A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SOME CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF IMPETIGO PATIENTS SEEN IN DERMATOLOGY CLINIC IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF SAUDI ARABIA : Journal of Family and Community Medicine

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SOME CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF IMPETIGO PATIENTS SEEN IN DERMATOLOGY CLINIC IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF SAUDI ARABIA

Al-Ghamdi, Khalid M. MD

Author Information
Journal of Family and Community Medicine: Jan–Apr 2006 - Volume 13 - Issue 1 - p 31-34
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Impetigo is one of the most common skin infections in children accounting for approximately one tenth of all cutaneous problems presenting to pediatric clinics.13 In the USA, 9 – 10% of all children presenting with skin complaints had impetigo.4 A prospective survey of a pediatric dermatology clinic to determine the spectrum and pattern of skin diseases of children in Kuwait determined that impetigo was the fifth most common dermatoses constituting about 7.6% of dermatological cases.5

Impetigo is superficial skin infection mainly caused by staphylococcus aureus or group A beta haemolytic streptococcus (GAβHS). It is characterized clinically by the appearance of small, erythematous lesions which quickly develop into vesicles and pustules. Later, the vesicles and pustules become crusted and weepy, and new vesicles or blisters develop in the same place or other body sites.68 It commonly occurs in the preschool age with equal sex distribution. It involves the face and extremities, and is seen mainly during the summer and early fall and is, therefore, more common in warm climates.24910

Few studies of impetigo have been done in the Middle East and this preliminary retrospective study was done to review the epidemiological characteristic and clinical features of impetigo among patients at KFHU, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with impetigo from January 1990 to December 2001 were retrieved and only patients with positive skin culture were included in the study.

A data collection sheet was prepared to summarize the information obtained from each patient record, including the demographic features (age, gender and nationality), clinical features, investigations and the treatment prescribed.

During the period of study, January 1990 to December 2001, the total number of new patients seen in the dermatology clinic was 77068. Among these, 203 (0.26%) patients were diagnosed on clinical basis as impetigo, and only 65 (0.08%) were confirmed by culture study.

The data was analyzed using a personal computer and statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). Statistical analysis was performed for qualitative variables with chi-square test and for quantitative variables by students’ T-test. Significance level was set to be less than 0.05%, throughout the study analysis.

RESULTS

The Epidemiological Characteristics of Impetigo Patients

The number of Saudi and non-Saudi patients with impetigo and their sex distribution is shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference between Saudi and non-Saudi patients and the male to female ratio was 1.7:1.

T1-6
Table 1:
Gender distribution of impetigo patients

The age at presentation with impetigo varied from 0.063 to 44.0 years, and the median age was 4.0 years. In males, the age at presentation ranged from 0.420 to 33.0 years (median 4.0 years), and in females from 0.063 to 44 years (median 4.0 years). The gender difference between different age groups in Saudi and non-Saudi patients at presentation was not statistically significant.

The duration of impetigo on the day of presentation in the dermatology clinic ranged from 1 to 15 days with a median of 7 days and the differences in duration between males and females was not statistically significant.

The distribution of impetigo patients throughout the year is shown in Figure 1. The highest number of patients was seen during the summer months, peaking in the months of June and July. The lowest number of patients was seen during the winter months (December to March).

F1-6
Figure 1:
Distribution of patients during the year

The Clinical features of Impetigo

The most frequent clinical feature of impetigo was erythema and yellowish crusted lesions. Yellowish crusts occurred in 43 patients (66.2%) and erythema occurred in 35 patients (53.8%). Regional adenopathy was found in 31 (50.8%) out of a total of 61 patients examined.

Non–bullous impetigo was the predominant clinical type seen in 43 (66.2%) patients, 30 (69.8%) of whom were males and 13 (30.2%) females. The Bullous type impetigo was present in 16 (24.6%) patients, 10 of whom were males and 6 females; the majority (87.5%) of these cases were <5 years of age. The site distribution of impetigo according to morphological types is shown in Table 2.

T2-6
Table 2:
Distribution of sites according to morphological types (bullous and non-bullous)

Precipitating factors for impetigo were reported in 28 (43.1%) patients, and included itchy skin, wounds, insect bites, cuts and burns. Eczema was the most common pre-existing skin disease found in 11 (16.9%) patients, Tinea Capitis was observed in 5 (7.7%) patients, and varicella found in one patient (1.5%).

Laboratory Results

Results of swab cultures from impetigo patients revealed that Staphylococcus aureus was positive in 43 cases (66.2%) and group A β Hemolytic streptococci were positive in 8 cases (12.3%). Mixed infection by both organisms was positive in 12 cases (18.5%) and in 2 cases, Klebsiella and Streptococcus Group C were also reported. All cases caused by S. Aureus were resistant to penicillin, but all cases caused by GAβHS were sensitive to it. The distribution of the causatives organisms according to the type of impetigo is shown in Figure 2.

F2-6
Figure 2:
The causative organisms according to the type of impetigo

DISCUSSION

The total number of patients with impetigo in this study was 65, constituting 0.08% of the dermatological cases seen during the period of the study. The low incidence of impetigo in the present study compared to other studies1011 can be explained by the fact that most of the impetigo cases are managed at primary health care centers. Only a few complicated cases are referred to the university hospital. Besides, all cases without reported cultures had been excluded in this study.

The sex distribution of impetigo patients in this study was similar to that found in other studies.1215 The age of presentation of impetigo of patients in the present study showed a high frequency in the younger age groups and is in agreement with reports in the literature.131617

The present study showed that 67.7% of the patients had had impetigo for up to 7 days, and 24.6% between one and two weeks. In 7.7% of the patients, duration of the disease was not documented. This finding is similar to the reported duration of impetigo in a study done in Western Sweden and another in the USA.1819

In this study, the predominant form of impetigo was the non-bullous type which together with the specific sites involved are in accord with other studies.151920 The seasonal distribution of impetigo in our patients showed an increase during the summer months as found in other similar studies.1319

Staphylococcus aureus isolated in 55 cases (84.7%), 43 in pure culture and 12 in mixed cultures with GAβHS, was the commonest cause of impetigo in this study as in other studies.81519

The importance of impetigo caused by A-β hemolytic streptococci strains is the fact that its nephritogenic M-strains can be followed by acute glomerulonephritis and therefore, urinalysis should always be performed in endemic areas. The risk of developing acute post streptococcal glomuerulonephritis (APSGN) is not altered by the treatment of Impetigo.1221 ASPGN appears 18-21 days after infection, and children aged 3-7 years are most commonly affected.1012

All cultures that yielded S. aureus were resistant to penicillin, and in the majority of cases (87.7%). S. aureus was sensitive to erythromycin, cloxacillin and augmentin as expected from reports in the literature.81418

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The majority (83.1%) of cases of Impetigo patients who attended the dermatology clinic at KFHU were below 10 years of age, and the male to female ratio was 1.7:1.

The predominant type of impetigo was non-bullous, and the major sites affected were the extremities and the face. The impetigo patients were mostly seen during hot humid summer months.

Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of impetigo in this study and was sensitive to erythromycin, cloxacillin and augmentin oral antibiotics.

A community-based study should be performed to establish the incidence or the prevalence of impetigo in the general population and to identify the nephroitogenic strains of group A-b hemolytic streptococci.

Culture and sensitivity investigations are recommended for all patients with clinical diagnosis of impetigo. To avoid the development of resistance because of its role in systemic infections, fusidic acid should not be used as first line of topical therapy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author would like to thank Prof. Hassan Bella for his valuable suggestions and assistance in the writing of this article.

REFERENCES

1. Lewis Ls, Fredman Ad. Impetigo eMedicine Journal. 2002;3(4):1–16
2. Wortman PD. Bacterial infections of the skin Curr Probl Dermatol. 1993;6:193–228
3. Koning S, Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Nouwen JL, Verduin CM, Drensen RMD, Orange AP, et al Fusidic acid cream in the treatment of impetigo in general practice: double blind randomized placebo controlled trial BMJ. 2002;324:1–5
4. Park R. Impetigo eMedicine Journal. 2001;2(6):1–11
5. Nanda A, Al-Hasawi F, Alsaleh QA. A prospective survey of pediatric dermatology clinic patients in Kuwait: an analysis of 10,000 cases Pediatric dermatology. 1999;16(1):6–11
6. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulous J, Lina G, Meuginier H, Forey F, Mesme X, et al relationships between Staphylococcus aureus geneti background, virulence factors, age groups (Alleles), and human disease Infection and Immunity. 2002;70(2):631–41
7. Tack KJ, Keyserling CH. Cefdinir versus Cephalexing for treatment of skin infections in pediatric patients Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1997;41(4):739–42
8. Demidovich CW, Wittler RR, Ruff ME, Bass JW, Browning WC. Impetigo: current etiology and comparison of pencillin, erythromycin, and cephalexin therapies AJDC. 1990;144:1313–5
9. Ginsburg CM. Staphylococcual toxin syndromes Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;1(4):319–21
10. Bassett DCJ. Streptococcal pyoderma and acute nephritis in Trinidad Br J Derm. 1972;86(8S):55–61
11. Adachi J, Endo K, Fukuzumi T, Tanigawa N, Aoki T. Increasing incidence of ;streptococcal impetigo in atopic dermatitis J Dermatol Sci. 1998;17(1):45–53
12. Dillon HC. Impetigo contagiosaa: suppurative and non-suppurative complications Amer J Dis Child. 1968;115:530–41
13. Hellgren L, Hersle K. Impetigo contagiosa: statistical evaluation of clinical and laboratory data in 3167 patients and matched healthy controls Acta Dermato-Venereological. 1964;44:356–61
14. Barton LL, Friedman AD, Sharkey AM, Schneller DJ, Swierkosz EM. Impetigo contagiosa III: Comparative efficacy of oral erythromycin and topical mupirocin Pediatric Dermatology. 1989;6(2):134–8
15. Barton LL, Friedman AD. Impetigo: A reassessment of etiology and therapy Pediatric Dermatology. 1987;4(3):185–8
16. Dajani AS, Ferrieri P, Wannamaker L. Endemic superficial pyoderma in children Arch dermatol. 1973;108:517–22
17. Mertz PM, Marshall DA, Eaglstin WH. Topical mupirocin treatment of impetigo is equal to oral erythromycin therapy Arch dermatol. 1989;125:1069–73
18. Mobacken H, Holst R, Wengstrom C, Holm SE. Epidemiological aspects of impetigo contagiosa in Western Sweden Scand J Infect Dis. 1975;7:39–44
19. Coskey RJ, Coskey LA. Diagnosis and treatment of impetigo J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:62–3
20. Disson HC Jr. topical and systemic therapy for pyodermas International Journal of Dematology. 1980;19(8):443–51
21. Dermstadt GL, Lane AT. Impetigo: An overview Pediatric Dermatology. 1994;11(4):293–303
Keywords:

Bullous impetigo; non-bullous impetigo; positive skin culture; staphylococcus aureus

© 2006 Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow