PATTERNS OF RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS AT KING FAHD HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY : Journal of Family and Community Medicine

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Leading article

PATTERNS OF RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS AT KING FAHD HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY

Al-Ghamdi, Mastour S. PhD*,; El-Morsy, Fikry PhD; Al-Mustafa, Zaki H. PhD*

Author Information
Journal of Family and Community Medicine: Jul–Dec 1999 - Volume 6 - Issue 2 - p 43-50
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the last several years, the incidence of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has risen sharply in both nosocomial and community acquired pathogens.1 The resistance to antibiotics may result in therapeutic failure, relapse of infections or increase in the cost of their management.2 Many factors contribute to the increase in the incidence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics, particularly, the misuse of antibiotics by physicians and the easy acquisition of antibiotics via non-physicians.3 In addition, the feeding of farm animals with subtherapeutic levels of antimicrobial agents may cause the development of resistant strains that may spread to humans.3

The mechanisms by which bacterial resistance to antibiotics arise may be natural or acquired through chromosomal mutation or transfer of plasmids between bacterial cells by conjugation, transformation and transduction.4 Resistance to individual antibiotics differs according to bacterial species and antibiotic policies adopted by different countries. One of the most important mechanisms of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is the production of β-lactamase enzymes. The incidence of development of strain-producing enzymes together with that of those with extended spectrum β-lactamases has been increasing rapidly.5 Most of these strains show cross-resistance to different types of antibiotics.5 Among the isolates which exhibit these characteristics are E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Resistance to the new fluoroquinolones is also increasing especially in some nosocomial pathogens such as Serratia spp., Acinetobacter spp., and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.6

Our study aimed at analyzing the antibiograms of the organisms isolated during a one-year period in the laboratories of King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, in order to provide the basis for updating the current antibiotic policy in our hospital and serve as base data for future review.

METHODOLOGY

The results of all microbiological suscept-ibility tests performed at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) were collated over a period of one year, between 1st January 1995 and 31st December 1995. Organisms were isolated and identified according to standard laboratory methods.7 Each organism was tested against the recommended antimicrobial agents using single-disc antibiotic-sensitivity testing method. Susceptibility tests were performed using BBL® Sensi-Disc® antimicrobial susceptibility test discs (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, USA). The criteria for interpretation were those recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)8 and quality control was performed on a regular basis. Control culture of S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used and zone diameters were measured in parallel with susceptibility tests performed on clinical isolates. The zone diameters given by the control studies were compared with the standard zone diameters recommended by NCCLS. Patient's number, type of specimen, organism detected and its antibiogram were recorded and later entered in a database for analysis using SPSS/PC software.

RESULTS

Over the one-year period, 3679 isolates of 35 types of organisms were isolated from 2484 patients (Table 1). The most frequently isolated organisms (939 – 25.5%) were streptococcus groups (552 Streptococcus B, 199 Streptococcus D, 124 Streptococcus A, 57 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 7 Viridans streptococci), S. aureus 594 (16.1%), E. coli 469 (12.7%) and Pseudomonas spp. 342 (9.3%).

T1-6
Table 1:
Organisms isolated from patients treated in KFHU

The overall resistance rate to ampicillin was 36.4%. Streptococcus groups showed the lowest resistance rate (1.6%) while the highest rates were observed with Enterobacter spp. (92.8%), H. influenzae (61.9%) and E. coli (60.2%) (Table 2). S. aureus, Enterobacter spp., H. influenzae and E. coli organisms were also highly resistant to amoxycillin + clavulanate with rates of 91.1%, 80%, 50% and 38.1% respectively (Table 3). All B. fragilis, 98.3% of S. aureus and 92% of S. epidermidis isolates were resistant to penicillin G while streptococci remained the most sensitive to the drug with a resistance rate of only 5.6% (Table 4).

T2-6
Table 2:
Patterns of resistance to ampicillin
T3-6
Table 3:
Patterns of resistance to amoxicillin + clavulanate (AMX + CLV)
T4-6
Table 4:
Patterns of resistance to penicillin G

The resistance rates of Pseudomonas spp., isolates to piperacillin, aztreonam, imipenem and ceftazidime were 8.5%, 16%, 12.4% and 6.8% respectively; 15.2% of 407 S. aureus and 25.7% of 74 S. epidermis isolates were resistant to cefoxitin.

Sensitivity of 2830 isolates to tetracycline is presented in Table 5. The overall resistance rate was 52.3%. In ranking order, the higher resistance rates were 80.5%, 76.9%, 72.9% and 54.5% for H. influenzae, H. aegyptius, streptococci and E. coli respectively, while S. epidermidis had the lowest rate of resistance (19.4%).

T5-6
Table 5:
Patterns of resistance to tetracycline

Table 6 summarizes the resistance patters of 1568 isolates to gentamicin. The highest rate of resistance (54.4%) was observed with S. aureus and the lowest (11.3%) with H. aegyptius. In addition, a high resistance pattern to amikacin was exhibited by S. aureus, 135 (71.1%) while 33 (10%) of 331 Pseudomonas spp. and only 1 (1.1%) of 93 S. epidermidis isolates showed resistance to it. All the 146 (25.5%) methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and teicoplanin but 11.3% of them were resistant to lincomycin.

T6-6
Table 6:
Patterns of resistance to gentamicin and multiple resistance to gentamicin and amoxycillin + clavulanate

Sensitivity of 2972 isolates to trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole is shown in Table 7. The overall resistance rate was 48.7%, the highest rate (89.9%) was observed with H. aegyptius, streptococci (80.4%), H. influenzae (75.5%), and E. coli (48.1%) while Salmonella spp. sowed the lowest resistance rate (13%).

T7-6
Table 7:
Patterns of resistance to trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole

Nalidixic acid, norfloxacin and nitrofurantoin showed high efficacy against E. coli with resistance rates as low as 15.8%, 10.5% and 7.4% respectively. Only 7 (4.3%) of 163 Klebsiella spp. and 6 (5%) of 119 Enterobacter spp. isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin.

Amoxycillin + clavulanate and chloram-phenicol were the most effective drugs against Salmonella spp. isolates with resistance rates of 5.9% and 8.7% respectively, while resistance rates to erythromycin were relatively high in streptococci (41.5%) and S. aureus (33.9%).

DISCUSSION

The data in this study include community and nosocomial infections at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The most frequently isolated pathogens were strepto-cocci (25.5%) of which streptococcus B was the most common group, S. aureus (16.1%) and E. coli (12.7%). However, another study carried out in a general hospital in the same region9 showed that the most frequently isolated nosocomial pathogens were Pseudomonas spp., S. aureus, Klebsiella spp., and E. coli. Similar patterns of prevalence were observed in Danish, Spanish and Canadian hospitals while P. aeruginosa and methicillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and S. aureus were found to be the most frequent nosocomial pathogens in some other European hospitals.1014

The antibiograms of isolated organisms showed great variation between types of antimicrobial agents tested and types of isolates. Very low rates of resistance were observed with streptococci to all the investigated penicillins (range 1.0-5.6%), thus penicillins remain the most effective agents in the treatment of streptococcal infections which constitute 26% of all infections. In contrast, very high rates of resistance (>90%) were encountered with S. aureus to both penicillin and AMX+CLV suggesting that the likely mechanism of resistance to penicillin and AMX+CLV is in the change in the target of action of penicillin and not the production of beta-lactamases since AMX+CLV contains a beta lactamase inhibitor, clavulanic acid. Similarly, enterobacter isolates in our hospital were highly resistant to both ampicillin (92.8%) and AMX+CLV (80.0%), again, suggesting that the mechanism of enterobacter resistance to beta lactam antibiotics is not via the production of β-lactamase. These results are in agreement with those of Andersen et al15 who reported that 46 enterobacter isolates showed a high resistance to both extended spectrum penicillins and third generation cephalosporins. Resistance of E. coli to ampicillin (60.2%) and AMX+CLV (38.1%), however, suggests that production of β-lactamase and extended – spectrum β-lactamase are the most likely mechanisms of resistance by these organisms. Similar findings have been reported for both E. coli and Klebsiella spp., by several investigators.51618

Resistance to tetracycline (Table 5) was generally high or moderate with all isolated organisms including Haemophilus spp., streptococci, E. coli and staphylococci. However, tetracyclines are not considered among the drugs of choice for infections caused by all of these organisms. Nevertheless, our data reflects the impact of extensive use of these antibiotics in primary health clinics and as additives to animal feed in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. It is well established that cross-resistance between the various tetracycline compounds is common and probably plasmid mediated. The mechanisms by which organisms acquire resistance to tetracyclines possibly involve decreased drug penetration through cell membranes, reduced binding to bacterial ribosomes or by enzymatic inactivation of the drug.19

The good activity of gentamicin against all gram-negative organisms investigated (Table 6) in our study confirms the fact that aminoglycosides are known to be mostly effective against gram negative species. The relatively low resistance rates observed with gentamicin suggest that aminoglycosides are not misused since their use is restricted mainly to hospitalized patients. Multiple resistance to both gentamicin and AMX+CLV was observed with some gram-negative organisms, such as E. coli (7.1%), Enterobacter spp., (18.9%) and Klebsiella spp., (11.5%). Such findings were previously reported by French et al18 who isolated an extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella strains which were resistant to aminoglycosides and both cephalosporins and β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Although, P. aeruginosa isolates were not investigated for the combination of aminoglycosides and extended spectrum β-lactams in our study, other investigators reported an outbreak of these organisms which were highly resistant to aminoglycosides, extended spectrum β-lactams and quinolones in a Brazilian hospital.20

Trimethoprim is a bacteriostatic agent commonly used in combination with sulphamethoxazole (Co-trimoxazole, TMP-SMX) or as a single agent to treat urinary tract infections.2123 Our data suggest an emergence of high resistance to this drug combination especially, in E. coli and streptococci which are the main infecting agents of the urinary tract. The mechanism of acquired resistance to trimethoprim in gram negative bacteria is suggested to be plasmid – mediated alteration of the target enzyme, dihydrofolate reductase.24

In contrast to the observation of Asensi et al25 who reported an outbreak in Brazil of Salmonella agona that was resistant to ampicillin, TMP-SMX, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Amoxycillin + clavulanate, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim were still highly effective against Salmonella spp.

The results of the investigated quinolones showed that nalidixic acid and norfloxacin had good activity against E. coli while ciprofloxacin was highly effective against enterobacteriaceae. Similar results were reported by Acar et al6 who concluded that resistance to fluoroquinolones was still rare in common pathogens in France.

In conclusion, the antibiograms of pathogenic organisms in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia show alarmingly high resistance patterns especially to these essential antibiotics. This may be due to the fact that these drugs are available to patients without prescription2627 inspite of laws which classify them as non-over-the-counter (non-OTC) drugs. However, in comparison to those published in other countries our results show a great variation owing to a number of factors, such as antibiotic policies, the extent of use of broad spectrum antibiotics, abuse of antibiotics and the absence of global standard method for performing the sensitivity test or interpreting the results.28

We, therefore, recommend that antibiogram studies of nosocomial and community pathogens should be carried out periodically on national or regional levels. The results would be of great value in optimizing treatment strategies and national drug policies as well as in measuring the success of these policies. Furthermore, the results of such studies could be used to educate policy-makers, prescribers, health care professionals, and the general public in order to reduce misuse of antibmicrobial agents.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The King Abdulaziz City of Science and Technology (KACST) to whom we express our gratitude funded this work. Our sincere thanks also go to Dr. Abdulrahman Qurashi, and the technical staff at the Microbiology laboratories at King Fahd Hospital of the University and to Mr. Hasan Isa and Mr. Abdul-Rahman Al-Fakki, College of Medicine for their assistance. We also thank Dr. E.B. Larbi for reviewing the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1. Dever LA, Dermody TS. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antibiotics Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:886–95
2. Sanders CC, Sonders WE. Microbial resistance to newer generation B-lactam antibiotics.Clinical and laboratory implications J Infect Dis. 1985;151:399–406
3. Boyed RF, Hoerl BG. Basic medical microbiology 19914th ed Boston (Toronto) Little Brown and Company
4. Livemore DM, Wood MJ. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents N Engl J Med. 1991;324:601–12
5. Sader HS, Pfaller MA, Jones RN. Prevalence of important pathogens and the antimicrobial activity of parenteral drugs at numerous medical centers in the United States. II study of beta-lactamases producing Enterobacter-iaceae Diagn-Microbiol-Infect Dis. 1994;20(4):203–8
6. Acar JF, O’ Brien TF, Goldstein FW, Jones RN. The epidemiology of bacterial resistance to quinolones Drugs. 1993;45(suppl. 3):24–8
7. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger BC, Winns WC. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology 1992 Phladelphia J.B. Lippincott Company
8. . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests Approved standard M2 - A5. 19935th ed Villanova, Pa National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
9. Elbashier AM. Five years of prospective surveillance of nosocomial infections in a Saudi Arabian general hospital Saudi Med J. 1997;18(4):414–7
10. Fomsgaard A, Hoiby N, Fris HM, Gahrn-Hansen B, Kolmos HJ, chouenborg P, Korsager B, Tvede M, Gutschik E, Bremmelgaard A. Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of Danish versus other European bacterial isolates from intensive care and hematology/oncology units Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14(4):275–81
11. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe JAMA. 1995;274(8):639–44
12. Spencer RC. Epidemiology of infection in ICUs Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(suppl 4):S2–6
13. Vazques F, Mendoza MC, Villar MH, Perez F, Mendez FJ. Survey of bacteraemia in a Spanish hospital over a decade (1981-1990) J Hosp Infect. 1994;26(2):111–21
14. Preston CA, Bruce AW, Reid G. Antibiotic resistance of urinary pathogens isolated from patients attending the Toronto Hospital between 1986 and 1990 J Hosp Infect. 1992;22(2):129–35
15. Anderson J, Asmar BI, Dajani AS. Increasing Enterobacter bacteremia in pediatric patients Pediatr-Infect-Dis J. 1994;13(9):787–92
16. Johnson AP, Weinbren MJ, Ayling-Smith B, Du-Bois SK, Amyes SG, George RC. Outbreak of infection in two UK hospitals caused by a strain of klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to cefotaxime and ceftazidime J Hosp Infect. 1992;20(2):97–103
17. Meyer-KS , Urban C, Eagan JA, Berger BJ, Rahal JJ. Nosocomial outbreak of klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(5):353–8
18. French GL, Shannon Kpand Simmons N. Hospital outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to broad-spectrum cephalosporins and beta lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations by hyperproduction of SHV-5 beta-lactamase J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(2):358–63
19. Speer B.S, Shoemaker N.B, Salyers A.A. Bacterial resistance to tetracycline: mechanism, transfer, and clinical significance Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5:387–99
20. Sader HS, Pignatari AC, Leme IL, Burattini MN, Tancresi R, Hollis RJ, Jones RN. Epidemiologic typing of multiply drug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from an outbreak in an intensive care unit Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;17(1):13–8
21. Vahlensieck W Jr, Westenfelder M. Nitrofurantoin versus trimethoprim for low-dose long-term prophylaxis in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections Int Urol Nephrol. 1992;24(1):3–10
22. Spencer RC, Moseley DJ, Greensmith MJ. Nitrofurantoin modified release versus trimethoprim or co-trimoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in general practice J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33(suppl A):121–9
23. Masterton RG, Bochsler JA. High-dosage co-amoxiclav in a single dose versus 7 days of co-trimoxazole as treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35(1):129–37
24. Houvinen P. Trimethoprim resistance Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:1451–6
25. Asensi MD, Solari CA, Hofer E. A salmonella agona outbreak in a pediatric hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1994;89(1):1–4
26. Al-Freihi H, Ballal SG, Jaccarini A, Young MS, Abdul-Cader Z, El-Mouzan M. Potential for drug misuse in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia Ann Saudi Med. 1987;7:301–5
27. Bawazir SA. Prescribing pattern at community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia Int. Pharmacy J. 1992;6(5):222–3
28. . World Health Organisation, Geneva Weekly Epidemiological Record. 1997;72(45):333–40
Keywords:

Antibiotics; resistance; pathogenic organisms; Saudi Arabia

© 1999 Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow