Prevalence and the relationship of oral mucosal lesions in tobacco users and denture wearers in the North Indian population : Journal of Family and Community Medicine

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Prevalence and the relationship of oral mucosal lesions in tobacco users and denture wearers in the North Indian population

Patil, Santosh; Yadav, Nidhi; Patil, Prashant; Kaswan, Sumita1

Author Information
Journal of Family and Community Medicine: Sep–Dec 2013 - Volume 20 - Issue 3 - p 187-191
doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.122009
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most studies on the prevalence of oral mucosal lesions have been conducted in the developed world such the American,[12] European[34] and Asian[56] continents. Since there are vast cultural, ethnic and geographical differences between the Indian subcontinent and the countries on these continents, it would not be realistic to apply the results of those studies to the Indian population. As stated previously, tobacco and its related products are notable risk factors for the development of pre-cancerous lesions and conditions, which may eventually lead to oral cancer.[78] The prevalence of melanin pigmentation, various oral lesions and white lesions is higher among smokers.[39] However, some studies do not identify smoking as a risk factor for oral lesions.[10] The use of dentures in the elderly has also been known to act as a potential risk factor for oral lesions and the development of oral cancer as well as other characteristic lesions such as denture stomatitis and hyperplasia.[1112] Traumatic ulcers are the most frequently seen oral lesion in users of dentures.[13]

The present study was carried out to verify the association between the use of tobacco and dentures and the development of oral mucosal lesions and to find the prevalence of oral lesions in a North Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the study, 3,749 patients attending the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Jodhpur Dental College General Hospital, between September 2008 and December 2012 for the treatment of dental problems other than oral mucosal lesions, were selected. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee, Jodhpur Dental College General Hospital and Jodhpur National University. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the examination. The study was designed as per the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the conduct of oral health epidemiological studies and all diseases were diagnosed and recorded according to the WHO classification.[141516] Patients with any lesions resulting from trauma were excluded from the study. The oral examination was conducted with appropriate instruments under suitable lighting. A patient who has smoked >8 cigarettes/bidis a day for the past 10 years was identified as a smoker. A patient who uses either partially removable or complete dentures was included as a wearer of dentures for the study. A provisional diagnosis was established at the time of examination. If there was no improvement in the lesion after 15 days, a biopsy of the lesion for histopathological examination was advised. The observations were analyzed using the computer program, SPSS 12 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA). The results were evaluated using the Pearson Chi-square test, with Yate’s correction and ANOVA tests. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 2035 (54.3%) male and 1714 (45.7%) female patients. The ages of the patients ranged from 28 years to 83 years with a mean age of 49.7 years. The distribution of the sample by age and gender is shown in Table 1. Most of the patients (n = 1049; 58.34%) in the 28-37 years age group were smokers and the number of patients with either partial or complete dentures (n = 553) (non-denture wearers, n = 318) increased after the fourth decade [Table 2]. A total of 2,318 patients (61.8%) were diagnosed with lesions associated with tobacco use and the wearing of dentures. The most frequently seen lesion was melanin pigmentation (n = 1121; 29.9%) followed by linea alba (n = 835; 22.2%) and frictional keratosis (n = 746; 19.9%) [Table 3]. Melanin pigmentation was more commonly seen in males (n = 632; 40.8%) while females showed a higher prevalence of linea alba (n = 423; 24.6%) and frictional keratosis (n = 418; 24.4%). Ulcers (n = 232; 6.1%) were the most commonly seen oral lesion in patients who wore dentures, followed by hyperplasia (n = 181; 4.8%). All the denture-related lesions were more common in females. It was noticed that a large number of the lesions occurred on the buccal mucosa and the lips. Most of the patients examined were of middle and lower socio-economic status (>80%).

T1-8
Table 1:
Distribution of the sample according to age and gender
T2-8
Table 2:
Distribution of the sample according to age and smoking habits and age and denture wearing status
T3-8
Table 3:
Distribution of oral pathology lesion according to gender

The distribution of the oral mucosal lesions according to the habit of smoking and the use of dentures is shown in Table 4. The statistical analysis showed a statistically significant relation (P < 0.05) between the tobacco habit and melanin pigmentation (P = 0.0001), frictional keratosis (P = 0.0016), traumatic ulcerations (P = 0.0342) and leukoplakia. Similarly, in wearers of dentures a statistically significant relation (P < 0.05) was found between Candidiasis (P = 0.0004), traumatic ulceration (0.0073), stomatitis (P = 0.0116) and frictional keratosis (P = 0.0000). No significant relation was established between gender and melanin pigmentation (P = 0.0012) and melanin pigmentation and the socio-economic status of patients (P > 0.05). However, a statistically significant relation was found between frictional keratosis and gender (P = 0.0024) as well as in patients of low socio-economic status (P < 0.05).

