Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Age-dependent changes in blood pressure over consecutive office measurements: impact on hypertension diagnosis and implications for international guidelines

Veloudi, Panagiota; Blizzard, Christopher L.; Srikanth, Velandai K.; Breslin, Monique; Schultz, Martin G.; Sharman, James E.

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001227

Objectives: Based on anecdotal belief that blood pressure (BP) drops over consecutive measurements, guidelines recommend discarding the first BP reading (Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines) or take only one reading if SBP less than 140 mmHg (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). However, the extent to which SBP fluctuations affect BP classification as well as the potential effect of age are unknown. We sought to assess the change in SBP classification over consecutive measurements following different guidelines, among younger (<50 years) and older individuals (≥50 years). Furthermore, we aimed to investigate the direction of the change in SBP over consecutive measurements (increase or decrease) and the impact of age on SBP differences.

Methods: BP was measured among 20 716 adults from a general population. SBP was classified using the first reading (normal SBP or hypertension) and compared with the average SBP using different guideline protocols (reclassification).

Results: Reclassification from normal SBP to hypertension was greatest with Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines (3% younger, 12% older individuals) and reclassification from hypertension to normal SBP was greatest with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (70% younger, 44% older individuals). SBP increased between the first two measures in 37%, decreased in 56% and did not change in 7% of the population. Age had a strong interaction with SBP level (P < 0.0001) so that younger individuals exhibited greater SBP differences over repeated measures.

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for an improvement in the evidence-base regarding the best way to assess office BP for correct hypertension diagnosis.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

aMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania

bDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to Associate Professor James E. Sharman, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Liverpool Street, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia. Tel: +61 0 3 6226 4709; fax: +61 0 3 6226 7704; e-mail:

Abbreviations: |ΔSBP|, absolute difference between SBP1 and SBP2; ABS, Australian Bureau of Statistics; AHS, Australian Health Survey; BP, blood pressure; CHEP, Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines; ESH/ESC,, European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology; JNC-7, the seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; PP, pulse pressure; SBP CV, variability in SBP; SBP1, first SBP; SBP2, second SBP; SBP3, third SBP; SNA, sympathetic nerve activity; ΔSBP, difference between SBP1 and SBP2

Received 19 October, 2016

Revised 22 November, 2016

Accepted 28 November, 2016

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.