In this article [1], the number of the rs polymorphism in question was incorrectly reported as rs734555. The correct number of the same polymorphism should be rs734553 throughout the article.
REFERENCE
1. Mallamaci F, Testa A, Leonardis D, Tripepi R, Pisano A, Spoto B, et al. A polymorphism in the major gene regulating serum uric acid associates with clinic SBP and the white-coat effect in a family-based study.
J Hypertens 2014; 33:1621–1628.