T4-8
Table 4:
Distribution of oral mucosal lesions according to smoking habit and denture wearing status

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of the various oral mucosal lesions in the present study (61.8%) was similar to other studies mentioned in the literature.[171819] However, these results are much higher than the global prevalence, which is reported to be <10%.[6] The number of patients who have the habit of smoking is much higher (55.0%), than in similar studies with the reported number of smokers as approximately 34-37%.[317] Some studies had a higher percentage of patients who wore dentures,[18] but the present study had 969 patients who wore dentures (25.8%).

In certain countries, the pigmentation of the oral mucosa ranges from 70.5% to 88.4%.[318] The current study showed melanin pigmentation in 29.9% of the patients, a much higher finding than those of Salonen et al.[3] who reported prevalence of 9.9% in 1976 and 6.6% in the 1990 study. Similar to the findings of Axéll et al.[18] and Hedin and Axéll[9] melanin pigmentation was more common in males (40.8%). However, a few other studies have reported a higher prevalence in females taking contraceptives.[20] Hedin and Axéll[9] reported a statistically significant relationship between melanin pigmentation and the tobacco habit, but no statistically significant relation was established in the present study.

The prevalence of leukoplakia in the current study was 6.6%, similar to the findings of other studies.[421] This was, however, much higher than the 0.5% prevalence reported by Martínez Díaz-Canel and García-Pola Vallejo.[17] The relationship of leukoplakia with the tobacco habit is somewhat controversial. Some studies[422] link tobacco habits to leukoplakia, as in the study, which showed 13.6% of smokers afflicted with leukoplakia.[3] While others have shown no relation between leukoplakia and smoking.[23] The present study established a statistically significant relation between the 2 entities.

Lichen planus represents approximately 20% of the diagnoses in routine practice and is the most frequent non-infectious disease of the oral mucosa.[24] The present study reported prevalence of 1.5%, a figure which is much higher than that of the previous study done in an Indian population.[25] Other similar studies done in Thailand and in Sweden showed a higher prevalence of 3.8% and 2.4% respectively.[318] Lichen planus was more commonly seen in males in the current study, similar to the findings of Bouquot and Gorlin[1] and Salem.[26] On the other hand, a few studies have shown it to be more common in females.[17]

According to the symposium on white lesions held in Uppsala in 1994,[27] the origin of a white lesion of the oral mucosa is unlikely to be trauma. The theory of cheek biting in anxiety and stress is shown by the difference in prevalence depending on where the study is conducted. In a study in Denmark,[28] 0.5% of the patients presented with cheek or lip biting while in another study carried out in South Africa the prevalence was 4.6%.[29] The prevalence in the present study was estimated as 16.9%, a much higher figure than the studies done in American and Spanish populations showed.[117] The prevalence of frictional keratosis observed in the current study was 19.9%, which was much higher than was reported by Salonen et al. (4,6%).[3] The greater frequency of keratosis seen in patients younger than 50 years, was thought to have originated from caries and fractured teeth rather than from dentures. A statistically significant relationship between frictional keratosis and tobacco was established.

The prevalence of pathologies of the tongue in the present study (11.1%) was similar to that observed Axéll et al.(12,6%).[18] Some studies have however, suggested the prevalence as high as 18%.[30] The prevalence of geographical tongue or benign migratory tongue in patients of the present study was 3.3%, which is closer to what was seen in the Swedish population.[3] However, a much lower prevalence was seen in the United States (0.3%)[31] and in the Spanish population (0.8%).[17] The prevalence of hairy tongue, was 7.8%, a much higher figure than has been reported in similar studies.[1830] This phenomenon is more frequent in males, its prevalence increasing with age. No statistically significant relation was established between this lesion and the habit of smoking or the wearing of dentures as proposed by Beaven and Brooks.[32]

Some studies have shown the highest prevalence of oral lesions to be traumatic ulcerations.[20] However, this was not so in the present study. The prevalence of traumatic ulcerations found in the present study (11.5%) was higher than was estimated by Salonen et al.[3] who reported it as 8%. The prevalence of recurrent aphthous stomatitis also shows great variations in different populations owing to the differences in the methodology used for the study, socio-economic status and the professional level.[1733] The result of the present study (8.2%) is higher than the 2% found in the Swedish study.[3] However, there was no indication in the present study that this entity is related to a determined socioeconomic-professional level. The prevalence is higher in females, which is in accord with other similar studies.[3334] Ship[35] stated that in edentulous patients, underlying denture aphthous lesions are uncommon. Indeed some similar studies have reported a relationship between non-denture wearers and non-smokers and the presence of aphthous. Some authors consider local trauma as one of the predisposing factors for recurrent aphthous.[17]

Embil et al.[36] indicated that there are geographical variations in the prevalence of herpes labialis. These variations may be seen as possibly due to social and ethnic differences, as seen in other Asian countries.[18] The differences in the results of the present study and the study of Salonen et al.[3] may be because in these studies, the lesion was verified when it was present and not from recurrence in the clinical history. It has been suggested, that recurrent herpes is more frequent in low social classes than in higher social classes.[37] The values for the prevalence of candidiasis in previous studies (<0.5%)[118] were much lower than the present study (5.5%). These differences may be due to the high percentage of wearers of dentures in the present study sample. This was statistically significant, as in other similar studies.[1738]

In the present study, the percentage of hyperplasia caused by the suction effect or negative pressure[39] diagnosed in those who do not wear dentures is very similar to the findings of Salonen et al.[3] and Axéll et al.[18] As indicated in similar studies,[13] our study shows that wearers of dentures more frequently suffer from traumatic ulceration. While a few other studies have shown that frictional keratosis, denture stomatitis and hyperplasia[10] were more commonly seen in wearers of dentures. Due the presence of fibrous hyperplasia and candidiasis in a high number of denture wearers, it is essential to carry out periodic examination of the oral mucosa in these patients to establish a preventive protocol to eradicate the pathology caused by the use of dentures.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study indicate a strong association of frictional keratosis with tobacco users and wearers of dentures with the etiology of oral cancer. This should be of interest to dental clinicians since it would help in quick diagnosis and planning the treatment of oral cancer. Wearers of dentures should also be recalled periodically for a check-up, so that optimum preventive measures could be taken.

REFERENCES

1. Bouquot JE, Gorlin RJ. Leukoplakia, lichen planus and other oral keratoses in 23,616 white Americans over the age of 35 years Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61:373–81
2. Sedano HO, Carreon Freyre I, Garza de la Garza ML, Gomar Franco CM, Grimaldo Hernandez C, Hernandez Montoya ME, et al Clinical orodental abnormalities in Mexican children Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;68:300–11
3. Salonen L, Axéll T, Helldén L. Occurrence of oral mucosal lesions, the influence of tobacco habits and an estimate of treatment time in an adult Swedish population J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19:170–6
4. Bánóczy J, Rigó O. Prevalence study of oral precancerous lesions within a complex screening system in Hungary Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:265–7
5. Gupta PC, Mehta FS, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Bhonsle RB, Jalnawalla PN, et al Incidence rates of oral cancer and natural history of oral precancerous lesions in a 10-year follow-up study of Indian villagers Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980;8:283–33
6. Zain RB, Ikeda N, Razak IA, Axéll T, Majid ZA, Gupta PC, et al A national epidemiological survey of oral mucosal lesions in Malaysia Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:377–83
7. Vigneswaran N, Tilashalski K, Rodu B, Cole P. Tobacco use and cancer. A reappraisal Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:178–82
8. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, Austin DF, Greenberg RS, Preston-Martin S, et al Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer Cancer Res. 1988;48:3282–7
9. Hedin CA, Axéll T. Oral melanin pigmentation in 467 Thai and Malaysian people with special emphasis on smoker’s melanosis J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20:8–12
10. Corbet EF, Holmgren CJ, Phillipsen HP. Oral mucosal lesions in 65-74-year-old Hong Kong Chinese Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:392–5
11. Mikkonen M, Nyyssönen V, Paunio I, Rajala M. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions associated with wearing removable dentures in Finnish adults Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984;12:191–4
12. Hoad-Reddick G. Oral pathology and prostheses: Are they related. Investigations in an elderly population? J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:75–87
13. Dorey JL, Blasberg B, MacEntee MI, Conklin RJ. Oral mucosal disorders in denture wearers J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:210–3
14. World Health Organization. Guide to Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Oral Mucosal Diseases and Conditions. 1980 Copenhagen Munksgaard
15. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. 19873rd ed Geneva WHO
16. Kramer IR, Lucas RB, Pindborg JJ, Sobin LH. Definition of leukoplakia and related lesions: An aid to studies on oral precancer Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;46:518–39
17. Martínez Díaz-Canel AI, García-Pola Vallejo MJ. Epidemiological study of oral mucosa pathology in patients of the Oviedo School of Stomatology Med Oral. 2002;7:4–10:9–10
18. Axéll T, Zain RB, Siwamogstham P, Tantiniran D, Thampipit J. Prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions in out-patients at two Malaysian and Thai dental schools Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1990;18:95–9
19. Garcia-Pola Vallejo MJ, Martinez AI. Prevalence of oral pathology in patients of Oviedo School of Stomatology Rev Act Odontoestomatol Esp. 1996;1:22–31
20. Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ Patologia Bucal: Correlaciones Clinicopatologicas. 20003rd ed Mexico McGraw-Hill Interamericana:31–151
21. Hogewind WF, van der Waal I. Prevalence study of oral leukoplakia in a selected population of 1000 patients from The Netherlands Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988;16:302–5
22. Bagan JV, Vera F, Milian MA, Penarrocha M, Silvestre FJ, Sanchis JM. Oral leukoplakia: Clinico-pathological study of 110 cases Archivos De Odontoestomatologia. 1993;9:127–38
23. Ikeda N, Ishii T, Iida S, Kawai T. Epidemiological study of oral leukoplakia based on mass screening for oral mucosal diseases in a selected Japanese population Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:160–3
24. Cerero Lapiedra R, Garcia Nunez JA, Garcia-Pola MJ. Oral lichen planus Rev Act Odontoestomatol Esp. 1997;8:643–60
25. Bhonsle RB, Pindborg JJ, Gupta PC, Murti PR, Mehta FS. Incidence rate of oral lichen planus among Indian villagers Acta Derm Venereol. 1979;59:255–7
26. Salem G. Oral lichen planus among 4277 patients from Gizan, Saudi Arabia Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989;17:322–4
27. Axéll T, Pindborg JJ, Smith CJ, van der Waal I. Oral white lesions with special reference to precancerous and tobacco-related lesions: Conclusions of an international symposium held in Uppsala, Sweden, May 18-21 1994.International Collaborative Group on Oral White Lesions J Oral Pathol Med. 1996;25:49–54
28. Sewerin I. A clinical and epidemiologic study morsicatio buccarum-labiorum Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79:73–80
29. Van Wyk CW, Staz J, Farman AG. The chewing lesion of the cheeks and lips: Its features and prevalence among a selected group of adolescents J Dent. 1977;5:193–9
30. Darwazeh AM, Pillai K. Prevalence of tongue lesions in 1013 Jordanian dental outpatients Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21:323–4
31. Bouquot JE, Gundlach KK. Odd tongues: The prevalence of common tongue lesions in 23,616 white Americans over 35 years of age Quintessence Int. 1986;17:719–30
32. Beaven DW, Brooks SE A Colour Atlas of the Tongue in Clinical Diagnosis. 1988 London Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd:74
33. Pongissawaranun W, Laohapand P. Epidemiologic study on recurrent aphthous stomatitis in a Thai dental patient population Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:52–3
34. Ferguson MM, Carter J, Boyle P. An epidemiological study of factors associated with recurrent aphthae in women J Oral Med. 1984;39:212–7
35. Ship II. Epidemiologic aspects of recurrent aphthous ulcerations Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;33:400–6
36. Embil JA, Stephens RG, Manuel FR. Prevalence of recurrent herpes labialis and aphthous ulcers among young adults on six continents Can Med Assoc J. 1975;113:627–30
37. Crivelli MR, Aguas S, Adler I, Quarracino C, Bazerque P. Influence of socioeconomic status on oral mucosa lesion prevalence in schoolchildren Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988;16:58–60
38. Martin MV, Lamb DJ. Frequency of Candida albicans serotypes in patients with denture-induced stomatitis and in normal denture wearers J Clin Pathol. 1982;35:888–91
39. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 1995 Philadelphia WB Saunders Company:259–415

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Keywords:

Denture wearers; oral mucosal pathology; smokers

© 2013 Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow