Journal Logo

Review

Antihypertensive pharmacogenetics: getting the right drug into the right patient

Turner, Stephen T.a; Schwartz, Gary L.a; Chapman, Arlene B.b; Hall, W. Dallasb; Boerwinkle, Ericc

Author Information
  • Free

Abstract

Introduction

It has long been suspected that interindividual variation in the efficacy and side-effects of medications may be influenced by genetic factors [1]. Pharmacogenetics, defined as ‘the study of the role of genetics in drug response’[2], is based on the tenet that ‘the genetic endowment of the individual, phenotypically expressed in protein structure, configuration and concentration, may alter drug action in multiple ways’[3]. Until recently, the only pharmacogenetic phenomena known to influence blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy were single gene polymorphisms with large effects on the metabolism of a few drugs that are no longer widely used. Genes coding for the enzyme variants determining these discretely distributed differences in drug disposition have been identified, and the responsible mutations within these genes are well characterized. With the mapping and sequencing of all human genes soon to be completed [4], attention is turning to identification and characterization of genes with more modest effects on drug action that contribute to continuously distributed variation in blood pressure responses to the antihypertensive medications now in common use. Identification of these genes is being accelerated by technological advances that facilitate measurement of DNA sequence variation throughout the genome and by the discovery of genes contributing to interindividual differences in blood pressure level and the occurrence of hypertension [5–8]. Knowledge of genes that influence the pharmacodynamic determinants of blood pressure response to antihypertensive medications has the potential to provide new insights not only into molecular mechanisms influencing drug response, but also into the role that these genes may play in determining interindividual differences in blood pressure level and the occurrence of hypertension.

The objectives of this review are (i) to present pharmacogenetic concepts relevant to antihypertensive drug therapy; (ii) to consider the challenge of identifying individual genetic factors that contribute to differences in responses to antihypertensive medications; (iii) to describe classical pharmacogenetic investigations successful in identifying single gene polymorphisms with large effects on the metabolism of several antihypertensive drugs; (iv) to provide examples of candidate gene and genome scanning approaches now being applied to identify genes contributing to continuously distributed variation in blood pressure response to antihypertensive medications; and (v) to suggest developments likely in the future to expand the role of pharmacogenetics in the evaluation, treatment, and control of hypertension and its complications.

Basic concepts

A variety of mechanisms determine drug response (Fig. 1). Pharmacokinetic mechanisms that determine the level of the drug in the blood, and ultimately at its target, include absorption of the drug, its distribution, excretion and metabolism. These mechanisms that determine the fate of the drug itself are distinguished from pharmacodynamic mechanisms that govern the interaction of the drug with its target and the subsequent cellular and systemic events that occur as a consequence of this interaction. Genetic variation that alters the structure, configuration or quantity of any of the proteins involved in any of these mechanisms may contribute to interindividual variation in drug response.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Determinants of drug response. Genetic variation may contribute to interindividual differences in drug response by altering the structure, configuration or quantity of proteins involved in pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic mechanisms determining drug response.

When a standard dose of a drug is given to a group of individuals and an index of response is measured and plotted, several types of frequency distribution curves can be observed. Rarely, the distribution of responses is bimodal (Fig. 2). Separate subpopulations with distinctly different drug responses suggest that a single factor, possibly segregation of alleles at a single genetic locus, has a large effect on drug response [9]. In contrast, for most drugs, the frequency distribution histogram for most measures of response is unimodal and bell-shaped, or a so-called ‘normal’ or Gaussian distribution (Fig. 2). Such a frequency distribution is consistent with multifactorial determination by effects of many genetic and environmental factors, with no single factor having a discernibly large effect on response. Clearly, when the distribution of responses is continuous and unimodal, it is more difficult to identify the effects of individual genes.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
Bimodal and unimodal frequency distributions of drug response. (a) The bimodal distribution indicates that a single factor has a large effect on drug response. (b) The unimodal distribution results from many factors each having a smaller effect on drug response.

The challenge: heterogeneity of hypertension and antihypertensive drug responses

Blood pressure levels are homeostatically maintained through complex interactions of many biochemical, physiological and anatomical traits organized into interrelated systems that exert redundant and counterbalancing pressor and depressor effects [10]. Although single factors may rarely cause blood pressure to deviate into the hypertensive range [11–13], most hypertension has a multifactorial aetiology that includes many genetic and environmental factors acting through the intermediate systems regulating blood pressure level [10].

Antihypertensive drugs lower blood pressure by acting on specific targets within these intermediate systems (Table 1). Since many components of the systems are proteins that may vary in structure, configuration, or quantity because of genetic differences among individuals, it is reasonable to expect that interindividual variation in blood pressure responses to these drugs would in part be genetically determined. Obvious candidate genes to influence blood pressure responses are those that code for components of a system targeted by the drug. Additional candidates are genes that code for components of the counter-regulatory systems opposing an initial drug-induced fall in blood pressure.

Table 1
Table 1:
 Antihypertensive drug classes and targets

Diversity in responses to antihypertensive therapy is well-documented [14–21]. In one study conducted by the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents, men with diastolic blood pressures of 95–109 mmHg were randomly assigned to treatment with one of six antihypertensive agents (hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, captopril, clonidine, diltiazem or prazosin), each having a different mechanism of action [14,15]. After dosages were titrated upward to achieve maximal effects, the percentage of patients in whom diastolic blood pressure was lowered to < 90 mmHg was similar among drugs and was only slightly greater than 50% for most drugs. As in other studies, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses to each drug were continuous and unimodally distributed [16,22]; the standard deviation of responses was similar in magnitude to the average response (approximately 10 mmHg); the range of responses was four-to-eight times greater than the average response [14–16,18]; and, for each drug, a sizable percentage of patients (10–20%) had paradoxical increases in blood pressure [16,20,22]. In most crossover comparisons of individual patients, response to one drug did not reliably predict response to another drug with a different mechanism of action [19–21,23,24].

