Secondary Logo

Latin American Consensus on the management of hypertension in the patient with diabetes and the metabolic syndrome

López-Jaramillo, Patricioa; Barbosa, Eduardob; Molina, Dora I.c; Sanchez, Ramirod; Diaz, Margaritae; Camacho, Paul A.f; Lanas, Fernandog; Pasquel, Miguelh; Accini, José L.i; Ponte-Negretti, Carlos I.j; Alcocer, Luisk; Cobos, Leonardol; Wyss, Fernandom; Sebba-Barroso, Weimarn; Coca, Antonioo; Zanchetti, Albertop,* on behalf of the Latin American Society of Hypertension Consensus Expert Group

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002072

The prevalence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and the metabolic syndrome continues to increase in Latin America, while the rates of diagnosis, treatment and control of these disorders remain low. The frequency of the risk factors that constitute the metabolic syndrome and are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease has not diminished since the publication of the previous consensus. This document discusses the socioeconomic, demographic, environmental and cultural characteristics of most associated Latin American countries and partially explains the lack of better results in improving clinical and public health actions that allow high morbidity and mortality rates caused by cardiovascular diseases and DM2 to be reduced through programs aligned with the so-called precision medicine, which should be predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. The Consensus ratifies the diagnostic criteria expressed in the previous consensus to define hypertension and DM2 but, for the metabolic syndrome, and in the absence of evidence, the recommendation is to implement a cohort study that determines the abdominal perimeter value associated with hard outcomes, such as DM2 and CVD. Meanwhile, we recommend modifying the criterion to more than 94 cm in men and more than 84 cm in women according to WHO recommendations. We also recommend the carrying out of a study that identifies the situation of hypertension and DM2 in people of African ancestry who, in Latin America, exceed 75 million and whose epidemiology does not include solid studies. With respect to the proposed therapeutic targets, we recommended maintaining those defined in the previous consensus, but insisting that early pharmacological management of prediabetes with metformin should be introduced, as should the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients with a combination therapy of two fixed-dose antihypertensive drugs and management with statins. To increase adherence, the use of different drugs combined in a single pill (polypill) is recommended. The simplification of the therapeutic regimen is accompanied by greater control of cardiovascular risk factors, both in primary and secondary prevention, and has been shown to be cost-effective. The consensus recommends the use of the currently available polypill combining an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a statin and aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention and in patients with a high cardiovascular risk, such as hypertension patients with DM2.

aClinica de Síndrome Metabolico, Prediabetes y Diabetes, Direccion de Investigaciones FOSCAL y Facultad de Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia

bLiga de Combate a la Hipertensión de Porto Alegre, Brazil

cUniversidad de Caldas e IPS Médicos Internistas de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia

dHospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina

eClinica Platinium, Montevideo, Uruguay

fDireccion de Investigaciones FOSCAL y Facultad de Salud, Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga (UNAB), Bucaramanga, Colombia

gUniversidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile

hInstituto Médico Integral VIDA, Quito, Ecuador

iFundacion Hospital Universidad del Norte y Universidad Libre, Barranquilla, Colombia

jFundación Venezolana de Cardiología Preventiva, Caracas, Venezuela

kInstituto Mexicano de Salud Cardiovascular, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

lUnidad de Cardiologia, Hospital El Pino, Santiago, Chile

mServicios y Tecnologica Cardiovascular de Gautemala, S.A., Guatemala

nHypertension League, Federal University of Goias, Brazil

oHospital Clínico, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain

pIstituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, and Università degli Studi of Milan, Italy

Correspondence to Professor Patricio López-Jaramillo, MD, PhD, Clinica de Síndrome Metabolico, Prediabetes y Diabetes, Direccion de Investigaciones FOSCAL y Facultad de Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia. Tel: + 57 7 679 7979 x6164; e-mail:

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BP, blood pressure; CAMDI, Central American Diabetes Initiative; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DIU, diuretic; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DOTA, Declaration of the Americas on Diabetes; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; LASH, Latin American Society of Hypertension; LATAM, Latin America; PAHO, Pan American Health Organization; PURE, The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology study; RAS, renin–angiotensin system; RCTs, randomized clinical trials; SLIM, Lifestyle Intervention on Postprandial Glucose Metabolism Study; SPC, single pill combination; UPF, ultra-processed foods; USA, United States of America

Received 10 December, 2018

Revised 22 December, 2018

Accepted 24 January, 2019

Back to Top | Article Outline


In Latin America, hypertension is responsible for 1.6 million deaths annually because of cardiovascular disease (CVD) of which 500 000 occur before 70 years of age [1]. Hypertension is the main risk factor for coronary and cerebrovascular disease, affecting between 20 and 40% of Latin American adults [2–4]. Previous LASH guidelines and consensuses [5,6] described a high prevalence of hypertension and associated risk factors, as increasingly shown by reports from many countries [6]. However, the prevalence of hypertension differs widely between studies, which may be because of different definitions of hypertension, the age of the study populations, sampling biases, which are usually very small and the methods used to measure blood pressure (BP) [4]. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study, carried out in four Latin American countries, is a population-based project that included people of both sexes aged 35–70 years, with 7497 people from Argentina, 5557 from Brazil, 3274 from Chile and 7478 from Colombia [7]. The prevalence of hypertension was 50.8% in Argentina, 52.6% in Brazil, 46.7% in Chile and 37.5% in Colombia: 57% of hypertensive patients were aware they were hypertensive, 52.8% had received treatment and only 18.3% were controlled (SBP <140 mmHg), rising to 36.3% in treated patients. Only 12.5% of hypertensive patients were receiving combination therapy with at least two antihypertensive drugs [8].

Recently, the results of a broadened sample of individuals from the PURE-LATAM study have been reported [9], including two studies with similar methodological characteristics carried out in Peru [10] and the countries of the Southern Cone of Latin America (Argentina, Chile and Uruguay) [11]. Table 1 shows the characteristics of individuals studied, in whom the global prevalence of hypertension was 44.6%, which was higher in Brazil (52.5%) and lower in Peru (19.3%): 59.6% of individuals knew they were hypertensive, which was higher in Brazil (64.8%) and lower in Colombia (51.9%), and 54.2% were receiving treatment, rising to 90.9% in persons who knew they were hypertensive, although only 37.6% were controlled (Table 1). Social inequality is one of the factors that most affects the control of hypertension, according to the PURE-Colombia study [12], which showed that the prevalence of hypertension was 37.5% in the study population, rising to 62.5% in persons with low educational levels. The study also found that the highest risk of uncontrolled hypertension occurred in overweight or obese men aged less than 50 years living in rural areas who had low educational and income levels [12]. These factors are also important in the rapidly accelerating increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), which is observed globally and in Latin America.



The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates that approximately 425 million people worldwide have DM2, of which one third are aged more than 65 years and 80% live in middle-income and low-income countries, and also estimates that the number will increase to 693 million by 2045 [13]. The prevalence of DM2 in Latin America ranges between 5.5 and 13.6% and has increased by between 3 and 12% between 2015 and 2017 in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Uruguay (Fig. 1). The increase in the prevalence of DM2 also implies a significant increase in the disease burden for Latin American health systems. Thus, the risk of premature death in a patient with DM2 is higher than in those without DM2 [14] and the risk of cardiovascular death is double [15]. It is estimated that 40% of people with DM2 in Latin America are not diagnosed, making it difficult to accurately estimate the costs of managing DM2 and its complications for health systems [16,17].



As shown in Fig. 1, there are variations in the prevalence of DM2 between Latina American countries which, as happens in hypertension, may be because of the different diagnostic criteria used, the characteristics of the populations studied, the age groups evaluated and the diagnostic methods used. Migration to cities, greater access to screening and diagnostic tests, and environmental, social, cultural and economic factors that influence the demographic, epidemiological and nutritional transition, expressed as the aging of the population, changes in lifestyles (dietary habits and physical activity) and the increase in urbanization [18–20], are also influencing factors. All these factors contribute to the remarkable increase in overweight and obesity, particularly abdominal, seen in Latin America which, together with glycemic alterations, hypertension, dyslipidemia characterized by an increase in triglycerides and a decrease in HDL-cholesterol, are the components of the metabolic syndrome. The high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Latin America described above [5] has been confirmed in a recent systematic review [21] and in new studies, such as the Central American Diabetes Initiative (CAMDI), sponsored by the Declaration of the Americas on Diabetes (DOTA) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), which evaluated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Costa Rica (San José), Guatemala (Guatemala City), Honduras (Tegucigalpa), Nicaragua (Managua) and Belize, and reported a prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 30.3%, ranging from 23% in Honduras to 35.1% in Costa Rica. Nicaragua had the highest prevalence of hypertension (41.4%) and Guatemala the highest prevalence of hyperglycemia (28.2) [22].

Each metabolic syndrome component increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. However, the metabolic syndrome cluster increases the risk more than the sum of each independent component and is associated with a 1.5–2.5 increase in all-cause death, cardiovascular death and death because of DM2 [23,24].

Back to Top | Article Outline


The concept that metabolic syndrome in Latin America should consider the criterion of abdominal obesity as mandatory is based on observations from recent studies that show the incidence and prevalence of overweight and obesity have increased progressively during the last six decades and alarmingly so in the last 20 years, reaching figures of 10–20% in childhood, 30–40% in adolescence and 60–70% in adults [25,26]. Due to the fact that Mexico has Official Mexican Standards on hypertension and overweight [27,28] which are mandatory, while the guidelines of the scientific society are only suggestions on the way to approach and treat a particular problem taking into account the characteristics of the patient, in order to unify criteria for Latin America, the Consensus recommends accepting the definitions of overweight and obesity determined by law in Mexico. Consequently, we define overweight as a BMI at least 25 kg/m2 and less than 29.9 kg/m2 and in adults of short stature, at least 23 kg/m2 and less than 25 kg/m2. In persons aged less than 19 years, overweight is defined as a BMI between the 85th and 95th percentile of the WHO age and sex tables. Obesity in adults is defined as a BMI at least 30 and 25 kg/m2 in persons of short stature. In persons aged less than 19 years, obesity is defined as a BMI in the 95th percentile of the WHO BMI tables for age and sex. Low stature is defined as less than 1.50 m in adult women and less than 1.60 m in adult men [27,28].

With respect to central obesity, a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, the current Consensus demands that the cut-off points to be proposed must be supported by a demonstration of therapeutic benefit or association with risk. Concerning therapeutic benefits, these should come from results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) or analysis of subgroups of RCTs showing a better prognosis after treatment in Latin American patients when dealing with a certain limit of the risk factor (glycemia, BMI, definition of metabolic syndrome, abdominal perimeter). Unfortunately, this evidence was nonexistent in the Latin American population with only few cohort studies that show associations between levels of these risk factors and the incidence of cardiovascular events or the presence of another risk factor, and no studies with an estimated event risk based on a Framingham-type risk scale. The most common studies are cross-sectional or case–control, in which the risk is estimated by the presence of CVD or by risk equations. Therefore, it is difficult to make a recommendation on the cut-off points to be applied to the Latin American population, and even more so when the characteristics of the Latin American population are considered, such as differences and ethnic mixes with variable proportions of European ancestors and the native population and, in some countries, with a black or Asian population [29–37].

The measurements proposed to define central obesity are waist circumference, waist/hip ratio and waist/height ratio. In general, there is a consensus that these measurements are more closely associated with cardiovascular risk than with BMI. Indexes that correct the waist perimeter per the hip circumference (waist/hip ratio) tend to have a better correlation and predictive capacity for DM2 or CVD than the waist circumference alone, although in some reports the benefit of adding these measurements is marginal. Therefore, the Consensus recommends the use of the abdominal perimeter, with the measurement being made at the midpoint between the palpable lower margin of the last rib and the upper edge of the iliac crest, at the end of expiration, with a nonelastic tape with a tension of 100 g [38].

In the absence of Latin American studies that met the quality criteria demanded, the previous Consensus [5] followed the IDF recommendations for South and Central American ethnic groups of at least 90 cm in men and at least 80 cm in women [39]. The present consensus also considered the WHO recommendations of more than 94 cm in men and more than 80 cm in women at increased risk, and more than 102 cm in men and more than 88 cm in women at substantially increased risk [40,41]. In the absence of evidence, the recommendation of the Consensus is to carry out a cohort study to determine the value of the abdominal perimeter best associated with hard outcomes, such as DM2 and CVD. Meanwhile, we recommend modifying the criterion to more than 94 cm in men and more than 84 cm in women, according to the WHO recommendations [40,41].

