On the Ethical Issues That Arise When Religion and Treatment Collide in End-of-Life Decision MakingLazenby, Mark PhD, APRN, FAPOSJournal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing: August 2015 - Volume 17 - Issue 4 - p 275–282 doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000161 Ethics Series Buy CE Abstract Author InformationAuthors Article MetricsMetrics This article explores the ethical issues that arise when patients’ and families’ religious beliefs collide with clinicians’ views of appropriate end-of-life decisions. The article begins with a case study drawn from clinical experience that focuses on the need for a surrogate decision maker for a deeply religious patient in the intensive care unit with life-limiting cancer. The patient’s adult children, also religious, against the health care team’s clinical advice, want all life-extending measures taken as they await a divine miracle. The conflict between the family and the health care team points to (1) the ethical issues of patients’ and families’ status of vulnerability and the health care team’s necessary moral response to this status; (2) the moral obligation of the health care team to show their trustworthiness to the family by showing the family the team’s competence, honesty, and reliability; and (3) the moral obligations of the health care team to provide the patient and family spiritual support. Mark Lazenby, PhD, APRN, FAPOS, is assistant professor of nursing and divinity, Yale University, West Haven, Connecticut. Address correspondence to Mark Lazenby, PhD, APRN, FAPOS, Yale University, PO Box 27399, West Haven, CT 06516 (email@example.com). The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. © 2015 by The Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association.