Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its predictors among diabetic men : Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its predictors among diabetic men

Parmar, Ramkesh S.1; Verma, Stuti2,; Neelkamal, 3; Pathak, Vineet K.4; Bhadoria, Ajeet S.5

Author Information
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 11(7):p 3875-3879, July 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1130_21
  • Open



Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide,[1] expected to rise significantly in coming decades,[2] with India already been called “The Diabetes capital of the world.” Diabetes is now one of the leading causes of death worldwide.[13] It has been associated with both macrovascular (cardiovascular disease [CVD] and stroke) and microvascular (including retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) complications.[45]

Recent concept in the pathogenesis of Type 2 DM (T2DM) is an ominous octet. Increased risk of CVD results, in part, due to clustered risk factors accompanying diabetes[6] including hypertension, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and obesity.[7] A diabetic person also has an elevated risk for sight loss, foot and leg amputation, and renal failure, due to microvascular complications, which cause damage to the nerves and small blood vessels.[89]

Diabetes has also been associated with sexual dysfunction in men[10] including increased risk of erectile dysfunction (ED)[1011] Among women, evidence regarding the association between diabetes and sexual dysfunction is less conclusive,[12] though some studies have also reported a higher prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in diabetic women.[13]

Though hyperglycemia is the main determinant of vascular diabetic complications, its role in the pathogenesis of sexual dysfunction is unclear. Clinical conditions like hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, smoking, and atherogenic dyslipidemia that coexist with diabetes are risk factors for sexual dysfunction.[14]

Several studies have associated ED with cardiovascular risk factors, like diabetes,[101516] smoking,[17] hypertension,[18] hyperlipidemia,[19] metabolic syndrome as well as depression[19] lower urinary tract symptoms,[20] and poor health state.[15] Moreover, ED is a marker of significantly increased risk of CVD, CHD, stroke, and all-cause mortality.[21]

ED is a common sexual disorder that increases with age in the general population, However ED is known to occur at an earlier age,[10] is more severe, and less responsive to oral drugs[22] in diabetes, leading to poor quality of life.[23] Identification of factors associated with ED might prevent or delay its progression. Here, the role of primary healthcare physician plays a critical role in raising the awareness among the patient suffering from the disease that early identification, controlling the diabetes. Educating them that ED can be because of the uncontrolled disease can significantly decrease the prevalence of same and at the same time can improve the quality of life. Hence, the present study aims to determine the proportion of Diabetics with ED and to determine its associated factors.

Material and Methods

This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine, one of the largest tertiary referral hospital in Northern India. Informed written consent was sought from all the participants following the administration of the participant information sheet. The study was done according to principles laid by the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the ethics review board of SMS Medical College, Rajasthan, India (IEC No/2006/MC/EC/2020). For sample size calculation, the prevalence of ED was taken as 50% among men to obtain the maximum sample size for a fixed absolute precision. Using n = Z2pq/d2 formula for cross-sectional study, where n = sample size, Z = Level of significance which is 1.96 for reporting confidence interval of 95%, p is the prevalence of ED, q is 1 − p and d is absolute precision of 5%. The total sample size was found to be 384 participants, out of which 357 participants (93% response rate) were included in the study over a period of one and half years. Patients with diagnosis of major depressive disorder or history of spinal or prostate surgery or other known secondary causes of ED were excluded from the study.

ED is defined as the persistent inability to achieve or maintain penile erection for successful sexual intercourse,[24] causing decreased quality of life in men[1523] In the present study, ED was identified in study subjects using the International Index of Erectile Function-5.[25] General, demographic, and clinical information was obtained using a predesigned semi-structured questionnaire. Data collection was started after obtaining ethical clearance from Institute’s Ethical Committee. Eligible study subjects were recruited consecutively and written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects.

Statistical analyses

The qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages and analyzed using the Chi-square test. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviations and analyzed using the student t-test. Correlation was found between continuous variables analyses by using Pearson correlation coefficient. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the significant predictors of the ED. A P value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS trial version 20.


ED was found in 212 patients (59.38%) diabetic males [Figure 1]. The mean potency score of diabetics with ED (11.45 ± 3.86) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) as compared to those without ED (23.34 ± 1.14). A strong negative correlation was found between potency score and age (r = −0.647), and a moderate negative correlation with duration of DM (r = −0.324), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). BMI, fasting blood sugar (FBS), serum cholesterol, and serum creatinine showed a weak negative correlation with potency score [Table 1]. Serum testosterone level showed a strong positive correlation with potency score [Figure 2]. On univariate analysis, age, BMI, duration of DM, FBS, SBP, and DBP, serum total cholesterol, serum creatinine were found to be significantly associated with ED. Serum-free testosterone was also significantly lower in those with ED [Table 2].

Figure 1:
Showing proportion of erectile dysfunction in type II diabetic males
Table 1:
Correlation of Potency Score with Different Suspected Factors
Figure 2:
Correlation between serum-free testosterone and potency score
Table 2:
Factors Associated with Erectile Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

A test of full model was statistically significant indicating that the predictors as an asset reliably distinguish between ED status. (Chi-square 174, df 7, P < 0.001). Also, the Hosmer and Lemshow test shows a good fit by high P value and low Chi-square value (Chi-square 9.44, df 8, P > 0.05). NegelKerke’s R2 of 0.522 indicates a good relationship between predictors and grouping. Prediction success overall was 81.5%. The Wald criteria demonstrated that age, systolic blood pressure, duration of diabetes, fasting blood sugar, and serum-free testosterone (P < 0.05) were independent predictors of ED [Table 3].

Table 3:
Binary Logistic Regression for Independent Predictors of Erectile Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus


ED is a common occurrence in aged men especially in Diabetic ones, who are affected with diabetic vasculopathy and neuropathy.[26] ED is associated with a reduced quality of life and unfortunately occurs at an earlier age in diabetic patients when compared with the general population.[27]

ED was found in 59.39% of diabetic men in the present study. Previous studies have reported the prevalence of ED among diabetic men varying between 35 and 90%.[2829] Other studies have reported ED in over 50% of diabetic men in the United States[30] and 41% of diabetic men in the Netherlands.[31] Studies from Saudi diabetic patients reported ED among 80% to 90% of the patients.[3233] Higher prevalence reported by some studies could be explained by the fact that they did not exclude secondary psychological factors associated with ED leading to false high prevalence.

In the present study, a significant moderate correlation was found between potency score and age (r = −0.647), duration of DM (r = −0.324). Whereas SBP, DBP, BMI, FBS, serum cholesterol, and serum creatinine showed a weak correlation with potency score. Serum testosterone level showed a strong positive correlation with potency score. Sharifi et al.[34] in 2012 reported almost similar findings including significant moderate correlation with age (r = −0.44) and weak correlation with SBP (r = −0.18), FBS (r = −0.17), HbA1c (r = −0.2) and serum creatinine (r = −0.2).

ED was found to be significantly associated with higher age. Similar finding had been reported in studies by Sharifi et al.[34] and Shi et al.[35] In the present study, the mean duration of diabetes in patients with ED was significantly longer than those without ED which is in concordance with the findings of Sharifi et al.[34] Higher mean SBP and DBP were also significantly associated with ED. Other studies like those by Sharifi et al.[34] and Fanuel et al.[36] also reported significantly higher mean SBP and DBP in those with ED as compared to without ED.

BMI was significantly lower in the diabetic males with ED (P < 0.001). Contrary to this, Shi et al.[35] reported slightly higher BMI (27.72 ± 4.36 kg/m2) in those with ED as compared to those without ED (27.13 ± 3.65 kg/m2). Some other studies have reported no correlation between ED and BMI.[3738]

In the present study, the mean FBS of patients with ED was significantly higher as compared to those without ED (P < 0.001) as was similarly found reported by Fanuel et al.[36] However, Sharifi et al.[34] did not find any significant association of FBS with ED. No significant association was found between ED and HbA1C supporting the results of Sharifi et al.[34] These findings indicate that immediate diabetic control is a possible predictor of ED rather than long-term diabetic control.

Considering lipid profile, only serum cholesterol was found to be significantly associated with ED, and serum triglyceride and HDL showed no significant association. Sharifi et al.[34] found no significant association with any lipid parameter, whereas Shi et al.[35] found a significant association with HDL. These varying results could be due to the presence of confounding factors like hypolipidemic drugs not taken into consideration in these studies.

Mean creatinine level in those with ED was significantly higher (P = 0.002) as was similarly found in the study by Sharifi et al.[35] Mean serum testosterone level in patients with ED was significantly lower than in those without ED mean level 5.95 ± 1.17 pg/mL (P < 0.001). This result was supported by the findings of Shi et al.[35] Multiple logistic regression analysis found only age, SBP, duration of diabetes, FBP, and serum-free testosterone (P < 0.05) to be independently associated with ED in diabetic men.


The prevalence of ED was found to be very high in men with T2DM. Age, blood pressure, duration of disease, FBS, and serum-free testosterone were independent predictors of ED in men with T2DM and some of these are modifiable. Better control of blood pressure and blood sugar level may reduce the prevalence of ED in diabetic, thus improve quality of life and reduce the economic impact associated with its management. Also, community awareness on the same should be included at the primary healthcare level, regular screening using simple one or two questions can be used to prevent the irreversible ED among poor glycemic control diabetic males.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


To all the study participants to provide their valuable time and data for the research.


1. World Health Organization Available at Last accessed on 2021 Jun 20
2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H Global prevalence of diabetes:Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030 Diabetes Care 2004 27 1047 53
3. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics –2013 update:A report from the American Heart Association Circulation 2013 127 e6 245
4. Campos C Chronic hyperglycemia and glucose toxicity:Pathology and clinical sequelae Postgrad Med 2012 124 90 7
5. Rahman S, Rahman T, Ismail AA, Rashid AR Diabetes-associated macrovasculopathy:Pathophysiology and pathogenesis Diabetes Obes Metab 2007 9 767 80
6. Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, D'Agostino RB Sr, Pencina MJ, Vasan RS, et al. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus:The Framingham Heart Study Circulation 2007 115 1544 50
7. Preis SR, Pencina MJ, Hwang SJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, Savage PJ, Levy D, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation 2009 120 212 20
8. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus N Engl J Med 1993 329 977 86
9. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35):Prospective observational study BMJ 2000 321 405 12
10. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates:Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study J Urol 1994 151 54 61
11. Giugliano F, Maiorino M, Bellastella G, Gicchino M, Giugliano D, Esposito K Determinants of erectile dysfunction in type 2 diabetes Int J Impot Res 2010 22 204 9
12. Enzlin P, Mathieu C, Van Den Bruel A, Vanderschueren D, Demyttenaere K Prevalence and predictors of sexual dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2003 26 409 14
13. Enzlin P, Rosen R, Wiegel M, Brown J, Wessells H, Gatcomb P, et al. DCCT/EDIC Research Group Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes:Long-term findings from the DCCT/EDIC study cohort Diabetes Care 2009 32 780 5
14. Seftel AD, Sun P, Swindle R The prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and depression in men with erectile dysfunction J Urol 2004 171 2341 5
15. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC Sexual dysfunction in the United States:Prevalence and predictors JAMA 1999 281 537 44
16. Ponholzer A, Temml C, Mock K, Marszalek M, Obermayr R, Madersbacher S Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in 2869 men using a validated questionnaire Eur Urol 2005 47 80 5 discussion 85-6
17. Bortolotti A, Fedele D, Chatenoud L, Colli E, Coscelli C, Landoni M, et al. Cigarette smoking:A risk factor for erectile dysfunction in diabetics Eur Urol 2001 40 392 6 discussion 397
18. Giuliano FA, Leriche A, Jaudinot EO, de Gendre AS Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among 7689 patients with diabetes or hypertension, or both Urology 2004 64 1196 201
19. De Berardis G, Pellegrini F, Franciosi M, et al. Clinical and psychological predictors of incidence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes J Urol 2007 177 1 252 257 doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.102
20. Demir O, Akgul K, Akar Z, Cakmak O, Ozdemir I, Bolukbasi A, et al. Association between severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile dysfunction and metabolic syndrome Aging Male 2009 12 29 34
21. Turek SJ, Hastings SM, Sun JK, King GL, Keenan HA Sexual dysfunction as a marker of cardiovascular disease in males with 50 or more years of type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2013 36 3222 6
22. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA Sildenafil Study Group Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction N Engl J Med 1998 338 1397 404
23. De Berardis G, Franciosi M, Belfiglio M, Di Nardo B, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, et al. Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients:A serious problem too often overlooked Diabetes Care 2002 25 284 91
24. NIH consensus conference Impotence. NIH consensus development panel on impotence JAMA 1993 270 83 90
25. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction Int J Impot Res 1999 11 319 26
26. Hermans MP, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF Erectile dysfunction, microangiopathy and UKPDS risk in type 2 diabetes Diabetes Metab 2009 35 484 9
27. Yang G, Pan C, Lu J Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among Chinese men with type 2 diabetes mellitus Int J Impot Res 2010 22 310 7
28. Nicolosi A, Moreira ED, Shirai M, Bin MI, Glasser DB Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction in four countries:Cross-national study of the prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction Urology 2003 61 201 6
29. Bacon CG, Mittleman MA, Kawachi I, Giovannucci E, Glasser DB, Rimm EB Sexual function in men older than 50 years of age:Results from the health professionals follow-up study Ann Int Med 2003 139 161 8
30. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US Am J Med 2007 120 151 7
31. Cleveringa FGW, Meulenberg MGG, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, Rutten GEHM The association between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in men with Type 2 diabetes in primary care:It is a matter of age J Diabetes Complications 2009 23 153 9
32. El-Sakka AI Characteristics of erectile dysfunction in Saudi patients Int J Impot Res 2004 16 13 20
33. El-Sakka AI, Tayeb KA Erectile dysfunction risk factors in noninsulin dependent diabetic Saudi patients J Urol 2003 169 1043 7
34. Sharifi F, Asghari M, Jaberi Y, Salehi O, Mirzamohammadi F Independent Predictors of Erectile Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:Is It True What They Say about Risk Factors? ISRN Endocrinol. 2012 2012 502353 doi:10.5402/2012/502353
35. Shi MD, Chao JK, Ma MC, Chiang SK, Chao IC The connection between type 2 diabetes and erectile dysfunction in Taiwanese aboriginal males Int J Impot Res 2014 26 235 40 doi:10.1038/ijir.2014.26
36. Lampiao F, Mahala M, Zumazuma A Erectile dysfunction as an early marker of elevated blood glucose levels and blood pressure in Malawian men in a rural setting Reprod Sys Sexual Disorders 2013 2 2
37. Ziaei-Rad M, Vahdaninia M, Montazeri A Sexual dysfunctions in patients with diabetes:A study from Iran Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010 8 50
38. Enzlin P, Mathieu C, Van den Bruel A, Bosteels J, Vanderschueren D, Demyttenaere K Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes:A controlled study Diabetes Care 2002 25 672 7

Diabetes; diabetes mellitus; erectile dysfunction; hyperglycemia; sexual dysfunction

Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care