Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Gap junction and atopic dermatitis: a study of connexin 43 mRNA expression in atopic skin lesions

El Tawdy, Amira M.a; Rashed, Laila M.b; Alhanafy, Hadeel M.b

Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society: July 2011 - Volume 8 - Issue 2 - p 78–83
doi: 10.1097/01.EWX.0000397891.41559.fb
Original articles
Free

Background Atopic dermatitis is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease. There is no doubt that there is an epidermal barrier defect in atopic dermatitis. Some recent studies have found a correlation between epidermal barrier function and tight junction. Recently a correlation between tight and gap junction was also reported.

Objective To study the expression of connexin 43(Cx43) mRNA, an important constituent of gap junction in the skin in atopic dermatitis lesions and to compare it with healthy controls.

Patients and methods The study was carried out in 20 patients with atopic dermatitis. Fifteen healthy volunteers served as controls. A 4-mm punch skin biopsy specimen was obtained from each patient and control for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR measurement of Cx43 mRNA expression. Biopsy specimens were stored at −70°C. Reverse transcription-PCR was conducted using the extracted RNA for the detection of the Cx43 gene.

Results The mean Cx43 mRNA expression in the patients was 1.23±0.1 mg/gm tissue and 0.27±0.05 mg/gm in the control group. This denoted a significant statistical difference between the groups (P value=0.000) revealing higher expression in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Conclusion This study suggests a new hypothesis for atopic dermatitis pathogenesis showing a possible contribution of gap junction abnormality in the disease. These findings raise new future directions for management of patients with atopic dermatitis.

aDepartments of Dermatology and

bBiochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence to Amira M. El Tawdy, MD, Lecturer of Dermatology Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Tel: +2 010 1581269; fax: +202 23687673; e-mail: a_tawdy@hotmail.com

Received November 10, 2010

Accepted February 5, 2011

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects up to 20% of children worldwide and can persist into adulthood [1]. It has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and their families and the economic impact is estimated to be in the billions of dollars [2]. More than 50% of patients develop asthma and other atopic disorders, further adding to the health and economic burden of this disease [3]. There is no doubt that there is an epidermal barrier defect in atopic dermatitis. The evidence to support this comes from the following findings: enhanced transepidermal water loss, reduced irritancy threshold, increased percutaneous absorption, and dry appearance of lesional skin [4]. The extent of barrier dysfunction correlates with the degree of inflammation within atopic dermatitis lesions and atopic dermatitis severity in general [5]. To maintain the structure and function of the epidermis a number of intercellular junctions exist, including tight junctions (TJ), gap junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes. These cell–cell contacts have multiple and diverse roles in regulating aspects of tissue adhesion, signaling, communication, differentiation, migration, proliferation, shape, permeability, polarity, and development [6].

Some recent studies have found a correlation between epidermal barrier function and TJ. They reported that claudin-1-deficient mice died within 24 h of birth with wrinkled skin, severe dehydration, and increased epidermal permeability as measured by dye permeability and transepidermal water loss. Importantly, these mice had a normal functioning stratum corneum (SC) (and normal expression of SC proteins) but a dysfunctional TJ [7]. Gap junctions (GJ) mediate direct communication between adjacent cells by means of the exchange of small molecules (<1000 Da), including metabolites and second messengers. The protein subunits of GJ channels are called connexins (Cx). Six Cx form a hemichannel (connexon), and two connexons (one from each cell) form a GJ channel [8]. GJ have been shown to play important roles in the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of keratinocytes [9]. In humans more than 20 Cx are expressed and of these the Cx43 is abundantly expressed in keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, vascular system, skin appendages, macrophages, neutrophils, and mast cells. It also plays a key role in cellular communication to maintain tissue homeostasis and angiogenesis [10]. However, no direct correlation has been reported between GJ and epidermal barrier function.

A correlation between TJ and GJ has been reported. Some studies have examined zonula occludens (ZO), ZO-1 and ZO-2 (considered as a TJ-associated protein), and reported zona occludens binding to Cx43 at different stages of the cell cycle. They found that ZO-1 bound preferentially with Cx43 in cells that were quiescent, suggesting that ZO-1 interaction with Cx43 may contribute to the stability of GJs [11,12]. Another study, using a Cx43-binding dominant-negative fragment of ZO-1, in osteoblast-derived cells, suggested a role for ZO-1 in regulating GJ assembly [13]. Consistent with the regulation of GJ formation, blocking ZO-1 binding to Cx43 has been reported to increase the size of GJs in HeLa cells [14,15]. Collectively, these studies suggest that ZO-1 binding to Cx43 acts to regulate GJ size and stability.

On the basis of the previous findings, we assumed that Cx43 expression may be affected in atopic dermatitis, whether being a primary or a secondary effect of the disease. Accordingly, we measured the level of Cx43 mRNA in 20 patients with atopic dermatitis in an attempt to clarify the relationship between GJ and this common skin disorder.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Patients and methods

The study was carried out in 20 patients with atopic dermatitis. They were selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before initiation of the study. The study verified the protocol of the ethics committee of Kasr El Aini Hospital applied to human studies.

The patient group included 12 male and eight female. Their age ranged between 10–46 years. Patients with history of any cutaneous or systemic disease other than atopic dermatitis were excluded. Six patients in the studied group had a family history of atopy, whereas the rest were not aware of family members who had any manifestations of atopy. Six patients had a history of recurrent bronchial asthma. All patients stopped any systemic therapy for atopy 2 months before the start of the study.

The grade of clinical severity was evaluated according to Rajka and Langeland [16] mild (score: 3–4); moderate (score: 4.5–7.5); severe (score: 8–9).

According to the grading of disease severity (Table 1), patients with atopic dermatitis were divided into three groups:

  • (1) Mild cases (score: 3–4) included eight (40%) patients, four male and four female.
  • (2) Moderate cases (score: 4.5–7.5) included five (25%) patients, all of them were male.
  • (3) Severe cases (score: 8–9) included seven (35%) patients, three male and four female.
Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Controls

Fifteen age-matched and sex-matched healthy volunteers served as controls (six male and six female). Written informed consent was obtained from each control to participate in the study.

A 4-mm punch skin biopsy specimen was obtained from each patient and control for quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR measurement of Cx43 mRNA expression. Biopsy specimens were stored at −70°C.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Detection of connexin 43 mRNA expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from skin tissue by the acid guanidinum thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method. RNA content and purity were measured by a ultraviolet spectrophotometer.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments

RT-PCR was carried out using the extracted RNA for detection of the Cx43 gene. For amplification of the target gene reverse transcription and PCR were run in two separate steps. Briefly, a reaction mixture of RT reaction containing 1 μg of total RNA, 0.5 μg of random primer, 5X RT buffer, 2.5 mmol/l of dNTP, 20 U RNase inhibitor, and 200 U Molney Murine Leukemic Virus RT in a total volume of 25 μl was incubated at 37°C for 60 min, and then heated to 95°C for 5 min to inactivate Molney Murine Leukemic Virus. PCR was carried out with 1.5 μl of RT products, 10X PCR buffer (without Mg2+) 2.5 μl, 2.0 μl dNTP (2.5 mmol/l), 2.0 μl of MgCl2 (25 mmol/l), 0.5 μl of each primer (20 μmol/l) of β-actin, 0.5 μl each primer of gene to be tested (20 μmol/l), and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega Incorportion, Madison, USA), in a final volume of 25 μl. Thermal cycler conditions were as follows: a first denaturing cycle at 97°C for 5 min, followed by a variable number of cycles of amplification defined by denaturation at 96°C for 1.5 min, annealing for 1.5 min, and extension at 72°C for 3 min. A final extension cycle of 72°C for 15 min was included. The appropriate primer pairs, annealing temperature and product size is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Agarose gel electrophoresis

All PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by a ultraviolet transilluminator (Figs 1 and 2).

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Semiquantitative determination of polymerase chain reaction products

Semiquantitation was performed using the gel documentation system (BioDO, Analyser, Biometra, Germany) supplied by Biometra according to the following amplification procedure: relative expression of studied gene (R) was calculated following the formula: R=Densitometrical Units of each studied gene/Densitometrical Units of β-actin (Table 2).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Data was coded and entered using the statistical package SPSS version 17 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were summarized using mean±standard deviation for quantitative variables and percentage for qualitative variables. Comparisons between groups were made using χ2 tests for qualitative variables and analysis of variance for normally distributed quantitative variables. Correlation was carried out to test the linear relationship between quantitative variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Patient and control data

The study included 20 patients; 12 male (60%) and eight female (40%). Their age ranged from 10–46 years with a mean of 26.7±10.9 years. Fifteen controls were included in the study, seven male (46%) and eight female (53%). Their age ranged from 15 to 42 years with a mean of 27.7±7.6 years. Both patients and controls were age-matched (P=0.737) and sex-matched (P=0.157) (Table 3).

Table 3

Table 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurement of Cx43 mRNA expression

The mean Cx43 mRNA expression in the patients was 1.23±0.1 μg/gm tissue and 0.27±0.05 in the control group. This denotes a significant statistical difference between the groups (P=0.000) revealing higher expression in patients with atopic dermatitis (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3

The highest level of Cx43 expression was found in patients with severe atopic dermatitis; however, the differences detected between patients with mild, moderate, and severe atopic dermatitis were not statistically significant (P=0.127) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4

No statistically significant correlation was present between each of sex, age, duration of the disease, and CX43 expression.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This study revealed a significant increase in Cx43 mRNA expression in atopic skin when compared with normal skin (P=0.000). To the best of our knowledge no previous studies have detected any relationship between Cx43 and atopic dermatitis.

Cxs are the structural GJ proteins that form channels for the exchange of small molecules between connected cells. The cells efficiently use these GJs for electrical synapse and sharing of intracellular metabolites that coordinate various metabolic events [17]. Cx43 is located both in the interfollicular epidermis and in adnexal structures [18]. It is expressed by most of the immunocompetent cells including macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, and lymphocytes [18]. It is also expressed along with Cx40 in polymorphonuclear cells under inflammatory conditions in humans [19]. The increased expression of Cx43 has been shown to increase the levels of various inflammatory and immunomodulatory molecules such as interleukin-1 and interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-β in cocultured endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells [20]. Cx43 is known to be regulated by various factors such as glucose [21] and nitric oxide [22]; and growth factors such as fibroblast growth factors [23], transforming growth factor-β [24], Epidermal growth factor [25], platelet-derived growth factor [26], nerve growth factor [27], ATP [28], and few cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ [29] though the precise molecular mechanisms by which they regulate Cx43 are not fully understood.

TJs have been studied recently in atopic dermatitis. One study showed that claudin-1 expression (one of the proteins forming the TJ) is markedly reduced in atopic dermatitis skin and this suggests that the barrier defect in this disease may be at the level of TJ [30]. Some studies have shown that several growth factors that regulate GJ also regulate TJ permeability, whereas others have shown that Cxs and TJ tetraspan membrane core proteins, claudins and occludins, coimmunoprecipitate [31,32], and that GJs may even regulate the expression and function of TJ proteins [33,34]. In addition, some studies have emphasized an important role played by the TJ in regulating the GJ size and stability. They found that blocking ZO-1 binding to Cx43 increases the size of GJs in HeLa cells [14], a position supported by ZO-1/Cx43 colocalization studies in cardiomyocytes [15].

Altogether, and from our results that showed higher expression of Cx43 in atopic patients, we hypothesize that the disease might start by downregulation of the TJ (which can be triggered either by extrinsic or intrinsic factors) leading to decreased binding to Cx43 and hence its upregulation. The increased level of Cx43 then excites an inflammatory response, as Cx43 has been shown to increase the levels of various inflammatory and immunomodulatory molecules [20]. This explains the higher level of the protein in severe cases detected in this study, although the difference was not statistically significant. This could be more evident if we could increase the number of studied groups of patients with atopic dermatitis with different degrees of severity in future studies.

Another explanation, is that increased expression of Cx43 increased expression in the disease could be a primary event, and as it is reported that it actually regulates the expression and function of TJ proteins its increased expression will lead to defective TJ, resulting in an epidermal barrier defect that will contribute to the evolution of atopic dermatitis.

In contrast, some other studies have reported that any cytosolic stress inhibits the dislocation and degradation of different Cxs [35]. Some evidence indicates that allergic and inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis, urticaria, and psoriasis are mediated by oxidative stress. Mast cells generate mainly intracellular reactive oxygen species following the aggregation of FceRI; these reactive oxygen species may act as secondary messengers in the induction of several biological responses [36]. This raised another possibility that the disease through inducing this form of oxidative stress on tissues, might lead to decreased degradation of Cx43 hence elevating its level and aggravating the inflammation.

In conclusion, we found that increased expression of Cx43 in atopic dermatitis, regardless of whether it has a primary or secondary role in the pathogenesis of the disease, certainly plays an important role in enhancing the inflammatory process. It might share other factors that cause the defect in the epidermal barrier function. These findings raise new future directions for the management of patients with atopic dermatitis.

There are no conflict of interest and funding sources declared.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Leung DY, Nicklas RA, Li JT, Bernstein IL, Blessing Moore J, Boguniewicz M, et al. Disease management of atopic dermatitis: an updated practice parameter. Joint task force on practice parameters. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;93:S1–S21
2. Akdis CA, Akdis M, Bieber T, Bindslev-Jensen C, Boguniewicz M, Eigenmann P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:152–169
3. Kapoor R, Menon C, Hoffstad O, Bilker W, Leclerc P, Margolis DJ. The prevalence of atopic triad in children with physician-confirmed atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:68–73
4. Madison KC. Barrier function of the skin: ‘la raison d'etre’ of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:231–241
5. Lebwohl M, Herrmann LG. Impaired skin barrier function in dermatologic disease and repair with moisturization. Cutis. 2005;76:7–12
6. Lai-Cheong JE, Arita K, McGrath JA. Genetic diseases of junctions. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2713–2725
7. Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K, Yoshida Y, Haratake A, Sugitani Y, et al. Claudin-based tight junctions are crucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier: a lesson from claudin-1-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:1099–1111
8. Kumar NM, Gilula NB. The gap junction communication channel. Cell. 1996;84:381–388
9. Lucke T, Choudhry R, Thom R, Selmer IS, Burden AD, Hodgins MB. Upregulation of connexin 26 is a feature of keratinocyte differentiation in hyperproliferative epidermis, vaginal epithelium, and buccal epithelium. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;112:354–361
10. Lampe PD, Lau AF. Regulation of gap junctions by phosphorylation of connexins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000;384:205–215
11. Giepmans BN, Moolenaar WH. The gap junction protein connexin43 interacts with the second PDZ domain of the zona occludens-1 protein. Curr Biol. 1998;8:931–934
12. Toyofuku T, Yabuki M, Otsu K, Kuzuya T, Hori M, Tada M. Direct association of the gap junction protein connexin-43 with ZO-1 in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:12725–12731
13. Laing JG, Chou BC, Steinberg TH. ZO-1 alters the plasma membrane localization and function of Cx43 in osteoblastic cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2167–2176
14. Hunter AW, Jourdan J, Gourdie RG. Fusion of GFP to the carboxyl terminus of connexin43 increases gap junction size in HeLa cells. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003;10:211–214
15. Zhu C, Barker RJ, Hunter AW, Zhang Y, Jourdan J, Gourdie RG. Quantitative analysis of ZO-1 colocalization with Cx43 gap junction plaques in cultures of rat neonatal cardiomyocytes. Microsc Microanal. 2005;11:244–248
16. Rajka G, Langeland T. Grading of the severity of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989;144:13–14
17. Goliger JA, Paul DL. Wounding alters epidermal connnexin expression and gap junction-mediated intercellular communication. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6:1491–1501
18. Salomon D, Masgrau E, Vischer S, Ullrich S, Dupont E, Sappino P, et al. Topography of mammalian connexins in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103:240–247
19. Oviedo Orta E, Howard Evans W. Gap junctions and connexin-mediated communication in the immune system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:102–112
20. Branes MC, Contreras JE, Saez JC. Activation of human polymorphonuclear cells induces formation of functional gap junctions and expression of connexins. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:BR313–BR323
21. Navab M, Liao F, Hough GP, Ross LA, Van Lenten BJ, Rajavashisth TB, et al. Interaction of monocytes with cocultures of human aortic wall cells involves interleukins 1 and 6 with marked increases in connexin43 message. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1763–1772
22. Ogawa T, Hayashi T, Yorioka N, Kyoizumi S, Trosko JE. Hexamethylene bisacetamide protects peritoneal mesothelial cells from glucose. Kidney Int. 2001;60:996–1008
23. Yao J, Hiramatsu N, Zhu Y, Morioka T, Takeda M, Oite T, et al. Nitric oxide-mediated regulation of connexin43 expression and gap junctional intercellular communication in mesangial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:58–67
24. Shiokawa Sawada M, Mano H, Hanada K, Kakudo S, Kameda T, Miyazawa K, et al. Down-regulation of gap junctional intercellular communication between osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells by basic fibroblast growth factor and a phorbol ester (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate). J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:1165–1173
25. van Zoelen EJ, Tertoolen LG. Transforming growth factor-beta enhances the extent of intercellular communication between normal rat kidney cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12075–12081
26. Lau AF, Kanemitsu MY, Kurata WE, Danesh S, Boynton AL. Epidermal growth factor disrupts gap-junctional communication and induces phosphorylation of connexin43 on serine. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:865–874
27. Burt JM, Steele TD. Selective effect of PDGF on connexin43 versus connexin40 comprised gap junction channels. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003;10:287–291
28. Cushing P, Bhalla R, Johnson AM, Rushlow WJ, Meakin SO, Belliveau DJ. Nerve growth factor increases connexin43 phosphorylation and gap junctional intercellular communication. J Neurosci Res. 2005;82:788–801
29. Turner MS, Haywood GA, Andreka P, You L, Martin PE, Evans WH, et al. Reversible connexin 43 dephosphorylation during hypoxia and reoxygenation is linked to cellular ATP levels. Circ Res. 2004;95:726–733
30. De Benedetto A, Latchney L, McGirt L, Vidyasagar S, Cheadle C, Barnes KC, et al. The tight junction protein, claudin-1 is dysregulated in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;119:S280
31. Morita K, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S. Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:511–516
32. Kojima T, Kokai Y, Chiba H, Yamamoto M, Mochizuki Y, Sawada N. Cx32 but not Cx26 is associated with tight junctions in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2001;263:193–201
33. Herve JC, Bourmeyster N, Sarrouilhe D, Duffy HS. Gap junctional complexes: from partners to functions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;94:29–65
34. Herve JC, Bourmeyster N, Sarrouilhe D. Diversity in protein-protein interactions of connexins: emerging roles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:22–41
35. VanSlyke JK, Musil LS. Dislocation and degradation from the ER are regulated by cytosolic stress. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:381–394
36. Nakai K, Yoneda K, Maeda R, Munehiro A, Fujita N, Yokoi I, et al. Urinary biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:1405–1408
Keywords:

atopic dermatitis; connexin 43; gap junction; tight junction

© 2011 Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society