To test the workplace impact of depression when it is stratified by severity and considered in broader context.
Structural equation models of health risk appraisal data (n = 39,097) involving 41 measures of contextual characteristics, depression severity, health, and job performance.
Approximately 15.7% exhibited mild depression, whereas 6.9% recorded moderate to severe symptoms. Depression severity exerted large effects on general health and productivity loss, with the mild group posting the largest aggregate impact. Adverse personal life impact and financial concerns more significantly affected moderate to severe depression. In contrast, factors more directly amenable to employer health management efforts (eg, stressful job) better predicted mild depression.
These results link depression to large health and productivity deficits. They call for public-private collaboration, parity in mental and physical health benefits, and resource allocation that is proportionate across the depression spectrum and facilitated by symptom severity screening.
From the School of Public Health (Dr Allen), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Harris Allen Group, LLC (Dr Allen), Brighton, Mass; Infotech (Ms Hyworon), Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; and PPG Industries, Inc (Dr Colombi), Pittsburgh, Pa.
The authors are solely responsible for all findings and conclusions presented in this article.
Address correspondence to: Harris Allen, PhD, Harris Allen Group, LLC, 116 Lake Shore Road #1, Brighton, MA 02135; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
A technical appendix for this article is available at http://links.lww.com/JOM/A29.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.joem.org).