Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Translation of Research into Healthcare Quality Practice

Workforce Competencies for Healthcare Quality Professionals: Leading Quality-Driven Healthcare

Schrimmer, Karen; Williams, Nidia; Mercado, Stephanie; Pitts, Jennifer; Polancich, Shea

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000212
  • Free



As the pace and transformation of healthcare continues at an unprecedented rate, so does the complexity of the roles of Healthcare Quality Professionals (HQPs). These HQPs are champions and leaders of quality and safety within the healthcare industry and work in every facet of the healthcare system and at every organizational level. HQPs are indispensable members of the healthcare system, and their contributions are necessary for driving quality to support the optimization of healthcare systems including improving outcomes, increasing capacity, and providing safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable care.1 Achieving the Quadruple Aim2 necessitates that healthcare leaders focus on Quality-Driven Healthcare.3 Quality-Driven Healthcare includes (1) leadership commitment to quality workforce integration; (2) workforce training in quality competencies, and (3) provider engagement in quality work. Healthcare leaders should have an awareness of the competencies necessary to perform quality and safety work and use quality professionals with these requisite skills to promote safe care and positive clinical outcomes.

As a leader in the field of healthcare quality and as the professional home for HQPs, the National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ) is committed to advancing healthcare quality, supporting the continued development of the HQP, and ensuring that HQPs are well prepared to continue to serve and lead in quality roles both now and in the future. The association developed the NAHQ Healthcare Quality Competency Framework as a defined set of standardized competencies for the HQP. NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework was built on the foundational work of the HQ Principles,4 Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality (CPHQ) Practice Analysis,5 and HQ Essentials: Competencies for the Healthcare Quality Profession (HQ Essentials).6 NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework was developed to address a defined gap in quality and safety competencies not yet addressed in quality competency development efforts to date. The knowledge, skills, and attitudes essential for all healthcare professionals holding both quality roles and those in clinical practice roles are addressed in NAHQ's Framework. NAHQ leadership called for creating a framework for the competencies necessary to engage in professional practice, and at all skill levels for the field of healthcare quality regardless of discipline. The purpose of this article is to describe the methodology used to develop NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework, present the eight foundational dimensions of the framework, and discuss translation and use of the framework in clinical practice and in academic quality curriculum development.


Competency frameworks are organizing schemas that detail the knowledge, skills, and abilities required for effective performance in a defined discipline. These competency frameworks play an important role in the selection, training, assessment, and development of professionals within a given field. In 2016, a study team evaluated 22 position papers containing evidence- or expert opinion–based competencies for “patient safety” or “patient safety and quality improvement.” The study team found limited conformity in quality and patient safety competencies7 and called for creating a consensus for the competencies necessary to practice at all skill levels for the field of healthcare quality.

In addition to the lack of standardization of competencies in healthcare quality practice, there has been a call for standardization of quality and safety curriculum components in academic program development. Graduate programs in quality and patient safety have been increasing in number since 2006. Today, there are approximately 18 schools of higher education offering master's to doctoral degrees in healthcare quality. The increase in the number of quality and safety programs has escalated in part due to the demand for trained HQPs to fill roles in professional practice environments. The Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education is currently working with 11 leading academic institutions and professional associations such as NAHQ to develop accreditation standards for their graduate programs in healthcare quality and patient safety.8 Several graduate programs, Northwestern University, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Thomas Jefferson University now award master's level credit hours to graduate students who earn the CPHQ certification thus reducing the number of hours a student needs to complete to achieve the degree. Advancing competency-based training by developing strategic partnerships among academic organizations is an additional building block that defines a profession that is maturing and increases the understanding of the profession. This competency development work recognizes a scientific foundation and the broad diversity covered within this discipline.

A standardized healthcare quality competency framework provides (1) payers, employers, healthcare institutions, peers, and recipients of care with uniform expectations of HQP performance; (2) a clearly articulated breadth of responsibilities delineating the functions of the HQP, and (3) consistent expectations for HQPs therefore reducing variability in practice for individual HQPs from one healthcare setting to another. Clearly established healthcare quality competencies serve as a foundation and guide for quality practice and curriculum development. The future of healthcare depends on a coordinated competent workforce delivering exceptional quality care in a cost-effective manner.

Development of NAHQ's Competency Framework

The National Association for Healthcare Quality's Competency Framework was developed in three phases: content development, content evaluation, and user evaluation. A panel of quality experts coordinated with the NAHQ team completed the 3-phased process in a 10-month period. Each of the phases will be described.

Phase 1: Content Development

A framework oversight team was established to conduct the activities necessary for the content development of NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework. The four-member oversight team included two individuals from the NAHQ HQ Essentials development team, a member with CPHQ expertise, and a member with academic expertise in quality and safety. A PhD prepared education specialist served as a consultant on the framework development. Six rapid cycle work groups were convened to iteratively develop the content for the framework.

Using foundational content previously developed by NAHQ, the framework oversight and rapid cycle work groups created a crosswalk and harmonized HQ Principles, the CPHQ and HQ Essentials into a single framework using the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition9 and Blooms' revised taxonomy.10 The content development process included a literature synthesis, a comparative analysis of quality position job descriptions, and expert opinion from individual and group interviews of practicing HQPs.

During the harmonization process, the four domains within the CPHQ content outline and the six areas within the HQ Essentials were combined and reframed as dimensions within NAHQ's Framework. The six areas of the HQ Essentials: Performance and Process Improvement, Population Health and Care Transitions, Health Data Analytics, Patient Safety, Regulatory and Accreditation, and Quality Review and Accountability were included in the framework as dimensions. The CPHQ domain, Organizational Leadership (renamed Quality Leadership and Integration), was included as a framework dimension. One additional dimension, professional engagement, was included based on analysis of the literature, CPHQ content outline, and stakeholder feedback. The final framework included a definition of each of the eight dimensions, 29 competency statements (Figure 1 depicts NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework), and 486 observable behaviors differentiating three proficiency levels: novice, proficient, and expert to direct professional and curriculum development.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.:
NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework.

Phase 2: Content Evaluation

NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework was evaluated using expert opinion, through a survey process. The survey only included the eight competency dimensions and 29 competency statements. An education consultant designed the survey using a Likert Scale and open-ended questions for feedback. Members of the framework development team and non-team members completed the initial review of the survey. The final survey was deployed to randomly selected HQPs listed in the NAHQ database.

After survey completion and analysis of feedback, the framework team concluded that all the competency statements in the framework were relevant and accurately reflected skills required for HQP roles. There were no recommendations for additional competency statements to be included.

Phase 3: User Evaluation

A self-assessment tool provides a method for HQPs to translate and use NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework. Upon completion of the framework evaluation process described in phase 2, NAHQ engaged survey experts to design a self-assessment tool to evaluate the consistency of the framework content compared with quality practice. The self-assessment format allowed participants to provide feedback on the framework competencies and the eight dimensions within the framework.

The self-assessment tool was developed using four types of questions: demographics, questions related to attitudes about healthcare, questions related to confidence in their ability to enact certain competencies (e.g., “I am confident in my ability …), and questions asking respondents to select a group of observable behaviors that best represented typical job activities that corresponded to categories of (0) do not engage in the observable behavior, (1) novice, (2) proficient, or (3) expert behaviors. The survey was tested by the framework development team and NAHQ staff and then deployed to 1,500 randomly selected HQPs listed in the NAHQ database. Participants were unaware of the categories being assigned. The survey expert and the NAHQ team found the self-assessment tool consistently provided accurate information on competencies relevant to quality practice.


There are limitations associated with development and evaluation of the framework for ensuring consistent and accurate content. The framework was developed using an extensive literature review and expert opinion. However, there remains a risk that important resources were not identified or used as foundational elements to quality and safety practice. In addition, the number of participants for both the evaluation of the framework content and the self-assessment tool were limited to participants from the NAHQ database. Although, NAHQ's database potentially contains the largest amount of information and participation from HQPs, the demographics of those providing feedback on the self-assessment survey may not represent the population of healthcare quality professions working across all settings. Furthermore, psychometric testing within a formal research protocol could be performed with a broader sample of HQPs to gain further insights into the tool's validity and reliability.

Other limitations include both survey-specific and participant factors. The evaluation methodology comprised a lengthy survey process. NAHQ's content self-evaluation survey contained 28 multitiered questions and the self-assessment; user evaluation survey contained 81 questions, so participant fatigue may have been a factor. The results of both surveys are based on user responses that may be inherently biased by the individual who chooses to voluntarily complete a survey. Self-assessment tools are subjective tools and only provide one person's view. The respondents who took the self-assessment survey assessed their current work against the competency behavioral levels (novice, proficient, and expert), meaning the respondents could have broader capabilities than what the assessment results show.

Using NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework

NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework developed and evaluated by industry experts, gives healthcare a common quality language, sets standards and expectations for quality work, and provides accountability by offering a way to assess competency in professional quality practice. NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework serves as a guide not a prescription. NAHQ will be responsible for future evolution and psychometric testing of the framework as the profession of healthcare quality evolves.

NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework articulates the breadth of competencies across the career path of a HQP (from novice to expert) regardless of setting and provides a schema that offers a staged approach to develop competencies and expertise for practicing HQPs. NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework provides a useful resource not previously available to individuals, healthcare leaders, or academic institutions. Table 1 provides tips and strategies for using NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework.

Table 1.
Table 1.:
Guide to Using NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework
Table 1-A.
Table 1-A.:
Guide to Using NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework

Healthcare Quality Professionals can use NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework for individual career management and life-long learning through (1) planning and development by assessing professional strengths and gaps, (2) guiding and mapping career pathway options, and (3) identifying and working toward advancement opportunities and other career decisions. A self-assessment tool is one of the most active and impactful ways for HQPs to engage in a competency framework and is a great first step to charting one's healthcare quality career trajectory.

Healthcare leaders can use NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework to define their organizational quality structure and align their departments and teams on what matters most to the organization to help drive success. In addition, NAHQ's Framework has applicability for human resource functions such as evaluating individual and team assessments and gap analysis, building job descriptions, creating behavioral interviews, and developing performance and succession plans. NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework can be used as a standard against which to measure HQP job performance and to develop, recruit, and hire employees. NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework codifies what makes an HQP successful and provides a framework for communicating to others what HQPs do and how they can contribute to an organization's needs and outcomes.

Academic institutions and professional development instructors can use NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework to align their core healthcare quality and safety curriculum with the best practices in the quality field and provide their students with the knowledge and skills that healthcare employers value and are necessary for success in quality roles. Educators from all healthcare disciplines, at all levels from undergraduate to graduate, can integrate the framework dimensions as modules in their curriculum and select and adapt as appropriate for the level of learner ranging from novice to expert. Using NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework as a standard provides students with a clear set of shared expectations for the knowledge and competencies required for success in quality roles both now and in the future.


NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework is a broad and dynamic guide for HQP training and development. It encompasses the diversity of HQP roles and settings HQPs work within across the care continuum.

The National Association for Healthcare Quality invites healthcare professionals to participate in NAHQ's self-assessment process, which may provide them feedback for professional growth. Healthcare Quality Professional participation in the self-assessment process will increase the amount of data available for study related to healthcare quality competency development. The data may allow NAHQ and other organizations to collaborate in producing learning opportunities that improve the quality of healthcare delivery. NAHQ invites comments and interprofessional collaborations as HQP quality competencies evolve over time to meet the needs of the continuously changing healthcare environment.


1. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
2. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573-576.
3. National Association for Healthcare Quality and Accountable Care Learning Collaborative. The road to healthcare value is driven by quality workforce integration. 2018. Accessed March 18, 2018.
4. National Association for Healthcare Quality. HQ Principles. Chicago, IL, NAHQ: 2017. Accessed May 6, 2019.
5. Results from A Practice Analysis of the Professional in Healthcare Quality. Olathe, KS. Healthcare, Applied Measurement Professional (AMP), a PSI Company; 2016. HQCC Confidential Publication.
6. National Association for Healthcare Quality. HQ Essentials: Competencies for the Healthcare Quality Professional. Chicago, IL: NAHQ, 2017.
7. Moran K, Harris I, Valenta A. Competencies for patient safety and quality improvement: A synthesis of recommendations in influential position papers. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016;42(4):162-169.
8. Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education. CAHME to Certify Quality and Safety Programs. 2019. Accessed May 6, 2019.
9. Results from the Dreyfus Five-Stage Model of Adult Skills Acquisition Applied to Engineering Lifelong Learning. University of Louisville, American Society for Engineering Education. 2013:36110.
10. Anderson L, Krathwohl D, Airasian P, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. State College, PA: Longman Publishers, 2011.
11. National Association for Healthcare Quality. Key workforce competencies for quality-driven healthcare. 2019. Accessed May 6, 2019.
    12. National Association for Healthcare Quality. Education. Accessed May 6, 2019.
      13. National Association for Healthcare Quality Certification. Accessed May 6, 2019.

        Authors' Biographies

        Karen Schrimmer, MA, CPHQ, is the Director Quality Practice and Research, the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Chicago, Illinois. She is responsible for project management, industry expertise, relationship management, and strategic support.

        Nidia Williams, PhD, MBB, CPHQ, FNAHQ, is the Vice President, Operational Excellence (OpX), Lifespan, Providence, Rhode Island. She is responsible for operational oversight for core quality and patient safety functions, including process and performance improvement initiatives for achieving clinical, operational, and service excellence. She also serves as a member of the NAHQ Board of Directors.

        Stephanie Mercado, CAE, is the Executive Director/CEO, National Association for Healthcare Quality. She works as a strategic partner with the NAHQ board of directors to advance the profession of Healthcare Quality and to leverage NAHQ as the professional home for Healthcare Quality Professionals.

        Jennifer Pitts, MA, is the Senior Director, Products and Programs, National Association for Healthcare Quality. She is strategy focused and is responsible for directing the business of resource development and execution, education and certification, and staff and faculty development.

        Shea Polancich, PhD, RN, is column editor for the Journal of Healthcare Quality's department “Translation of Research into Healthcare Quality Practice.” Dr. Polancich has been practicing in quality and patient safety for over a decade. She is currently an assistant professor and assistant dean at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Nursing, with a primary practice at the UAB Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, as a director specializing in nursing improvement, innovation, and analytics. Formerly, her roles included the Director for Quality and Patient Safety at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Director of Data Analysis and Measurement at Texas Health Resources, NIH/NINR research intern, and health policy fellow at George Mason University. She served on an NQF advisory group specific to patient safety and adverse events. She may be contacted at


        competence; NAHQ's Healthcare Quality Competency Framework; professional development; career advancement; workforce development

        © 2019 National Association for Healthcare Quality