Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

How to treat arterial stiffness beyond blood pressure lowering?

Van Bortel, Luc Ma,b; De Backer, Tinea,b,c; De Buyzere, Marca,c

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328347cca9
Editorial commentaries
Free

aHypertension Excellence Center Ghent University Hospital, Belgium

bHeymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Belgium

cDepartment of Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence to Luc M. Van Bortel, MD, PhD, Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium E-mail: luc.vanbortel@ugent.be

In recent years, aortic stiffness has been recognized as an important predictor of cardiovascular events [1], adding predictive value to classical cardiovascular risk scores like the Framingham risk score [2]. In the Framingham Heart study, aortic stiffness expressed as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) predicted major cardiovascular events, whereas other hemodynamic measures such as carotid-radial (muscular artery) PWV, central pulse pressure, pulse pressure amplification and augmentation index did not [3]. Aortic stiffness has been proposed as target organ damage by the 2007 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) hypertension guidelines [4] and advocated for use in daily practice. An aortic stiffness expressed as carotid-femoral PWV above 12 m/s has been considered of prognostic value. One should realize that this cutoff point only applies to aortic pulse wave velocities using the direct carotid to femoral distance. Many different estimates of the traveled distance of the pulse wave have been used. Each of them results in different absolute values and the cutoff value should be adapted accordingly. A formula has been established to calculate direct distance (carotid to femoral) from subtracted distance (suprasternal notch to femoral artery minus suprasternal notch to carotid artery) making use of height and vice versa [5]. Recently, reference values for aortic PWV have been published using 80% of the direct distance [6]. Based on MRI and invasive studies [7,8], this distance is probably closer to the real traveled distance.

Whereas evidence for predictive value of aortic stiffness is well established [9] and methods to measure it are becoming more accurate, less evidence is present on how to treat arterial stiffness. In single dose or short-term studies, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), selective beta1-blockers, beta-blockers with vasodilating properties and some diuretics could improve arterial stiffness [10,11]. However, it is not clear whether this effect was limited to the decrease in blood pressure, or whether also an effect beyond the effect of blood pressure reduction was present. After a 6-month treatment period for a similar reduction in blood pressure, the ACEI perindopril showed a more pronounced improvement of carotid artery stiffness than the diuretic amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide [12], showing that the de-stiffening potency differs between antihypertensive drugs and suggesting that some may have an effect beyond the effect due to blood pressure decrease. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate which classes of antihypertensive drugs may have a de-stiffening potency beyond blood pressure reduction.

In this issue of the Journal, Ong et al.[13] present the results of a meta-analysis of individual data from 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 294 hypertensive patients treated with a variety of blood pressure-lowering drugs. This meta-analysis showed that in short-term studies (defined by the authors as a duration <4 weeks), only ACEIs reduced PWV beyond the blood pressure effect, whereas in long-term studies (4 weeks or more), all studied drug classes were effective. Vasodilation may at least in part account for the effect beyond blood pressure reduction of vasoactive drugs such as ACEI, ARB, CCB and beta-blockers with vasodilating properties. The mechanisms by which diuretics and selective beta1-blockers would reduce stiffness beyond blood pressure values are unknown. For beta-blockers, it is not clear whether the reduction in heart rate may play a role [14]. Of interest, Ong et al.[13] observed a comparable effect for selective beta1-blockers and diuretics on PWV compared to the vasoactive drug classes in their meta-analysis. The latter may suggest that apart from the antihypertensive property of the antihypertensive drug, the sustained unloading of the arteries by blood pressure reduction itself may contribute to structural de-stiffening of arteries within a few months. As ACEIs were found to improve arterial stiffness also in short-term studies, this class of drugs may accelerate this de-stiffening process.

The strengths of the meta-analysis by Ong et al.[13] are the Gold Standard outcome variable, a meta-analysis on individual data from homogeneous study populations, the use of uniform standard operating procedures and the centralized data analysis in a well qualified center. Important limitations of this study are the relatively small number of inclusions and the lack of inclusion of studies conducted outside their laboratory. In addition, authors' cut-off of 4 weeks for so-called long-term studies is arbitrary and in fact as no study exceeded 6 months of follow-up, long-term results in the usual meaning of the term are not available. These limitations mean that this study needs to be confirmed by studies with a larger number of patients and longer duration of treatment.

As strategies to reduce PWV beyond blood pressure lowering, inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), nitrates and nitric oxide donors (see below), advanced glycation end products (AGE) breakers and statins may be of interest [15]. Besides their vasoactive effect, RAAS inhibitors may have de-stiffening effects by preventing and reducing collagen accumulation. The AGE breaker alagebrium can decrease stiffness by breaking cross-links and showed promising results in humans [16]. Mixed results have been published for statins on PWV in a meta-analysis [17].

Lifestyle changes may also decrease arterial stiffness. In some selected studies, the effect size of lifestyle changes was comparable to the reported effect size in the meta-analysis of Ong et al.[13]. However, the effect size of these studies should be cautiously interpreted as some of these studies might not have been ideally designed or analyzed. Among the attempts to reduce PWV by lifestyle change, one should mention physical activity, smoking cessation and salt reduction. Recently, a highly significant decrease of carotid-femoral PWV has been reported by interval training in treated hypertension [18]. A final conclusion might be unwarranted as many positive older studies had a doubtful (statistical) design and analysis and some did not show positive results. Jatoi et al.[19] demonstrated that smoking cessation reduced PWV, although it took a decade of nonsmoking before returning to baseline PWV. On the contrary, a recent meta-analysis [20] was unable to confirm these findings due to conflicting and low quality data. Also for salt reduction, the effects on PWV are far from univocal ranging from no effect at all to a significant reduction in blacks [21], whereas regular habitual cocoa consumption was associated with low arterial stiffness [22]. Weight reduction and a balanced diet are other nonpharmacological measures worth further studying in the near future.

What are the implications for clinical practice? Antihypertensive drugs are currently the only well established treatment options for arterial stiffness available. The meta-analysis by Ong et al.[13] suggests that sustained unloading of the vessel wall by blood pressure reduction may structurally improve arterial stiffness. Current antihypertensive drugs decrease SBP and DBP. A further decrease of the already low DBP by classical antihypertensive drugs may be harmful in a subset of patients with isolated systolic hypertension and coronary artery disease [23]. This rapidly growing group of patients needs antihypertensive drugs that decrease pulse pressure, thereby decreasing SBP without further decreasing diastolic pressure. Those drugs act mainly on large artery stiffness without a substantial effect on resistance arteries. Among the available vasoactive drugs, nitrates are the most selective to large arteries. But some nitric oxide donors may be still more selective to large arteries than to resistance vessels than nitrates, and should be further investigated [24].

Although arterial stiffness can be improved even beyond the effect due to blood pressure lowering, data on improved survival due to a decrease in arterial stiffness are still scarce [25]. The expected beneficial effect of this decrease in arterial stiffness on hard endpoints should be further established. Therefore, the meta-analysis by Ong et al.[13] is not likely to induce changes in therapeutic strategy published in the 2009 reappraisal of the European Hypertension guidelines [26].

In conclusion, in the absence of commercially available specific de-stiffening drugs, improvement of arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients will still be discussed in terms of efficacy and efficiency of drugs classes and strategies with a propensity for hypertension-related risk factors. Antihypertensive drugs are a first and logical choice not only for improvement of arterial stiffness but essentially because they improve outcome. As suggested by the meta-analysis by Ong et al.[13] in this issue of the Journal, there seems to be a mid-term effect on arterial stiffness beyond the effect on blood pressure of all classes of these drugs, suggesting that a sustained unloading of the arterial wall itself by a decrease in blood pressure may lead to a further decrease in arterial stiffness. More and larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to further investigate the potency of different antihypertensive drugs in reducing arterial stiffness beyond the effect of blood pressure. An increasing therapeutic problem may exist in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and coronary artery disease, as evidence is growing that a further lowering of the already low DBP may be harmful. New antihypertensive drugs that decrease SBP without decreasing DBP appear to be urgently needed for this rapidly growing subgroup of elderly patients. The arterial de-stiffening potency of other drugs like AGE breakers and statins or lifestyle changes (salt reduction, smoking cessation, regular exercise, habitual cocoa consumption, a balanced diet with weight reduction) remains to be further established in the near future.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1 Laurent S, Cockroft L, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2588–2605.
2 Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, Gautier I, Benetos A, Lacolley P. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension 2002; 39:10–15.
3 Mitchell G, Hwang S-J, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 121:505–511.
4 Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension; European Society of Cardiology. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25:1105–1187.
5 Vermeersch SJ, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Van Bortel LM, Gillebert TC, Verdonck PR, et al. Distance measurements for the assessment of carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2009; 27:2377–2385.
6 Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2338–2350.
7 Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Tanaka H. Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1:739–748.
8 Weber T, Ammer M, Rammer M, Adji A, O'Rourke MF, Wassertheurer S, et al. Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens 2009; 27:1624–1630.
9 Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanidis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1318–1327.
10 Van Bortel LM, Kool MJ, Struijker-Boudier HA. Effects of antihypertensive agents on local arterial distensibility and compliance. Hypertension 1995; 26:531–534.
11 Blacher J, Protogerou AD, Safar ME. Large artery stiffness and antihypertensive agents. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11:3317–3326.
12 Kool MJ, Lustermans FA, Breed JG, Struijker-Boudier HA, Hoeks AP, Reneman RS, Van Bortel LM. The influence of perindopril and diuretic combination amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide on the vessel wall properties of large arteries in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 1995; 13:839–848.
13 Ong KT, Delerme S, Pannier B, Safar M, Benetos A, Laurent S Boutouyrie P, et al. Aortic stiffness is reduced beyond blood pressure lowering by short- and long term antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis of individual data in 294 patients. J Hypertens 2011; 29:1034–1042.
14 Wilkinson IB, Mohammed NH, Tyrell S, Hall IR, Webb DJ, Paul VE, et al. Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15:24–30.
15 Van Bortel LMAB, Struijker-Boudier HAJ, Safar ME. Pulse pressure, arterial stiffness, and drug treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 2001; 38:914–921.
16 Kass DA, Shapiro EP, Kawaguchi M, Capriotti AR, Scuteri A, deGroof RC, Lakatta EG. Improved arterial compliance by a novel advanced glycation end-product crosslink breaker. Circulation 2001; 104:1464–1470.
17 Rizos EC, Agouridis AP, Elisaf MS. The effect of statin therapy on arterial stiffness by measuring pulse wave velocity: a systematic review. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2010; 8:638–644.
18 Guimaraes GV, Ciolac EG, Carvalho VO, D'Avila VM, Bortolotto LA, Bocchi EA. Effects on continuous vs interval exercise training on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in treated hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010; 33:544–545.
19 Jatoi NA, Jerrard-Dunne P, Feely J, Mahmud A. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on arterial stiffness and aortic wave reflection in hypertension. Hypertension 2007; 49:981–985.
20 Doonan RJ, Hausvater A, Scallan C, Mikhailidis DP, Pilote L, Daskalopoulou SS. The effect of smoking on arterial stiffness. Hypertens Res 2010; 33:398–410.
21 He FJ, Marciniak M, Visagie E, Markandu ND, Anand V, Dalton RN, et al. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure, urinary albumin, and pulse wave velocity in white, black, and Asian mild hypertensives. Hypertension 2009; 54:482–488.
22 Vlachopoulos CV, Alexopoulos NA, Aznaouridis KA, Ioakeimidis NC, Dima IA, Dagre A, et al. Relation of habitual cocoa consumption to aortic stiffness and wave reflections, and to central hemodynamics in healthy individuals. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:1473–1475.
23 Messerli FH, Panjrath GS. The J-curve between blood pressure and coronary artery disease or essential hypertension: exactly how essential? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:1827–1834.
24 Van Bortel LMAB, Spek JJ, Balkestein EJ, Sardina M, Struijker-Boudier HA. Is it possible to develop drugs which act more selectively on large arteries? J Hypertens 1999; 17:701–705.
25 Guerin AP, Blacher J, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness attenuation on survival of patients in end-stage renal failure. Circulation 2001; 103:987–992.
26 Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Burnier M, Caulfield M, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a ESH Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009; 27:2121–2158.
© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.