Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Snakebite profile from a tertiary care setup in a largely rural setting in the hills of North-West India

Kumar, Anil1; Raina, Sunil K.2,; Raina, Sujeet3

Author Information
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care: August 27, 2021 - Volume 10 - Issue 8 - p 2793-2797
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2377_20
  • Open



India accounts for almost half of the total number of annual snakebite deaths in the world.[1] As per a report, India reported 1.2 million snakebite deaths (representing an average of 58,000 per year) from 2000 to 2019. Nearly half of these deaths were in the age-group of 30–69 years with over a quarter being children under 15 years of age.[1]

As per available reports, there are about 216 species of snakes in India, of which only four are being reported as venomous (cobra, krait, Russell's viper, and saw-scaled viper).[2] Himachal Pradesh, a northern India state, situated in the Western Himalayas is one of the 11-mountain states in the country.

The state has reported the existence of venomous snakes like Trimeresurus albolabris (white lipped pit viper), Gloydius himalayanus (Himalayan pit viper) and Naja oxiana (black cobra) in addition to the common “Big 4” – the Indian cobra (Naja naja), the common krait (Bungarus caeruleus), the Russell's viper (Daboia russelii), and the saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus), which are found throughout India.[3]

An important aspect of morbidity due to snakebite is its large-scale neglect by public health. Despite being a common acute medical emergency, snakebite has been largely ignored by public health in India with very few large-scale epidemiological studies having been conducted. Mountainous terrains are a special challenge as the terrain in itself increases the challenge medical emergencies like snakebites bring on.[4] The Hills are a special environment, thereby providing special setting to study the challenges in the management of snakebites. The geography offers eco-rich vegetation and abundance of flora and fauna. A scattered population using paths traversing rural and forest lands makes people in these areas particularly vulnerable to snakebite.[5]

Material and Methods

A hospital record-based retrospective descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected from the Medical Records Department of the 821-bedded, tertiary care hospital catering to the rural hilly population of the state of the physio-geographic zone of Shivalik and Lesser Himalayas of the Himachal Pradesh state of India. Data on all snakebite cases admitted to the tertiary care hospital from January 2018 to December 2018 was retrieved using a structured format after obtaining institutional permission for the same. The data were entered in a pre-coded proforma and included details on demography, clinical profile, treatment, and outcome. Only records of snakebite cases in which complete information was available were included in pre-coded proforma parameters. Snakebite patients who absconded or were discharged against medical advice and where records were incomplete were excluded.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data analysis will include means, standard deviation, and proportions. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test for comparison. Risk was estimated using odds ratio. Data analysis was done by app version 7.


A total of 252 patients were analyzed. Majority (153/252; 60.7%) of the patients was female and the maximum number of patients (110/252; 43.7%) was in the age-group of 21–40 with mean and standard deviation of 30.52 ± 5.693 and 31.81 ± 7.117 for male and female, respectively [Table 1]. Time distribution of snakebite is shown in Table 2 with maximum bites being seen between 12 noon to 6 pm. However, the difference in the proportion of patients reporting in different time slots was not statistically significant. Only 3.12% (8/252) patients reported to health facility within 1 h of the bite with [Table 3]. A substantial number (161/252; 63.58%) had no information on their first contact with healthcare facility. Majority of bites (143/252; 56.74%) were on the lower limb with an odds ratio of 1.957 and CI of 1.376–2.81 [Table 4].

Table 1:
Age-wise distribution of snakebite cases (n=252)
Table 2:
Time distribution of snakebite cases (n=252)
Table 3:
Time between bite and first health contact (n=252)
Table 4:
Site distribution of snakebite cases (n=252)

The clinical presentation of data reveals that no signs of envenomation in 59.52% (150/252) of patients. Out of the envenomation found 26.58% (67/252) of bite was reported as hematotoxic while 11.90% (30/252) were reported as neurotoxic [Table 5]. A small percentage (5/252; 1.98%) showed a mixed pattern. The data analysis revealed that all snakebite patients recorded presence from April onwards till October [Table 6], with June to September being the peak season of presentation (221/252; 87.6%). Maximum bites were reported in July (74/252; 29.3%) followed by August (63/252; 25%). Majority (94/252; 37.3%) of patients did not report a particular activity at the time of the bite [Table 7]. However, a significant number of patients (74/252; 29.4%) mentioned farming as their activity during the bite. Importantly 13.09% (33/252) of patients reported of bite while sleeping.

Table 5:
Clinical presentation of the cases (n=252)
Table 6:
Month-wise distribution of snakebite cases (n=252)
Table 7:
Activities of snakebite cases during bite (n=252)

A significant majority (176/252; 69.84%) of patients did not report of application of tourniquet at the time of bite [Table 8]. A large majority (222/252; 88.1%) refused to have taken any alternate medicine for the management of the snakebite. Acute kidney injury was present in 6.74% (17/252) of patients, whereas cranial bleed was present only in 0.4% of the patients [Table 9]. A significant minority of patients (6/252; 2.3%) did not survive the snakebite [Table 10].

Table 8:
Tourniquet application and use of alternative medicine at the time of bite (n=252)
Table 9:
AKI/Cranial bleed among snakebite cases (n=252)
Table 10:
Outcome of snakebite cases (n=252)


The data analysis although restricted to a tertiary care setup provides insight into morbidity due to snakebite in a largely rural population in addition to some insights into the potential role of healthcare providers in primary care settings in dealing with such situations. As per the data analysis, the maximum number of patients in our study belonged to the age-group of 21–40 years. This age-group being highly active and involved in outdoor activities is increasingly more prone to snakebite. Studies on similar domain report similar results.[67] An increased proportion of patients belonging to the female gender could be attributed to the vocation of the females in this physio-geographic zone.

Grass cutting activity for fodder is a common practice resorted to by the females in this region.[89] This could be the reason that our proportions are not similar to some other studies where male (74.2%) were more in number than females the reason.[10] Maximum bites were between 12 noon to 6 pm, reflecting the time when people are mostly outdoors doing their chores.

Snakebite cases occurred, starting from the month of April till October which is ideal condition for snakes. Also, this season is ideal for harvesting and also marked by monsoons, adding on to the favorable conditions for snakebites.[8] This distinct seasonal pattern with peaks in the warm and rainy months has been observed in the state of Himachal Pradesh, as in other parts of the country.[5891112131415]

There were only eight patients who presented to the hospital (or health facility) within 1 h. Acute kidney injury was seen in 6.7% of patients, which could be attributed to late presentation to the hospital leading to the development of complications. Initial delay in transportation and inadequate ambulance services coupled with low level of awareness on the nature of intervention could be the reasons for delayed presentation to the health facility.[814] As per studies, the incidence of acute renal failure is around 13–32% following viper bite in India.

Majority of bites were in the lower limbs (150) followed by the upper limb (96) which are generally the exposed parts of the body. Similar findings have been reported by other studies.[8141516] A large proportion of patients presented with no signs of envenomation, which again emphasizes the need for creation of awareness among general public as well the healthcare providers in the primary care setting. Correct information would reduce panic and save vital time in instituting management. Furthermore, this would reduce unnecessary burden on emergency department.[10] Increased awareness will also ensure lesser and lesser use of tourniquet application and alternate medicine.

Overall mortality rate in our study was 2.38%, which was a little higher than as seen in another study.[11] The probable reason could be delayed presentation to the health facility, delayed administration of ASV. However, the mortality rate after snakebite depends upon various factors like type of snakebite, amount of venom injected, site of bite (serious if bitten on the trunk or head, neck, and face), species and size of the snakes, the extent of its anger or fear, the presence of bacteria in the mouth of the snake or on the skin of the victim.[11]

The study although restricted to one physio-geography does highlight the management difficulties posed by mountain terrain. It also raises issues regarding the lack of available and easily accessible snakebite management at all places. In addition to the fact that large-scale studies on epidemiological determinants of snakebite coupled with research in venom biochemistry and bio-pharmacology of anti-snake venom (ASV) are needed, research also needs to focus on the role of primary care physicians in the management of snakebite. An integration of snakebite management into injury management protocols as part of comprehensive emergency care with primary care physician as focus will go a long way in preventing mortality. Creating an ecosystem favorable for snakebite management at primary care level will be the key.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

1. Last accessed on 2020 Dec 03 Available from:
2. Suraweera W, Warrell D, Whitaker R, Menon G, Rodrigues R, Fu SH, et al Trends in snakebite deaths in India from 2000 to 2019 in a nationally representative mortality study Elife. 2020;9:e54076
3. Saikia U, Sharma DK, Sharma RM. Checklist of the reptilian fauna of Himachal Pradesh, India Reptile Rap.;8:6–9
4. Boyd JJ, Agazzi G, Svajda D, Morgan AJ, Ferrandis S, Norris RL. Venomous snakebite in mountainous terrain: Prevention and management Wilderness Environ Med. 2007;18:190–202
5. Mapping snakes in Uttarakhand for safer coexistence with humans.Last accessed on 2021 Feb 19 Available from:
6. Jones AL, Karalliedde LBoon NA, Colledge NR, Walker BR. Poisoning Davidson's Principles and Practice of Medicine. 200620th ed Philadelphia Churchill Livingstone Elsevier:203–26
7. Warrell DAWarrel DA, Cox TM, Firth JD. Injuries, envenoming, poisoning and allergic reactions caused by animals Oxford Textbook of Medicine. 2003;14th ed New York Oxford University Press:923–46
8. Raina S, Raina S, Kaul R, Chander V, Jaryal A. Snakebite profile from a medical college in rural setting in the hills of Himachal Pradesh, India Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:134–8
9. Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, Bhatia P, Dhingra N, Jotkar RM, et al Snakebite mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1018
10. Ahmed SM, Nadeem A, Islam MS, Agarwal S, Singh L. Retrospective analysis of snake victims in Northern India admitted in a tertiary level institute J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28:45–50
11. Monteiro FN, Kanchan T, Bhagavath P, Kumar GP, Menezes RG, Yoganarasimha K. Clinico-epidemiological features of viper bite envenomation: A study from Manipal, South India Singapore Med J. 2012;53:203–7
12. Saravu K, Somavarapu V, Shastry AB, Kumar R. Clinical profile, species-specific severity grading, and outcome determinants of snake envenomation: An Indian tertiary care hospital-based prospective study Indian J Crit Care Med. 2012;16:187–92
13. Sharma N, Chauhan S, Faruqi S, Bhat P, Varma S. Snake envenomation in a north Indian hospital Emerg Med J. 2005;22:118–20
14. Alirol E, Sharma SK, Bawaskar HS, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Snake bite in South Asia: A review PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;26(4):e603
15. Halesha BR, Harshavardhan L, Lokesh AJ, Channaveerappa PK, Venkatesh KB. A study on the clinico-epidemiological profile and the outcome of snake bite victims in a tertiary care centre in southern India J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:122–6
16. Jarwani B, Jadav P, Madaiya M. Demographic, epidemiologic and clinical profile of snake bite cases, presented to emergency medicine department, Ahmedabad, Gujarat J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2013;6:199–202

Envenomation; outcome; profile; snakebite

© 2021 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow