Low Confidence: microcurrent electrical stimulation,700 neuromuscular electrical stimulation (non-chronic pain), and percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS).52,56,57,65,159,160,690,701,702,705,706,708,709 There is No Recommendation (I), Low Confidence for or against all of: H-Wave® Device stimulation therapy, high-voltage galvanic therapy, interferential therapy,515,681,710–715 and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (chronic LBP, chronic radicular pain).
Quality evidence to guide the treatment of LBP is available. Detailed algorithms have been developed using the quality evidence where available, with supplementation with the Panel's expert opinions (ie, consensus guidance).
Acute LBP is best initially treated with directional stretching, progressive aerobic exercise, management of kinesiophobia, and NSAIDs. Work limitations may be needed especially for those with occupational demands exceeding the patient's abilities; limitations should be gradually eliminated. Adjunctive use of other treatments (eg, muscle relaxants, manipulation) may be added particularly for those with worse and/or persistent pain. There may be some patients for whom initial treatment with manipulation may be effective, however, if there is not rapid improvement with manipulation, it is recommended that the primary focus should change to progressive exercises. Other treatments with some evidence of efficacy include self-applied heat therapy. Failure of LBP to rapidly improve should necessitate an early search for, and treatment of other factors, including kinesiophobia and other psychosocial factors.
Patients with radicular pain syndromes should be treated with maintaining activity as able, stretching, aerobic exercise, and NSAIDs. A course of oral glucocorticosteroids has some evidence of efficacy, although the Panel vote was split in large part based on the risk-benefit ratio driven by potential adverse effects. Ongoing or progressive neurological deficits require other treatment.
Patients with chronic LBP require institution of a program that primarily emphasizes functional restoration including aerobic exercise, strengthening exercises, and kinesiophobia. Cognitive behavioral therapy and functional restoration also have evidence of efficacy. Medications with evidence of efficacy include NSAIDs, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants, and mixed SNRIs. Massage, manipulation, and acupuncture have some indications as adjunctive treatments; however, the emphasis should be on functional restoration. In no case should treatments be cumulative without ascertaining incremental functional benefits; instead, ineffective treatments should be discontinued after trialing.
The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Research Team at the University of Utah's Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health without which this work would not have been possible. Team members include: Jeremy J. Biggs, MD, MSPH, Matthew A. Hughes, MD, MPH, Matthew S. Thiese, PhD, MSPH, Ulrike Ott, PhD, MSPH, Atim Effiong, MPH, Kristine Hegmann, MSPH, CIC, Alzina Koric, MPP, Brenden Ronna, BS, Austen J. Knudsen, Pranjal A. Muthe, Leslie M.C. Echeverria, BS, Jeremiah L. Dortch, BS, Ninoska De Jesus, BS, Zackary C. Arnold, BS, Kylee F. Tokita, BS, Katherine A. Schwei, MPH, Deborah G. Passey, MS, Holly Uphold, PhD, Jenna L. Praggastis, BS, Weijun Yu, BS, Emilee Eden, MPH, Chapman B. Cox, Jenny Dang, BS, Melissa Gonzalez, Amrinder Kaur Thind, Helena Tremblay, Uchenna Ogbonnaya, MS, Elise Chan, and Madison Tallman.
1. Hegmann KT, Travis R, Belcourt RM, et al. Diagnostic tests for low back disorders. J Occup Environ Med
2. Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, et al. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
3. GRADE Working Group. Criteria for Applying or Using GRADE; 2016. Available at: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/docs/Criteria_for_using_GRADE_2016-04-05.pdf
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
4. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Cervical and Thoracic Spine Disorders; 2018. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/cervical-and-thoracic-spine
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
5. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Low Back Disorders; 2019. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/low-back-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
6. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Knee Disorders; 2015. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/knee-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
7. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Disorders; 2019. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/hand-wrist-and-forearm-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
8. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Ankle and Foot Disorders; 2018. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/ankle-and-foot-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
9. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Shoulder Disorders; 2016. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/shoulder-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
10. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Hip and Groin Disorders; 2019. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/hip-and-groin-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
11. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Chronic Pain; 2017. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/chronic-pain
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
12. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Elbow Disorders; 2018. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/elbow-disorders
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
13. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ
14. Institute of Medicine. Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines; 2011. Available at: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-Can-Trust/Standards.aspx
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
15. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodology
16. American College of Occupational and Environmental MedicineMethodology for ACOEM's Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines-2017 Revision. 2017; 1–74. Available at: https://acoem.org/acoem/media/PracticeResources/Methodology-2017-Update.pdf
. Accessed September 16, 2019.
17. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Initial Approaches to Treatment; 2017. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/foundations/initial-approaches-to-treatment-2017
. Accessed October 8, 2019.
18. Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med
19. Garg A, Boda S, Hegmann KT, et al. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, part 1: association with low-back pain in the Backworks prospective cohort study. Hum Factors
20. Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Wood EM, et al. Low-back pain ratings for lifetime, 1-month period, and point prevalences in a large occupational population. Hum Factors
21. Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Wood EM, et al. Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population. BMC Musculoskelet Dis
22. Kapoor S, Shaw WS, Pransky G, Patterson W. Initial patient and clinician expectations of return to work after acute onset of work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med
23. Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Haldorsen EM, Espehaug B. The impact of physical function and pain on work status at 1-year follow-up in patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
24. Coomes EN. A comparison between epidural anaesthesia and bed rest in sciatica. Br Med J
25. Deyo RA, Diehl AK, Rosenthal M. How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med
26. Hofstee DJ, Gijtenbeek JM, Hoogland PH, et al. Westeinde sciatica trial: randomized controlled study of bed rest and physiotherapy for acute sciatica. J Neurosurg
27. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, et al. The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med
28. Rozenberg S, Delval C, Rezvani Y, et al. Bed rest or normal activity for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
29. Wilkinson MJ. Does 48 hours’ bed rest influence the outcome of acute low back pain? Br J Gen Pract
30. Szpalski M, Hayez J. How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function. Eur Spine J
31. Evans C, Gilbert J, Taylor W, Hildebrand A. A randomized controlled trial of flexion exercises, education, and bed rest for patients with acute low back pain. Physiother Can
32. Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
33. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med
34. Waddell G, Feder G, Lewis M. Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain. Br J Gen Pract
35. Dahm KT, Brurberg KG, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB. Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
36. Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM, Deluca F, et al. Acute low-back pain. An objective analysis of conservative therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
37. Bamford KW. Bilingual issues in mental health assessment and treatment. Hispanic J Behav Sci
38. Slade P, Troup J, Lethem J, Bentley G. The fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception—II: preliminary studies of coping strategies for pain. Behav Res Ther
39. Lethem J, Slade P, Troup J, Bentley G. Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception—I. Behav Res Ther
40. George SZ, Fritz JM, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
41. Klaber Moffett JA, Carr J, Howarth E. High fear-avoiders of physical activity benefit from an exercise program for patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2004; 29:1167–1172. discussion 1173.
42. Storheim K, Brox JI, Holm I, Bo K. Predictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up study. J Rehabil Med
43. Storheim K, Brox JI, Holm I, Koller AK, Bo K. Intensive group training versus cognitive intervention in sub-acute low back pain: short-term results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med
44. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Skouen JS, Eriksen HR. Motivating disability pensioners with back pain to return to work--a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med
45. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain
46. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Pena A, et al. Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet
47. Bergholdt K, Fabricius RN, Bendix T. Better backs by better beds? Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
48. Marin R, Cyhan T, Miklos W. Sleep disturbance in patients with chronic low back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
49. Levy H, Hutton W. Mattresses and sleep for patients with low back pain: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons. J South Orthop Assoc
50. Hagino C. Before-after study to determine the effectiveness of an adjustable wood frame-foam and wool mattress bed-system (The Natura Mattress System) in reducing chronic back pain in adults. J Can Chiropr Assoc
51. Chan CW, Mok NW, Yeung EW. Aerobic exercise training in addition to conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
52. Chatzitheodorou D, Kabitsis C, Malliou P, Mougios V. A pilot study of the effects of high-intensity aerobic exercise versus passive interventions on pain, disability, psychological strain, and serum cortisol concentrations in people with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther
53. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med
54. Goldby LJ, Moore AP, Doust J, Trew ME. A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of musculoskeletal physiotherapy on chronic low back disorder. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
55. Sculco AD, Paup DC, Fernhall B, Sculco MJ. Effects of aerobic exercise on low back pain patients in treatment. Spine J
56. Tritilanunt T, Wajanavisit W. The efficacy of an aerobic exercise and health education program for treatment of chronic low back pain. J Med Assoc Thai
2001; 84: (suppl): S528–S533.
57. Weiner DK, Perera S, Rudy TE, et al. Efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and therapeutic exercise for older adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pain
58. Cuesta-Vargas A, Adams N, Salazar J, et al. Deep water running and general practice in primary care for non-specific low back pain versus general practice alone: randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheum
59. Delitto A, Piva SR, Moore CG, et al. Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
60. Doğan ŞK, Tur BS, Kurtaiş Y, Atay MB. Comparison of three different approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clin Rheum
61. Evjenth O, Hamberg J. Muscle Stretching in Manual Therapy: The Spinal Column and the Temporo-mandibular joint. Forlag, Sweden: Alfta Rehab; 1984.
62. Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
63. Jousset N, Fanello S, Bontoux L, et al. Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2004; 29:487–493. discussion 494.
64. Kell RT, Asmundson GJ. A comparison of two forms of periodized exercise rehabilitation programs in the management of chronic nonspecific low-back pain. J Strength Cond Res
65. Murtezani A, Hundozi H, Orovcanec N, Sllamniku S, Osmani T. A comparison of high intensity aerobic exercise and passive modalities for the treatment of workers with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
66. Shnayderman I, Katz-Leurer M. An aerobic walking programme versus muscle strengthening programme for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
67. Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, et al. Chronic low back pain: physical training, graded activity with problem solving training, or both? The one-year post-treatment results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain
68. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Wellman RD, et al. A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med
69. Staal JB, Hlobil H, Twisk JW, et al. Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med
70. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
71. Pope RP, Herbert RD, Kirwan JD, Graham BJ. A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc
72. Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low-back pain. A prospective randomized trial: McKenzie method of treatment versus patient education in “mini back school.”. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
73. Stankovic R, Johnell O. Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
74. Kim D, Brown J. Efficacy and safety of lumbar epidural dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone in the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy: a comparison of soluble versus particulate steroids. Clin J Pain
75. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther
1992; 72:279–290. discussion 291-3.
76. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
77. Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
78. Moffett JK, Torgerson D, Bell-Syer S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ
79. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, et al. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil
80. Hlobil H, Uegaki K, Staal JB, et al. Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back pain. Eur Spine J
81. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Nachemson A. Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med
82. Aure OF, Nilsen JH, Vasseljen O. Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2003; 28:525–531. discussion 531-2.
83. Bi X, Zhao J, Zhao L, et al. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for chronic low back pain. J Int Med Res
84. Carr JL, Klaber Moffett JA, Howarth E, et al. A randomized trial comparing a group exercise programme for back pain patients with individual physiotherapy in a severely deprived area. Disabil Rehabil
85. Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Phys Ther
86. del Pozo-Cruz B, Parraca JA, del Pozo-Cruz J, et al. An occupational, internet-based intervention to prevent chronicity in subacute lower back pain: a randomised controlled trial. J Rehabil Med
87. Dufour N, Thamsborg G, Oefeldt A, Lundsgaard C, Stender S. Treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, clinical trial comparing group-based multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation and intensive individual therapist-assisted back muscle strengthening exercises. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
88. Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, et al. Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Pain
89. Filiz M, Cakmak A, Ozcan E. The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil
90. Franca FR, Burke TN, Caffaro RR, Ramos LA, Marques AP. Effects of muscular stretching and segmental stabilization on functional disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
91. Frost H, Klaber Moffett JA, Moser JS, Fairbank JC. Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain. BMJ
92. Helmhout PH, Harts CC, Staal JB, Candel MJ, de Bie RA. Comparison of a high-intensity and a low-intensity lumbar extensor training program as minimal intervention treatment in low back pain: a randomized trial. Eur Spine J
93. Hides JA, Jull GA, Richardson CA. Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
94. Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Supplementation of general endurance exercise with stabilisation training versus general exercise only. Physiological and functional outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
95. Lewis JS, Hewitt JS, Billington L, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing two physiotherapy interventions for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
96. Macedo L. Effect of motor control exercises versus graded activity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther J
97. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, et al. Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion. A clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
98. Shirado O, Doi T, Akai M, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of home-based exercise on patients with chronic low back pain: the Japan low back pain exercise therapy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
99. Yelland MJ, Glasziou PP, Bogduk N, Schluter PJ, McKernon M. Prolotherapy injections, saline injections, and exercises for chronic low-back pain: a randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2004; 29:9–16. discussion 16.
100. Diab AA, Moustafa IM. Lumbar lordosis rehabilitation for pain and lumbar segmental motion in chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
101. Hansen FR, Bendix T, Skov P, et al. Intensive, dynamic back-muscle exercises, conventional physiotherapy, or placebo-control treatment of low-back pain. A randomized, observer-blind trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
102. Niemisto L, Lahtinen-Suopanki T, Rissanen P, et al. A randomized trial of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
103. Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
104. Balthazard P, de Goumoens P, Rivier G, et al. Manual therapy followed by specific active exercises versus a placebo followed by specific active exercises on the improvement of functional disability in patients with chronic non specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
105. Bentsen H, Lindgarde F, Manthorpe R. The effect of dynamic strength back exercise and/or a home training program in 57-year-old women with chronic low back pain. Results of a prospective randomized study with a 3-year follow-up period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
106. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Arendasy M, Friedrich KM. Long-term effect of a combined exercise and motivational program on the level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
107. Kumar S, Sharma VP, Negi MP. Efficacy of dynamic muscular stabilization techniques (DMST) over conventional techniques in rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. J Strength Cond Res
108. Kuukkanen T, Malkia E. Effects of a three-month therapeutic exercise programme on flexibility in subjects with low back pain. Physiother Res Int
109. Machado LA, Azevedo DC, Capanema MB, Neto TN, Cerceau DM. Client-centered therapy vs exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial in Brazil. Pain Med
110. Manniche C, Hesselsoe G, Bentzen L, Christensen I, Lundberg E. Clinical trial of intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain. Lancet
111. Risch SV, Norvell NK, Pollock ML, et al. Lumbar strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. Physiologic and psychological benefits. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
112. Rydeard R, Leger A, Smith D. Pilates-based therapeutic exercise: effect on subjects with nonspecific chronic low back pain and functional disability: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
113. Snook SH, Webster BS, McGorry RW, Fogleman MT, McCann KB. The reduction of chronic nonspecific low back pain through the control of early morning lumbar flexion. A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
114. Soukup MG, Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Bo K, Larsen S. The effect of a Mensendieck exercise program as secondary prophylaxis for recurrent low back pain. A randomized, controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
1999; 24:1585–1591. discussion 1592.
115. Tavafian SS, Jamshidi AR, Mohammad K. Treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary group-based rehabilitation program and oral drug treatment with oral drug treatment alone. Clin J Pain
116. Winters MV, Blake CG, Trost JS, et al. Passive versus active stretching of hip flexor muscles in subjects with limited hip extension: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther
117. Wright A, Lloyd-Davies A, Williams S, Ellis R, Strike P. Individual active treatment combined with group exercise for acute and subacute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
118. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Vaegter K, et al. Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized, prospective study. Cleve Clin J Med
119. Bronfort G, Goldsmith CH, Nelson CF, Boline PD, Anderson AV. Trunk exercise combined with spinal manipulative or NSAID therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
120. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, Street J, Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med
121. Faas A, van Eijk JT, Chavannes AW, Gubbels JW. A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Efficacy on sickness absence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
122. Hemmila HM, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi SM, Levoska S, Puska P. Long-term effectiveness of bone-setting, light exercise therapy, and physiotherapy for prolonged back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
123. Henchoz Y, de Goumoens P, Norberg M, Paillex R, So AK. Role of physical exercise in low back pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial of a three-month exercise program in patients who have completed multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
124. Henchoz Y, de Goumoens P, So AK, Paillex R. Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus outpatient physiotherapy for non specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Swiss Med Wkly
125. Henchoz Y, Pinget C, Wasserfallen JB, et al. Cost-utility analysis of a three-month exercise programme vs usual care following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med
126. Marshall P, Murphy B. Self-report measures best explain changes in disability compared with physical measures after exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
127. Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, et al. Physiotherapist-directed exercise, advice, or both for subacute low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
128. Smeets RJ, Maher CG, Nicholas MK, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD. Do psychological characteristics predict response to exercise and advice for subacute low back pain? Arth Rheum
129. Torstensen TA, Ljunggren AE, Meen HD, et al. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain—a pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
130. Hallegraeff H, Winters JC, de Greef M, Lucas G. Manipulative therapy and clinical prediction criteria in treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain. Percept Mot Skills
131. Kilpikoski S, Alèn M, Paatelma M, et al. Outcome comparison among working adults with centralizing low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Adv Physiother
132. Grunnesjö MI, Bogefeldt JP, Svärdsudd KF, Blomberg SI. A randomized controlled clinical trial of stay-active care versus manual therapy in addition to stay-active care: functional variables and pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
133. Hartvigsen J, Morsø L, Bendix T, Manniche C. Supervised and non-supervised Nordic walking in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a single blind randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
134. Maitland GD. The slump test: examination and treatment. Aust J Physiother
135. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Herbert RD, McAuley JH. Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J
136. Moffett JK, Jackson DA, Gardiner ED, et al. Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care neck and back pain patients: ‘McKenzie’ vs brief physiotherapy pain management. Rheumatology
137. Browder DA, Childs JD, Cleland JA, Fritz JM. Effectiveness of an extension-oriented treatment approach in a subgroup of subjects with low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther
138. del Pozo-Cruz B, Adsuar JC, Parraca J, et al. A web-based intervention to improve and prevent low back pain among office workers: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
139. Garcia AN, Costa Lda C, da Silva TM, et al. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther
140. Häkkinen A, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Tarvainen U, Kiviranta I. Effects of home strength training and stretching versus stretching alone after lumbar disk surgery: a randomized study with a 1-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
141. Harts CC, Helmhout PH, de Bie RA, Staal JB. A high-intensity lumbar extensor strengthening program is little better than a low-intensity program or a waiting list control group for chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Aust J Physiother
142. Nagrale AV, Patil SP, Gandhi RA, Learman K. Effect of slump stretching versus lumbar mobilization with exercise in subjects with non-radicular low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther
143. Johnson R. Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
144. Lewis C, Souvlis T, Sterling M. Strain-counterstrain therapy combined with exercise is not more effective than exercise alone on pain and disability in people with acute low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother
145. O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
146. Wajswelner H, Metcalf B, Bennell K. Clinical Pilates versus general exercise for chronic low back pain: randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc
147. Arribas MJD, Sánchez MR, Hervás PP, et al. Effectiveness of the physical therapy Godelive Denys-Struyf method for nonspecific low back pain: primary care randomized control trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
148. Ewert T, Limm H, Wessels T, et al. The comparative effectiveness of a multimodal program versus exercise alone for the secondary prevention of chronic low back pain and disability. PM&R
149. Gatti R, Faccendini S, Tettamanti A, et al. Efficacy of trunk balance exercises for individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
150. Kluge J, Hall D, Louw Q, Theron G, Grové D. Specific exercises to treat pregnancy-related low back pain in a South African population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
151. Kuukkanen T, Mälkiä E, Kautiainen H, Pohjolainen T. Effectiveness of a home exercise programme in low back pain: a randomized five-year follow-up study. Physiother Res Int
152. Lewis M, Morley S, van der Windt DA, et al. Measuring practitioner/therapist effects in randomised trials of low back pain and neck pain interventions in primary care settings. Eur J Pain
153. Limke J, Rainville J, Pena E, Childs L. Randomized trial comparing the effects of one set vs two sets of resistance exercises for outpatients with chronic low back pain and leg pain. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
154. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, et al. A randomized trial of medical care with and without physical therapy and chiropractic care with and without physical modalities for patients with low back pain: 6-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
155. Ljunggren AE, Weber H, Kogstad O, Thom E, Kirkesola G. Effect of exercise on sick leave due to low back pain. A randomized, comparative, long-term study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
1997; 22:1610–1616. discussion 1617.
156. Petersen T, Larsen K, Nordsteen J, et al. The McKenzie method compared with manipulation when used adjunctive to information and advice in low back pain patients presenting with centralization or peripheralization: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
157. Diab A. The efficacy of lumbar extension traction for sagittal alignment in mechanical low back pain: A randomized trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil
158. Elnaggar IM, Nordin M, Sheikhzadeh A, Parnianpour M, Kahanovitz N. Effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises on low-back pain and spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
159. Kankaanpaa M, Taimela S, Airaksinen O, Hanninen O. The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
160. Brennan GP, Fritz JM, Hunter SJ, et al. Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute “nonspecific” low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
161. Cambron JA, Gudavalli MR, Hedeker D, et al. One-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion distraction with an exercise program for chronic low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med
162. Engbert K, Weber M. The effects of therapeutic climbing in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
163. Faas A, Chavannes AW, van Eijk JT, Gubbels JW. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
164. Goren A, Yildiz N, Topuz O, Findikoglu G, Ardic F. Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
165. Gundewall B, Liljeqvist M, Hansson T. Primary prevention of back symptoms and absence from work. A prospective randomized study among hospital employees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
166. Mannion A, Müntener M, Taimela S, Dvorak J. A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
167. Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Fladmark AM, Salvesen Ø, Vasseljen O. Motor control exercises, sling exercises, and general exercises for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Phys Ther
168. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Tarabichi Y. The role of the Back Rx exercise program in diskogenic low back pain: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
169. Vasseljen O, Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Westad C, Mork PJ. Effect of core stability exercises on feed-forward activation of deep abdominal muscles in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
170. Frih ZBS, Fendri Y, Jellad A, Boudoukhane S, Rejeb N. Efficacy and treatment compliance of a home-based rehabilitation programme for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med
171. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
172. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Brede E, Theodore BR. Lumbar surgery in work-related chronic low back pain: can a continuum of care enhance outcomes? Spine J
173. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Keeley J, et al. A randomized clinical trial of treatment for lumbar segmental rigidity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2004; 29:2199–2205. discussion 2206.
174. Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Brennan GP. Does adherence to the guideline recommendation for active treatments improve the quality of care for patients with acute low back pain delivered by physical therapists? Med Care
175. Medina-Mirapeix F, Escolar-Reina P, Gascon-Canovas JJ, Montilla-Herrador J, Collins SM. Personal characteristics influencing patients’ adherence to home exercise during chronic pain: a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med
176. Medina-Mirapeix F, Escolar-Reina P, Gascon-Canovas JJ, et al. Predictive factors of adherence to frequency and duration components in home exercise programs for neck and low back pain: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
177. Slade SC, Keating JL. Trunk-strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
178. Teasell RW, Harth M. Functional restoration. Returning patients with chronic low back pain to work--revolution or fad? Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
179. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J
180. Beinart NA, Goodchild CE, Weinman JA, Ayis S, Godfrey EL. Individual and intervention-related factors associated with adherence to home exercise in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J
181. Bell JA, Burnett A. Exercise for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of low back pain in the workplace: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil
182. Brede E, Mayer TG, Shea M, Garcia C, Gatchel RJ. Facilitating unequivocal and durable decisions in workers’ compensation patients eligible for elective orthopedic surgery. J Pain
183. Colle F, Rannou F, Revel M, Fermanian J, Poiraudeau S. Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain. Arch Phys Rehabil
184. Hauggaard A, Persson AL. Specific spinal stabilisation exercises in patients with low back pain–a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev
185. Hendrick P, Milosavljevic S, Hale L, et al. The relationship between physical activity and low back pain outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur Spine J
186. Hendrick P, Te Wake A, Tikkisetty A, Wulff L, Yap C, Milosavljevic S. The effectiveness of walking as an intervention for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J
187. Mayer J, Mooney V, Dagenais S. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with lumbar extensor strengthening exercises. Spine J
188. Delitto A, George SZ, Van Dillen L, et al. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
189. Escolar-Reina P, Medina-Mirapeix F, Gascón-Cánovas JJ, et al. How do care-provider and home exercise program characteristics affect patient adherence in chronic neck and back pain: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res
190. Fersum KV, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan PB, et al. Integration of subclassification strategies in randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating manual therapy treatment and exercise therapy for non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med
191. Hayden JA, Cartwright JL, Riley RD. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis. Syst Rev
192. Hettinga DM, Jackson A, Moffett JK, May S, Mercer C, Woby SR. A systematic review and synthesis of higher quality evidence of the effectiveness of exercise interventions for non-specific low back pain of at least 6 weeks’ duration. Phys Ther Rev
193. Hilde GG, Hagen KB, Jamtvedt G, Winnem M. Advice to stay active as a single treatment for low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
194. Jenkins E, Borenstein D. Exercise for the low back pain patient. Bailliere's Clin Rheum
195. Kent P, Mjøsund HL, Petersen DH. Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. BMC Med
196. Laird RA, Kent P, Keating JL. Modifying patterns of movement in people with low back pain-does it help? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
197. Liddle SD, Gracey JH, Baxter GD. Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Man Ther
198. Lim EC, Poh RL, Low AY, Wong WP. Effects of Pilates-based exercises on pain and disability in individuals with persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
199. Mayer TG, Neblett R, Brede E, Gatchel RJ. The quantified lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon is a useful measurement of improvement in a functional restoration program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
200. Mayer TG, Robinson R, Pegues P, Kohles S, Gatchel RJ. Lumbar segmental rigidity: can its identification with facet injections and stretching exercises be useful? Arch Phys Med Rehabil
201. McDonough SM, Tully MA, O’Connor SR, et al. The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
202. McFeely JA, Gracey J. Postoperative exercise programmes for lumbar spine decompression surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. Phys Ther Rev
203. Oesch P, Kool J, Hagen KB, Bachmann S. Effectiveness of exercise on work disability in patients with non-acute non-specific low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med
204. Posadzki P, Ernst E. Yoga for low back pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Rheum
205. Stanton TR, Fritz JM, Hancock MJ, et al. Evaluation of a treatment-based classification algorithm for low back pain: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther
206. Swinkels A, Cochrane K, Burt A, Johnson L, Lunn T, Rees AS. Exercise interventions for non-specific low back pain: an overview of systematic reviews. Phys Ther Rev
207. Theodore BR, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed functional restoration for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil
208. van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B. Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
209. Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, et al. Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
210. Krein SL, Metreger T, Kadri R, et al. Veterans walk to beat back pain: study rationale, design and protocol of a randomized trial of a pedometer-based internet mediated intervention for patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
211. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Chiao C. Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study. Am J Public Health
212. Turner JA, Clancy S, McQuade KJ, Cardenas DD. Effectiveness of behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain: a component analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol
213. Mannion AF, Muntener M, Taimela S, Dvorak J. Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology
214. Aina A, May S, Clare H. The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms—a systematic review. Man Ther
215. Long A, May S, Fung T. The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians? J Man Manip Ther
216. Orthopedic Physical Therapy, McKenzie R, May S. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis And Therapy. 2003.
217. Werneke MW, Hart DL, Cutrone G, et al. Association between directional preference and centralization in patients with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
218. Werneke MW, Hart DL, Resnik L, Stratford PW, Reyes A. Centralization: prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
219. Johannsen F, Remvig L, Kryger P, et al. Exercises for chronic low back pain: a clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
220. Rittweger J, Just K, Kautzsch K, Reeg P, Felsenberg D. Treatment of chronic lower back pain with lumbar extension and whole-body vibration exercise: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
221. Soukup MG, Lonn J, Glomsrod B, Bo K, Larsen S. Exercises and education as secondary prevention for recurrent low back pain. Physiother Res Int
222. Yilmaz F, Yilmaz A, Merdol F, Parlar D, Sahin F, Kuran B. Efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercise in lumbar microdiscectomy. J Rehabil Med
223. Garg A, Thiese M, Hegmann K. Individual factors associated with prevalence of low back pain. Presented at the 6th International Scientific Conference on Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (PREMUS), Boston, MA; 2007.
224. Balogh Z, Ördögh J, Gász A, Német L, Bender T. Effectiveness of balneotherapy in chronic low back pain–a randomized single-blind controlled follow-up study. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd
225. Dundar U, Solak O, Yigit I, Evcik D, Kavuncu V. Clinical effectiveness of aquatic exercise to treat chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
226. Kesiktas N, Karakas S, Gun K, Gun N, Murat S, Uludag M. Balneotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled study. Rheum Int
227. McIlveen B, Robertson VJ. A randomised controlled study of the outcome of hydrotherapy for subjects with low back or back and leg pain. Physiother
228. Tefner IK, Németh A, Lászlófi A, Kis T, Gyetvai G, Bender T. The effect of spa therapy in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled, single-blind, follow-up study. Rheum Int
229. Graves JE, Pollock ML, Foster D, et al. Effect of training frequency and specificity on isometric lumbar extension strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
230. Graves JE, Pollock ML, Leggett SH, Carpenter DM, Fix CK, Fulton MN. Limited range-of-motion lumbar extension strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc
231. Graves JE, Webb DC, Pollock ML, et al. Pelvic stabilization during resistance training: its effect on the development of lumbar extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
232. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, Miglioretti DL, Deyo RA. Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med
233. Cox H, Tilbrook H, Aplin J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of yoga for the treatment of chronic low back pain: results of a pilot study. Complement Ther Clin Pract
234. Donzelli S, Di Domenica E, Cova AM, Galletti R, Giunta N. Two different techniques in the rehabilitation treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eura Medicophys
235. Galantino ML, Bzdewka TM, Eissler-Russo JL, et al. The impact of modified Hatha yoga on chronic low back pain: a pilot study. Altern Ther Health Med
236. Hall AM, Maher CG, Lam P, Ferreira M, Latimer J. Tai chi exercise for treatment of pain and disability in people with persistent low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res
237. Saper RB, Sherman KJ, Cullum-Dugan D, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Culpepper L. Yoga for chronic low back pain in a predominantly minority population: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Altern Ther Health Med
238. Williams K, Abildso C, Steinberg L, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficacy of Iyengar yoga therapy on chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
239. Williams KA, Petronis J, Smith D, et al. Effect of Iyengar yoga therapy for chronic low back pain. Pain
240. Tilbrook HE, Cox H, Hewitt CE, et al. Yoga for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
241. Taimni IK. The Science of Yoga - the Yoga-Sutras of Patanjali in Sanskrit with Transliteration in Roman, Translation in English and Commentary. Madras, India: The Theosophical Publishing House; 1979.
242. Tekur P, Nagarathna R, Chametcha S, Hankey A, Nagendra HR. A comprehensive yoga programs improves pain, anxiety and depression in chronic low back pain patients more than exercise: an RCT. Complement Ther Med
243. Tekur P, Chametcha S, Hongasandra RN, Raghuram N. Effect of yoga on quality of life of CLBP patients: a randomized control study. Int J Yoga
244. Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain. Clin J Pain
245. Hill C. Is yoga an effective treatment in the management of patients with chronic low back pain compared with other care modalities–a systematic review. J Complement Integr Med
246. Kelly Z. Is yoga an effective treatment for low back pain: a research review. Int J Yoga Ther
247. Aubrun F, Langeron O, Heitz D, Coriat P, Riou B. Randomised, placebo-controlled study of the postoperative analgesic effects of ketoprofen after spinal fusion surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
248. Birbara CA, Puopolo AD, Munoz DR, et al. Treatment of chronic low back pain with etoricoxib, a new cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor: improvement in pain and disability--a randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-month trial. J Pain
249. Dreiser RL, Marty M, Ionescu E, Gold M, Liu JH. Relief of acute low back pain with diclofenac-K 12.5 mg tablets: a flexible dose, ibuprofen 200 mg and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther
250. Fletcher D, Negre I, Barbin C, et al. Postoperative analgesia with i.v. propacetamol and ketoprofen combination after disc surgery. Can J Anaesth
251. Grundmann U, Wornle C, Biedler A, Kreuer S, Wrobel M, Wilhelm W. The efficacy of the non-opioid analgesics parecoxib, paracetamol and metamizol for postoperative pain relief after lumbar microdiscectomy. Anesth Analg
252. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
253. Herrmann WA, Geertsen MS. Efficacy and safety of lornoxicam compared with placebo and diclofenac in acute sciatica/lumbo-sciatica: an analysis from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group study. Int J Clin Pract
254. Pallay RM, Seger W, Adler JL, et al. Etoricoxib reduced pain and disability and improved quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a 3 month, randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol
255. Pohjolainen T, Jekunen A, Autio L, Vuorela H. Treatment of acute low back pain with the COX-2-selective anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide: results of a randomized, double-blind comparative trial versus ibuprofen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
256. Pookarnjanamorakot C, Laohacharoensombat W, Jaovisidha S. The clinical efficacy of piroxicam fast-dissolving dosage form for postoperative pain control after simple lumbar spine surgery: a double-blinded randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
257. Schattenkirchner M, Milachowski KA. A double-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac with diclofenac resinate in patients with acute low back pain. Clin Rheum
258. Zerbini C, Ozturk ZE, Grifka J, et al. Efficacy of etoricoxib 60 mg/day and diclofenac 150 mg/day in reduction of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: results of a 4-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind study. Curr Med Res Opin
259. Berry H, Bloom B, Hamilton EB, Swinson DR. Naproxen sodium, diflunisal, and placebo in the treatment of chronic back pain. Ann Rheum Dis
260. Coats TL, Borenstein DG, Nangia NK, Brown MT. Effects of valdecoxib in the treatment of chronic low back pain: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther
261. Goldie I. A clinical trial with indomethacin (indomee(R)) in low back pain and sciatica. Acta Orthop Scand
262. Katz N, Ju WD, Krupa DA, et al. Efficacy and safety of rofecoxib in patients with chronic low back pain: results from two 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2003; 28:851–858. discussion 859.
263. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. Randomised clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow up. BMJ
264. Konstantinovic LM, Kanjuh ZM, Milovanovic AN, et al. Acute low back pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Photomed Laser Surg
265. Reuben SS, Connelly NR, Lurie S, Klatt M, Gibson CS. Dose-response of ketorolac as an adjunct to patient-controlled analgesia morphine in patients after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg
266. Reuben SS, Connelly NR, Steinberg R. Ketorolac as an adjunct to patient-controlled morphine in postoperative spine surgery patients. Reg Anesth
267. Szpalski M, Hayez JP. Objective functional assessment of the efficacy of tenoxicam in the treatment of acute low back pain. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Rheum
268. Veenema KR, Leahey N, Schneider S. Ketorolac versus meperidine: ED treatment of severe musculoskeletal low back pain. Am J Emerg Med
269. Videman T, Heikkila J, Partanen T. Double-blind parallel study of meptazinol versus diflunisal in the treatment of lumbago. Curr Med Res Opin
270. Videman T, Osterman K. Double-blind parallel study of piroxicam versus indomethacin in the treatment of low back pain. Ann Clin Res
271. Babej-Dolle R, Freytag S, Eckmeyer J, et al. Parenteral dipyrone versus diclofenac and placebo in patients with acute lumbago or sciatic pain: randomized observer-blind multicenter study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther
272. Blazek M, Keszthelyi B, Varhelyi M, Korosi O. Comparative study of Biarison and Voltaren in acute lumbar pain and lumbo-ischialgia. Ther Hung
273. Giles LG, Muller R. Chronic spinal pain: a randomized clinical trial comparing medication, acupuncture, and spinal manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2003; 28:1490–1502. discussion 1502-3.
274. Matsumo S, Kaneda K, Norhara Y. Clinical evaluation of ketoprofen (Orudis) in lumbago - a double-blind comparison with diclofenac sodium. Br J Clin Pract
275. Orava S. Medical treatment of acute low back pain. Diflunisal compared with indomethacin in acute lumbago. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res
276. Pownall R, Pickvance NJ. Does treatment timing matter?--A double blind crossover study of ibuprofen 2400 mg per day in different dosage schedules in treatment of chronic low back pain. Br J Clin Pract
277. Auvinet B, Ziller R, Appelboom T, Velicitat P. Comparison of the onset and intensity of action of intramuscular meloxicam and oral meloxicam in patients with acute sciatica. Clin Ther
278. Bekker A, Cooper PR, Frempong-Boadu A, Babu R, Errico T, Lebovits A. Evaluation of preoperative administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurgery
2002; 50:1053–1057. discussion 1057-8.
279. Dincer U, Kiralp MZ, Cakar E, Yasar E, Dursan H. Caudal epidural injection versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of low back pain accompanied with radicular pain. Joint Bone Spine
280. Evans DP, Burke MS, Newcombe RG. Medicines of choice in low back pain. Curr Med Res Opin
281. Hickey RF. Chronic low back pain: a comparison of diflunisal with paracetamol. N Z Med J
282. Innes GD, Croskerry P, Worthington J, Beveridge R, Jones D. Ketorolac versus acetaminophen-codeine in the emergency department treatment of acute low back pain. J Emerg Med
283. Nadler SF, Steiner DJ, Erasala GN, et al. Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy provides more efficacy than Ibuprofen and acetaminophen for acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
284. Nissen I, Jensen KA, Ohrstrom JK. Indomethacin in the management of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth
285. O’Donnell JB, Ekman EF, Spalding WM, Bhadra P, McCabe D, Berger MF. The effectiveness of a weak opioid medication versus a cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in treating flare-up of chronic low-back pain: results from two randomized, double-blind, 6-week studies. J Int Med Res
286. Romano CL, Romano D, Bonora C, Mineo G. Pregabalin, celecoxib, and their combination for treatment of chronic low-back pain. J Orthop Traumatol
287. Thienthong S, Jirarattanaphochai K, Krisanaprakornkit W, Simajareuk S, Tantanatewin W, Sathitkarnmanee A. Treatment of pain after spinal surgery in the recovery room by single dose lornoxicam: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai
288. Yamashita K, Fukusaki M, Ando Y, et al. Preoperative administration of intravenous flurbiprofen axetil reduces postoperative pain for spinal fusion surgery. J Anesth
289. Sweetman BJ, Baig A, Parsons DL. Mefenamic acid, chlormezanone-paracetamol, ethoheptazine-aspirin-meprobamate: a comparative study in acute low back pain. Br J Clin Pract
290. Katz N, Rodgers DB, Krupa D, Reicin A. Onset of pain relief with rofecoxib in chronic low back pain: results of two four-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin
291. Mack PF, Hass D, Lavyne MH, Snow RB, Lien CA. Postoperative narcotic requirement after microscopic lumbar discectomy is not affected by intraoperative ketorolac or bupivacaine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
292. Pareek A, Chandurkar N, Chandanwale A, Ambade R, Gupta A, Bartakke G. Aceclofenac–tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone. Eur Spine J
293. Le Roux P, Samudrala S. Postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery: a comparison between parenteral ketorolac and narcotics. Acta Neurochir (Wien)
294. Weber H, Holme I, Amlie E. The natural course of acute sciatica with nerve root symptoms in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of piroxicam. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
295. Bakshi R, Thumb N, Broll H, et al. Treatment of acute lumbosacral back pain with diclofenac resinate. Results of a double-blind comparative trial versus piroxicam. Drug Invest
296. Chou R, Huffman LH. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med
297. Dahners LE, Mullis BH. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone formation and soft-tissue healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
298. Jirarattanaphochai K, Jung S. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for postoperative pain management after lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurosurg Spine
299. Krismer M, van Tulder M. Strategies for prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Low back pain (non-specific). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
300. Kroenke K, Krebs EE, Bair MJ. Pharmacotherapy of chronic pain: a synthesis of recommendations from systematic reviews. Gen Hosp Psychiatry
301. Kuijpers T, van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain. Eur Spine J
302. Machado LA, Kamper SJ, Herbert RD, Maher CG, McAuley JH. Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Rheumatology
303. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ
304. Last AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician
305. Davies RA, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J
306. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. New Engl J Med
307. Baraf HS, Fuentealba C, Greenwald M, et al. Gastrointestinal side effects of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis: results of the Etoricoxib versus Diclofenac Sodium Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Effectiveness (EDGE) trial. J Rheumatol
308. Bensen WG, Zhao SZ, Burke TA, et al. Upper gastrointestinal tolerability of celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, compared to naproxen and placebo. J Rheumatol
309. Chan FK. NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection. Drug Saf
310. FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. New Engl J Med
311. Antman EM, Bennett JS, Daugherty A, Furberg C, Roberts H, Taubert KA. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update for clinicians: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation
312. Feldman M, McMahon AT. Do cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors provide benefits similar to those of traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with less gastrointestinal toxicity? Ann Intern Med
313. Fosbøl EL, Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason GH. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among healthy individuals. Expert Opin Drug Saf
314. McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase: a systematic review of the observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2. JAMA
315. McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies. PLoS Med
316. Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, et al. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. New Engl J Med
317. Ott E, Nussmeier NA, Duke PC, et al. Efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
318. Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, et al. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ
319. Albert HB, Sorensen JS, Christensen BS, Manniche C. Antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and vertebral bone edema (Modic type 1 changes): a double-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of efficacy. Eur Spine J
320. Medrik-Goldberg T, Lifschitz D, Pud D, Adler R, Eisenberg E. Intravenous lidocaine, amantadine, and placebo in the treatment of sciatica: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med
321. Albert HB, Manniche C, Sorensen JS, Deleuran BW. Antibiotic treatment in patients with low-back pain associated with Modic changes Type 1 (bone oedema): a pilot study. Br J Sports Med
322. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Wahlgren DR, et al. Effects of noradrenergic and serotonergic antidepressants on chronic low back pain intensity. Pain
323. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Williams RA, et al. A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of nortriptyline for chronic low back pain. Pain
324. Dickens C, Jayson M, Sutton C, Creed F. The relationship between pain and depression in a trial using paroxetine in sufferers of chronic low back pain. Psychosomatics
325. Khoromi S, Cui L, Nackers L, Max MB. Morphine, nortriptyline and their combination vs. placebo in patients with chronic lumbar root pain. Pain
326. Alcoff J, Jones E, Rust P, Newman R. Controlled trial of imipramine for chronic low back pain. J Fam Pract
327. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Capparelli EV, et al. Efficacy of noradrenergic and serotonergic antidepressants in chronic back pain: a preliminary concentration-controlled trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol
328. Goodkin K, Gullion CM, Agras WS. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of trazodone hydrochloride in chronic low back pain syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol
329. Hameroff SR, Cork RC, Scherer K, et al. Doxepin effects on chronic pain, depression and plasma opioids. J Clin Psychiatry
330. Hameroff SR, Weiss JL, Lerman JC, et al. Doxepin's effects on chronic pain and depression: a controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry
331. Jenkins DG, Ebbutt AF, Evans CD. Tofranil in the treatment of low back pain. J Int Med Res
332. Katz J, Pennella-Vaughan J, Hetzel RD, Kanazi GE, Dworkin RH. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of bupropion sustained release in chronic low back pain. J Pain
333. Kroenke K, Bair MJ, Damush TM, et al. Optimized antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients with depression and musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
334. Mazza M, Mazza O, Pazzaglia C, Padua L, Mazza S. Escitalopram 20 mg versus duloxetine 60 mg for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother
335. Skljarevski V, Ossanna M, Liu-Seifert H, et al. A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain. Eur J Neurol
336. Skljarevski V, Zhang S, Chappell AS, Walker DJ, Murray I, Backonja M. Maintenance of effect of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain: a 41-week uncontrolled, dose-blinded study. Pain Med
337. Skljarevski V, Zhang S, Desaiah D, et al. Duloxetine versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain: a 12-week, fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind trial. J Pain
338. Stein D, Peri T, Edelstein E, Elizur A, Floman Y. The efficacy of amitriptyline and acetaminophen in the management of acute low back pain. Psychosomatics
339. Pheasant H, Bursk A, Goldfarb J, Azen SP, Weiss JN, Borelli L. Amitriptyline and chronic low-back pain. A randomized double-blind crossover study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
340. Muehlbacher M, Nickel MK, Kettler C, et al. Topiramate in treatment of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin J Pain
341. Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, Memis D, et al. Analgesic effects of gabapentin after spinal surgery. Anesthesiology
342. Pandey CK, Navkar DV, Giri PJ, et al. Evaluation of the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after lumbar diskectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol
343. Radhakrishnan M, Bithal PK, Chaturvedi A. Effect of preemptive gabapentin on postoperative pain relief and morphine consumption following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol
344. Pandey CK, Sahay S, Gupta D, et al. Preemptive gabapentin decreases postoperative pain after lumbar discoidectomy. Can J Anaesth
345. Baron R, Freynhagen R, Tölle TR, et al. The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. Pain
346. Mathieson S, Maher CG, McLachlan AJ, et al. Trial of pregabalin for acute and chronic sciatica. N Engl J Med
347. Khan Z, Rahimi M, Makarem J, Khan R. Optimal dose of pre-incision/post-incision gabapentin for pain relief following lumbar laminectomy: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
348. Kim S, Song J, Park B, Park S, An Y, Shim Y. Pregabalin reduces post-operative pain after mastectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
349. Ozgencil E, Yalcin S, Tuna H, Yorukoglu D, Kecik Y. Perioperative administration of gabapentin 1,200 mg day-1 and pregabalin 300 mg day-1 for pain following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo controlled study. Singapore Med J
350. Yaksi A, Ozgonenel L, Ozgonenel B. The efficiency of gabapentin therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
351. Salinas FA, Lugo LH, Garcia HI. Efficacy of early treatment with carbamazepine in prevention of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
352. Harke H, Gretenkort P, Ladleif HU, Rahman S, Harke O. The response of neuropathic pain and pain in complex regional pain syndrome I to carbamazepine and sustained-release morphine in patients pretreated with spinal cord stimulation: a double-blinded randomized study. Anesth Analg
353. McCleane GJ. Does gabapentin have an analgesic effect on background, movement and referred pain? A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study. Pain Clin
354. Yildirim K, Sisecioglu M, Karatay S. The effectiveness of gabapentin in patients with chronic radiculopathy. Pain Clin
355. Beydoun A, Shaibani A, Hopwood M, Wan Y. Oxcarbazepine in painful diabetic neuropathy: results of a dose-ranging study. Acta Neurol Scand
356. Beydoun S, Alarcon F, Mangat S, Wan Y. Long-term safety and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in painful diabetic neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand
357. Challapalli V, Tremont-Lukats IW, McNicol ED, Lau J, Carr DB. Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
358. Dogra S, Beydoun S, Mazzola J, Hopwood M, Wan Y. Oxcarbazepine in painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Pain
359. Grosskopf J, Mazzola J, Wan Y, Hopwood M. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oxcarbazepine in painful diabetic neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand
360. Pandey CK, Raza M, Tripathi M, Navkar DV, Kumar A, Singh UK. The comparative evaluation of gabapentin and carbamazepine for pain management in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the intensive care unit. Anesth Analg
361. Silver M, Blum D, Grainger J, Hammer AE, Quessy S. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine in combination with other medications for neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage
362. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, et al. Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med
363. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Capparelli EV, et al. A randomized controlled trial of gabapentin for chronic low back pain with and without a radiating component. Pain
364. Schnebel BE, Simmons JW. The use of oral colchicine for low-back pain. A double-blind study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
365. Simmons JW, Harris WP, Koulisis CW, Kimmich SJ. Intravenous colchicine for low-back pain: a double-blind study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
366. Meek J, Giudice V, McFadden J, Key J, Enrick N. Colchicine confirmed as highly effective in disk disorders: final results of an FDA approved double-blind study. J Neurol Orthop Med Surg
367. Ketenci A, Ozcan E, Karamursel S. Assessment of efficacy and psychomotor performances of thiocolchicoside and tizanidine in patients with acute low back pain. Int J Clin Pract
368. Tuzun F, Unalan H, Oner N, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of thiocolchicoside in acute low back pain. Joint Bone Spine
369. Galer BS, Rowbotham MC, Perander J, Friedman E. Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study. Pain
370. Hashmi JA, Baliki MN, Huang L, et al. Lidocaine patch (5%) is no more potent than placebo in treating chronic back pain when tested in a randomised double blind placebo controlled brain imaging study. Mol Pain
371. Nalamachu S, Crockett R, Gammaitoni AR, Gould EM. A comparison of the lidocaine patch 5% vs naproxen 500 mg twice daily for the relief of pain associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: a 6-week, randomized, parallel-group study. MedGenMed
372. Hegmann KT, Weiss MS, Bowden K, et al. ACOEM practice guidelines: opioids for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic, and postoperative pain. J Occup Environ Med
373. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM Practice Guidelines: Opioids; 2017. MDGuidelines website. Available at: https://www.mdguidelines.com/acoem/disorders/opioids
. Accessed December 4, 2019.
374. Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, et al. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA
375. Duhon BS, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Kovalsky DA, Lockstadt H. SIFI Study GroupTriangular titanium implants for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study. Global Spine J
376. Bajaj P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Madeleine P, Svensson P. Prophylactic tolperisone for post-exercise muscle soreness causes reduced isometric force–a double-blind randomized crossover control study. Eur J Pain
377. Baratta R. A double-blind comparative study of carisoprodol, propoxyphene, and placebo in the management of low back syndrome. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp
378. Salzmann E. Treatment of chronic low-back pain syndrome with tetrazepam in a placebo controlled double-blind trial. J Drug Dev
379. Basmajian JV. Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride effect on skeletal muscle spasm in the lumbar region and neck: two double-blind controlled clinical and laboratory studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
380. Basmajian JV. Acute back pain and spasm. A controlled multicenter trial of combined analgesic and antispasm agents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
381. Borman P, Keskin D, Bodur H. The efficacy of lumbar traction in the management of patients with low back pain. Rheum Int
382. Brown BR Jr, Womble J. Cyclobenzaprine in intractable pain syndromes with muscle spasm. JAMA
383. Berry H, Hutchinson DR. Tizanidine and ibuprofen in acute low-back pain: results of a double-blind multicentre study in general practice. J Int Med Res
384. Bouchier-Hayes T. Chlormezanone in low back pain and wry neck--an “analgesic sparing” effect. Br J Clin Pract
385. Childers MK, Borenstein D, Brown RL, et al. Low-dose cyclobenzaprine versus combination therapy with ibuprofen for acute neck or back pain with muscle spasm: a randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin
386. Dapas F, Hartman SF, Martinez L, et al. Baclofen for the treatment of acute low-back syndrome. A double-blind comparison with placebo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
387. Fryda-Kaurimsky Z, Muller-Fassbender H. Tizanidine (DS 103-282) in the treatment of acute paravertebral muscle spasm: a controlled trial comparing tizanidine and diazepam. J Int Med Res
388. Hennies OL. A new skeletal muscle relaxant (DS 103-282) compared to diazepam in the treatment of muscle spasm of local origin. J Int Med Res
389. Hingorani K. Orphenadrin-paracetamol in backache-a double-blind controlled trial. Br J Clin Pract
390. Klinger NM, Wilson RR, Kanniainen CM, Wagenknecht KA, Re ON, Gold RH. Intravenous orphenadrine for the treatment of lumbar paravertebral muslce strain. Curr Ther Res
391. McGuinness BW. A double-blind comparison in general practice of a combination tablet containing orphenadrine citrate and paracetamol (’Norgesic’) with paracetamol alone. J Int Med Res
392. McGuinness BW, Lloyd-Jones M, Fowler PD. A double-blind comparative trial of ’parazolidin’ and paracetamol. Br J Clin Pract
393. Tervo T, Petaja L, Lepisto P. A controlled clinical trial of a muscle relaxant analgesic combination in the treatment of acute lumbago. Br J Clin Pract
394. Vernon WG. A double-blind evaluation of Parafon Forte in the treatment of musculo-skeletal back conditions. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp
395. Waagen G, Haldeman S, Cook G, Lopez D, DeBoer KF. Short term trial of chiropractic adjustments for the relief of chronic low back pain. Man Med
396. Zaringhalam J, Manaheji H, Rastqar A, Zaringhalam M. Reduction of chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled clinical trial on acupuncture and baclofen. Chinese Med
397. Brizzi A, Giusti A, Giacchetti P, Stefanelli S, Provinciali L, Ceravolo M. A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of hydroelectrophoresis in acute recurrences in chronic low back pain patients. Eura Medicophys
398. Bragstad A. Evaluation of a new skeletal muscle relaxant in the treatment of low back pain (a comparison of DS 103-282 with chlorzoxazone). Curr Ther Res
399. Cabitza P, Randelli P. Efficacy and safety of eperisone in patients with low back pain: a double blind randomized study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
400. Hoiriis KT, Pfleger B, McDuffie FC, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing chiropractic adjustments to muscle relaxants for subacute low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
401. Meng CF, Wang D, Ngeow J, Lao L, Peterson M, Paget S. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Rheumatology
402. Preston EJ, Herbertson RK. A double-blind multicenter trial of methocarbamol (Robixin) and cyclobenzaprine (flexeril) in acute musculoskeletal conditions. Today's Ther Trends
403. Casale R. Acute low back pain. Symptomatic treatment with a muscle relaxant drug. Clin J Pain
404. Arbus L, Fajadet B, Aubert D, Morre M, Goldberger E. Activity of Tetrazepam (Myolastan) in low back pain a double-blind trial vs. placebo. Clin Trials J
405. Gold RH. Orphenadrine citrate: sedative or muscle relaxant? Clin Ther
406. Rollings HE, Glassman JM, Soyka JP. Management of acute musculoskeletal conditions- thoracolumbar. Curr Ther Res
407. Sirdalud Ternelin Asia-Pacific Study GroupEfficacy and gastroprotective effects of tizanidine plus diclofenac versus placebo plus diclofenac in patients with painful muscle spasms. Curr Ther Res
408. Boyles W. Management of acute musculoskeletal conditions: thoracolumbar strain or sprain. A double-blind evaluation comparing the efficacy and safety of carisoprodol with diazepam. Today's Ther Trends
409. Bercel N. Cyclobenzaprine in the treatment of skeletal muscle spasm in osteoarthritis of the cervical and lumbar spine. Curr Ther Res
410. Abbruzzese G. The medical management of spasticity. Eur J Neurol
2002; 9: (suppl): 30–34. discussion 53-61.
411. Elenbaas JK. Centrally acting oral skeletal muscle relaxants. Am J Hosp Pharm
412. Browning R, Jackson JL, O’Malley PG. Cyclobenzaprine and back pain: a meta-analysis. Arch Int Med
413. Lofland J. Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride is a commonly prescribed centrally acting muscle relaxant, which is structurally similar to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and differs from amitriptyline by only one double bond. Clin J Pain
414. Borenstein DG, Korn S. Efficacy of a low-dose regimen of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride in acute skeletal muscle spasm: results of two placebo-controlled trials. Clin Ther
415. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Kim Burton A, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2001; 26:2504–2513. discussion 2513-4.
416. Elder NC. Abuse of skeletal muscle relaxants. Am Fam Physician
417. Toth PP, Urtis J. Commonly used muscle relaxant therapies for acute low back pain: a review of carisoprodol, cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride, and metaxalone. Clin Ther
418. Littrell RA, Hayes LR, Stillner V. Carisoprodol (Soma): a new and cautious perspective on an old agent. South Med J
419. Friedman BW, Holden L, Esses D, et al. Parenteral corticosteroids for Emergency Department patients with non-radicular low back pain. J Emerg Med
420. Goldberg H, Firtch W, Tyburski M, et al. Oral steroids for acute radiculopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA
421. Finckh A, Zufferey P, Schurch M-A, Balagué F, Waldburger M, So AK. Short-term efficacy of intravenous pulse glucocorticoids in acute discogenic sciatica. A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
422. Haimovic IC, Beresford HR. Dexamethasone is not superior to placebo for treating lumbosacral radicular pain. Neurology
423. Holve RL, Barkan H. Oral steroids in initial treatment of acute sciatica. J Am Board Fam Med
424. Porsman O, Friis H. Prolapsed lumbar disc treated with intramuscularly administered dexamethasonephosphate. A prospectively planned, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in 52 patients. Scand J Rheumatol
425. Benny B, Azari P. The efficacy of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a comprehensive literature review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil
426. Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L, Parr AT, et al. The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain. Pain Physician
427. Boswell MV, Hansen HC, Trescot AM, Hirsch JA. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain and radiculopathy. Pain Physician
428. McGrath JM, Schaefer MP, Malkamaki DM. Incidence and characteristics of complications from epidural steroid injections. Pain Med
429. Parr AT, Manchikanti L, Hameed H, et al. Caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain: a systematic appraisal of the literature. Pain Physician
430. Pinto RZ, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, et al. Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med
431. Roncoroni C, Baillet A, Durand M, Gaudin P, Juvin R. Efficacy and tolerance of systemic steroids in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford)
432. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Benyamin R. Fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain. J Pain Res
433. Cohen SP, White RL, Kurihara C, et al. Epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline in subacute sciatica: a multicenter, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
434. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet
435. Barré L, Lutz GE, Southern D, Cooper G. Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis: a restrospective evaluation of long term efficacy. Pain Physician
436. Benoist M, Boulu P, Hayem G. Epidural steroid injections in the management of low-back pain with radiculopathy: an update of their efficacy and safety. Eur Spine J
437. Benzon HT. Epidural steroid injections for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy. Pain
438. Botwin K, Brown L, Fishman M, Rao S. Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis. Pain Physician
439. Botwin KP, Gruber RD. Lumbar epidural steroid injections in the patient with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am
440. Bresnahan BW, Rundell SD, Dagadakis MC, et al. A systematic review to assess comparative effectiveness studies in epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis and to estimate reimbursement amounts. PM&R
441. Cohen SP, Mao J, Vu T-N, et al. Does pain score in response to a standardized subcutaneous local anesthetic injection predict epidural steroid injection outcomes in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy? A prospective correlational study. Pain Med
442. Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Foster L, et al. Comparison of fluoroscopically guided and blind corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ
443. DePalma MJ, Slipman CW. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with epidural steroid injections. Spine J
444. Dighe G, Friedman JH. Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic back pain. R I Med J
445. Mandel S, Schilling J, Peterson E, Rao DS, Sanders W. A retrospective analysis of vertebral body fractures following epidural steroid injections. J Bone Joint Surg Am
446. Mobaleghi J, Allahdini F, Nasseri K, et al. Comparing the effects of epidural methylprednisolone acetate injected in patients with pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis or herniated disks: a prospective study. Int J Gen Med
447. Radcliff K, Hilibrand A, Lurie JD, et al. The impact of epidural steroid injections on the outcomes of patients treated for lumbar disc herniation: a subgroup analysis of the SPORT trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am
448. Singh V, Manchikanti L. Role of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain. Pain Physician
449. Whynes DK, McCahon RA, Ravenscroft A, Hardman J. Cost effectiveness of epidural steroid injections to manage chronic lower back pain. BMC Anesthesiol
450. Wilkinson IM, Cohen SP. Epidural steroid injections. Curr Pain Headache Rep
451. Botwin KP, Thomas S, Gruber RD, et al. Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
452. Nelemans PJ, deBie RA, deVet HC, Sturmans F. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
453. Freeman BJ, Ludbrook GL, Hall S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of transforaminal epidural etanercept for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
454. Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Paimela L, et al. The treatment of disc herniation-induced sciatica with infliximab: results of a randomized, controlled, 3-month follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
455. Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Paimela L, et al. The treatment of disc-herniation-induced sciatica with infliximab: one-year follow-up results of FIRST II, a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
456. Autio RA, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, et al. The effect of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha, on disc herniation resorption: a randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
457. Tobinick E, Davoodifar S. Efficacy of etanercept delivered by perispinal administration for chronic back and/or neck disc-related pain: a study of clinical observations in 143 patients. Curr Med Res Opin
458. Zochling J, Maxwell L, Beardmore J, Boonen A. TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
459. Brandt J, Listing J, Haibel H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept after readministration in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology
460. Shell WE, Charuvastra EH, DeWood MA, May LA, Bullias DH, Silver DS. A double-blind controlled trial of a single dose naproxen and an amino acid medical food theramine for the treatment of low back pain. Am J Ther
461. Chrubasik S, Junck H, Breitschwerdt H, Conradt C, Zappe H. Effectiveness of Harpagophytum extract WS 1531 in the treatment of exacerbation of low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Eur J Anaesthesiol
462. Chrubasik S, Model A, Black A, Pollak S. A randomized double-blind pilot study comparing Doloteffin and Vioxx in the treatment of low back pain. Rheumatology
463. Chrubasik S, Eisenberg E, Balan E, Weinberger T, Luzzati R, Conradt C. Treatment of low back pain exacerbations with willow bark extract: a randomized double-blind study. Am J Med
464. Chrubasik S, Kunzel O, Model A, Conradt C, Black A. Treatment of low back pain with a herbal or synthetic anti-rheumatic: a randomized controlled study. Willow bark extract for low back pain. Rheumatology
465. Giannetti BM, Staiger C, Bulitta M, Predel HG. Efficacy and safety of comfrey root extract ointment in the treatment of acute upper or lower back pain: results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre trial. Br J Sports Med
466. Pabst H, Schaefer A, Staiger C, Junker-Samek M, Predel HG. Combination of comfrey root extract plus methyl nicotinate in patients with conditions of acute upper or low back pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Phytother Res
467. van Tulder MW, Furlan AD, Gagnier JJ. Complementary and alternative therapies for low back pain. Best Prac Res
468. Krivoy N, Pavlotzky E, Chrubasik S, Eisenberg E, Brook G. Effect of salicis cortex extract on human platelet aggregation. Planta Medica
469. Frerick H, Keitel W, Kuhn U, Schmidt S, Bredehorst A, Kuhlmann M. Topical treatment of chronic low back pain with a capsicum plaster. Pain
470. Stam C, Bonnet MS, van Haselen RA. The efficacy and safety of a homeopathic gel in the treatment of acute low back pain: a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind comparative clinical trial. Br Homoeopath J
471. Ginsberg F, Famaey JP. A double-blind study of topical massage with Rado-Salil ointment in mechanical low-back pain. J Int Med Res
472. Keitel W, Frerick H, Kuhn U, Schmidt U, Kuhlmann M, Bredehorst A. Capsicum pain plaster in chronic non-specific low back pain. Arzneimittelforschung
473. Hiura A. Neuroanatomical effects of capsaicin on the primary afferent neurons. Arch Histol Cytol
474. Mibielli MA, Geller M, Cohen JC, et al. Diclofenac plus B vitamins versus diclofenac monotherapy in lumbago: the DOLOR study. Curr Med Res Opin
475. Fu PP, Xia Q, Yin JJ, et al. Photodecomposition of vitamin A and photobiological implications for the skin. Photochem Photobiol
476. Poljšak B, Raspor P. The antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of vitamin C and trolox in vitro: a comparative study. J Appl Toxicol
477. Lonn E, Bosch J, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of long-term vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
478. Hayden KM, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Wengreen HJ, et al. Risk of mortality with vitamin E supplements: the Cache County study. Am J Med
479. Marchioli R, Levantesi G, Macchia A, et al. Vitamin E increases the risk of developing heart failure after myocardial infarction: results from the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. J Cardiovasc Med
480. Gagnier JJ. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with herbal, vitamin, mineral, and homeopathic supplements. Spine J
481. Heidari B, Shirvani JS, Firouzjahi A, Heidari P, Hajian-Tilaki KO. Association between nonspecific skeletal pain and vitamin D deficiency. Int J Rheum Dis
482. Johansen JV, Manniche C, Kjaer P. Vitamin D levels appear to be normal in Danish patients attending secondary care for low back pain and a weak positive correlation between serum level Vitamin D and Modic changes was demonstrated: a cross-sectional cohort study of consecutive patients with non-specific low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
483. Schwalfenberg G. Improvement of chronic back pain or failed back surgery with vitamin D repletion: a case series. J Am Board Fam Med
484. Castro-Sanchez AM, Lara-Palomo IC, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Sanchez-Labraca N, Arroyo-Morales M. Kinesio Taping reduces disability and pain slightly in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother
485. Chen SM, Alexander R, Lo SK, Cook J. Effects of Functional Fascial Taping on pain and function in patients with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
486. Paoloni M, Bernetti A, Fratocchi G, et al. Kinesio Taping applied to lumbar muscles influences clinical and electromyographic characteristics in chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
487. Álvarez-Álvarez S, San José F, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Güeita-Rodríguez J, Waller B. Effects of Kinesio® Tape in low back muscle fatigue: randomized, controlled, doubled-blinded clinical trial on healthy subjects. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil
488. Basford JR, Smith MA. Shoe insoles in the workplace. Orthopedics
489. Shabat S, Gefen T, Nyska M, Folman Y, Gepstein R. The effect of insoles on the incidence and severity of low back pain among workers whose job involves long-distance walking. Eur Spine J
490. Larsen K, Weidich F, Leboeuf-Yde C. Can custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses prevent problems in the back and lower extremities? A randomized, controlled intervention trial of 146 military conscripts. J Manipultative Physiol Ther
491. Calmels P, Queneau P, Hamonet C, et al. Effectiveness of a lumbar belt in subacute low back pain: an open, multicentric, and randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
492. Coxhead CE, Inskip H, Meade TW, North WR, Troup JD. Multicentre trial of physiotherapy in the management of sciatic symptoms. Lancet
493. Doran DM, Newell DJ. Manipulation in treatment of low back pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J
494. Hsieh CY, Phillips RB, Adams AH, Pope MH. Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
495. Oleske DM, Lavender SA, Andersson GB, Kwasny MM. Are back supports plus education more effective than education alone in promoting recovery from low back pain?: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
496. Reddell CR, Congleton JJ, Dale Huchingson R, Montgomery JF. An evaluation of a weightlifting belt and back injury prevention training class for airline baggage handlers. Appl Ergon
497. van Poppel MN, Koes BW, van der Ploeg T, Smid T, Bouter LM. Lumbar supports and education for the prevention of low back pain in industry: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
498. Walsh NE, Schwartz RK. The influence of prophylactic orthoses on abdominal strength and low back injury in the workplace. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
499. Roelofs PD, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Poppel MN, et al. Lumbar supports to prevent recurrent low back pain among home care workers: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
500. Roelofs PD, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar supports for home care workers with recurrent low back pain: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized-controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
501. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Acute and Chronic Low Back PainEffective Health Care Bulletin. 2000; York, UK: University of York, Royal Society of Medicine Press, Volume 6, Number 5.
502. Maher CG. Effective physical treatment for chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am
503. Dillingham TR. Lumbar supports for prevention of low back pain in the workplace. JAMA
504. Fischbacher C. Outpatient physiotherapy services for low back pain. STEER: Succinct and Timely Evaluated Evidence Reviews
. Bazian, Ltd., eds. London, UK: Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton; 2002; 2:1–8.
505. Ammendolia C, Kerr MS, Bombardier C. Back belt use for prevention of occupational low back pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
506. Bigos SJ, Holland J, Holland C, Webster JS, Battie M, Malmgren JA. High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults. Spine J
507. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Back Belts: Do They Prevent Injury? DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-127. 1994; 1–12.
508. Jellema P, van Tulder MW, van Poppel MN, Nachemson AL, Bouter LM. Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
509. Collacott EA, Zimmerman JT, White DW, Rindone JP. Bipolar permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a pilot study. JAMA
510. Khoromi S, Blackman MR, Kingman A, et al. Low intensity permanent magnets in the treatment of chronic lumbar radicular pain. J Pain Symptom Manage
511. Cherkin DC, Eisenberg D, Sherman KJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing traditional Chinese medical acupuncture, therapeutic massage, and self-care education for chronic low back pain. Arch Int Med
512. Gam AN, Warming S, Larsen LH, et al. Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise--a randomised controlled trial. Pain
513. Kalauokalani D, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA. Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
514. Melzack R, Vetere P, Finch L. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain. A comparison of TENS and massage for pain and range of motion. Phys Ther
515. Werners R, Pynsent PB, Bulstrode CJ. Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
516. Preyde M. Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ
517. Chatchawan U, Thinkhamrop B, Kharmwan S, Knowles J, Eungpinichpong W. Effectiveness of traditional Thai massage versus Swedish massage among patients with back pain associated with myofascial trigger points. J Bodywork Movement Ther
518. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Kahn J, et al. A comparison of the effects of 2 types of massage and usual care on chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Int Med
519. Little P, Lewith G, Webley F, et al. Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain. BMJ
520. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG. A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med
521. Brosseau L, Wells GA, Poitras S, et al. Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on therapeutic massage for low back pain. J Bodywork Movement Ther
522. Chambers H. Physiotherapy and lumbar facet joint injections as a combination treatment for chronic low back pain. A narrative review of lumbar facet joint injections, lumbar spinal mobilizations, soft tissue massage and lower back mobility exercises. Musculoskeletal Care
523. Furlan AD, Imamura M, Dryden T, Irvin E. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
524. Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for back pain II. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)
525. Kumar S, Beaton K, Hughes T. The effectiveness of massage therapy for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Gen Med
526. Melancon B, Miller LH. Massage therapy versus traditional therapy for low back pain relief: implications for holistic nursing practice. Holistic Nurse Prac
527. Romanowski M, Romanowska J, Grzeskowiak M. A comparison of the effects of deep tissue massage and therapeutic massage on chronic low back pain. Stud Health Technol Inform
528. Ernst E. Massage therapy for low back pain: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage
529. Imamura M, Furlan AD, Dryden T, Irvin E. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with massage. Spine J
530. Netchanok S, Wendy M, Marie C. The effectiveness of Swedish massage and traditional Thai massage in treating chronic low back pain: a review of the literature. Complement Ther Clin Pract
531. Albright J, Allman R, Bonfiglio R, et al. Philadelphia panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for low back pain. Phys Ther
532. Buselli P, Bosoni R, Busè G, et al. Effectiveness evaluation of an integrated automatic termomechanic massage system (SMATH( system) in nonspecific sub-acute and chronic low back pain - a randomized double blinded controlled trial, comparing SMATH therapy versus sham therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials
533. Poole H, Glenn S, Murphy P. A randomised controlled study of reflexology for the management of chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain
534. Quinn F, Hughes CM, Baxter G. Reflexology in the management of low back pain: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Med
535. Ernst E. Is reflexology an effective intervention? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Australia
536. Hsieh CY, Adams AH, Tobis J, et al. Effectiveness of four conservative treatments for subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
537. Beurskens AJ, van der Heijden GJ, de Vet HC, et al. The efficacy of traction for lumbar back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
538. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, et al. Efficacy of traction for nonspecific low back pain. 12-week and 6-month results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
539. Mathews JA, Hickling J. Lumbar traction: a double-blind controlled study for sciatica. Rheum Rehabil
540. Mathews JA, Mills SB, Jenkins VM, et al. Back pain and sciatica: controlled trials of manipulation, traction, sclerosant and epidural injections. Br J Rheumatol
541. Letchuman R, Deusinger RH. Comparison of sacrospinalis myoelectric activity and pain levels in patients undergoing static and intermittent lumbar traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
542. Guvenol K, Tuzun C, Peker O, Goktay Y. A comparison of inverted spinal traction and conventional traction in the treatment of lumbar disc herniations. Physiother Theory Prac
543. Konrad K, Tatrai T, Hunka A, Vereckei E, Korondi I. Controlled trial of balneotherapy in treatment of low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis
544. Larsson U, Choler U, Lidstrom A, et al. Auto-traction for treatment of lumbago-sciatica. A multicentre controlled investigation. Acta Orthop Scand
545. Ljunggren AE, Weber H, Larsen S. Autotraction versus manual traction in patients with prolapsed lumbar intervertebral discs. Scand J Rehabil Med
546. Pal B, Mangion P, Hossain MA, Diffey BL. A controlled trial of continuous lumbar traction in the treatment of back pain and sciatica. Br J Rheum
547. Mathews W, Morkel M, Mathews J. Manipulation and traction for lumbago and sciatica: physiotherapeutic techniques used in two controlled trials. Physiother Prac
548. Van der Heijden G, Beurskens A, Dirx M, Bouter L, Lindeman E. Efficacy of lumbar traction: a randomised clinical trial. Physiother
549. Schimmel JJ, de Kleuver M, Horsting PP, Spruit M, Jacobs WC, van Limbeek J. No effect of traction in patients with low back pain: a single centre, single blind, randomized controlled trial of Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
550. Sweetman BJHI, Anderson JAD. A randomized controlled trial of exercises, short wave diathermy, and traction for low back pain, with evidence of diagnosis-related response to treatment. J Orthop Rheum
551. Weber H. Traction therapy in sciatica due to disc prolapse (does traction treatment have any positive effect on patients suffering from sciatica caused by disc prolapse?). J Oslo City Hosp
552. Weber H. Traction therapy in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. J Oslo City Hosp
553. Ljunggren A. Manual traction versus ismetric exercises in patients with herniated invertebral lumbar discs. Phiysiother Theory Prac
554. Macario A, Pergolizzi JV. Systematic literature review of spinal decompression via motorized traction for chronic discogenic low back pain. Pain Pract
555. Wegner I, Widyahening IS, van Tulder MW, et al. Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
556. Cai C, Pua YH, Lim KC. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with mechanical lumbar traction. Eur Spine J
557. Gay RE, Brault JS. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with traction therapy. Spine J
558. Harte AA, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. The efficacy of traction for back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
559. Krause M, Refshauge K, Dessen M, Boland R. Lumbar spine traction: evaluation of effects and recommended application for treatment. Man Ther
560. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Slofstra PD, Knottnerus JA. Conservative treatment of sciatica: a systematic review. Clin Spine Surg
561. Brown LL. A double-blind, randomized, prospective study of epidural steroid injection vs. the mild(R) procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Pract
562. Sherry E, Kitchener P, Smart R. A prospective randomized controlled study of VAX-D and TENS for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Neurol Res
563. Ramos G. Efficacy of vertebral axial decompression on chronic low back pain: study of dosage regimen. Neurol Res
564. Prasad KM, Gregson BA, Hargreaves G, Byrnes T, Winburn P, Mendelow AD. Inversion therapy in patients with pure single level lumbar discogenic disease: a pilot randomized trial. Disabil Rehabil
565. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Kulig K, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
566. Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S. Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J
567. Skargren EI, Carlsson PG, Öberg BE. One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain: subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
568. Strauss S. Myofascial pain syndromes: a short review. Web J Acupuncture
2002; Available at: https://med-vetacupuncture.org/english/articles/myofac.html
. Accessed January 30, 2020.
569. von Heymann WJ, Schloemer P, Timm J, Muehlbauer B. Spinal high-velocity low amplitude manipulation in acute nonspecific low back pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in comparison with diclofenac and placebo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
570. Skargren EI, Oberg BE, Carlsson PG, Gade M. Cost and effectiveness analysis of chiropractic and physiotherapy treatment for low back and neck pain. Six-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
571. Schneider M, Haas M, Glick R, Stevans J, Landsittel D. A comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and Sub-acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
572. Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Robinson ME, Zeppieri G Jr, George SZ. Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther
573. Cecchi F, Molino-Lova R, Chiti M, et al. Spinal manipulation compared with back school and with individually delivered physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil
574. Childs JD, Flynn TW, Fritz JM. A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain. Man Ther
575. Glover JR, Morris JG, Khosla T. Back pain: a randomized clinical trial of rotational manipulation of the trunk. Br J Ind Med
576. Juni P, Battaglia M, Nuesch E, et al. A randomised controlled trial of spinal manipulative therapy in acute low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis
577. Skargren EI, Oberg BE. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of low-back and neck pain in patients treated in primary care: comparison between the treatment strategies chiropractic and physiotherapy. Pain
578. Sutlive TG, Mabry LM, Easterling EJ, et al. Comparison of short-term response to two spinal manipulation techniques for patients with low back pain in a military beneficiary population. Mil Med
579. Hadler NM, Curtis P, Gillings DB, Stinnett S. A benefit of spinal manipulation as adjunctive therapy for acute low-back pain: a stratified controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
580. Hondras MA, Long CR, Cao Y, Rowell RM, Meeker WC. A randomized controlled trial comparing 2 types of spinal manipulation and minimal conservative medical care for adults 55 years and older with subacute or chronic low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
581. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Kominski GF, Yu F, Chiang LM. A randomized trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients with low back pain: eighteen-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2006; 31:611–621. discussion 622.
582. Sims-Williams H, Jayson MI, Young SM, Baddeley H, Collins E. Controlled trial of mobilisation and manipulation for patients with low back pain in general practice. Br Med J
583. Sims-Williams H, Jayson MI, Young SM, Baddeley H, Collins E. Controlled trial of mobilisation and manipulation for low back pain: hospital patients. Br Med J
584. Farrell JP, Twomey LT. Acute low back pain. Comparison of two conservative treatment approaches. Med J Aust
585. Jayson MI, Sims-Williams H, Young S, Baddeley H, Collins E. Mobilization and manipulation for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
586. Learman KE, Myers JB, Lephart SM, Sell TC, Kerns GJ, Cook CE. Effects of spinal manipulation on trunk proprioception in subjects with chronic low back pain during symptom remission. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
587. Sanders GE, Reinert O, Tepe R, Maloney P. Chiropractic adjustive manipulation on subjects with acute low back pain: visual analog pain scores and plasma beta-endorphin levels. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
588. MacDonald RS, Bell CM. An open controlled assessment of osteopathic manipulation in nonspecific low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
589. McMorland G, Suter E, Casha S, du Plessis SJ, Hurlbert RJ. Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
590. Paatelma M, Kilpikoski S, Simonen R, Heinonen A, Alen M, Videman T. Orthopaedic manual therapy, McKenzie method or advice only for low back pain in working adults: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up. J Rehabil Med
591. Pope MH, Phillips RB, Haugh LD, Hsieh CY, MacDonald L, Haldeman S. A prospective randomized three-week trial of spinal manipulation, transcutaneous muscle stimulation, massage and corset in the treatment of subacute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
592. Rasmussen J, Laetgaard J, Lindecrona AL, Qvistgaard E, Bliddal H. Manipulation does not add to the effect of extension exercises in chronic low-back pain (LBP). A randomized, controlled, double blind study. Joint Bone Spine
593. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Hondras MA, Brennan PC. Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
594. Wreje U, Nordgren B, Aberg H. Treatment of pelvic joint dysfunction in primary care--a controlled study. Scand J Prim Health Care
595. Bronfort G, Hondras MA, Schulz CA, Evans RL, Long CR, Grimm R. Spinal manipulation and home exercise with advice for subacute and chronic back-related leg pain: a trial with adaptive allocation. Ann Intern Med
596. Ernst E, Harkness E. Spinal manipulation: a systematic review of sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Pain Symptom Manage
597. Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S. Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. Spine J
598. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: an update of the Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
599. Andersson GB, Lucente T, Davis AM, Kappler RE, Lipton JA, Leurgans S. A comparison of osteopathic spinal manipulation with standard care for patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med
600. Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Knipschild PG, Bouter LM. The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation. JAMA
601. Koes BW, Assendelft WJ, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM. Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
1996; 21:2860–2871. discussion 2872-2863.
602. Avery S, O’Driscoll ML. Randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of spinal manipulation therapy in the treamment of low back pain. Phys Ther Rev
603. Hoehler FK, Tobis JS. Appropriate statistical methods for clinical trials of spinal manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
604. Ongley MJ, Klein RG, Dorman TA, Eek BC, Hubert LJ. A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain. Lancet
605. Digiorgi D. Spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review of the literature and commentary. Chiropractic Man Ther
606. Morningstar MW, Strauchman MN. Manipulation under anesthesia for patients with failed back surgery: retrospective report of 3 cases with 1-year follow-up. J Chiropractic Med
607. Palmieri NF, Smoyak S. Chronic low back pain: a study of the effects of manipulation under anesthesia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
608. Siehl D, Olson DR, Ross HE, Rockwood EE. Manipulation of the lumbar spine with the patient under general anesthesia: evaluation by electromyography and clinical-neurologic examination of its use for lumbar nerve root compression syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc
609. Ross H, Siehl D. Evaluation of manipulation of the lumbar spine under general anesthesia for lumbar nerve root compression syndrome, utilizing electromyographic and clinical neurologic examinations. J Am Osteopath Assoc
610. West DT, Mathews RS, Miller MR, Kent GM. Effective management of spinal pain in one hundred seventy-seven patients evaluated for manipulation under anesthesia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
611. Roberts D, Walls C, Carlile J. Aronoff GH, et al. Relief of chronic low back pain: heat versus cold. Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Pain
. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1992. 263–266.
612. Grana W. Physical agents in musculoskeletal problems: heat and cold therapy modalities. Instr Course Lect
613. Lloyd A, Scott DA, Akehurst RL, Lurie-Luke E, Jessen G. Cost-effectiveness of low-level heat wrap therapy for low back pain. Value Health
614. Mayer JM, Ralph L, Look M, et al. Treating acute low back pain with continuous low-level heat wrap therapy and/or exercise: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J
615. Nadler SF, Steiner DJ, Petty SR, Erasala GN, Hengehold DA, Weingand KW. Overnight use of continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for relief of low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
616. Nadler SF, Steiner DJ, Erasala GN, Hengehold DA, Abeln SB, Weingand KW. Continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for treating acute nonspecific low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
617. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, Reggars JW, Esterman AJ. Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2006; Art. No.: CD004750.
618. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: subgroup analysis and relationship between outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
619. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. A blinded randomized clinical trial of manual therapy and physiotherapy for chronic back and neck complaints: physical outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
620. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy, and treatment by the general practitioner for nonspecific back and neck complaints. A randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
621. Cacolice P, Scibek J, Martin R. Diathermy: a literature review of current research and practices. Orthop Phys Ther Prac
622. Gale GD, Rothbart PJ, Li Y. Infrared therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Pain Res Manag
623. Glazov G, Schattner P, Lopez D, Shandley K. Laser acupuncture for chronic non-specific low back pain: a controlled clinical trial. Acupunct Med
624. Licciardone JC, Minotti DE, Gatchel RJ, Kearns CM, Singh KP. Osteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med
625. Ansari NN, Ebadi S, Talebian S, et al. A randomized, single blind placebo controlled clinical trial on the effect of continuous ultrasound on low back pain. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol
626. Blomberg S, Svardsudd K, Mildenberger F. A controlled, multicentre trial of manual therapy in low-back pain. Initial status, sick-leave and pain score during follow-up. Scand J Prim Health Care
627. Ebadi S, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, et al. The effect of continuous ultrasound on chronic non-specific low back pain: a single blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
628. Chon S-C, Chang K-Y, You JSH. Effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion in strengthening the transverse abdominal muscle in healthy young adults: a preliminary, randomised, controlled study. Physiotherapy
629. Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Walch C, Schatzer R, Ploner F, Gruber H. Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-controlled facet joint injections in the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med
630. Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med
631. Poitras S, Brosseau L. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential current, electrical muscle stimulation, ultrasound, and thermotherapy. Spine J
632. Seco J, Kovacs FM, Urrutia G. The efficacy, safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound and shock wave therapies for low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J
633. Hicks GS, Duddleston DN, Russell LD, Holman HE, Shepherd JM, Brown CA. Low back pain. Am J Med Sci
634. Basford JR, Sheffield CG, Harmsen WS. Laser therapy: a randomized, controlled trial of the effects of low-intensity Nd:YAG laser irradiation on musculoskeletal back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
635. Klein RG, Eek BC. Low-energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: double-blind controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
636. Toya S. Report on a computer-randomized double blind clinical trial to determine the eddectiveness of the GaAlAs (830 nm) diode laser for pain attenuation in selected pain groups. Laser Ther
637. Ay S, Dogan SK, Evcik D. Is low-level laser therapy effective in acute or chronic low back pain? Clin Rheumatol
638. Djavid GE, Mehrdad R, Ghasemi M, Hasan-Zadeh H, Sotoodeh-Manesh A, Pouryaghoub G. In chronic low back pain, low level laser therapy combined with exercise is more beneficial than exercise alone in the long term: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother
639. Soriano F. Gallium Arsenide laser treatment of chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized and double blind study. Laser Ther
640. Brinkhaus B, Witt CM, Jena S, et al. Interventions and physician characteristics in a randomized multicenter trial of acupuncture in patients with low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med
641. Brinkhaus B, Witt CM, Jena S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med
642. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, et al. A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med
643. Di Cesare A, Giombini A, Di Cesare M, Ripani M, Vulpiani MC, Saraceni VM. Comparison between the effects of trigger point mesotherapy versus acupuncture points mesotherapy in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a short term randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med
644. Kennedy S, Baxter GD, Kerr DP, Bradbury I, Park J, McDonough SM. Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomised non-penetrating sham controlled trial. Complement Ther Med
645. Leibing E, Leonhardt U, Koster G, et al. Acupuncture treatment of chronic low-back pain – a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. Pain
646. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Ichikawa L, et al. Treatment expectations and preferences as predictors of outcome of acupuncture for chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
647. Cho Y-J, Song Y-K, Cha Y-Y, et al. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a multicenter, randomized, patient-assessor blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
648. Inoue M, Kitakoji H, Ishizaki N, et al. Relief of low back pain immediately after acupuncture treatment–a randomised, placebo controlled trial. Acupunct Med
649. Haake M, Müller H-H, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Int Med
650. Yuan J, Purepong N, Hunter RF, et al. Different frequencies of acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain: an assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Med
651. Garvey TA, Marks MR, Wiesel SW. A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
652. Hackett GI, Seddon D, Kaminski D. Electroacupuncture compared with paracetamol for acute low back pain. Practitioner
653. Itoh K, Itoh S, Katsumi Y, Kitakoji H. A pilot study on using acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to treat chronic non-specific low back pain. Complement Ther Clin Prac
654. Sator-Katzenschlager SM, Scharbert G, Kozek-Langenecker SA, et al. The short- and long-term benefit in chronic low back pain through adjuvant electrical versus manual auricular acupuncture. Anesth Analg
655. Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Ratcliffe J, et al. Longer term clinical and economic benefits of offering acupuncture care to patients with chronic low back pain. Health Technol Assess
2005; 9:iii–iv. ix-x, 1-109.
656. Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Thorpe L, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain. BMJ
657. Tsui ML, Cheing GL. The effectiveness of electroacupuncture versus electrical heat acupuncture in the management of chronic low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med
658. Tsukayama H, Yamashita H, Amagai H, Tanno Y. Randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of electroacupuncture and TENS for low back pain: a preliminary study for a pragmatic trial. Acupunct Med
659. Wasan AD, Kong J, Pham LD, Kaptchuk TJ, Edwards R, Gollub RL. The impact of placebo, psychopathology, and expectations on the response to acupuncture needling in patients with chronic low back pain. J Pain
660. Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, et al. Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol
661. Lehmann TR, Russell DW, Spratt KF. The impact of patients with nonorganic physical findings on a controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electroacupuncture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
662. Lehmann TR, Russell DW, Spratt KF, et al. Efficacy of electroacupuncture and TENS in the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain patients. Pain
663. Macdonald AJ, Macrae KD, Master BR, Rubin AP. Superficial acupuncture in the relief of chronic low back pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl
664. Mendelson G, Selwood TS, Kranz H, Loh TS, Kidson MA, Scott DS. Acupuncture treatment of chronic back pain. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Am J Med
665. Molsberger AF, Mau J, Pawelec DB, Winkler J. Does acupuncture improve the orthopedic management of chronic low back pain--a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with 3 months follow up. Pain
666. Vas J, Aranda JM, Modesto M, et al. Acupuncture in patients with acute low back pain: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Pain
667. Yeung CK, Leung MC, Chow DH. The use of electro-acupuncture in conjunction with exercise for the treatment of chronic low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med
668. Carlsson CP, Sjolund BH. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study with long-term follow-up. Clin J Pain
669. Inoue M, Hojo T, Nakajima M, Kitakoji H, Itoi M. Comparison of the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment and local anaesthetic injection for low back pain: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Acupunct Med
670. Yun M, Shao Y, Zhang Y, et al. Hegu acupuncture for chronic low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med
671. Grant DJ, Bishop-Miller J, Winchester DM, Anderson M, Faulkner S. A randomized comparative trial of acupuncture versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic back pain in the elderly. Pain
672. Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Effects of trigger point acupuncture on chronic low back pain in elderly patients--a sham-controlled randomised trial. Acupunct Med
673. Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Kitakoji H. Trigger point acupuncture treatment of chronic low back pain in elderly patients–a blinded RCT. Acupunct Med
674. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
675. van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B, Lao L, Koes BW. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
676. Furlan AD, van Tulder M, Cherkin D, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
677. MacPherson H, Mercer SW, Scullion T, Thomas KJ. Empathy, enablement, and outcome: an exploratory study on acupuncture patients’ perceptions. J Altern Complement Med
678. Bertalanffy A, Kober A, Bertalanffy P, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces acute low back pain during emergency transport. Acad Emerg Med
679. Bloodworth DM, Nguyen BN, Garver W, et al. Comparison of stochastic vs. conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain modulation in patients with electromyographically documented radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
680. Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Martin DC, Schoenfeld LS, Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med
681. Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormem F, Trevisani VF. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J
682. Jarzem PF, Harvey EJ, Arcaro N, Kaezorowski J. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS] for short-term treatment of low back pain- randomized double blind crossover study of sham versus conventional TENS. J Musculoskelet Pain
683. Al-Smadi J, Warke K, Wilson I, et al. A pilot investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation upon low back pain in people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil
684. Buchmuller A, Navez M, Milletre-Bernardin M, et al. Value of TENS for relief of chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain. Eur J Pain
685. Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: nonparallel antinociceptive effects on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
686. Gabis L, Shklar B, Baruch YK, Raz R, Gabis E, Geva D. Pain reduction using transcranial electrostimulation: a double blind “active placebo” controlled trial. J Rehabil Med
687. Gabis L, Shklar B, Geva D. Immediate influence of transcranial electrostimulation on pain and beta-endorphin blood levels: an active placebo-controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
688. Ghoname ES, Craig WF, White PF, et al. The effect of stimulus frequency on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain. Anesth Analg
689. Herman E, Williams R, Stratford P, Fargas-Babjak A, Trott M. A randomized controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (CODETRON) to determine its benefits in a rehabilitation program for acute occupational low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
690. Hsieh RL, Lee WC. One-shot percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: comparison of therapeutic effects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
691. Marchand S, Charest J, Li J, Chenard JR, Lavignolle B, Laurencelle L. Is TENS purely a placebo effect? A controlled study on chronic low back pain. Pain
692. Thompson JW, Bower S, Tyrer SP. A double blind randomised controlled clinical trial on the effect of transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on low back pain. Eur J Pain
693. Thorsteinsson G, Stonnington HH, Stillwell GK, Elveback LR. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a double-blind trial of its efficacy for pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
694. Barker KL, Elliott CJ, Sackley CM, Fairbank JC. Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS. BMC Musculoskelet Disord
695. Fox EJ, Melzack R. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and acupuncture: comparison of treatment for low-back pain. Pain
696. Kofotolis ND, Vlachopoulos SP, Kellis E. Sequentially allocated clinical trial of rhythmic stabilization exercises and TENS in women with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil
697. Moore SR, Shurman J. Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic back pain: a double-blind, repeated measures comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
698. Shimoji K, Takahashi N, Nishio Y, Koyanagi M, Aida S. Pain relief by transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation with bidirectional modulated sine waves in patients with chronic back pain: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Neuromodulation
699. Yip YB, Tse HM, Wu KK. An experimental study comparing the effects of combined transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation and electromagnetic millimeter waves for spinal pain in Hong Kong. Complement Ther Clin Pract
700. Koopman JS, Vrinten DH, van Wijck AJ. Efficacy of microcurrent therapy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain: a pilot study. Clin J Pain
701. Pérez-Palomares S, Oliván-Blázquez B, Magallón-Botaya R, et al. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus dry needling: effectiveness in the treatment of chronic low back pain. J Musculoskelet Pain
702. Ghoname EA, Craig WF, White PF, et al. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: a randomized crossover study. JAMA
703. McRoberts WP, Wolkowitz R, Meyer DJ, et al. Peripheral nerve field stimulation for the management of localized chronic intractable back pain: results from a randomized controlled study. Neuromodulation
704. Weiner DK, Rudy TE, Glick RM, et al. Efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc
705. Hamza MA, Ghoname EA, White PF, et al. Effect of the duration of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response in patients with low back pain. Anesthesiology
706. White PF, El-sayed AG, Ahmed HE, Hamza MA, Craig WF, Vakharia AS. The effect of montage on the analgesic response to percutaneous neuromodulation therapy. Anesth Analg
707. El-sayed AG, White PF, Ahmed HE, Hamza MA, Craig WF, Noe CE. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: an alternative to TENS in the management of sciatica. Pain
708. North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery
2002; 51:381–389. discussion 389-90.
709. North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes: part II-clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery
2005; 57:990–996. discussion 990-6.
710. Hurley DA, McDonough SM, Dempster M, Moore AP, Baxter GD. A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
711. Hurley DA, Minder PM, McDonough SM, Walsh DM, Moore AP, Baxter DG. Interferential therapy electrode placement technique in acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
712. Lara-Palomo IC, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, et al. Short-term effects of interferential current electro-massage in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
713. Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
714. Zambito A, Bianchini D, Gatti D, Viapiana O, Rossini M, Adami S. Interferential and horizontal therapies in chronic low back pain: a randomized, double blind, clinical study. Clin Exp Rheumatol
715. Zambito A, Bianchini D, Gatti D, Rossini M, Adami S, Viapiana O. Interferential and horizontal therapies in chronic low back pain due to multiple vertebral fractures: a randomized, double blind, clinical study. Osteoporos Int