Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

LETTERS

Reply: Transient effect of suction on retinal neuro-vasculature in myopic patients after small-incision lenticule extraction

Liu, Jiayan MD; Zeng, Minzhi MD; Zou, Huyong MD; Zheng, Yu MD; Luo, Wei MD; Sha, Xiangyin MD, PhD; Liu, Zhiping MD, PhD; Tonk, Rahul Singh MD; Huang, Amy Michelle MD; Han, Elaine MD; Karp, Carol L. MD

Author Information
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery: May 2021 - Volume 47 - Issue 5 - p 683-684
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000078
  • Free
  • Linked Articles

We appreciate the interest that Dr. Roy has shown in our research. He is correct in that axial length changes after refractive surgery due to changes in corneal thickness. He is also correct that refractive surgery causes a change in the magnification of the optical coherence images acquired postoperatively. However, we have found that the valuables would not significantly impact the accuracy of retinal thickness measurements in our cohort.

The commonly used avenue to correct the image magnification after refractive surgery is Bennett's formula [scaling factor = 3.3823 × 0.0130623 × (axial length − 1.82)].1–3 To check whether our assessment of retinal thickness is correct, we carefully reviewed the changes in corneal thickness after small-incision lenticule extraction. Based on the changes in corneal thickness (∆Cor), we recalculated the retinal thickness based on the following formula: corrected retinal thickness = primary retinal thickness (RNFL/GCIPL) × (13.3823×0.0130623×ΔCor1000). In our cohort, the changes in corneal thickness from PRE to postoperative day 1 (POD1) and PRE to POD7 were 87 ± 18 μm (range 54 to 127) and 92 ± 19 μm (range 56 to 131), respectively. Thus, these changes in corneal thickness at POD1 and POD7 would result in the magnification of 0.0038 ± 0.0008 (range 0.0024 to 0.0056) and 0.0041 ± 0.0008 (range 0.0025 to 0.0058), respectively, changes that unlikely significantly affect the accuracy assessment of retinal thickness.

Shpak AA et al. found that in patients with very high myopia, a decrease of over 10 diopters (D) in corneal refractive power can increase the average thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer by 2 to 3 μm acquired by optical coherence tomography.4 It is unclear whether this effect is mediated by magnification or by anatomical physiological change. However, in our cohort, there were no patients with such an extreme change in corneal refractive power, with an average spherical equivalent of −4.50 ± 1.77 D (range −8.00 to −1.75).

In Table 5 of our manuscript, we discussed 7 papers that studied RNFL changes after refractive surgery.4–10 We carefully reviewed them again, and we found that none of the 7 papers adjusted the axial length after refractive surgery. Furthermore, our findings are in agreement with those of 7 studies, which also did not find any significant changes in RNFL thickness after refractive surgery.

Taken together, these statements and supporting evidence suggest that the assessment of retinal thickness after small-incision lenticule extraction in this study was correct and reliable.

REFERENCES

1. Moghimi S, Hosseini H, Riddle J, Lee GY, Bitrian E, Giaconi J, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Measurement of optic disc size and rim area with spectral-domain OCT and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4519–4530
2. Hirasawa K, Shoji N, Yoshii Y, Haraguchi S. Comparison of Kang's and Littmann's methods of correction for ocular magnification in circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:8353–8358
3. Aykut V, Oner V, Tas M, Iscan Y, Agachan A. Influence of axial length on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children: a study by RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 2013;38:1241–1247
4. Shpak AA, Kostenev SV, Mushkova IA, Korobkova MV. Effect of corneal refractive surgery on optical coherence tomography measurements [in Russian]. Vestn Oftalmol 2018;134:48–53
5. Zivkovic M, Jaksic V, Giarmoukakis A, Grentzelos M, Zlatanovic M, Zlatanovic G, Miljkovic A, Jovanovic S, Stamenkovic M, Kymionis G. The effect of LASIK procedure on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in myopic eyes. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:8923819
6. Sharma N, Sony P, Gupta A, Vajpayee RB. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:446–450
7. Zhao PF, Zhou YH, Zhang J, Wei WB. Analysis of macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with refractory amblyopia after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a retrospective study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130:2234–2240
8. Zhang J, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Liu Q, Zhai C, Wang Y. Effect of suction on macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during femtosecond lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1994–2001
9. Zangwill LM, Abunto T, Bowd C, Angeles R, Schanzlin DJ, Weinreb RN. Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2005;112:200–207
10. Halkiadakis I, Anglionto L, Ferensowicz M, Triebwasser RW, van Westenbrugge JA, Gimbel HV. Assessment of nerve fiber layer thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1035–1041
Copyright © 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS