Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Two-Minute Step Test of Exercise Capacity

Systematic Review of Procedures, Performance, and Clinimetric Properties

Bohannon, Richard W., PT, DPT, EdD, NCS; Crouch, Rebecca H., PT, DPT, CCS

Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy: April/June 2019 - Volume 42 - Issue 2 - p 105–112
doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000164
Systematic Review
Buy
SDC

Background and Purpose: The 2-minute step test (TMST) is one of many alternatives for measuring exercise capacity. First introduced in 1999 as part of the Senior Fitness Test, the TMST has the advantage of requiring limited space, only a few minutes' time, and no expensive equipment. These advantages notwithstanding, the test must be clinimetrically sound if it is to be recommended. We sought therefore to summarize the literature addressing TMST performance and measurement properties.

Methods: Relevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health) and hand searches. Inclusion of an article required that it described use of the TMST of Rikli and Jones and that it focused on adults. Articles published in a language other than English were excluded. Studies were abstracted for information on participants, TMST description, and findings.

Results and Discussion: Thirty articles were deemed appropriate based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The participants in the studies included community-dwelling healthy older adults and adults with assorted pathologies. Studies described varied methods of conducting the TMST. Among tests in which steps for one side were counted over a full 2 minutes, the mean number of steps among populations ranged from 29.1 for patients with chronic stroke to 110.8 for older osteoporotic women. Numerous reviewed studies provide support for the validity of the TMST. Only one study addressed reliability and none focused on responsiveness. Normative data have been proffered.

Conclusions: The TMST has been widely used since first introduced, albeit not always as originally described. There is considerable evidence for the validity of the test, but its reliability and responsiveness are not yet firmly established.

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Lillington, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to: Rebecca H. Crouch, PT, DPT, CCS, Doctoral Program of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Tracey F. Smith Hall, 4150 U.S. 421 South, Lillington, NC 27546 (rcrouch@campbell.edu).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ann Medley was the Decision Editor.

© 2019 Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy, APTA
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website