Progress towards identifying individual patient characteristics that predict blood pressure response prior to drug administration has been limited [25]. Although higher pretreatment blood pressure level is associated with greater antihypertensive drug response, the relationship is not specific to a particular antihypertensive drug or drug class, nor is it correlated with other patient characteristics [26,27]. African Americans are reported to be more responsive to diuretics and calcium channel blockers and less responsive to β-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors than their Caucasian counterparts [14,25,28–30]; however, neither gender, nor age, nor measures of body size has been found to predict response [25,31–34]. While some advocate measurement of plasma renin activity, indexed to sodium intake, to aid selection of antihypertensive drug therapy [35–37], other investigators find this approach no more predictive than simply determined characteristics of race and age [38,39]. Consequently, no profiling method is currently recommended as a basis for selection of antihypertensive drug therapy in individual patients [40].

Classical pharmacogenetics: genes with large effects on drug metabolism.

Many classical pharmacogenetic investigations were initiated by serendipitous observation of an unexpected drug response, such as an exaggerated response or complete lack of response [41]. Unrelated individuals were then studied to verify a bimodal (or multimodal) distribution of the drug response. Next, families of individuals from the opposite extremes of the distributions were evaluated to determine whether the unusual response phenotype was transmitted from generation to generation in a pattern consistent with Mendelian inheritance of a single gene disorder. Finally, modern techniques of molecular genetics introduced in the late 1980s made it possible to clone genes responsible for such discretely distributed differences in drug responses [42]. Three of these single gene polymorphisms, summarized in Table 2, are responsible for large interindividual differences in the metabolism of several antihypertensive agents. To our knowledge, no single gene polymorphisms have yet been identified that have large effects on the absorption, distribution, or elimination of an antihypertensive drug.

Table 2
Table 2:
 Single gene polymorphisms with large effects on the metabolism of antihypertensive medications

Although single gene polymorphisms with large effects on drug metabolism have been at the forefront of pharmacogenetic investigation since its inception [41], several factors diminish their relevance to contemporary clinical practice. First, the antihypertensive drugs metabolized by the polymorphic enzymes in Table 2 are no longer widely used. Second, newer antihypertensive agents found to be associated with large interpatient differences in therapeutic or toxic responses have been promptly withdrawn from the marketplace [80]. Third, methods to evaluate pathways of human drug metabolism in vitro[81] decrease the likelihood that new drugs largely metabolized by a single polymorphic enzyme will be introduced in the future [82]. Thus, pharmacodynamic mechanisms may play the predominant role in determining interindividual variation in blood pressure responses to the antihypertensive drugs now in common use. For example, the dose–response relationships for most modern antihypertensive drugs are relatively flat [83] with little, if any, correlation between steady-state drug levels and blood pressure-lowering effects [84–86]. Furthermore, at usual therapeutic dosages, the magnitude of blood pressure lowering is similar for drugs within a class [14,18,23], despite considerable differences in their pharmacokinetic properties [87–91]. Finally, when chronic antihypertensive therapy is interrupted, blood pressure-lowering effects often persist long after the drug is eliminated from the body [92,93]. Consequently, there has been major interest in identifying genes that influence the pharmacodynamic determinants of blood pressure response [94,95]. Some progress is being made using candidate gene and genome scanning approaches.

Candidate gene studies

α-Adducin gene

Adducin is an α/β heterodimeric cytoskeletal protein of the actin–spectrin lattice that is involved in signal transduction. Point mutations in the α-adducin gene explain up to 50% of the difference in blood pressure level between Milan normotensive and Milan hypertensive rats, a genetically hypertensive strain of rats in which increased renal sodium reabsorption plays a major pathophysiological role [96,97].

Cusi and colleagues reported linkage between markers at the human α-adducin locus and a gene contributing to hypertension [6] and found that a variant allele, characterized by a glycine-to-tryptophan change at amino acid 460 of α-adducin (Trp460), was significantly more frequent in 477 hypertensive patients than in 332 normotensive control subjects. Because variants of the α-adducin gene are associated with increased renal tubular reabsorption of sodium and a volume-expanded sodium-sensitive form of hypertension in rats [98], the investigators tested whether the Gly460Trp polymorphism was associated with differences in the antihypertensive response to diuretic treatment with furosemide (40 mg orally every 6 h for three doses) or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5–25 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks). In both protocols, the average blood pressure reduction was more than two times greater in heterozygotes carrying the Trp460 variant than in Gly460 homozygotes [6]. These findings were confirmed in a subsequent trial [99], supporting the contention that the α-adducin polymorphism may be useful in identifying a subset of ‘salt-sensitive’ hypertensive patients more responsive to diuretic therapy [6,99]. The findings also demonstrate how a gene that contributes to hypertension via a particular physiological mechanism (namely, increased renal sodium reabsorption and volume expansion) can serve as a candidate to influence blood pressure response to an antihypertensive agent that targets this mechanism [100].

Renin–angiotensin system genes

Hypertensive subjects carrying the Trp460 variant of α-adducin had lower mean plasma renin activity than Gly460 homozygotes [6,98,99], which is consistent with the notion that individuals with ‘low renin’ hypertension are more responsive to diuretic therapy than those with normal or high renin hypertension [35,101,102]. Since the antihypertensive effectiveness of diuretic therapy is inversely related to the degree of counter-regulatory activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAA) system [35,100,103], it is reasonable to hypothesize that variation in genes of the system [5,104–108] may be predictive of variation in blood pressure response. In partial support of this possibility, blood pressure responses to changes in dietary sodium intake were associated with polymorphisms of the genes coding for angiotensinogen and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) in some studies [109–113]. Unexpectedly, one of the allelic variants found to be associated with greater blood pressure reduction in response to dietary sodium restriction [109,110] was previously associated with increased, not diminished, activity of the RAA system [5,104,105].

Variation in genes of the RAA system has also been investigated in relation to antihypertensive responses to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and calcium channel blockers (Table 3). Among hypertensive patients treated with ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, lisinopril or perindopril), the T235 allele of the angiotensinogen gene was associated with significantly greater systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions in one study [114,115]. However, the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene was not associated with differences in blood pressure responses to ACE inhibitors, a β-blocker (atenolol), or a dihydropyrindine calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) [114–117]; nor was a polymorphism of the angiotensin II (AT) receptor type 1 gene (A1166 to C) associated with differences in blood pressure response to ACE inhibitors [114]. Recently, a silent polymorphism in exon 5 of the gene coding for the α-subunit of GS-protein (FokI +/–), which couples β-adrenoreceptors to cAMP production, was reported to be associated with differences in blood pressure response to β-blockers [118].

Table 3
Table 3:
 Candidate gene studies of blood pressure response to antihypertensive drug therapy

A variety of other cardiovascular responses to antihypertensive drug therapy have been investigated in relation to polymorphisms in the genes coding for ACE and the AT1 receptor (Table 4). Overall, early results support the notion that genetic variation may have pleiotropic effects on numerous biochemical, physiologic, and anatomic measures of response to antihypertensive drug therapy [116,117,119–132].

Table 4
Table 4:
 Candidate gene studies of other cardiovascular responses

Genome scanning studies

For many traits, there may be no known polymorphic candidate gene or the list of plausible candidates may be so extensive as to render investigation of each one impractical. In these circumstances, a genome scanning approach can be used to first identify chromosomal regions containing genes influencing the trait, followed by positional cloning of candidate gene(s) within linked regions [133,134]. Generally, such an approach employs highly polymorphic markers of DNA sequence variation throughout the genome measured in biologically related family members; linkage analyses then assess coinheritance of the markers with chromosomal regions containing genes influencing the trait [135]. Because no prior knowledge or assumptions are required about gene function, one attractive feature of this approach is the possibility of identifying new genes previously unsuspected to influence the trait. Moreover, the relative strength of linkage evidence accompanied by already-available knowledge about functions of genes within the linked regions, can serve to prioritize the subsequent search for functional mutations in the positionally implicated genes. However, because this method requires that the trait of interest be measured in a large number of related individuals (for example, sibling pairs), it poses difficult logistical challenges for antihypertensive drug response traits in humans.

To our knowledge, the only published genome-wide search for a pharmacogenetic trait locus employed a rodent model of genetic hypertension to identify a region of rat chromosome 2 containing a gene influencing blood pressure response to a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (PY108–068) [136]. In a backcross of F1 generation rats with Lyon hypertensive rats, Vincent and colleagues performed linkage analyses using 40 different microsatellite markers measured over 15 chromosomes. For eight of 11 markers on chromosome 2, the reduction in blood pressure in response to the calcium channel blocker was significantly greater in animals homozygous for the allele from hypertensive rats than in heterozygous rats. Maximum LOD scores of 4.4 and 4.1 for the systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses, respectively, were observed between two markers, D2Wox8 and D2Mit15, with variation at this locus accounting for 10.3 and 10.4% of variation in systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses, respectively [136]. In contrast, no effects of variation at this or other measured loci were seen on baseline blood pressure level or the blood pressure responses to a short-acting ganglionic blocking agent (trimethaphan camsylate) or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (losartan) [136].

Implication of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) on rat chromosome 2 that specifically affects blood pressure response to blockade of voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels is consistent with human and animal studies indicating that variation in calcium metabolism plays a role in determining differences in blood pressure level and the development of hypertension [137]. A gene coding for a protein involved in intracellular calcium homeostasis [calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-delta (Camk)] resides within the linked region and is therefore a candidate to influence blood pressure response to the calcium channel antagonist. Although inferences to human hypertension are speculative, this study demonstrates the potential for genetic variation to contribute to differences in blood pressure response to specific antihypertensive agents and illustrates how a gene that influences response to a drug with a known mechanism of action can implicate the blood pressure-regulating system targeted by the drug as a contributor to the hypertensive state.

Future developments

Mapping and sequencing of all 50 000–100 000 genes in the human genome [138] are expected to be fully completed by the year 2003 [4]. Among the many methodological and technological advancements spawned by these accomplishments, several are likely to expand the role of pharmacogenetics in interventions against hypertension.

Genome-wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms

One capability that will facilitate the discovery of genes influencing drug responses in humans is the ability to perform genome-wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs are positions in the genome at which two alternative nucleotides occur at an appreciable frequency (> 1%). As the most abundant form of polymorphism in the human genome, SNPs are estimated to occur every 500–1000 bp [139]; thus, there are more than three million SNPs per human genome (which consists of approximately 3 × 109 bp). Genetic maps are now being constructed with > 2000 SNPs at an average spacing of < 2 cM between variable sites [140] (1 cM ≈ 1000 000 bp). In contrast, the ‘variable number of tandem repeat’ (VNTR) marker sets now used for genome-wide searches generally include 300–400 markers spaced every 10 cM. It has been calculated that a collection of 1000 biallelic SNPs provides the same power to detect a QTL as conventional sets of 300–400 multi-allelic VNTR markers [141]. Moreover, for linkage studies to achieve adequate power to detect QTLs with small or moderately sized effects, very large samples of related family members must be studied [142], clearly, a sample design that is unfeasible for most drug response traits. Association studies that utilize biallelic SNPs measured in biologically unrelated individuals not only are inherently more powerful, but also require fewer study subjects, and thus are the only practical study design for genetic analyses of antihypertensive drug responses in humans. Dense SNP maps have the potential to reduce a genome-wide search for a QTL influencing antihypertensive drug responses to a relatively straight-forward series of comparisons of allele frequencies between groups of unrelated individuals selected from opposite extremes of the drug response distribution [139].

An additional development necessary to make this approach widely applicable is the ability to rapidly genotype large numbers of SNPs at a reasonable cost. Two-dimensional arrays of chemically synthesized oligonucleotides attached to a glass surface (so-called DNA chips) appear to offer one possible approach [140,143]. Such chips are already commercially available to assess known mutations in the human cytochrome P450 genes encoding the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzymes responsible for metabolizing many commonly prescribed drugs. Standardization and commercialization of this technology should reduce costs and extend its applicability [144,145]. A further challenge is the development and implementation of efficient methods of cataloging and analysing the massive amounts of genotypic data that can be generated [146].

Genotyping in large-scale clinical trials

Collection and analysis of genotype information is likely to become a routine part of large antihypertensive drug trials designed to assess blood pressure lowering and reduction in clinical cardiovascular disease events, including stroke, myocardial infarction and progression of renal disease. Genotyping study participants can be viewed as a logical extension of the usual covariate information (such as race, gender, age and body size) collected to assess potential ‘modifiers’ of drug response [147]. One can envision testing the effects of variation in known candidate genes as well as scanning the entire genome to identify loci harboring new genetic variants influencing blood pressure response and the subsequent development of target organ complications. Such studies are already reported to be underway [148–153].

Not all of the variation in target organ complications among hypertensive individuals can be predicted by measurements of blood pressure [154–156]. Even if equally hypertensive individuals have their blood pressures lowered to the same level, there may still be residual genotype-dependent variation in measures of target organ disease. Although our current trial and error approach to antihypertensive drug therapy can be effective in controlling blood pressure [23,24], a ‘wait-and-see’ approach to the prevention of target organ complications is difficult to defend. Genetic measurements, which need only be made once in a person's lifetime, appear to be well-suited for evaluation and potential use as predictors of clinical events that may take decades to develop but have their origins early in life.

Individualized drug therapy

An ultimate goal of pharmacogenetic knowledge is to advance beyond the current ‘one size fits all’ approach to antihypertensive drug therapy to more individualized approaches. Since proteins are the targets of antihypertensive drugs, the complete mapping and sequencing of all genes in the human genome [4] implies that potential targets of virtually every antihypertensive drug will be discovered. The challenge will be to ascertain the functions of many newly discovered genes, assess the extent and impact of their polymorphisms, and identify those whose gene products are valid drug targets [149,157,158]. The latter task will be aided by identification of genes that influence disease activity, inasmuch as disease genes may be candidates to influence drug response. Conversely, drug response genes may become candidates to influence disease process. The ability to obtain complete ‘molecular profiles’ of disease and drug response genes in individual patients [159] should provide efficient and highly accurate methods to identify individuals prior to drug administration who are likely to have favourable or unfavourable responses to treatment with a particular drug or class of drugs [160]. Reliable methods to ensure that a drug is only administered to those in whom it will be effective and non-toxic may also serve to maintain the usefulness of drugs that are found to be toxic in a few but are efficacious in many others [161].

Knowledge of genes that contribute to the disease process and genes that influence drug responses will facilitate the development of new drugs and therapeutic approaches that are based on a deeper understanding of the molecular determinants of the disease and the response to therapy. Drugs that are more specific for the molecular characteristics of individual patients should contribute to greater efficacy and reduced toxicity. Certainly, the collection and analyses of unprecedented amounts of genetic information in the coming years has the potential to revolutionize the way drugs are developed and the approaches taken to diagnose, treat and prevent hypertension and its associated target organ diseases.

References

1. Motulsky A. Drug reactions, enzymes and biochemical genetics. J Am Med Assoc 1957; 165: 835–837.
2. Vogel F. Moderne probleme der humangenetik. Ergebn Inn Med Kinderheilk 1959; 12: 52–125.
3. Meyer U. Drugs in special patient groups: clinical importance of genetics in drug effects. In: Melmon K, Morrelli H, Hoffman B, Nierenberg D (editors):Clinical pharmacology: basic principles in therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1992. pp. 875–894.
4. Collins F. Shattuck lecture – medical and societal consequences of the human genome project. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 28–37.
5. Jeunemaitre X, Lifton R, Hunt S, Williams R, Lalouel J. Absence of linkage between the angiotensin converting enzyme locus and human essential hypertension. Nature Genet 1992; 1: 72–75.
6. Cusi D, Barlassina C, Azzani T, Casari G, Citterio L, Devoto M. et al. Polymorphisms of a-adducin and salt sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension. Lancet 1997; 349: 1353–1357.
7. Siffert W, Rosskopf D, Siffert G, Busch S, Moritz A, Erbel R. et al. Association of a human G-protein B3 subunit variant with hypertension. Nature Genet 1998; 18: 45–48.
8. Krushkal J, Xiong M, Ferrell R, Sing CF, Turner ST, Boerwinkle E. Linkage and association of adrenergic and dopamine receptor genes in the distal portion of the long arm of chromosome 5 with systolic blood pressure variation Hum Mol Genet 1998; 7: 1379–1383.
9. Murphy E. One cause? Many causes? The argument from the bimodal distribution. J Chron Dis 1964; 17: 301–324.
10. Guyton A, Hall J, Lohmeier T, Jackson T, Kastner P. Blood pressure regulation: basic concepts. Fed Proc 1981; 40: 2252–2256.
11. Gifford R. Evaluation of the hypertensive patient with emphasis on detecting curable causes. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 1969; 47: 170–186.
12. Rudnick K, Sackett D, Hirst S, Holmes C. Hypertension in a family practice. Can Med Assoc J 1977; 117: 492–497.
13. Sinclair A, Isles C, Brown I. Secondary hypertension in a blood pressure clinic. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 1289–1293.
14. Materson B, Reda D, Cushman W, Massie B, Freis E, Kochar M. et al. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. New Engl J Med 1993; 328: 914–921.
15. Materson B, Reda D, Cushman W. Department of veterans affairs single-drug therapy of hypertension study. Revised figures and new data. Am J Hypertens 1995; 8: 189–192.
16. Attwood S, Bird R, Burch K, Casadei B, Coats A, Conway J. et al. Within-patient correlation between the antihypertensive effects of atenolol, lisinopril, and nifedipine. J Hypertens 1994; 12: 1053–1060.
17. Bidiville J, Nussberger J, Waeber G, Porchet M, Waeber B, Brunner H. Individual responses to converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Hypertension 1988; 11: 166–173.
18. The Treatment of Mild Hypertension Research Group. The treatment of mild hypertension study. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a nutritional-hygienic regimen along with various drug monotherapies. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1413–1423.
19. Niutta E, Cusi D, Colombo R, Pellizzoni M, Cesana B, Barlassina C. et al. Predicting interindividual variations in antihypertensive therapy: the role of sodium transport systems and renin. J Hypertens 1990; 8: S53–S58.
20. Edmonds D, Huss R, Jeck T, Mengden T, Schubert M, Vetter W. Individualizing antihypertensive therapy with enalapril versus atenolol: the Zurich experience. J Hypertens 1990; 8: S49–S52.
21. Waeber G, Beck G, Waeber B, Bidiville J, Nussberger J, Brunner H. Comparison of betaxolol with verapamil in hypertensive patients: discrepancy between office and ambulatory blood pressures. J Hypertens 1988; 6: 239–245.
22. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Double blind control study of antihypertensive agents. III. Chlorothiazide alone and in combination with other agents; preliminary results. Arch Intern Med 1962; 110: 230–236.
23. Materson B, Reda D, Preston R, Cushman W, Massie B, Freis E. et al. Response to a second single antihypertensive agent used as monotherapy for hypertension after failure of the initial drug. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1757–1762.
24. Dickerson J, Hingorani A, Ashby M, Palmer C, Brown M. Optimization of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet 1999; 353: 2008–2013.
25. Weder A, Julius S. Pathophysiology of hypertension and treatment. In: Singh B, Vanhoutte P, Dzau V, Woosley R (editors):Cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc.; 1994. pp. 861–883.
26. Gill J, Beevers D, Zezulka A, Davies P. Relation between initial blood pressure and its fall with treatment. Lancet 1985; 1: 567–569.
27. Sumner D, Meredith P, Howie C, Elliott H. Initial blood pressure as a predictor of the response to antihypertensive therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 26: 715.715.
28. Hall W. Pharmacologic therapy of hypertension in blacks. J Clin Hypertens 1987; 3: 108S–113S.
29. Jamerson K, DeQuattro V. The impact of ethnicity on response to antihypertensive therapy. Am J Med 1996; 101: 22S–32S.
30. Seedat Y. Varying responses to hypotensive agents in different racial groups: black versus white differences J Hypertens 1989; 7: 515–518.
31. Kaplan N. Critical comments on recent literature. Age and the response to antihypertensive drugs. Am J Hypertens 1989; 2: 213–215.
32. Robertson J. Comparative studies in hypertension: some fallacious claims of age-related drug efficacy. J Hypertens 1990; 8: S59–S61.
33. Vez L, La Vecchia L, Vincenzi M. Hypertension, obesity and response to antihypertensive treatment: results of a community survey. J Hum Hypertens 1992; 6: 215–220.
34. Hayes S, Taler S. Hypertension in women: current understanding of gender differences. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 157–165.
35. Laragh J, Lamport B, Sealey J, Alderman M. Diagnosis Ex Juvantibus. Individual response patterns to drugs reveal hypertension mechanisms and simplify treatment. Hypertension 1988; 12: 223–226.
36. Blumenfeld J, Laragh J. Renin system analysis: a rational method for the diagnosis and treatment of the individual patient with hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 894–896.
37. Buhler F, Bolli P, Kiowski W, Erne P, Hulthen U, Block L. Renin profiling to select antihypertensive baseline drugs. Renin inhibitors for high-renin and calcium entry blockers for low-renin patients. Am J Med 1984; 77: 36–42.
38. Preston R, Materson B, Reda D, Williams D, Hamburger R, Cushman W. et al. Age-race subgroup compared with renin profile as predictors of blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy. JAMA 1998; 280: 1168–1172.
39. Freis E, Materson B, Flamenbaum W. Comparison of propranolol or hydrochlorothiazide alone for treatment of hypertension. III. Evaluation of the renin-angiotensin. system. Am J Med 1983; 74: 1029–1041.
40. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The sixth report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413–2446.
41. Weber W. Pharmacogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
42. Gonzalez F, Skoda R, Kimura S, Umeno M, Zanger U, Nebert D. Characterization of the common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine metabolism. Nature 1988; 331: 442–446.
43. Mahgoub A, Idle J, Dring L, Lancaster R, Smith R. Polymorphic hydroxylation of debrisoquine in man. Lancet 1977; 2: 584–586.
44. Eichelbaum M, Spannbrucker N, Steincke B, Dengler H. Defective N-oxidation of sparteine in man: a new pharmacogenetic defect. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 16: 183–187.
45. Daly A, Brockmoller J, Broly F, Eichelbaum M, Evans W, Gonzalez F. et al. Nomenclature for human CYP2D6 alleles. Pharmacogenetics 1996; 6: 193–201.
46. Broly F, Gaedigk A, Heim M, Eichelbaum M, Mariko K, Meyer U. Debrisoquine hydroxylase genotype and phenotype. DNA Cell Biol 1991; 10: 545–558.
47. Dahl M, Johansson I, Palmertz MP, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Sjoqvist F. Analysis of the CYP2D6 gene in relation to debrisoquine and desipramine hydroxylation in a Swedish population. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52: 12–17.
48. Kalow W, Otton S, Kadar D, Endrenyi L, Inaba T. Ethnic difference in drug metabolism: debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation in caucasians and orientals. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1980; 58: 1142–1144.
49. Johansson I, Lundqvist E, Bertilsson I, Dahl M, Sjoqvist F, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Inherited amplification of an active gene in the cytochrome P450 CYP2D locus as a cause of ultrarapid metabolism of debrisoquine. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1993; 90: 11825–11829.
50. Alvan G, von Bahr C, Seidman P, Sjoqvist F. High plasma concentrations of B-receptor blocking drugs and deficient debrisoquine hydroxylation. Lancet 1982; 1: 333.333.
51. Lennard M, Silas J, Freestone S, Ramsay L, Tucker G, Woods H. Oxidation phenotype – a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1558–1560.
52. Lennard M, Silas J, Freestone S, Trevethick J. Defective metabolism of metoprolol in poor hydroxylators of debrisoquine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 14: 301–303.
53. Shah R, Oates N, Idle J, Smith R. Beta-blockers and drug oxidation status. Lancet 1982; 1: 508–509.
54. Dayer P, Balant L, Kupfer A, Courvoisier F, Fabre J. Contribution of the genetic status of oxidative metabolism to variability in the plasma concentrations of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983; 24: 797–799.
55. Silas J, Freestone S, Lennard M, Ramsay L. Chronic dosing comparison of three formulations of metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 18: 270P.270P.
56. Buchert E, Woosley R. Clinical implications of variable anti-arrhythmic drug metabolism. Pharmacogenetics 1992; 2: 2–11.
57. Broly F, Marez D, Sabbagh N, Legrand M, Millecamps S, Lo Guidice J. et al. An efficient strategy for detection of known and new mutations of the CYP2D6 gene using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Pharmacogenetics 1995; 5: 373–384.
58. Linder M, Prough R, Valdes R. Pharmacogenetics: a laboratory tool for optimizing therapeutic efficiency. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 254–266.
59. Franke S, Klawitz I, Schnakenberg E, Rommel B, van der Wen W, Bullerdick J. et al. Isolation and mapping of a cosmid clone containing the human NAT2 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994; 199: 52–55.
60. Hickman D, Risch A, Buckie V, Spurr N, Jeremiah S, McCarthy A. et al. Chromosomal localization of human genes for arylamine N-acetyltransferase Biochem J 1994; 297: 441–445.
61. Knight R, Selin M, Harris H. Genetic factors influencing isoniazid blood levels in humans. Trans Conf Chemother Tubercul 1959; 8: 52–56.
    62. Dufour A, Knight R, Harris H. Genetics of isoniazid metabolism in Caucasians, Negro, and Japanese populations. Science 1964; 145: 391.391.
    63. Karim A, Elfellah M, Evans D. Human acetylator polymorphism: Estimates of allele frequency in Libya and details of global distribution. J Med Genet 1981; 18: 325–333.
    64. Sunahara S, Motoyuki U, Ogawa M. Genetical and geographic studies on isoniazid inactivation. Science 1961; 134: 1530.1530.
    65. Sunahara S, Utano M, Lin H, Cheg T, Jarumalinda A. Further observations on trimodality of frequency distribution curve of biologically active isoniazid blood levels and ‘cline’ in frequencies of alleles controlling isoniazid inactivation. Acta Tuberc Scand 1963; 43: 143–206.
      66. Zacest R, Koch-Weser J. Relation of hydralazine plasma concentration to dosage and hypotensive action. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1972; 13: 420–425.
      67. Jounela A, Pasanen M, Mattila M. Acetylator phenotype and the antihypertensive response to hydralazine. Acta Med Scand 1975; 197: 303–306.
      68. Shepherd A, McNay J, Ludden T, Lin M, Musgrave G. Plasma concentration and acetylator phenotype determine response to oral hydralazine. Hypertension 1981; 3: 580–585.
      69. Perry H. Late toxicity to hydralazine resembling systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med 1973; 54: 58–72.
      70. Uetrecht J, Woosley R. Acetylator phenotype and lupus erythematosus. Clin Pharmacokinet 1981; 6: 118–134.
      71. Batchelor J, Welsh K, Tinoco R, Dollery C, Hughes G, Bernstein R. et al. Hydralazine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus: influence of HLA-DR and sex on susceptibility. Lancet 1980; 1: 1107–1109.
      72. Weinshilboum R, Raymond F. Inheritance of low erythrocyte catechol-o-methyltransferase activity in man Am J Hum Genet 1977; 29: 125–135.
      73. Weinshilboum R. Methyltransferase pharmacogenetics. Pharmacol Ther 1989; 43: 77–90.
      74. Weinshilboum R, Otterness D, Szumlanski C. Methylation pharmacogenetics: catechol-o-methyltransferase, thiopurine methyltransferase, and histamine n-methyltransferase. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1999; 39: 19–52.
      75. Campbell N, Dunnette J, Mwaluko G, Van Loon J, Weinshilboum R. Platelet phenol sulfotransferase and erythrocyte catechol-o-methyltransferase activities: correlation with methyldopa metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984; 35: 55–63.
      76. Campbell N, Sundaram Werness P, Van Loon J, Weinshilboum R. Sulfate and methyldopa metabolism: metabolite patterns and platelet phenol sulfotransferase activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985; 37: 308–315.
      77. Grossman M, Littrell J, Weinstein R, Szumlanski C, Weinshilboum R. Identification of the possible molecular basis for inherited differences in human catechol O-methyltransferase. Neurosci Soc 1992; 18: 70.70.
        78. Lachman H, Papolos D, Saito T, Yu Y, Szumlanski C. Human catechol O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: description of a functional polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacogenetics 1996; 6: 243–250.
        79. Spielman R, Weinshilboum R. Genetics of red cell COMT activity: analysis of thermal stability and family data. Am J Med Genet 1981; 10: 279–290.
        80. SoRelle R. Withdrawal of posicor from market. Circulation 1998; 98: 831–832.
        81. Guengerich F. In vitro techniques for studying drug metabolism. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996; 24: 521–533.
        82. Kalow W. Pharmacogenetics: its biologic roots and the medical challenge. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 235–241.
        83. Kaplan N. Treatment of hypertension: drug therapy. In:Clinical hypertension. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998. pp. 181–264.
        84. Israili Z. Correlation of pharmacological effects with plasma levels of antihypertensive drugs in man. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1979; 19: 25–52.
        85. Von Bahr C, Collste P, Frisk-Holmberg M, Haglund K, Jorfelt L, Orme M. et al. Plasma levels and effects of metoprolol on blood pressure, adrenergic beta receptor blockade, and plasma renin activity in essential hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1976; 20: 130–137.
        86. Beermann B, Groschinsky-Grind M. Antihypertensive effect of various doses of hydrochlorothiazide and its relation to the plasma level of the drug. Europ J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 13: 195–201.
        87. Hall W, Reed J, Flack J, Yunis C, Preisser J, for Group II. Comparison of the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in African American patients with hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 2029–2034.
        88. Zusman R. Are there differences among angiotensin receptor blockers? Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 231S–235S.
        89. Burnier M, Brunner H. Comparative antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: S278–S282.
        90. Wahl J, Turlapaty P, Bramah N, Phil D. Comparison of acebutolol and propranolol in essential hypertension. Am Heart J 1985; 109: 313.313.
        91. Leonetti G, Cuspidi C. Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection. Drugs 1995; 49: 516–535.
        92. Fletcher A, Franks P, Bulpitt C. The effect of withdrawing antihypertensive therapy: a review. J Hypertens 1988; 6: 431–436.
        93. Ekbom T, Lindholm L, Oden A, Dahlof B, Hansson L, Wester P. et al. A 5-year prospective, observational study of the withdrawal of antihypertensive treatment in elderly people. J Intern Med 1994; 235: 581–588.
        94. Bianchi G, Swales J. Do we need more anti-hypertensive drugs: lessons from the new biology. Lancet 1995; 345: 1555–1557.
        95. Ferrari P. Pharmacogenomics: a new approach to individual therapy of hypertension? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1998; 7: 217–222.
        96. Bianchi G, Tripodi G, Casari G, Salardi S, Barber B, Garcia R. et al. Two point mutations within the adducin gene are involved in blood pressure variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1994; 91: 3999–4003.
        97. Tripodi G, Valtorta F, Torielli L, Chieregatti E, Salardi S, Trusolino S. et al. Hypertension-association point mutations in the adducin a and B subunits affect actin cytoskeleton and ion transport. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 2815–2822.
        98. Manunta P, Barlassin C, Bianchi G. Adducin in essential hypertension FEBS Lett 1998; 430: 41–44.
        99. Glorioso N, Manunta P, Filigheddu F, Troffa C, Stella P, Barlassina C. et al. The role of a-adducin polymorphism in blood pressure and sodium handling regulation may not be excluded by a negative association study. Hypertension 1999; 34: 649–654.
        100. Pecker M. Pathophysiologic effects and strategies for long-term diuretic treatment of hypertension. In: Laragh J, Brenner B (editors):Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven Press; 1990. pp. 2143–2167.
        101. Muntzel M, Drueke T. A comprehensive review of the salt and blood pressure relationship. Am J Hypertens 1992; 5: 1S–42S.
        102. Cody R, Laragh J, Case D, Atlas S. Renin system activity as a determinant of response to treatment in hypertension and heart failure. Hypertension 1983; 5 (suppl III) : 36–42.
        103. Gavras H, Brunner H, Laragh J, Sealey J, Gavras I, Vukovich R. An angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor to identify and treat vasoconstrictor and volume factors in hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 821.821.
        104. Bloem L, Manatunga A, Tewksbury D, Pratt J. The serum angiotensin concentration and variants of the angiotensinogen gene in white and black children. J Clin Invest 1995; 95: 948–953.
        105. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams C, Quackenbush J, Puryear R, Powers M. et al. A nucleotide substitution in the promoter of human angiotensinogen is associated with essential hypertension and affects basal transcription in vitro. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 1786–1797.
        106. Zhao Y, Zhou J, Narayanan C, Cui Y, Kumar A. Role of C/A polymorphism at –20 on the expression of human angiotensinogen gene Hypertension 1999; 33: 108–115.
        107. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest 1990; 86: 1343–1346.
        108. White P. Inherited forms of mineralocorticoid hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 28: 927–936.
        109. Hunt S, Cook N, Oberman A, Cutler J, Hennekens C, Allender P. et al. Angiotensinogen genotype, sodium reduction, weight loss, and prevention of hypertension. Trials of hypertension prevention, phase II. Hypertension 1998; 32: 393–401.
        110. Hunt S, Geleijnse J, Wu L, Witteman J, Williams R, Grobbee D. Enhanced blood pressure response to mild sodium reduction in subjects with the 235T variant of the angiotensinogen gene. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 460–466.
        111. Hiraga H, Oshima T, Watanabe M, Ishida M, Ishida T, Shingu T. et al. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and salt sensitivity in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 27: 569–572.
        112. Schorr U, Blaschke K, Beige J, Distler A, Sharma A. Angiotensinogen M235T variant and salt sensitivity in young normotensive Caucasians. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 475–479.
        113. Kojima S, Inenaga T, Matsuoka H, Kuramochi M, Omae T, Nara Y. et al. The association between salt sensitivity of blood pressure and some polymorphic factors. J Hypertens 1994; 12: 797–801.
        114. Hingorani A, Jia H, Stevens P, Hopper R, Claire Dickerson J, Brown M. Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms influence blood pressure and the response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1602–1609.
        115. Dudley C, Keavney B, Casadei B, Conway J, Bird R, Ratcliffe P. Prediction of patient responses to antihypertensive drugs using genetic polymorphisms: investigation of renin-angiotensin system genes. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 259–262.
        116. Sasaki M, Oki T, Iuchi A, Tabata T, Yamada H, Manabe K. et al. Relationship between the angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism and the effects of enalapril on left ventricular hypertrophy and impaired diastolic filling in essential hypertension: M-mode and pulsed Doppler echocardiographic studies. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 1403–1408.
        117. Moriyama T, Kitamura H, Ochi S, Izumi M, Yokoyama K, Yamauchi A. et al. Association of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism with susceptibility to antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1674–1678.
        118. Jia H, Hingorani A, Sharma P, Hopper R, Dickerson C, Trutwein D. et al. Association of the Gs gene with essential hypertension and response to B-blockade. Hypertension 1999; 34: 8–14.
        119. Furuya K, Yamaguchi E, Hirabayashi T, Itoh A, Hizawa N, Ohnuma N, et al. Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and susceptibility to cough. Lancet 1994 354.
        120. Zee R, Rao V, Paster R, Sweet C, Lindpaintner K. Three candidate genes and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-related cough. Hypertension 1998; 31: 925–928.
        121. Todd G, Chadwick I, Higgins K, Yeo W, Jackson P, Ramsay L. Relation between changes in blood pressure and serum ACE activity after a single dose of enalapril and ACE genotype in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39: 131–134.
        122. Nakano Y, Oshima T, Watanabe M, Matsuura H, Kajiyama G, Kambe M. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and acute response to captopril in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 1064–1068.
        123. Dieguez-Lucena J, Aranda-Lara P, Ruiz-Galdon M, Garcia-Villanova J, Morrel-Ocana M, Reyes-Engel A. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme genotypes and angiotensin II receptors. Response to therapy. Hypertension 1996; 28: 98–103.
        124. Mizuiri S, Hemmi H, Inoue A, Takano M, Kadomatsu S, Tanimoto H. et al. Renal hemodynamic changes induced by captopril and angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism. Nephron 1997; 75: 310–314.
        125. Yoshida H, Mitarai T, Kawamura T, Kitajima T, Miyazaki Y, Nagasawa R. et al. Role of the deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene in the progression and therapeutic responsiveness of IgA nephropathy. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 2162–2169.
        126. Haas M, Yilmaz N, Schmidt A, Neyer U, Arneitz K, Stummvoll H. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism determines the antiproteinuric and systemic hemodynamic effect of enalapril in patients with proteinuric renal disease. Kidney Blood Press Res 1998; 21: 66–69.
        127. van der Kleij F, Navis G, Gansevoort R, Heeg J, Scheffer H, de Zeeuw D. et al. ACE polymorphism does not determine short-term renal response to ACE-inhibition in proteinuric patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: 42–46.
        128. van der Kleij F, Schmidt A, Navis G, Haas M, Yilmaz N, de Jong P. et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and short-term renal response to ACE inhibition: role of sodium status. Kidney Int 1998; 53: S23–S26.
        129. Cannella G, Paoletti E, Barocci S, Massarino F, Delfino R, Ravera G. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and reversibility of uremic left ventricular hypertrophy following long-term antihypertensive therapy. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 618–626.
        130. van Essen G, Rensma P, de Zeeuw D, Sluiter W, Scheffer H, Apperloo A. et al. Association between angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene polymorphism and failure of renoprotective therapy. Lancet 1996; 347: 94–95.
        131. Henrion D, Amant C, Benessiano J, Philip I, Plantefeve G, Chatel D. et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with an increased vascular reactivity in the human mammary artery in vitro. J Vasc Res 1998; 35: 356–362.
        132. Benetos A, Cambien F, Gautier S, Ricard S, Safar M, Laurent S. et al. Influence of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism on the effects of perindopril and nitrendipine on arterial stiffness in hypertensive individuals. Hypertension 1996; 28: 1081–1084.
        133. Collins F. Positional cloning: let's not call it reverse anymore. Nature Genet 1992; 1: 3–6.
        134. Collins F. Positional cloning moves from perditional to traditional. Nature Genet 1995; 9: 347–350.
        135. Hearne C, Ghosh S, Todd J. Microsatellites for linkage analysis of genetic traits. Trends Genet 1992; 8: 288–294.
        136. Vincent M, Samani N, Gauguier D, Thompson J, Lathrop G, Sassard J. A pharmacogenetic approach to blood pressure in Lyon hypertensive rats. J Clin Invest 1997; 100: 2000–2006.
        137. Resnick L. Ionic disturbances of calcium and magnesium metabolism in essential hypertension. In: Laragh J, Brenner B (editors):Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven Press; 1995. pp. 1169–1193.
        138. Fields C, Adams M, White O, Venter J. How many genes in the human genome? Nature Genet 1994; 7: 345–346.
        139. Collins F, Guyer M, Chakravarti A. Variations on a theme: cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science 1997; 278: 1580–1581.
        140. Wang D, Fan J, Siao C, Berno A, Young P, Sapolsky R. et al. Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science 1998; 280: 1077–1082.
        141. Kruglyak L. The use of a genetic map of biallelic markers in linkage studies. Nature Genet 1997; 17: 21–24.
        142. Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996; 273: 1516–1517.
        143. Persidis A. Biochips: an evolving clinical technology. Hosp Pract 1999; 34: 67–85.
        144. Graves D. Powerful tools for genetic analysis come of age. Trends Biotechnol 1999; 17: 127–134.
        145. Wilgenbus K, Lichter P. DNA chip technology ante portas J Mol Med 1999; 77: 761–768.
        146. Lyall A. Bioinformatics in the pharmaceutical industry. Trends Biotechnol 1996; 14: 308–312.
        147. Schork N, Weder A. The use of genetic information in large-scale clinical trials: applications of alzheimer research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1996; 10: 22–26.
        148. Ruano G, Stephens J. Genetics and the drug response. Genet Eng 1999.
        149. Dutton G. Computational genomics: medicine of the future? Ann Inter Med 1999; 131: 801–804.
        150. Persidis A. Biotechnologies to watch. Which technologies promise to make significant contributions to biotechnology's drug pipeline? Nat Biotechnol 1997; 15: 1409.1409.
        151. Persidis A. The business of pharmacogenomics. Considered the heir apparent to functional genomics, pharmacogenomics promises to redefine basic notions of what constitutes a disease. Nature Biotechnol 1998; 16: 209–210.
        152. Dorey E. Millenium exploits retained right with new venture. Nature Biotechnol 1997; 15: 614.614.
        153. Marshall A. Phase II results in rheumatoid arthritis encouraging for Immunex. Nature Biotechnol 1997; 15: 829–830.
        154. Peyser P. Genetic epidemiology of coronary artery disease. Epidemiol Rev 1997; 19: 80–90.
        155. Boerwinkle E, Doris P, Fornage M. Field of needs. The genetics of stroke. Circulation 1999; 99: 331–333.
        156. Broeckel U, Shiozawa M, Kissebah A, Provoost A, Jacob H. Susceptibility genes for end-organ damage. New strategies to understand diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 840–842.
        157. Grahame-Smith D. How will knowledge of the human genome affect drug therapy? Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 47: 7–10.
        158. Wiley S. Genomics in the real world. Curr Pharm Design 1998; 4: 417–422.
        159. Stephenson J. Human genome studies expected to revolutionize cancer classification. JAMA 1999; 282: 927–928.
        160. Lichter J, Kurth J. The impact of pharmacogenetics on the future of healthcare. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1997; 8: 692–695.
        161. Evans W, Relling M. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science 1999; 286: 487–491.
        Keywords:

        pharmacology; genetics; hypertension; blood pressure

        © 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.