Back to Top | Article Outline


The consensus confirms the previous concepts [5,6,42] that hypertension is diagnosed in patients with metabolic syndrome and DM2 when office BP is measured at two different times and, according to the norms that validate the measurement [5,6], is at least 140/90 mmHg. We also maintain the classification of hypertension grade 1 as BP values between 140/90 and 159/99 mmHg; grade 2 as between 160/100 and 179/109 mmHg and grade 3 as at least 180/110 mmHg. Pharmacological treatment should be initiated when BP is more than 140/90 mmHg and, despite the debate about the BP targets that should be achieved, the current Consensus recommends reaching and maintaining values of less than 140/85 mmHg, considering that the optimal goal for SBP is 130 mmHg or less, and there is no additional benefit in trying to reach levels less than 120 mmHg, and the optimal goal for DBP is 80 mmHg, recommendations that coincide with the recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension [43].

Back to Top | Article Outline


The diagnosis of DM2 is based on increased levels of glycemia and/or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). As these measurements are the only means to diagnose DM2, they must be adapted to each population according to genetic and epigenetic characteristics, which may vary in populations subjected to different socioeconomic conditions [44]. The WHO determined the cut-off points for glycemia and HbA1c for the diagnosis of DM2 based on the results of epidemiological studies conducted in high-income countries and which are associated with the risk of retinopathy [45,46], cut-off points that could be inadequate for medium-income and low-income countries, especially considering the association of these cut-off points with the risk of CVD [47,48]. The Consensus recommends the continued use of the WHO criteria for the diagnosis of DM2, which means meeting any of the following four criteria: criterion 1, symptoms of hyperglycemia, such as polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia and unexplained weight loss, together with casual blood glucose at least 200 mg/dl, defining as casual the result obtained at any time of the day; criterion 2, glycemia at least 200 mg/dl 2 h after an oral glucose load. The test should be carried out as described by the WHO, using a glucose drink containing the equivalent of 75 g of glucose dissolved in water; criterion 3, fasting blood glucose at least 126 mg/dl and criterion 4, HbA1c at least 6.5%.

On the basis of the two works recently published in Latin America [49,50], the Consensus also recommends diagnosing and treating prediabetes, also known as glycemia with an increased risk of DM2, or intermediate hyperglycemia, a term proposed by the WHO referring to an intermediate metabolic state between normal glucose homeostasis and DM2 [45]. It is diagnosed by venous blood glucose levels: altered fasting blood glucose when values are between 100 and 125 mg/dl after at least 8 h of fasting, and/or glucose intolerance when glycemia values 2 h after the administration of an oral overload of 75 g of glucose are between 140 and 199 mg/dl, and/or if HbA1c values are between 5.7 and 6.4% [51]. According to the IDF, the worldwide prevalence of prediabetes varies between 6 and 14% and, for Colombia, the age-adjusted estimate (20–79 years) is 8–10% [52]. There is a large body of evidence showing that prediabetes progresses to DM2 at an annual rate of at least 10% and that, regardless of progression to DM2, it is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease [53–59]. Therefore, the Consensus recommends immediate management through changes in lifestyle and new assessments at 3 and 6 months once prediabetes is detected and diagnosed. If the patient does not respond with a weight loss of at least 5% and if HbA1C values are not normalized, pharmacological treatment with a dose of 500 mg/day of metformin should be initiated, escalating to 1500–1700 mg/day, according to tolerance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Social risk

Latin America has a series of ethnic, economic, geographic and cultural characteristics that influence the high prevalence of hypertension, metabolic syndrome and DM2 [60]. Socioeconomic inequalities, which are common in Latin America [61] and which vary according to the ethnic composition, should be considered as a conditional risk factor for CVD which, in turn, contributes to an increased social risk [62]. Inequalities in social, economic and educational conditions contribute to chronic psychosocial stress, which is a frequent risk factor in the Latin American population, and which is associated with hypertension [12,63], DM2 [44], metabolic syndrome [64,65] and CVD [66–68]. Socioeconomic inequalities and differences in access to health services between urban and rural areas in Latin America are other determinants of the differences in the prevalence of CVD risk factors and their management [68–70]. Social inequalities are so characteristic of Latin America that the Latin American hypertension guidelines were the first to include social risk as a scoring factor within the risk scale of hypertension management [71]. Figure 2 shows the components of social risk and their association with hypertension, metabolic syndrome and DM2. Factors, such as the educational level, the income level, the possession or absence of housing and whether people have permanent jobs are conditioning factors of social risk, which is directly associated with access to healthy foods and the intake of macronutrients and micronutrients. The recent results of the PURE study have shown that low-income and middle-income countries, which include the Latin American countries participating in the study, have less availability, less access to and lower consumption of fruits and vegetables [72,73], proteins and fats [74], and milk and derivatives [75] compared with high-income countries. However, the consumption of carbohydrates, especially processed and ultra-processed ones, is greater [74]. These dietary characteristics, observed throughout Latin America, and particularly in the poorer socioeconomic sectors, are a risk factor for hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity and CVD [76,77].



Mass internal migration from the countryside to the big cities, seeking, at least in theory, greater opportunities, has led to an accelerated, disorganized process of urbanization, which is another characteristic aspect of Latin America related to poverty, with social inequities and, in some countries, situations of forced displacement because of political violence. This migration results in the formation of marginal suburbs lacking any health infrastructure, and changes in lifestyles with the adoption of unhealthy habits, such as the consumption of processed foods and sedentary lifestyles [78,79]. The Chronicles study in Peru [64] found a difference in the prevalence of obesity among rural inhabitants, migrants from rural areas to urban areas and urban dwellers. The prevalence of obesity was 3, 20 and 33%, respectively, and the prevalence of DM2 0.8, 3 and 6%, respectively.

Education and schooling are also key determinants of the risk of hypertension, DM2 and obesity [80]. The PURE-Colombia study found that, in men aged less than 50 years with lower salaries living in rural areas, the lower level of schooling was the factor that most influenced not only high BP but also the treatment and control of hypertension [12]. In Latin America, dropping out of school is common because of the economic conditions of households, which further aggravates the already-low number of individuals from lower social classes who have access to primary education and almost no possibility of accessing higher education [81]. This, in turn, is related to an increase in risk factors [80] and cardiovascular events [82], an association consistent with that found in other populations [83].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Ethnic and geographical factors

Another characteristic of the Latin American population is the enormous degree of mixing between ethnic groups, from Indian aborigines through the European whites and blacks of African ancestry and, more recently, large migratory groups of Asians and Syrian-Lebanese, which has contributed to the mixture of ethnicities that makes the definition and categorization of ethnic groups difficult [5,84]. However, the black skin characteristic of African ancestry, the greater risk of developing hypertension and DM2, and the large black population in Latin America, determined that the previous consensus [5] concluded that, before 2012, there was no large epidemiological study on the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in this population, and that no study with a representative sample has investigated food intake, physical activity and body composition, factors associated with hypertension and diabetes in this group. It, therefore, recommended carrying out epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic research in persons of African ancestry living in Latin America to verify whether the results of US studies are applicable to the black population of Latin America. In addition, it was recommended that, until there was an adequate amount of data from studies in the black population of Latin America, the adoption of the guidelines of the International Society of Hypertension in Blacks, a document that highlights the high prevalence of the coexistence of hypertension with obesity and DM2, especially in women, as well as the greater frequency of cardio-renal complications associated with hypertension and DM2 [85]. In spite of the recommendation to conduct new epidemiological studies in this region, very few studies in Latin American people of African ancestry have been published between 2012 and 2018 [86,87], and those have found a higher prevalence of hypertension and lower rates of diagnosis, treatment and control of hypertension with respect to other ethnic groups. Most studies from the Caribbean islands [88–94] show that blacks in the Caribbean have a higher prevalence of hypertension than whites in the United Kingdom and that, moreover, there is higher mortality because of causes associated with hypertension than that presented by blacks in the United Kingdom, especially women. However, in the population of Cuba where there are no great differences in social risk between whites and blacks and where hypertensive patients had equal access to medications [95], it was shown that differences in BP levels were less pronounced, which underlines the fact that in addition to the proposed higher genetic sensitivity to sodium intake presented by people of African descent [96], other socioeconomic factors may be interacting to determine the higher prevalence of hypertension and DM2 observed in this specific population in Latin America [97]. The implication of clearly determining these factors is of great importance in the public health of the Latin American countries with a high percentage of blacks [84,98]. Therefore, this Consensus insists on recommending, to Latin American Science and Technology systems, the need to finance projects that clarify the causes of the greater risk in people of African ancestry of presenting a higher incidence of hypertension and DM2 (Table 2).



Altitude-induced hypobaric hypoxia involves adaptive changes in many physiological systems in exposed individuals and may have important effects on the regulation of BP and the glucose metabolism [99–102]. The population of Latin America living in the Andes Mountains shares similar characteristics and historical colonization patterns with people living at lower altitudes, being mostly Amerindians or mixed race. People living at high altitudes in the Andes (>3000 m above sea level) constitute a special group in whom the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes is poorly understood. However, the few existing data suggest there are no differences in the prevalence of hypertension and DM2 between them and populations living at sea level or lower altitudes, as reported in the previous consensus [5]. Recently, a higher prevalence of hypertension has been described in Colombian populations living at sea level (44.8%) than in those living at altitude (>2000 m above sea level: 36.0%) [12]. However, this study could not exclude the influence of the ethnic group because it is well known that the percentage of black people living at sea level is greater than that of those living at high altitude. In addition, altitude is related to greater exposure to cold, which increases BP levels, as has been demonstrated in other populations [103–105]. The lack of data led to the previous consensus recommending the initiation of studies to define the role of altitude and concomitant low temperatures in the risk of hypertension in Latin America. Parati et al. have initiated a series of studies in Peru, Ecuador and Colombia with the aim of defining, in the high Andean population, whether the prevalence of hypertension differs from that of people living at sea level, and of determining the mechanisms involved and their impact on the management of hypertension in these Andean high-altitude populations [106,107].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Food characteristics

Noncommunicable chronic diseases are attributed to inadequate human behavior, especially that related to diet, physical activity, smoking and alcohol. Guidelines and consensuses on hypertension, diabetes, overweight, obesity, dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic disease agree that lifestyle modifications are the preferred first-step intervention for the prevention or treatment of these conditions, either when they occur in isolation or when they do so in various ways, as happens in metabolic syndrome . Any strategy that tries to influence these risk factors is expensive as it requires a complex approach and highly qualified professionals, making these interventions not affordable for low-income and middle-income countries, where illnesses derived from unhealthy lifestyles are the most prevalent.

In 2014, the NutriCoDE study, designed and directed by the Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group [108] systematically studied and analyzed 266 national adult nutrition surveys, evaluating the consumption of saturated fats, fatty acids Ω-6 and Ω-3 from fish, fatty acid Ω-3 from plants, trans fats and dietary cholesterol. The study showed that, in Latin America, there is a high level of cholesterol and trans fats in the regular daily diet. In Mexico, the consumption of cholesterol and trans fats can be as high as 4.5 g/day. Saturated fats are consumed in a similar pattern to that which occurs in other areas of the developing world comparable with Latin America, but unsaturated fatty acids are consumed in significantly smaller quantities, especially with respect to the low consumption of Ω-3 from marine fish sources. In countries, such as Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina, Mexico and the Dominican Republic, the consumption is less than 50 g/day. This situation, which may be understood in Bolivia and Paraguay, countries without an oceanic coast, cannot be explained by this reason in the other countries mentioned, all of which have long coastlines, including the Dominican Republic, which is an island. Therefore, this imbalance in the consumption of polyunsaturated fats from fish is a consequence of cultural, economic and educational situations, which affords an opportunity to intervene in the population through education and laws that limit the consumption of trans fats, given that the largest sources of these fats are fried flours containing margarine. In addition, the high consumption of refined sugars, soft drinks with added sugar and ultra-processed foods (UPF) in ready-to-eat or drink formulations, which contain more sugar, more trans fats and more sodium, are widely consumed in Latin America, as they are accessible, practical, ubiquitous, very well publicized, tasty and highly addictive [109]. UPF consumption is associated with an increase in adult BMI at all levels of consumption, after adjustment for covariates (R2 = 0.79, P < 0.0001), to the point that the per capita sale of these products (in kg) is an independent predictor of the increase in BMI over time [110]. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) conducted a study to estimate UPF consumption trends using sales information from the Euromonitor International 2014 database [111], and found that, in a time series analysis using national surveys from 12 countries between 1999 and 2013, which analyzed the association between changes in annual sales per capita of UPF (in kg) and changes in the mean standardized BMI in adults, the Latin American market is the third in the world, behind Asia and Canada, with an increase of 50% in consumption between 2000 and 2013, surpassing the US market in the sale of sugary soft drinks in 2013. The five countries with the highest consumption of UPF per capita are Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia and Paraguay which, in turn, are the five countries with the highest BMI and the highest incidence of obesity.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Dietary recommendations

Most studies have found that the gold-standard or first-line indication with respect to cardioprotective diets is the Mediterranean diet, which demonstrated effectiveness in longitudinal studies and can be recommended both in primary and secondary prevention of cardiometabolic diseases [112–115]. The Mediterranean diet is a cardio-protective diet, defined as ‘foods and beverages that were consumed in the countries that border the Mediterranean Sea in the 1960s.’ It is rich in unsaturated fats (olive oil, nuts, seeds), low in saturated fats (red meat), whole milk) and, in general, contains more fresh or natural foods (fruits, vegetables, whole grains) than processed foods. Saturated fats found in greater amounts in red meat, cheese, and whole milk increase total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. For a long time, the intake of saturated fat, especially of animal origin, was considered the most important risk factor for cardiometabolic disease and low fat consumption was promoted at the expense of saturated fats. Recently, the PURE study established that this recommendation caused high consumption of processed carbohydrates in order to cover calorific requirements, resulting in excess consumption that increases the risk of cardiometabolic disease [74,76], whereas the adequate consumption of fats, similar to that of the Mediterranean diet, was associated with a significant reduction of 23% in total mortality risk, an 18% lower risk of stroke and a 30% lower risk of noncardiovascular mortality. Each type of fat was associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk: a reduction of 14% with saturated fats, 19% with monounsaturated fats and 20% with polyunsaturated fats. A higher intake of saturated fat was also associated with a 21% decrease in the risk of stroke (Table 3). Another important change in the dietary recommendations is the elimination of the restriction on the consumption of cholesterol of 300 mg/day as a strategy for the prevention of atherosclerotic disease. Since 2015, the warning on restricting foods with high cholesterol content, such as eggs, some meats or whole milk products, among others, has been eliminated [77].



This new evidence leads us to recommend a complete diet, that is, it must cover, in a balanced fashion, all dietary nutrients, be isocaloric, with 50–55% of energy ingested from carbohydrates, preferably from slowly absorbed natural carbohydrates, and must restrict the consumption of processed carbohydrates with a high glycemic index, maintain an adequate protein intake corresponding to 20–25% of the energy ingested, which the remaining 20–30% coming from fats, maintaining a 1–1–1 ratio between saturated, unsaturated and polyunsaturated fats. Currently, in the diet of most of the population of Latin America, this would entail avoiding processed foods with high calorific density, avoiding combining easily absorbed carbohydrates with fat, promoting the consumption of white meat over red meat and of foods rich in polyunsaturated fats (Ω-3) at least twice a week, such as fish and nuts, stimulating the consumption of legumes (100 g two or three times per week), including those originating in Latin America, such as quinoa and lupine (Lupino mutabilis), which are of high nutritional value and have been shown to be useful in the coadjuvant management of DM2 [77,116,117].

The consumption of natural foods offers a contribution of dietary fiber that is lost in industrial or home processed food. It is advisable to ingest the natural fruit, as the contribution of carbohydrates per gram (fructose) is lower than that of juice, which may contain more than twice that of fresh fruit. The PURE study also established that the recommendation to ingest five fruits/vegetables per day exceeds the daily carbohydrate requirements, suggesting an intake of three servings per day [73].

We emphatically and repeatedly recommend minimizing the intake of sweetened beverages, as these are very important risk factors for the Latin American population, especially children, and the intake of artificial beverages, such as soft drinks, instant tea or energy drinks. The consumption of sweeteners should be avoided, as this group of artificial additives, without calorific value, is sweeter than sugar, making it more difficult to wean patients from sweet foods. They have not shown significant benefits on health, and have recently been linked to an increase in BMI and DM2. Therefore, this Consensus does not recommend their consumption and promotes a reduction in simple sugars as the most appropriate way to reduce the calories derived from carbohydrates.

Another controversial issue in the dietary recommendations is related to salt consumption. Reports based on the results of the PURE study [118–122] confirm the positive association between sodium intake and SBP. This association is particularly evident in populations and individuals with a higher sodium intake (>5 g/day, equivalent to >12.5 g/day of salt), but not when sodium consumption is lower. Sodium intake was associated with a significant increase in stroke rates only in populations with salt intake in the upper tertile, and most were communities in China. Unexpectedly, there was an inverse association between sodium consumption and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and mortality rates, while the increase in potassium consumption was associated with a significant decrease in all cardiovascular events. The magnitude of the association between sodium consumption and SBP (2.86 mmHg per 1 g increase in sodium consumption) was more robust than that reported in the INTERSALT (1.94 mmHg) [123] and INTERMAP (0.22 mmHg) studies [124]. However, this association only occurs in communities with a mean sodium consumption similar to that observed in China (5.58 g/day), and not in countries whose mean consumption is in the order of 4.49 g/day. These results have led some sectors to support them with data obtained in different populations [125–130], whereas others have questioned them [131,132]. The contrasting data suggest that the current recommendations for sodium intake [133,134] need to be re-evaluated [135] and that the impact of reductions in salt intake in reducing CVD should be the subject of controlled clinical studies, which are already being implemented [136]. This should allow the resolution of disputes that, as pointed out by Alberto Zanchetti, ‘are welcome, because it is through controversy that science advances’ [137]. Meanwhile, the recommendation to reduce sodium consumption as a measure preventive for hypertension and CVD should be, rather than a universal population intervention, directed and implemented in those communities and individuals in whom sodium consumption is more than 5 g/day, which will avoid the dispersion of resources in trying to introduce this measure in communities or individuals in whom the consumption of sodium is less than this amount and who will not benefit from the intervention. In addition, there is a risk that reducing sodium intake to minimum levels in populations that consume an adequate amount may increase the risk of AMI and death. On the other hand, the difficulty in ensuring good adherence to diets very restrictive in sodium is well known and, as was pointed out by Pickering [138] ‘rigid low-sodium diets are tasteless, unappetizing, monotonous, unacceptable and intolerable. To maintain them requires the asceticism of a religious fanatic.’

Lifestyle modifications should be recommended in high-risk adults, such as patients with diabetes and hypertension, as an important complement in the control of their problems and in reducing medicament use. However, major efforts should focus primarily on the creation of healthy lifestyles in the expectant mother, during childhood and throughout life, as recommended by the Lancet Commission on Hypertension [139]. Recently, the concept of the first 1000 days has been gaining acceptance [140,141]. This includes a critical period that covers 40 weeks of gestation and the first 2 years of life, as the changes generated in this stage are decisive. It is considered to be a unique window of opportunity to shape and improve health in the short-term and long-term, given that it is a stage of cell formation, multiplication and differentiation from the pluripotent stem cell. Early feeding and metabolic programming influence genetic expression by modifying, among other things, the risk of chronic noncommunicable disease. In this stage of high plasticity and accommodation to the environment, it is important that the body receives all the nutrients needed for optimal development. Deficiencies and excesses can result in metabolic changes that could predispose to the appearance of noncommunicable diseases, such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, among others [19,78,142]. During the first 1000 days, the most important risk factors for cardiometabolic disease in children are: obese or overweight mother, excess maternal weight gain during pregnancy, maternal smoking, rapid weight gain in the first year of life and little or no contribution of breast milk.

Therefore, the introduction of mass nutritional education programs for pregnant women and children and adolescents, in addition to adults with risk factors and CVD, is a priority as are new laws and actions aimed at reducing the consumption of these products, such as an increase in taxes. These strategies are recommended by the present Consensus, which also demands from medical-scientific societies, primary and secondary educational institutions, and universities, the establishment of programs to promote, advice, endorse and organize structured campaigns to create awareness in all social sectors, and especially in children and adolescents, the risk implied by excessive consumption of these products.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Laws on food labeling and health literacy

As mentioned above, in recent years, there has been a large increase in the sales of processed and ultra-processed foods in Latin America, including snacks and sugary drinks, a phenomenon related to the high rate of overweight and obesity. Between 1999 and 2013, sales of processed foods and sugary beverages increased hugely, mainly in countries, such as Chile and Mexico [143]. In fact, Chile is the main consumer of sugary drinks per capita in the world, followed by Mexico and the USA.

The link between processed food and obesity is well documented and begins in childhood [143]. The problem of childhood obesity requires a broad response that takes into consideration the current obesogenic environment in Latin America. In the context of the fight against obesity, a key component, which UNICEF supports in the countries of the region, is the regulation of the labeling of processed foods and beverages aimed at children and adolescents, which would contribute positively to reducing obesity levels in these age groups. [144–147].

There have been some innovative actions in Latin America, such as the taxing of soft drinks in Mexico, new food labeling in Chile and, in Brazil and Uruguay, the publication of food guidelines that adopt a food classification according to the degree of processing. Analysis of current food labeling regulations in Latin America and the Caribbean shows Chile, Ecuador and Mexico have introduced frontal labeling as a public health strategy. Food labeling is associated with several factors, such as the level of education and the type of diet (Table 4).



Frontal labeling is effective when displayed in a simple, consistent, eye-catching way that can be interpreted quickly. For this, it is proposed to direct the efforts of the regulation of frontal labeling at the most vulnerable groups (those with lower educational and socioeconomic levels and who live in rural areas, among others), and promote the introduction of frontal labeling of industrialized foods and beverages that is simple and striking, does not require mathematical skills, takes little time to interpret and is consistent throughout the region. The labeling must be supported by scientific evidence generated by institutions without conflicts of interest; it must include the different elements of food and beverage packaging, and must be accompanied by an educational campaign that ensures sustainability. It is important to develop these campaigns to improve understanding and use by consumers, especially parents and children. Civil society must provide information about the use and understanding of frontal labeling systems, and request and demand best practices.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Alcohol consumption

In Latin American countries, the mean annual per capita consumption of alcohol is 2.2 l, higher than the rest of the world's regions [148]. The relationship between consumption more than 35 g/day and the risk of hypertension, metabolic syndrome, DM2 and CVD is well established [149,150]. The PURE study analyzed the data obtained in 12 of the participating countries in which alcohol consumption is allowed [150], and included 114 970 adults of whom 12 904 (11%) were from high-income countries, 24 408 (21%) from upper middle-income countries, 48 845 (43%) from low middle-income countries and 28 813 (25%) from low-income countries, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Current drinking was reported by 36 030 (31%) people and was associated with a reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction [hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.63–0.93)] and an increase in types of cancer related to alcohol [hazard ratio 1.51 (95% CI 1.22–1.89)] and accidents [hazard ratio 1.29 (95% CI 1.04–1.61)]. High alcohol intake was associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio 1.31 (95% CI 1.04–1.66)]. There was a significant reduction in the hazard ratio for the composite of major CVD in high-income countries compared with people who never drank, but not in low-income and middle-income countries, which shows that alcohol consumption has different associations according to the socioeconomic status of the countries. On the basis of these data, we recommend introducing actions aimed at avoiding excess alcohol consumption in Latina American countries as a strategy to reduce the risk of hypertension and other risk factors for CVD, such as atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is extremely frequent in Latin America [151].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Physical activity

The increase in sedentary behavior due, in large part, to technological advances in transportation and entertainment is contributing to the increase in the rates of obesity, DM2, hypertension, CVD and all-cause mortality [152,153]. Although most studies have been conducted in high-income countries, the PURE study recently evaluated the effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people without cardiovascular disease from 17 countries classified as high, medium and low income, including Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Colombia [154]. It was shown that the greater the physical activity, the lower the prevalence of hypertension and DM2. The reduction in the relative risk between groups with high physical activity compared with groups with low physical activity was 86% for hypertension and 66% for DM2. The reduction in the relative risk for total mortality and CVD was 28 and 20%, respectively. The lowest risk was presented by people who engage in high and moderate physical activity compared with those who engaged in low physical activity. High physical activity was defined as more than 750 min per week of moderately intense physical activity, moderate physical activity as 150–750 min per week and low physical activity as less than 150 min. The benefit was independent of whether the physical activity was recreational or not, or whether individuals came from high-income, medium-income or low-income countries, which shows the association is global.

Other studies in adults have shown that aerobic physical activity reduces SBP on average by between 2 and 5 mmHg and DBP between 1 and 4 mmHg, and it is estimated that the reduction in BP can explain up to 27% of the reduction in CVD rates associated with regular physical activity [155–157]. We accept that the greatest benefit on BP is obtained from moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise three to four times a week, with sessions of a mean of 40 min maintained for at least 12 weeks [157,158]. Multiple prospective studies have shown that physical activity can prevent or delay the onset of DM2 [159–161] and cardiovascular events [162–169].

Currently there is special interest in the role of skeletal muscle in DM2, as this tissue is one of those most involved in the use and storage of glucose, and it is well documented that the loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) is associated with alterations in blood glucose and BP [170–172]. It has been shown that muscle strength and muscle mass play an important role in the cardiovascular outcomes of patients with hypertension and DM2. The ORIGIN study found a 1 kg increase in prehensile strength in prediabetic and diabetic patients was associated with a reduction of between 9 and 30% in total mortality and mortality from CVD, AMI and stroke [173]. The PURE study in more than 130 000 apparently healthy people showed that a reduction of 5 kg was associated with an increase of between 7 and 17% in the risk of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality and mortality because of AMI and stroke, and that, in addition, loss of prehensile strength was as predictive of CVD as increased SBP [174]. This association between lower prehensile strength and cardiovascular risk factors occurs from childhood [175]. In support of the results of these epidemiological studies, studies have shown that resistance training, the most powerful stimulus for the development of muscular strength, reduces the incidence of DM2. The SLIM study [176,177] reported a reduction of 18% in the cumulative incidence of DM2 in the intervention group, which included access to a combination aerobic and resistance training program. Currently, there are no data on this intervention in the Latin American population, although a study in young Colombian adults with excess weight observed an improvement in insulin sensitivity in the group of individuals undergoing weight training [177].

In addition, it has been shown that in children, the greatest muscle strength is associated with lower BP levels [171], and in individuals with hypertension it has been shown that both aerobic training and strength training are well tolerated and effective in reducing BP, with mean reductions of 11/5 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) after moderate-to-high intensity training, and with minor but significant effects using dynamic strength training, whereas isometric activity results in a reduction in BP similar to or greater than that observed with aerobic training [178–181].

In low-income and middle-income countries where, because of fetal programming and nutritional deficiencies during the early stages of life, the PURE study showed a higher prevalence of lower muscle mass and strength, with clear regional and country differences that made it necessary to establish differentiated reference ranges [182]. Therefore, avoiding sarcopenia is essential, and we recommend an increase in strength training and protein intake, which can significantly reduce the loss of muscle mass during the negative energy balance. In addition, after high protein diets, a decrease in HbA1c has been reported as has a trend to BP reduction in people with DM2, without adverse effects on blood lipids [183].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Environmental pollution

More than 90% of the world's population is exposed to pollution levels that exceed the WHO air quality guidelines, which recommend a level of good quality air environments of less than 10 μg/m3 of particulate pollutants [184–186]. The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health [187] and the Global Burden of Disease [188,189] estimate that diseases caused by all forms of pollution were responsible for 9 million deaths in 2015, more than those attributed to obesity, alcoholism, traffic accidents, child or maternal malnutrition, and of the combination of AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, and being surpassed only by hypertension and the combination of all nutritional factors.

The most worrisome environmental pollutants are volatile organic compounds and nanoparticles less than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5). Recent calculations estimate that 3.15 million deaths per year are attributable to PM2.5, which places environmental pollution among the top 10 risk factors for global mortality [187–189]. More than half the health burden of these particles is related to cardiovascular disease, and it has been shown that exposure to PM2.5 increases the risk of AMI, hospitalizations and deaths because of heart failure, stroke and arrhythmias [190–194].

Inhalation of PM2.5 can trigger acute elevations in BP over the subsequent hours or days, and long-term exposure can lead to an increase of 13% in the risk of new cases of hypertension [195–199]. PM2.5 and other environmental pollutants can worsen insulin resistance and promote DM2 [200–202]. Although most studies have been conducted in high-income countries, there is evidence that the situation in Latin America is similar [202–208]. This information shows that, in addition to changes in diet and physical activity to prevent hypertension, DM2 and CVD, it is the responsibility of Latin American governments to take measures to reduce environmental pollution through environmental protection agencies.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Smoking continues to be one of the main avoidable causes of morbidity and mortality, with almost six million deaths each year worldwide because of diseases associated with smoking [189]. The recent meeting of the Working Group of the European-Latin American Respiratory Diseases Society held in Madrid showed that Latin America is making progress in smoking control [209], but that it is still necessary to increase the strictness of antismoking laws, increase taxes on cigarettes and develop alternative packaging plans. In Latin America, the results of smoking control programs have been reported in recent years [210–226], with excellent results obtained in Uruguay, Brazil, Chile and Panama through actions, such as the prohibition of smoking in public places, the imposition of high taxes and the inclusion of large warnings on cigarette packages, all agreed with the active participation of the leaders of governments, including, in Uruguay, the direct participation of the President of the Republic. Unfortunately, the same does not occur in other countries of the region, such as Argentina, Peru, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. The PURE study analyzed this situation in 12 953 adults from countries that ratified the international reference framework for smoking control, and found that the implementation of control policies is weak, especially in the lower income countries, and that the possibilities of quitting smoking are greater when antismoking measure are effective, social acceptance of smoking is lower and knowledge of the health damage is greater [227]. The implementation of these actions throughout Latin America is crucial to combat the increase not only in the incidence of cancer and CVD, whose association with smoking is well described, but also of DM2, as demonstrated by a recent meta-analysis of 88 prospective studies that involved almost six million participants and 295 446 new cases of DM2. This study showed that, compared with those who never smoked, the increaser in relative risk was 37% in active smokers, 14% in ex-smokers and 22% in nonsmokers with passive exposure. In addition, it was shown that the relationship is dose-dependent and it is estimated that 11.7% of cases of DM2 in men and 2.4% in women were attributable to smoking, equivalent to 27.8 million cases of diabetes worldwide. There is no doubt that efforts to reduce smoking will have a significant effect on the global burden of DM2 [228], and that the weight gain associated with smoking cessation does not affect the benefits of reducing cardiovascular and all-cause mortality [229].

Back to Top | Article Outline


Metabolic syndrome alone does not justify pharmacological treatment, as it is not considered a disease, but an agglomeration of different risk factors. Therefore, it is necessary to treat each of its constituents separately but at the same time [230]. As already discussed in the previous points, weight reduction, increased regular physical activity, reduced alcohol intake, smoking cessation, moderation of sodium intake, increased potassium consumption through greater fruit and vegetable intake and an adequate balance in the consumption of macronutrients are some of the important lifestyle changes recommended. By modifying these factors, the response to pharmacological treatment is improved and overall cardiovascular risk is reduced. In patients with diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome , the initiation of early antihypertensive treatment and BP control improve the survival and prognosis of cardiometabolic diseases [231,232], reducing the residual risk. The benefit is even greater than that attributable to the benefit of reaching glycemic and metabolic goals [233]. Therefore, treatment should be started as soon as BP is greater than 140/90 mmHg [234] and the goals are to reach less than 140/90 mmHg, and as far as possible to achieve less than 130/80 mmHg [235,236], which is associated with a decrease in the risk of coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents and deterioration of renal function [237–243] (Table 5).



On the basis of various clinical studies, the Consensus recommends starting with combination treatment in a single pill (SPC), with the drugs of choice in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome being renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, either and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), combined with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a thiazide-like diuretic, such as indapamide at low doses (DIU). If this dual treatment fails, triple (RAS and CCB combined with DIU) or quadruple treatment should be used (Fig. 3). Numerous studies show that combined therapy with two pharmacological groups is required in 50–70% of patients to achieve the goals [244,245]. One aspect to be considered is the antihypertensive effect of some hypoglycemic drug groups, particularly sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors [246], and therefore, BP should be carefully monitored in patients already receiving antihypertensive therapy, who should eventually be prescribed these antihypertensive drugs to avoid the sum of the effects and severe symptomatic hypotension.



Very low awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the population in general, and particularly, in patients with metabolic syndrome and DM2 [247,248] is a serious problem, as 95% do not have controlled BP even though the number of antihypertensive drugs used is higher in patients with DM2 and metabolic syndrome . The benefit of antihypertensive treatment in risk reduction is only achieved when it starts as soon as possible, and goals are reached quickly and are maintained lifelong, in order to avoid accelerating vascular damage [249]. In a critical reassessment of controlled and randomized studies of the effect of BP reduction in hypertensive patients, Zanchetti et al. showed the divergence between international medical societies in establishing a BP value that justify interventions and setting the goals that must be achieved to obtain a greater reduction in major cardiovascular outcomes [250]. However, it is clear that the earlier pharmacological intervention is implemented and the management of all risk factors is addressed, the easier it is to prevent or halt the pathogenic process leading to cardiovascular diseases [251]. In addition, and considering that one in four hypertensive patients has DM2 [252,253] and that the administration of statins to these patients increases the prevention of cardiovascular events by almost double, as shown by the HOPE-3 study [254–256], the recommendation of this Consensus is to use two antihypertensive medications, a statin and metformin as initial treatment. However, although antihypertensive and hypoglycemic drugs are listed as essential medicines by the WHO [257], availability and access to them are limited in medium-income and low-income countries, as shown by the PURE study [258–261]. Although at least one antihypertensive drug was available in 90% of the pharmacies surveyed, the availability of two or more drugs was lower in medium-income and low-income countries and, given the economic conditions, access was also low because of the high costs relative to the low ability to pay of most households in these countries. As with hypertension, many people with DM2 remain unidentified, untreated or inadequately treated, especially in the lowest income countries, despite the existence of easy screening tests and effective medications [262]. The availability of and access to essential medicines to treat DM2 was very low in poor countries, both in terms of availability in pharmacies and the unattainable costs for the large majority. Thus, metformin was available in 100% and insulin in 94% of pharmacies in high-income countries, but only in 65 and 10%, respectively, of pharmacies in low-income countries. Although only 0.7% of households with diabetic patients in high-income countries cannot afford to buy metformin, this rises to 26.9% in poor countries. Access is even worse for insulin, with 63% of households in poor countries unable to buy it.

Therefore, in order to improve the control of hypertension and DM2, it is essential that Latin American health systems guarantee availability and access to a core group of basic medicines, and that standardized treatment algorithms should be introduced, as previously proposed by LASH [244,245] and the WHO/PAHO [263–267]. This strategy is currently being piloted within the HEARTS program in Barbados, Cuba, Colombia and Chile [268], based on the positive experience obtained in other programs [269,270].

Back to Top | Article Outline


Adherence to long-term treatment is defined as the degree of adherence to pharmacological treatment, and following a diet and/or the adoption of lifestyle changes that correspond to the recommendations agreed with the physician or other health professionals. Many reasons why patients abandon treatment have been evaluated. Table 6 shows the main causes of nonadherence to prescribed treatments [271].



The use of polypharmacy and the dosing frequency is one of the factors that most influence treatment abandonment, and it has been shown that patients are more adherent to treatment if they take a single tablet instead of several a day [272]. Among the different strategies proposed to increase adherence, combination of different basic drugs in a single pill (polypill) to treat different risk cardiovascular factors (hypertension and dyslipidemia) makes the patient much more adherent to medical treatment than when they must take several a day. The simplification of the therapeutic regimen is accompanied by better results in terms of therapeutic adherence and, as a consequence, a greater control of cardiovascular risk factors, both in primary prevention [273,274] and in secondary prevention [275], and has been shown to be cost effective [276]. The only available polypill in Latin America providing careful in-vitro and in-vivo studies which have shown the safety, tolerability and bioequivalence of all its components with the drugs given separately combine ramipril, atorvastatin and aspirine [277]. This polypill was obtained by research conducted in Spain from the Centro Nacional de Investigationes Cardiovasculares (CNIC) in collaboration with Ferrer International, and approved in 2014 by the European Medical Agency for use in secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adult patients. Considering all these reasons, the Consensus recommends the use of the currently available polypill containing ramipril, atorvastatin and aspirin for patients in secondary cardiovascular prevention and in high-risk cardiovascular patients with indication of aspirin in the therapeutic regimen, such as patients with hypertension and DM2 (Table 7).



Back to Top | Article Outline


Latin American Society of Hypertension (LASH) Consensus Expert Group

Chairs: Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo (Colombia), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil)

Coordinators: Dora Ines Molina (Colombia), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina)

Advisors: Alberto Zanchetti (Italy), Antonio Coca (Spain), Carlos Morillo (Canada), Gianfranco Parati (Italia), Vicente Lahera (Spain)


Chair: Margarita Diaz (Uruguay)

Coordinator: Paul Antony Camacho (Colombia)

Members: Jose Ortellado (Paraguay)

Carlos Calderon (Colombia)

Segundo Seclen (Peru)


Chair: Fernando Lanas (Chile)

Coordinator: Miguel Pasquel (Ecuador)

Members: Ana Isabel Barrientos (Honduras)

Carlos Meza Galo (Honduras)


Chair: José Luis Accini (Colombia)

Coordinator: Carlos Ponte (Venezuela)

Members: Isaac Sinay (Argentina)

Alfonso Bryce (Perú)

Gustavo Aroca (Colombia)

Miguel Urina (Colombia)


Chair: Luis Alcocer (Mexico)

Coordinator: Leonardo Cobos (Chile)

Members: Joffre Lara (Ecuador)

Livia Machado (Venezuela)

Raul Villar (Chile)


Chairman: Fernando Wyss (Guatemala)

Coordinator: Weimar Sebba-Barroso (Brazil)

Members: Vladimir Ulluari (Ecuador)

Gregorio Sanchez (Colombia)

Osiris Valdez (Dominican Republic)

Enrique Gomez-Alvarez (Mexico)

Daniel Mantilla-Garcia (Colombia)

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. WHO. Chronic disease - mortality. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014; 24.
2. Schargrodsky H, Hernández-Hernández R, Champagne BM, Silva H, Vinueza R, Ayçaguer LCS, et al. CARMELA Study Investigators. CARMELA: assessment of cardiovascular risk in seven Latin American cities. Am J Med 2008; 121:58–65.
3. Peña MSB, Abdala CVM, Silva LC, Ordúñez P. Usefulness for surveillance of hypertension prevalence studies in Latin America and the Caribbean: the past 10 years. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2012; 32:15–21.
4. Rivera-Andrade A, Luna MA. Trends and heterogeneity of cardiovascular disease and risk factors across Latin American and Caribbean countries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 57:276–285.
5. López-Jaramillo P, Sánchez RA, Diaz M, Cobos L, Bryce A, Parra Carrillo JZ, et al. Latin America Expert Group. Latin American consensus of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. J Hypertens 2013; 31:223–238.
6. Task Force of the Latin American Society of Hypertension. Guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension and related comorbidities in Latin America. J Hypertens 2017; 35:1529–1545.
7. Teo K, Chow CK, Vaz M, Rangarajan S, Yusuf S. PURE Investigators-Writing Group. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Am Heart J 2009; 158:1–7.
8. Chow CK, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Gupta R, Avezum A, et al. PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) Study investigators. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. JAMA 2013; 310:959–968.
9. Palafox B, Goryakin Y, Stuckler D, Suhrcke M, Balabanova D, Alhabib KF, et al. Does greater individual social capital improve the management of hypertension? Cross-national analysis of 61 229 individuals in 21 countries. BMJ Clob Health 2017; 2:e000443.
10. Miranda JJ, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Smeeth L, Gilman RH, Checkley W. Cronicas Cohort Study Group. Addressing geographical variation in the progression of noncommunicable diseases in Peru: the CRONICAS cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 2012; 2:e000610.
11. Rubinstein AL, Irazola VE, Poggio R, Bazzano L, Calandrelli M, Zanetti FTL, et al. Detection and follow-up of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in the Southern Cone of Latin America: the CESCAS I study. BMJ Open 2011; 1:e000126.
12. Camacho PA, Gomez-Arbelaez D, Molina DI, Sanchez G, Arcos E, Narvaez C, et al. Social disparities explain differences in hypertension prevalence, detection and control in Colombia. J Hypertens 2016; 34:2344–2352.
13. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas. 8th ed.Brussels(Belgium): International Diabetes Federation; 2017.
14. Gómez Dantés H, Castro MV, Franco-Marina F, Bedregal P, Rodríguez-García JR, Espinoza A, et al. Red de Investigación sobre Carga de Enfermedad del Observatorio de Salud. Iniciativa para América [Burden of disease in Latin America]. Salud Publica Mez 2011; 53:s72–s77.
15. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Blood Glucose). National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2· 7 million participants. Lancet 2011; 378:31–40.
16. Barceló A, Aedo C, Rajpathak S, Robles S. The cost of diabetes in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81:19–27.
17. Arredondo A, De Icaza E. The cost of diabetes in Latin America: evidence from Mexico [Spanish]. Value Health 2011; 14 (5 Suppl 1):S85–S88.
18. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Lahera V, Lopez-Lopez J. Epidemic of cardiometabolic diseases: a Latin American point of view. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 5:119–131.
19. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Gomez-Arbelaez D, Sotomayor-Rubio A, Mantilla-Garcia D, Lopez-Lopez J. Maternal undernutrition and cardiometabolic disease: a Latin American perspective. BMC Med 2015; 13:41.
20. Hill J, Nielsen M, Fox MH. Understanding the social factors that contribute to diabetes: a means to informing healthcare and social policies for the chronically ill. Perm J 2013; 17:67–72.
21. Wong-McClure RA, Gregg EW, Barceló A, Lee K, Abarca-Gómez L, Sanabria-López L, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Central America: a cross-sectional population-based study. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2015; 38:202–208.
22. Pan American Health Organization. The Central America Diabetes Initiative (CAMDI): survey of diabetes, hypertension and chronic disease risk factors. Belize, San José, San Salvador, Guatemala City, Managua and Tegucigalpa. Washington DC: PAHO; 2011.
23. Isomaa BO, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsén B, Lahti K, Nissén M, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001; 24:683–689.
24. Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard DE, Erwin PJ, Gami LA, Somers VK, Montori VM. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:403–414.
25. Collaboration NCDRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19· 2 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387:1377–1396.
26. Caleyachetty R, Thomas GN, Toulis KA, Mohammed N, Gokhale KM, Balachandran K, Nirantharakumar K. Metabolically healthy obese and incident cardiovascular disease events among 3.5 million men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70:1429–1437.
27. Secretaria de Gobernacion de Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Diario Oficial de la Federeración. [Internet]. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-008-SSA3-2017, Para el tratamiento integral del sobrepeso y la obesidad. 2018 [cited 2 October 2018]. Available at:
28. Secretaria de Gobernacion de Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Diario Oficial de la Federeración. [Internet]. PROYECTO de Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-030-SSA2-2017, Para la prevención, detección, diagnóstico, tratamiento y control de la hipertensión arterial sistémica. 2017 [cited 2 October 2018]. Available at:
29. Romero-Velarde E, Aguirre-Salas LM, Álvarez-Román YA, Vásquez-Garibay EM, Casillas-Toral E, Fonseca-Reyes S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and associated factors in children and adolescents with obesity. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2016; 54:568–575.
30. Núñez AB, Sandoval FM, Babio N, Vizmanos B. Metabolic syndrome components in young health professionals; LATIN America METabolic Syndrome (LATINMETS) Mexico study. Nutr Hosp 2018; 35:864–873.
31. Gutiérrez-Solis AL, Datta Banik S, Méndez-González RM. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in mexico: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2018; 16:395–405.
32. Casapulla SL, Howe CA, Mora GR, Berryman D, Grijalva MJ, Rojas EW, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factors, metabolic syndrome and prediabetes in adolescents in the Sierra region of Ecuador. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2017; 9:24.
33. Nieto-Martínez R, Marulanda MI, González-Rivas JP, Ugel E, Durán M, Barengo N, et al. Cardio-Metabolic Health Venezuelan Study (EVESCAM): design and implementation. Invest Clin 2017; 58:56–59.
34. Agredo-Zúñiga RA, Aguilar-de Plata C, Suárez-Ortegón MF. Waist: height ratio, waist circumference and metabolic syndrome abnormalities in Colombian schooled adolescents: a multivariate analysis considering located adiposity. Br J Nutr 2015; 114:700–705.
35. de Carvalho Vidigal F, Ribeiro AQ, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J, Bressan J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and premetabolic syndrome in health professionals: LATINMETS Brazil study. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2015; 7:6.
36. Rubinstein AL, Irazola VE, Calandrelli M, Elorriaga N, Gutierrez L, Lanas F, et al. Multiple cardiometabolic risk factors in the Southern Cone of Latin America: a population-based study in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Int J Cardiol 2015; 183:82–88.
37. de Carvalho Vidigal F, Bressan J, Babio N, Salas-Salvadó J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:1198.
38. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 1998; 6 (Suppl 2):51S–209S.
39. Alberti K, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; Hational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009; 120:1640–1645.
40. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report on a WHO Consultation (WHO Technical Report Series 894). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
41. López-Jaramillo P, Coca A, Sánchez R, Zanchetti A. Latin American Society of Hypertension. Hypertension guidelines: is it time to reappraise blood pressure thresholds and targets? Position statement of the Latin American Society of Hypertension. Hypertension 2016; 68:257–262.
42. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. on behalf of the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2018; 36:1953–2041.
43. Dagenais GR, Gerstein HC, Zhang X, McQueen M, Lear S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, et al. Variations in diabetes prevalence in low-, middle-,and high-income countries. Results from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:780–787.
44. World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006; Geneva: World Health Organization, 1–46.
45. World Health Organization. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Abbreviated report of a WHO consultation. 2011; Geneva: World Health Organization, 1–25.
46. Gomez-Arbelaez D, Alvarado-Jurado L, Ayala-Castillo M, Forero-Naranjo L, Camacho PA, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Colombian population: a longitudinal observational study. World J Diabetes 2015; 6:1337–1344.
47. López-Jaramillo P, Velandia-Carrillo C, Gómez-Arbeláez D, Aldana-Campos M. Is the present cut-point to define type 2 diabetes appropriate in Latin-Americans? World J Diabetes 2014; 5:747–755.
48. López-Jaramillo P, Calderón C, Castillo J, Escobar ID, Melgarejo E, Parra GA. Prediabetes in Colombia: expert consensus. Colomb Med (Cali) 2017; 48:191–203.
49. López-Jaramillo P, Nieto-Martínez RE, Aure-Fariñez G, Mendivil CO, Lahsen RA, Silva-Filho RL, et al. Identification and management of prediabetes: results of the Latin America Strategic Prediabetes Meeting. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2017; 41:e172.
50. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:S1.
51. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas. 7th ed.Brussels (Belgium): International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
52. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin. NEJM 2002; 346:393–403.
53. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1343–1350.
54. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V, et al. Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme (IDPP). The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia 2006; 49:289–297.
55. Lopez-Jaramillo P. Defining the research priorities to fight the burden of cardiovascular diseases in Latin America. J Hypertens 2008; 26:1886–1889.
56. Huang Y, Cai X, Mai W, Li M, Hu Y. Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 355:i5953.
57. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, Matsushita K, Wagenknecht L, Pankow J, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:800–811.
58. Gomez-Arbelaez D, Sánchez-Vallejo G, Perez M, Garcia RG, Arguello JF, Peñaherrera E, et al. Hiperglucemia se asocia a mayor número de desenlaces adversos en individuos latinoamericanos con infarto agudo de miocardio. Clin Investig Arterioscler 2016; 28:9–18.
59. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363:157–163.
60. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Pradilla LP, Castillo VR, Lahera V. Patología socioeconómica como causa de las diferencias regionales en las prevalencias de síndrome metabólico e hipertensión inducida por el embarazo. Rev española Cardiol 2007; 60:168–178.
61. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2017 (LC/PUB.2017/17-P), Santiago; 2017.
62. Everson-Rose SA, Roetker NS, Lutsey PL, Kershaw KN, Longstreth WTJJr, Sacco RL, et al. Chronic stress, depressive symptoms, anger, hostility, and risk of stroke and transient ischemic attack in the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2014; 45:2318–2323.
63. Costa de Robert S, Barontini M, Forcada P, Carrizo P, Almada L. Estrés psicosocial y baja resiliencia, un factor de riesgo de hipertensión arterial. Rev Argent Cardiol 2010; 78:425–431.
64. Hilmers A, Bernabé-Ortiz A, Gilman RH, McDermott AY, Smeeth L, Miranda JJ. Rural-to-urban migration: socioeconomic status but not acculturation was associated with overweight/obesity risk. J Immigr Minor Health 2016; 18:644–651.
65. Brunner EJ, Marmot MG, Nanchahal K, Shipley MJ, Stansfeld SA, Juneja M, Alberti KG. Social inequality in coronary risk: central obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Evidence from the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia 1997; 40:1341–1349.
66. Lanas F, Avezum A, Bautista LE, Diaz R, Luna M, Islam S, Yusuf S. INTERHEART Investigators in Latin America. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in Latin America: the INTERHEART Latin American study. Circulation 2007; 115:1067–1074.
67. O’Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. INTERSTROKE investigators. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet 2016; 388:761–775.
68. Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, et al. PURE Investigators. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:818–827.
69. Miranda JJ, Gilman RH, Smeeth L. Differences in cardiovascular risk factors in rural, urban and rural-to-urban migrants in Peru. Heart 2011; 97:787–796.
70. Legido-Quigley H, Lopez PAC, Balabanova D, Perel P, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Patients’ knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and healthcare experiences on the prevention, detection, management and control of hypertension in Colombia: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122112.
71. Sanchez RA, Ayala M, Baglivo H, Velazquez C, Burlando G, Kohlmann O, et al. Latin American guidelines on hypertension. J Hypertens 2009; 27:905–922.
72. Miller V, Yusuf S, Chow CK, Dehghan M, Corsi DJ, Lock K, et al. Availability, affordability, and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries across income levels: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet Glob Heal 2016; 4:e695–e703.
73. Miller V, Mente A, Dehghan M, Rangarajan S, Zhang X, Swaminathan S, et al. Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017; 390:2037–2049.
74. Dehghan M, Mente A, Zhang X, Swaminathan S, Li W, Mohan V, et al. Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017; 390:2050–2062.
75. Dehghan M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, Sheridan P, Mohan V, Iqbal R, et al. Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2018; 392:2288–2297.
76. Mente A, Dehghan M, Rangarajan S, McQueen M, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A, et al. Association of dietary nutrients with blood lipids and blood pressure in 18 countries: a cross-sectional analysis from the PURE study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5:774–787.
77. López-Jaramillo P, Otero J, Camacho PA, Baldeón M, Fornasini M. Reevaluating nutrition as a risk factor for cardio-metabolic diseases. Colomb Med (Cali) 2018; 49:175–181.
78. López-Jaramillo P. Cardiometabolic disease in Latin America: the role of fetal programming in response to maternal malnutrition. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62:670–676.
79. López-Jaramillo P, Silva SY, Rodríguez-Salamanca N, Duran A, Mosquera W, Castillo V. Are nutrition-induced epigenetic changes the link between socioeconomic pathology and cardiovascular diseases? Am J Ther 2008; 15:362–372.
80. Dégano IR, Marrugat J, Grau M, Salvador-González B, Ramos R, Zamora A, et al. The association between education and cardiovascular disease incidence is mediated by hypertension, diabetes, and body mass index. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12370.
81. Reimers F. Education and poverty in Latin America. Can schools make any difference? DRClass News. Harvard University. 1999, pp. 3–5.
82. Bassanesi SL, Azambuja MI, Achutti A. Premature mortality due to cardiovascular disease and social inequalities in Porto Alegre: from evidence to action. Arq Bras Cardiol 2008; 90:370–379.
83. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, Clavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, et al. US Renal Data System 2012 Annual Data Report. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61 (1 Suppl 1):A7e1-476.
84. Lizcano F. Composicion etnica de las Tres areas Culturales del Continente Americano al Comienzo del Siglo XXI. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales 2005; 38:185–232.
85. Flack JM, Sica DA, Bakris G, Brown AL, Ferdinand KC, Grimm RHJJr, et al. Management of high blood pressure in blacks. An update of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks Consensus Statement on behalf of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks. Hypertension 2010; 56:780–800.
86. Urina-Triana M, Urina-Jassir D, Urina-Jassir M, Urina-Triana M. Consideraciones especiales de la hipertensión arterial sistémica en afrodescendientes de América latina. Rev Latinoam Hipertens 2017; 12:151–160.
87. López-Jaramillo P, González-Gómez S, Otero J, Camacho P. Ethnic differences in awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Colombia. J Hypertens 2017; 35:e187.
88. Rodriguez F, Ferdinand KC. Hypertension in minority populations: new guidelines and emerging concepts. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2015; 22:145–153.
89. Corbin DO, Poddar V, Hennis A, Gaskin A, Rambarat C, Wilks R, et al. Incidence and case fatality rates of first- ever stroke in a black Caribbean population: the Barbados Register of Strokes. Stroke 2004; 35:1254–1258.
90. Whincup PH, Nightingale CM, Owen CG, Rapala A, Bhowruth DJ, Prescott MH, et al. Ethnic differences in carotid intima- media thickness between UK children of black African- Caribbean and white European origin. Stroke 2012; 43:1747–1754.
91. Jones DW, Hall JE. Racial and ethnic differences in blood pressure: biology and sociology. Circulation 2006; 114:2757–2759.
92. Agyemang C, Humphry RW, Bhopal R. Divergence with age in blood pressure in African- Caribbean and white populations in England: implications for screening for hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25:89–96.
93. Berry-Caban CS, Sanders L, Adeboye OO. Self-reported hypertension on a Caribbean island. J Clin Med Res 2009; 1:17–23.
94. Bidulescu A, Francis DK, Ferguson TS, Bennett NR, Hennis AJ, Wilks R, et al. U.S. Caribbean Alliance for Health Disparities Research Group (USCAHDR). Disparities in hypertension among black Caribbean populations: a scoping review by the U.S. Caribbean Alliance for Health Disparities Research Group (USCAHDR). Int J Equity Health 2015; 14:125.
95. Ordúñez P, Kaufman JS, Benet M, Morejon A, Silva LC, Shoham DA, Cooper RS. Blacks and whites in the Cuba have equal prevalence of hypertension: confirmation from a new population survey. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:169.
96. Brewster LM, Seedat YK. Why do hypertensive patients of African ancestry respond better to calcium blockers and diuretics than to ACE inhibitors and β-adrenergic blockers? A systematic review. BMC Med 2013; 11:141.
97. Colgrove P, Connell KL, Lackland DT, Ordunez P, DiPette DJ. Controlling hypertension and reducing its associated morbidity and mortality in the Caribbean: implications of race and ethnicity. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017; 19:1010–1014.
98. Reid G. Afro-Latinoamerica 1800-2000. Editorial Iberoamericana Vervuert (Madrid, Espana) 2007. ISBN: 9788484893097.
99. Hainsworth R, Drinkhill MJ. Cardiovascular adjustments for life at high altitude. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2007; 158:204–211.
100. Hansen J, Sander M. Sympathetic neural overactivity in healthy humans after prolonged exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. J Physiol 2003; 546 (Pt 3):921–929.
101. Bernabé-Ortiz A, Carrillo-Larco RM, Gilman RH, Miele CH, Checkley W, Wells JC, et al. CRONICAS Cohort Study Group. Geographical variation in the progression of type 2 diabetes in Peru: The CRONICAS Cohort Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016; 121:135–145.
102. Seclen SN, Rosas ME, Arias AJ, Medina CA. Elevated incidence rates of diabetes in Peru: report from PERUDIAB, a national urban population-based longitudinal study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017; 5:e000401.
103. Negi PC, Bhardwaj R, Kandoria A, Asotra S, Ganju N, Marwaha R, et al. Epidemiological study of hypertension in natives of Spiti Valley in Himalayas and impact of hypobaric hypoxemia; a cross-sectional study. J Assoc Physicians India 2012; 60:21–25.
104. Lei S, Yong-Yong X, Xiao-Han D, Chang-Sheng C. Geographical difference in blood pressure of male youth aged 17-21 years in China. Blood Press 2004; 13:169–175.
105. Parati G, Ochoa JE, Torlasco C, Salvi P, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Aging, high altitude, and blood pressure: a complex relationship. High Alt Med Biol 2015; 16:97–109.
106. Bilo G, Villafuerte FC, Faini A, Anza-Ramírez C, Revera M, Giuliano A, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure in untreated and treated hypertensive patients at high altitude: the High Altitude Cardiovascular Research-Andes study. Hypertension 2015; 65:1266–1272.
107. Parati G. HIGHCARE: the HIGH altitude CArdiovascular the Research study: a scientific expedition on Mount Everest to measure effects of altitude on blood pressure. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:260–261.
108. Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Fahimi S, Lim S, Andrews KG, et al. Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group NutriCoDE. Global, regional, and national consumption levels of dietary fats and oils in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys. BMJ 2014; 348:g2272.
109. Monteiro CA, Moubarac J, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B. Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 2013; 14:21–28.
110. Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, et al. Lancet NCD Action Group. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet 2013; 381:670–679.
111. Euromonitor International., 2014. [Accessed 21 March 2018]
112. Panagiotakos DB, Georgousopoulou EN, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Metaxa V, Georgiopoulos GA, et al. ATTICA Study group. Ten-year (2002-2012) cardiovascular disease incidence and all-cause mortality, in urban Greek population: the ATTICA Study. Int J Cardiol 2015; 180:178–184.
113. de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1999; 99:779–785.
114. Esposito K, Kastorini CM, Panagiotakos DB, Giugliano D. Mediterranean diet and metabolic syndrome: an updated systematic review. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2013; 14:255–263.
115. Kastorini CM, Milionis HJ, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Goudevenos JA, Panagiotakos DB. The effect of Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome and its components: a meta-analysis of 50 studies and 534,906 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:1299–1313.
116. Fornasini M, Castro J, Villacrés E, Narváez L, Villamar MP, Baldeón ME. Hypoglycemic effect of Lupinus mutabilis in healthy volunteers and subjects with dysglycemia. Nutr Hosp 2012; 27:425–433.
117. Munoz EB, Luna-Vital DA, Fornasini M, Baldeon ME, de Mejia EG. Gamma-conglutin peptides from Andean lupin legume (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) enhanced glucose uptake and reduce gluconeogenesis in vitro. J Funct Foods 2018; 45:339–347.
118. O’Donnell M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, McQueen M, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A< ET-AL>. PURE Investigators. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion, mortality, and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:612–623.
119. Mente A, O’Donnell MJ, Rangarajan S, McQueen MJ, Poirier P, Wielgosz A, et al. PURE Investigators. Association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with blood pressure. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:601–611.
120. Mente A, O’Donnell MJ, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A, Lear SA, McQueen MJ, et al. Validation and comparison of three formulae to estimate sodium and potassium excretion from a single morning fasting urine compared to 24-h measures in 11 countries. J Hypertens 2014; 32:1005–1014.
121. Mente A, O’Donnell M, Rangarajan S, Dagenais G, Lear S, McQueen M, et al. PURE, EPIDREAM and ONTARGET/TRANSCEND Investigators. Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies. Lancet 2016; 388:465–475.
122. Mente A, O’Donnell M, Rangarajan S, McQueen M, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A< ET-AL>. Urinary sodium excretion, blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: a community-level prospective epidemiological cohort study. Lancet 2018; 392:496–506.
123. INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. INTERSALT: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 h urinary sodium and potassium excretion. BMJ 1988; 297:319–328.
124. Stamler J, Chan Q, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, Van Horn L, Garside DB, et al. INTERMAP Research Group. Relation of dietary sodium (salt) to blood pressure and its possible modulation by other dietary factors: the INTERMAP study. Hypertension 2018; 71:631–637.
125. Graudal N, Jürgens G, Baslund B, Alderman MH. Compared with usual sodium intake, low- and excessive-sodium diets are associatedwith increased mortality: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2014; 27:1129–1137.
126. Cook NR, Appel LJ, Whelton PK. Sodium intake and all-cause mortality over 20 years in the Trials of Hypertension Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68:1609–1617.
127. Liu ZM, Ho SC, Tang N, Chan R, Chen YM, Woo J. Urinary sodium excretion and dietary sources of sodium intake in Chinese postmenopausal women with prehypertension. PLoS One 2014; 9:e104018.
128. van der Stouwe JG, Carmeli C, Aeschbacher S, Schoen T, Krisai P, Wenger G, et al. Association of 24-h blood pressure with urinary sodium excretion in healthy adults. Am J Hypertens 2018; 31:784–791.
129. Messerli FH, Rimoldi SF, Bangalore S. Salt, tomato soup, and the hypocrisy of the American Heart Association. Am J Med 2017; 130:392–393.
130. Messerli FH, Hofstetter L, Bangalore S. Salt and heart disease: a second round of ‘bad science’? Lancet 2018; 392:456–458.
131. Johnston I. Lancet attacked for publishing study claiming low-salt diet could kill you. Independent, 21 May 2016, p. 12.
132. American Heart Association. American Heart Association comment strongly refutes study findings on sodium consumption. 21 May 2016. Available at:
133. WHO. Guideline: sodium intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
134. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Sacco RL, Anderson CA, Antman EM, Campbell N, et al. Sodium, blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease: further evidence supporting the American Heart Association sodium reduction recommendations. Circulation 2012; 126:2880–2889.
135. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Lopez-Lopez J, Lopez-Lopez C. Sodium intake recommendations: a subject that needs to be reconsidered. Curr Hypertens Rev 2015; 11:8–13.
136. Jones DW, Luft FC, Whelton PK, et al. Can we end the salt wars with a randomized clinical trial in a controlled environment? Hypertension 2018; 72:10–11.
137. Frohlich ED, Zanchetti A. Antihypertensive therapy: safety and efficacy of drugs and publications. Hypertension 1996; 27 (3 Pt 1):317–318.
138. Pickering G. The nature of essential hypertension. London: Churchill; 1961.
139. Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos JA, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet 2016; 388:2665–2712.
140. Woo Baidal JA, Locks LM, Cheng ER, Blake-Lamb TL, Perkins ME, Taveras EM. Risk factors for childhood obesity in the first 1,000 days: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50:761–779.
141. Blake-Lamb TL, Locks LM, Perkins ME, Woo Baidal JA, Cheng ER, Taveras EM. Interventions for childhood obesity in the first 1,000 days a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50:780–789.
142. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Camacho PA, Forero-Naranjo L. The role of environment and epigenetics in hypertension. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013; 11:1455–1457.
143. Alimentos y bebidas Ultra procesados en América Latina: Tendencias, efectos sobre Obesidad e implicaciones para las políticas públicas. OPS, OMS 2015. Sitio Web: acceso Marzo 2018.
144. Poptin B, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4:174–186.
145. Manrique H, Pinto M, Sifuentes V. Etiquetado de alimentos y procesados; una herramienta necesaria para la educación alimentaria. Rev Pers Med Exp Salud Publica 2017; 34:571–572.
146. Ministerio de Salud Ecuador: Web site. access December 2017, and March 2018.
147. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México. Análisis de regulaciones y prácticas para el etiquetado de alimentos y bebidas para niños y adolescentes en algunos países de América Latina (Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica y México), recomendaciones para facilitar la información al consumidores de América Latina (Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica y México) y recomendaciones para facilitar la información al consumidor. November, 2016.
148. World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health, 2014. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
149. Sun K, Ren M, Liu D, Wang C, Yang C, Yan L. Alcohol consumption and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Clin Nutr 2014; 33:596–602.
150. Smyth A, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, O’Donnell M, Zhang X, Rana P, et al. PURE Investigators. Alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease, cancer, injury, admission to hospital, and mortality: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386:1945–1954.
151. Ponte-Negretti CI, Isea-Perez JE, Lorenzatti AJ, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Wyss-Q FS, Pintó X, et al. Atherogenic Dyslipidemia in Latin America: Prevalence, causes and treatment: Expert's position paper made by The Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids (ALALIP) Endorsed by the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC), the South American Society of Cardiology (SSC), the Pan-American College of Endothelium (PACE), and the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS). Int J Cardiol 2017; 243:516–522.
152. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major noncommunicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012; 380:219–229.
153. Milton K, Macniven R, Bauman A. Review of the epidemiological evidence for physical activity and health from low- and middle-income countries. Glob Pub Health 2014; 9:369–381.
154. Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, Gasevic D, Leong D, Iqbal R, et al. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet 2017; 390:2643–2654.
155. Saxena Y, Gupta R, Moinuddin A, Narwai R. Blood pressure reduction following accumulated physical activity in prehypertensives. J Family Med Prim Care 2016; 5:349–356.
156. Rubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea A, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Gutierrez L, et al. Effectiveness of an health intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban stings in Latin America: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4:52–63.
157. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, Houston Miller N, Hubbard VS, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:2985–3023.
158. Kraus WE, Bittner V, Appel L, Blair SN, Church T, Despres JP, et al. American Heart Association Physical Activity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Metabolic Health, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Hypertension, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. The National Physical Activity Plan: a call to action from the American Heart Association: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015; 131:1932–1940.
159. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. NEJM 2002; 346:393–404.
160. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1343–1350.
161. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V. Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme. The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia 2006; 49:289–297.
162. Kelly P, Kahlmeier S, Gotschi T, Orsini N, Richards J, Roberts N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014; 11:132.
163. Johnsen AM, Alfredsson L, Knutsson A, Westerholm PJ, Fransson EI. Association between occupational physical activity and myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012692.
164. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
165. Matthews CE, Jurj AL, Shu XO, Li HL, Yang G, Li Q, et al. Influence of exercise, walking, cycling, and overall nonexercise physical activity on mortality in Chinese women. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165:1343–1350.
166. Sabia S, Dugravot A, Kivimaki M, Brunner E, Shipley MJ, Singh-Manoux A. Effect of intensity and type of physical activity on mortality: results from the Whitehall II cohort study. Am J Public Health 2012; 102:698–704.
167. Hu G, Jousilahti P, Antikainen R, Tuomilehto J. Occupational, commuting, and leisure-time physical activity in relation to cardiovascular mortality among Finnish subjects with hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20:1242–1250.
168. Wu CY, Hu HY, Chou YC, Huang N, Chou YJ, Li CP. The association of physical activity with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortalities among older adults. Prev Med 2015; 72:23–29.
169. Bauman A, Bull F, Chey T, Craig CL, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, et al. IPS Group. The international prevalence study on physical activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009; 6:21.
170. Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet 2016; 388:1337–1348.
171. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Gonzalez-Gomez S, Vanstrahlen-Gonzales L, Zarate-Bernal D, DiStefano K, Camacho-Lopez P, Cohen D. The interaction between epigenetic, muscle, and cardiovascular diseases. Clinical Epigenetics 2015; 1:7.
172. Cohen DD, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Santos FJJr, Castro-Piñero J, Sandercock G. Muscle strength is associated with lower diastolic blood pressure in schoolchildren. Prev Med 2017; 95:1–6.
173. Lopez-Lopez J, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Camacho PA, Gomez-Arbelaez D, Cohen DD. The link between fetal programming, inflammation, muscular strength, and blood pressure. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015:710613.
174. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cohen DD, Gómez-Arbeláez D, Bosch J, Dyal L, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC. ORIGIN Trial Investigators. Association of handgrip strength to cardiovascular mortality in prediabetic and diabetic patients: a subanalysis of the ORIGIN trial. Int J Cardiol 2014; 172:458–461.
175. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum AJJr, Orlandini A, et al. Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study investigators. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 2015; 386:266–273.
176. Cohen DD, Gomez-Arbelaez D, Camacho PA, Pinzon S, Hormiga C, Trejos-Suarez J, et al. Low muscle strength is associated with metabolic risk factors in Colombian children: The ACFIES study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e93150.
177. Roumen C, Corpeleijn E, Feskens EJ, Mensink M, Saris WH, Blaak EE. Impact of 3-year lifestyle intervention on postprandial glucose metabolism: the SLIM study. Diabet Med 2008; 25:597–605.
178. Hernán Jiménez O, Ramírez-Vélez R. El entrenamiento con pesas mejora la sensibilidad a la insulina y los niveles plasmáticos de lípidos, sin alterar la composición corporal en sujetos con sobrepeso y obesidad. Endocrinol Nutr 2011; 58:169–174.
179. Wong A, Figueroa A, Son WM, Chernykh O, Park SY. The effects of stair climbing on arterial stiffness, blood pressure, and leg strength in postmenopausal women with stage 2 hypertension. Menopause 2018; 25:731–737.
180. Trevizani GA, Seixas MB, Benchimol-Barbosa PR, Vianna JM, da Silva LP, Nadal J. Effect of resistance training on blood pressure and autonomic responses in treated hypertensives. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32:1462–1470.
181. Crump C, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA, Sundquist K. Interactive effects of physical fitness and body mass index on the risk of hypertension. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:210–216.
182. Nascimento Dda C, Tibana RA, Benik FM, Fontana KE, Ribeiro Neto F, Santana FS, et al. Sustained effect of resistance training on blood pressure and hand grip strength following a detraining period in elderly hypertensive women: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging 2014; 9:219–225.
183. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Kutty VR, Lanas F, Hui C, et al. Reference ranges of handgrip strength from 125,462 healthy adults in 21 countries: a prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016; 7:535–546.
184. Mateo-Gallego R, Marco-Benedí V, Perez-Calahorra S, Bea AM, Baila-Rueda L, Lamiquiz-Moneo I, et al. Energy-restricted, high-protein diets more effectively impact cardiometabolic profile in overweight and obese women than lower-protein diets. Clin Nutr 2017; 36:371–379.
185. WHO. Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. 2016. Available at: [Accessed 17 April 2017]
186. WHO global urban ambient air pollution database. June 2017. Available at: [Accessed 18 July 2016]
187. WHO. Indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. Nov 12, 2014. [Accessed 15 May 2017]
188. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu N, et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018; 391:462–512.
189. GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388:1459–1544.
190. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease. Lancet 2016; 388:1659–1724.
191. Scheers H, Jacobs L, Casas L, Nemery B, Nawrot TS. Long-term exposure to particulate matter air pollution is a risk factor for stroke: meta-analytical evidence. Stroke 2015; 46:3058–3066.
192. Chin MT. Basic mechanisms for adverse cardiovascular events associated with air pollution. Heart 2015; 101:253–256.
193. Du Y, Xu X, Chu M, Guo Y, Wang J. Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: the epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:E8–E19.
194. Mustafić H, Jabre P, Caussin C, Murad MH, Escolano S, Tafflet M, et al. Main air pollutants and myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 307:713–721.
195. Gardner B, Ling F, Hopke PK, Frampton MW, Utell MJ, Zareba W, et al. Ambient fine particulate air pollution triggers ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but not non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a case-crossover study. Part Fibre Toxicol 2014; 11:1.
196. Bruno RM, Di Pilla M, Ancona C, Sørensen M, Gesi M, Taddei S, et al. Environmental factors and hypertension. Curr Pharm Des 2017; 23:3239–3246.
197. Bilenko N, Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Eeftens M, de Hoogh K, Hoek G, et al. Associations between particulate matter composition and childhood blood pressure--the PIAMA study. Environ Int 2015; 84:1–6.
198. Chan SH, Van Hee VC, Bergen S, Szpiro AA, DeRoo LA, London SJ, et al. Long-term air pollution exposure and blood pressure in the sister study. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123:951–958.
199. Bravo Alvarez H, Sosa Echeverria R, Sanchez Alvarez P, Krupa S. Air quality standards for particulate matter (PM) at high altitude cities. Environ Pollut 2013; 173:255–256.
200. Burroughs Peña M, Romero KM, Velazquez EJ, Davila-Roman VG, Gilman RH, Wise RA, et al. Relationship between daily exposure to biomass fuel smoke and blood pressure in high-altitude Peru. Hypertension 2015; 65:1134–1140.
201. Park SK, Wang W. Ambient air pollution and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of epidemiologic research. Curr Environ Health Rep 2014; 1:275–286.
202. Sohn D, Oh H. Gender-dependent differences in the relationship between diabetes mellitus and ambient air pollution among adults in South Korean cities. Iran J Public Health 2017; 46:293–300.
203. Haberzettl P, McCracken JP, Bhatnagar A, Conklin DJ. Insulin sensitizers prevent fine particulate matter-induced vascular insulin resistance and changes in endothelial progenitor cell homeostasis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2016; 310:H1423–H1438.
204. Bell ML, O’Neill MS, Ranjit N, Borja-Aburto VH, Cifuentes LA, Gouveia NC. Vulnerability to heat-related mortality in Latin America: a case-crossover study in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Santiago, Chile and Mexico City, Mexico. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37:796–804.
205. Young BN, Clark ML, Rajkumar S, Benka-Coker ML, Bachand A, Brook RD, et al. Exposure to household air pollution from biomass cookstoves and blood pressure among women in rural Honduras: a cross-sectional study. Indoor Air 2019; 29:130–142.
206. Fajersztajn L, Saldiva P, Pereira LAA, Leite VF, Buehler AM. Short-term effects of fine particulate matter pollution on daily health events in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health 2017; 62:729–738.
207. Riojas-Rodríguez H, da Silva AS, Texcalac-Sangrador JL, Moreno-Banda GL. Air pollution management and control in Latin America and the Caribbean: implications for climate change. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2016; 40:150–159.
208. Romieu I, Gouveia N, Cifuentes LA, de Leon AP, Junger W, Vera J, et al. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study). Res Rep Health Eff Inst 2012; 171:5–86.
209. Díaz-Suarez V, Paez-Perez C. Contaminacion por material particulado en Quito y caracterizacion quimica de las muestras. Acta Nova 2006; 3:308–322.
210. Burki TK. Latin America makes progress on tobacco control. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5:470.
211. Chin N, Dozier A, Quinones Z, Diaz S, Weber E, Almonte H, et al. A qualitative study of tobacco use in eight economically disadvantaged Dominican Republic communities. Glob Health Promot 2017; 24:23–32.
212. Niedzin M, Gaszyńska E, Krakowiak J, Saran T, Szatko F, Kaleta D. Gender, age, social disadvantage and quitting smoking in Argentina and Uruguay. Ann Agric Environ Med 2018; 25:100–107.
213. Morgan BW, Leifheit KM, Romero KM, Gilman RH, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Miranda JJ, et al. CRONICAS Cohort Study. Low cigarette smoking prevalence in peri-urban Peru: results from a population-based study of tobacco use by self-report and urine cotinine. Tob Induc Dis 2017; 15:32.
214. Tamí-Maury I, Silva-Vetri MG, Marcano-Caldera M, Baasch A, Prokhorov AV. Smoking behavior among third year dental students in Latin American countries: prevalence, perceptions, and risk factors. Salud Publica Mex 2017; 59 (Suppl 1):45–53.
215. Machado MPA, Opaleye DC, Pereira TV, Padilla I, Noto AR, Prince M, Ferri CP. Alcohol and tobacco consumption concordance and its correlates in older couples in Latin America. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17:1849–1857.
216. Mejia R, Pérez A, Peña L, Kollath-Cattano C, Morello P, Braun S, et al. Smoking in movies and adolescent smoking initiation: a longitudinal study among Argentinian adolescents. J Pediatr 2017; 180:222–228.
217. Ossip DJ, Quiñones Z, Diaz S, Thevenet-Morrison K, Fisher S, Holderness H, et al. Tobacco cessation in economically disadvantaged dominican republic communities: who are the ex-users? J Smok Cessat 2016; 11:239–249.
218. Guindon GE, Paraje GR, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of prices and taxes on the use of tobacco products in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2016; 40:272–284.
219. Bardach A, Perdomo HA, Gándara RA, Ciapponi A. Income and smoking prevalence in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2016; 40:263–271.
220. Pichon-Riviere A, Bardach A, Augustovski F, Alcaraz A, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Pinto MT, et al. Financial impact of smoking on health systems in Latin America: a study of seven countries and extrapolation to the regional level. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2016; 40:213–221.
221. Salgado MV, Mejía RM, Kaplan CP, Pérez-Stable EJ. Smoking-related attitudes and knowledge among medical students and recent graduates in argentina: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32:549–555.
222. Lozano P, Fleischer NL, Moore S, Shigematsu LM, Santillán EA, Thrasher JF. Does neighborhood social cohesion modify the relationship between neighborhood social norms and smoking behaviors in Mexico? Health Place 2016; 40:145–152.
223. Portes LH, Machado CV. WHO framework convention on tobacco control: adherence and establishment in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015; 38:370–379.
224. Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Fleischer NL, Thrasher JF, Zhang Y, Meza R, Cummings KM, Levy DT. Effects of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and tobacco-attributable deaths in Mexico: the SimSmoke model. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015; 38:316–325.
225. Sreeramareddy CT, Pradhan PM. Prevalence and social determinants of smoking in 15 countries from North Africa, Central and Western Asia, Latin America and Caribbean: secondary data analyses of demographic and health surveys. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130104.
226. Palloni A, Novak B, Pinto-Aguirre G. The enduring effects of smoking in Latin America. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:1246–1253.
227. Guindon GE, Paraje GR, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of prices and taxes on the use of tobacco products in Latin America and the Caribbean. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:e9–e19.
228. Chow CK, Corsi DJ, Gilmore AB, Kruger A, Igumbor E, Chifamba J, et al. Tobacco control environment: cross-sectional survey of policy implementation, social unacceptability, knowledge of tobacco health harms and relationship to quit ratio in 17 low-income, middle-income and high-income countries. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013817.
229. Pan A, Wang Y, Talaei M, Hu F, Wu T. Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3:958–967.
230. Hu Y, Zong G, Liu G, Wang M, Rosner B, Pan A, et al. Smoking cessation, weight change, type 2 diabetes, and mortality. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:623–632.
231. Rantala AO, Kauma H, Lilja M, Savolainen MJ, Reunanen A, Kesaniemi YA. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in drug-treated hypertensive patients and control subjects. J Intern Med 1999; 245:163–174.
232. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlof B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998; 351:1755–1762.
233. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998; 317:703–713.
234. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:383–393.
235. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Lopez-Lopez J, Lopez-Lopez C, Rodriguez-Alvarez MI. The goal of blood pressure in the hypertensive patient with diabetes is defined: now the goal is go from recommendations to practice. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2014; 6:31.
236. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Lobach I, Messerli FH. Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of randomized trials. Circulation 2011; 123:2799–2810.
237. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 2017; 35:922–944.
238. Assmann G, Schulte H. The Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study: prevalence of hyperlipidemia in persons with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus and the relationship to coronary heart disease. Am Heart J 1988; 116 (6 Pt 2):1713–1724.
239. Somaratne JB, Whalley GA, Poppe KK, ter Bals MM, Wadams G, Pearl A, et al. Screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the community. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2011; 10:29.
240. Govind S, Saha S, Brodin LA, Ramesh SS, Arvind SR, Quintana M. Impaired myocardial functional reserve in hypertension and diabetes mellitus without coronary artery disease: searching for the possible link with congestive heart failure in the myocardial Doppler in diabetes (MYDID) study II. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19:851–857.
241. Grossman E, Messerli FH, Goldbourt U. High blood pressure and diabetes mellitus: are all antihypertensive drugs created equal? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2447–2452.
242. Patel A. ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370:829–840.
243. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DCJJr, Grimm RHJJr, Cutler JA, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1575–1585.
244. Brunstrom M, Carlberg B. Effect of antihypertensive treatment at different blood pressure levels in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review an meta-analyses. BMJ 2016; 352:i717.
245. Coca A, López-Jaramillo P, Thomopoulos C, Zanchetti A. Latin American Society of Hypertension (LASH). Best antihypertensive strategies to improve blood pressure control in Latin America: position of the Latin American Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018; 36:208–220.
246. Gonzalez-Gomez S, Mélendez-Gomez M, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Fixed dose combination therapy to improve hypertension treatment and control in Latin America. Arch Cardiol Mex 2018; 88:129–135.
247. Sanchez RA, Sanabria H, de los Santos C, Ramirez AJ. Incretins and selective renal sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in hypertension and coronary heart disease. World J Diabetes 2015; 11:1186–1197.
248. Barrios V, Escobar C, Calderón A, Llisterri JL, Echarri R, Alegría E, et al. Blood pressure and lipid goal attainment in the hypertensive population in the primary care setting in Spain. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007; 9:324–329.
249. Kjeldsen SE, Naditch-Brule L, Perlini S, Zidek W, Farsang C. Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in uncontrolled hypertension across Europe: the Global Cardiometabolic Risk Profile in Patients with hypertension disease survey. J Hypertens 2008; 26:2064–2070.
250. Luana de Rezende M, Paiva AMG, Mota MS, Lima AL, Jardim PCS, Veiga V, et al. Envelhecimento Vascular e Rigidez Arterial. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 2017; 109:253–258.
251. Zanchetti A, Thomopoulos C, Parati G. Randomized controlled trials of blood pressure lowering in hypertension: a critical reappraisal. Cir Res 2015; 116:1058–1073.
252. Jardim TV, Inuzuka S, Galvão L, Negretto LAF, Oliveira RO, Wanessa Faria Sá WF, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with diabetes and hypertension: experience of a Brazilian center. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2018; 10:3.
253. Gress TW, Nieto FJ, Shahar E, Wofford MR, Brancati FL. Hypertension and antihypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:905–912.
254. Mancia G. The association of hypertension and diabetes: prevalence, cardiovascular risk and protection by blood pressure reduction. Acta Diabetol 2005; 42:17–25.
255. Lonn EM, Bosch J, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Zhu J, Liu L, Pais P, et al. Blood-pressure lowering in intermediate-risk persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2009–2020.
256. Yusuf S, Bosch J, Dagenais G, Zhu J, Xavier D, Liu L, et al. HOPE-3 Investigators. Cholesterol lowering in intermediate-risk persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2021–2031.
257. Yusuf S, Lonn E, Pais P, Bosch J, López-Jaramillo P, Zhu J, et al. HOPE-3 Investigators. Blood-pressure and cholesterol lowering in persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2032–2043.
258. WHO. The selection of essential drugs. 1977. Available at: [Accessed 20 September 2016]
259. Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Dagenais G, Diaz R, et al. Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study Investigators. Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet 2011; 378:1231–1243.
260. Khatib R, McKee M, Shannon H, Chow C, Rangarajan S, Teo K, et al. PURE study investigators. Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data. Lancet 2016; 387:61–69.
261. Attaei MW, Khatib R, McKee M, Lear S, Dagenais G, Igumbor EU, et al. PURE study investigators. Availability and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines and the effect on blood pressure control in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data. Lancet Public Health 2017; 2:e411–e419.
262. Chow CK, Ramasundarahettige C, Hu W, AlHabib KF, Avezum A Jr, Cheng X, et al. PURE investigators. Availability and affordability of essential medicines for diabetes across high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective epidemiological study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:798–808.
263. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390:1211–1259.
264. Ordunez P, Martinez R, Niebylski ML, Campbell NR. Hypertension prevention and control in Latin America and the Caribbean. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2015; 17:499–502.
265. Patel P, Ordunez P, DiPette D, Escobar MC, Hassell T, Wyss F, et al. Standardized Hypertension Treatment and Prevention Network. Improved blood pressure control to reduce cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: the Standardized Hypertension Treatment and Prevention Project. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2016; 18:1284–1294.
266. Ordunez P, Martinez Ramon, Niebylski M, Campbell NR. Hypertension prevention and control in Latin America and the Caribbean. J Clin Hypertens 2015; 17:499–502.
267. WHO. Fixed-dose combination antihypertensives. WHO. 2018. Available at: [Accessed 15 August 2018]
268. Patel P, Ordunez P, Connell K, Lackland D, DiPette D. Standardized Hypertension Treatment and Prevention Network. Standardized hypertension management to reduce cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality worldwide. South Med J 2018; 111:133–136.
269. WHO. HEARTS Technical Package. WHO. 2018. Available at: [Accessed 4 August 2018]
270. Jaffe MG, Young JD. The Kaiser Permanente Northern California story: improving hypertension control from 44% to 90% in 13 years (2000 to 2013). J Clin Hypertens 2016; 18:260–261.
271. Flack JM, Nasser SA. Benefits of once-daily therapies in the treatment of hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7:777–787.
272. Castellano JM, Copeland-Halperin R, Fuster V. Aiming at strategies for a complex problem of medical nonadherence. Glob Heart 2013; 8:263–271.
273. Huffman MD, Xavier D, Perel P. Uses of polypills for cardiovascular disease and evidence to date. Lancet 2017; 389:1055–1065.
274. Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, Mant J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182625.
275. López-Jaramillo P, González-Gómez S, Zarate-Bernal D, Serrano A, Atuesta L, Clausen C, et al. Polypill: an affordable strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention in low-medium-income countries. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2018; 12:169–174.
276. Castellano JM, Sanz G, Fernandez Ortiz A, Garrido E, Bansilal S, Fuster V. A polypill strategy to improve global secondary cardiovascular prevention: from concept to reality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64:613–621.
277. Tamargo J, Castellano JM, Fuster V. The Fuster-CNIC-Ferrer Cardiovascular Polypill: a polypill for secondary cardiovascular prevention. Int J Cardiol 2015; 201 (Suppl 1):S15–S22.

* Professor Zanchetti passed away in March 2018 before the Consensus document was finalized. His contribution was invaluable in setting priorities, interpreting the available evidence and establishing final recommendations. His advice will remain in our memories.


hypertension; metabolic syndrome; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.